CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
|
Case No. |
|
|
Filed at: |
Office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton |
|
Date filed: |
17 January 2022 |
|
Filed by: |
Jack E. Boteler |
|
|
538 Surf Oaks Drive |
|
|
Seabrook, TX 77586 |
I,
Jack E. Boteler, a citizen of Seabrook,
Harris County, Texas and resident of same together with all interested parties
and subscribed citizens and residents of the United States of America who
received any Emergency Use Authorization investigational injection of genetic biologic
material (mRNA or adenoviral DNA) coding for the Wuhan spike protein known to
be the pathogenic structure of SARS-CoV-2 designed to provoke the human body to
produce antibodies for COVID-19, commonly referred to as the “COVID-19
vaccines,” along with all persons living with, near or adjacent to any such
person or persons in this county or State
(hereinafter the “Complainants”).
V.
Any and all
officers and/or directors of the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and affiliates: Food and Drug
Administration (“FDA”), National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”), Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”), Center for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS), all of the aforementioned hereinafter referred to as
“establishment officials”; Dr. Ralph
Baric and the Board of Regents at the University of North Carolina Chappell
Hill; Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus of the World Health Organization
(“WHO”); Dr. Anthony Fauci; Dr. Francis Collins; Dr. Rick Bright; Dr. Janet Woodcock, Dr. Peter Daszak; Mr. William
Gates Junior; Mr. Theodore (“Ted”)
Turner; Mr. Eli Broad; Mr. George Soros; Dr. Deborah Birx; Mr. Richard A. Rothschild; any Director or Officer of Moderna Inc.; any
Director or Officer of Pfizer, Inc.; any
Director or Officer of Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.; any Director or Officer of Astra Zeneca
Plc.; any Director or Officer of the Pirbright Institute; any
Director or Officer of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; any Director
or Officer of the World Economic Forum;
any Director or Officer of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; any Director or Officer of the World
Bank; any Director or Officer of the
International Monetary Fund (“IMF”); and
any other person, governmental, or non-governmental organization, incorporated
or not, including U.S. and international media outlets that / who knowingly
aided and abetted the denial or restriction of access to therapeutic treatments
for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and / or promoted or distributed Emergency Use
Authorization (“EUA”) experimental gene therapy injections commonly referred to
as “COVID-19 Vaccines” (collectively, the “Defendants”)
.
•
THEORY
OF THE CASE
•
FACTUAL
ALLEGATIONS – VIRUS ORIGINS
•
FACTUAL
ALLEGATIONS – VACCINE DEVELOPMENT & PROMOTION
•
FACTUAL
ALLEGATIONS – HOSPITALIZATIONS & CENSORED THERAPEUTICS & PHYSICIAN
PEROGATIVES
•
FACTUAL
ALLEGATIONS – POST VACCINATION REACTIONS & DEATHS
•
IN
RELATION TO DEFENDANT VACCINE MANUFACTURERS: THEIR TRIALS,
OFFICERS, DIRECTORS & CONSPIRATORS
•
PUBLICLY
AVAILABLE OPINIONS of MEDICAL DOCTORS and BIO‐SCIENTISTS
•
CONCLUSION
1. This Criminal Complaint
contemplates numerous defendants some of which are corporate, trusts,
affiliations, governmental and non-governmental entities; each such legal or natural person has minimum
contacts in this state and/or county and legal status or representation to
effectuate assertion of jurisdiction of the State of Texas Attorney General in
order to investigate, prosecute and try these defendants pursuant to the legal
authority and jurisdiction(s) below sequenced:
a) At all material times as alleged herein one or more
defendants was either physically present in this jurisdiction, had an “agent”
(as defined in 22
U.S.C. § 611) resident in this jurisdiction, had a Permanent
Establishment (supra) in this jurisdiction, or committed acts for which
local minimum contacts standards for application of jurisdiction are waived by
statute, convention, common or international law.
b) For the preponderance of Crimes alleged and exhibited
herein, there is no Statute of Limitations, and state law allows for the
assertion of jurisdiction over the subject matter where reasonable and
compelling facts are present, 212 F.3d 885 (5th Cir. 2000) et seq.
c) Crimes alleged herein provide minimum contacts for
equivalent State and Federal crimes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3235 and
supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (1994).
d) Criminal cases, where compelling State interests are
at issue, provide State, sovereign or local jurisdiction. See Holt
v. Hobbs, 574 U.S. 352
(2015).
e) This complaint is brought pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 2441
et seq. under the Universal
Jurisdiction provisions, which allow “any State” or instrumentality thereof
to prosecute Crimes Against Humanity.
f) Jurisdiction and venue are also proper under 18 U.S.C.
§ 175 et seq. in relation to Prohibitions
with Respect to Biological Weapons.
g) Universal jurisdiction (State, County, City and Federal)
is provided by 18 U.S.C. § 1091(e) in relation to Genocide.
h) Universal and local jurisdiction is provided by
Articles 3, 4 and 5 of the Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory
Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity per 18 U.S.C. §
2441 et seq.
j) Local Jurisdiction is provided by Texas State statute
in relation to Homicide (all forms, degrees and levels of intent).
k) Local Jurisdiction is provided by Texas State statute
in relation to Attempted Homicide (any
degree or similarly named crime in state statutes).
l) Local Jurisdiction is provided by Texas State statute
in relation to Criminal Assault (any degree
or similarly named crime in the State statutes).
m) Local Jurisdiction is provided by Texas State statute
in relation to Fraud in Connection
with Major Disaster or Emergency Benefits (any degree or similarly
named crime in the State statutes).
n) Probable Cause exists based on the facts, affidavits
and exhibits presented herein to believe that one or more crimes were committed
by one or more actors in this locality, and therefore subjects all other
Defendants to local jurisdiction by virtue of the Felony Murder Rule. (MODEL PENAL
CODE note 3,
§ 210.2 at 31 n.74.)
o) Reasonable Suspicion exists, based on the facts,
affidavits and exhibits presented herein, to believe that one or more crimes
were committed by parties, actors and persons within this jurisdiction to
initiate an investigation into the allegations recited herein.
2. This Complaint alleges murder and
crimes against humanity arising from a collection of facts, observations,
expert opinions, media reports and eye-witness testimony. It will show that
Defendants planned and executed, jointly and/or severely, the development and
release of a bio warfare toxin, referred to herein as either “SARS-CoV-2” or
“COVID-19” and/or as the ‘Spike Protein’ component with the dual objectives
of: 1) global depopulation, and 2) population
control leading to a one-world government by inducing panic, economic hardship,
terror, death and injury to global populations.
By
employing psychological warfare mechanisms, including but not limited to media
reports, public policy, coercion, deceit, mandates, bribes, travel
restrictions, employment restrictions, free speech restrictions and liberty
restrictions, this complaint will also show that Defendants seek to induce the
global population into receiving a pre-planned experimental gene therapy,
commonly referred to as “COVID-19 Vaccines”, in furtherance of their
aforementioned objectives.
The
data, evidence, testimony, articles and interviews provided herein amount to a
small fraction of demonstrable / evidentiary material, including but not
necessarily limited to: effectiveness,
side effects, drugs, hearings, false attributions, vaccine ingredients,
lawsuits (past and pending), immunity, and liability.
3. The sequence of dates and times may not follow a
linear path in the presentation of the FACTS as stated hereinafter, because
events contributing to the crimes enumerated herein are vast, international in
scope and occurred over the course of many years involving numerous defendants,
criminal actors, conspirators and collaborators.
4. Dr. Anthony Fauci was
appointed Director of the NIAID in 1984. In 1986 Fauci
took the first steps toward creating human dependency on vaccines by lobbying
for legislation to relieve big pharma of liability through what became the
‘Emergency Use Authorization’.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IWWRK0fYk5SU/
5. In 1994 David Rockefeller opined on the need to end
self-rule government.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/03/no_author/david-rockefellers-chilling-speech-bilderberg/
6. Addressing the U.N. General Assembly three years
earlier, in 1991 David Rockefeller implored his audience of the imperative of
world population control.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/03/no_author/david-rockefellers-chilling-speech-bilderberg/
7. In 1998 Dr. Fauci funded
research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill (“UNC”) following Dr.
Ralph Baric’s clone of the Corona Virus and amplifying
the pathogenic “Spike’ Protein. In 1999 the Coronavirus was engineered as a
bioweapon, paid for by Fauci through NIAID. It was
later patented by UNC as the SARS Corona Virus in 2002, a full year before
anyone ever heard the name, SARS.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IWWRK0fYk5SU/
;
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-pandemic-was-planned-in-2015-by-gang-of-rico-conspirators/
;
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IWWRK0fYk5SU/
8. In or about May 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation and
Global Business Network published Scenarios
for the Future of Technology and International Development, which outlines
a scenario whereby World powers utilize a global pandemic, naturally occurring
or man-made, that presents an opportunity to technocratically control humanity
and reduce the size of the global population.
See: LOCK
STEP Scenario, Narratives, A world of tighter top‐down government
control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing
citizen pushback (page 18). Said
publication provided the framework and methodology for the planning and
preparation of a planned bio warfare attack on the global population now
affecting every person in every country and in every location on the planet,
thus proving motive or the mens rea element
for the crimes alleged herein.
https://principia-scientific.com/2010-rockefellers-operation-lockstep-predicted-2020-lockdown/
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/news/center-news/2017/2017-10-23_spars-scenario.html
9. Though framed in less sinister terms, in a meeting
convened by Bill Gates on or about 1 March 2013, persons including but not
limited to: Dr. Anthony Fauci, Mr. Eli Broad, Mr.
Theodore (“Ted”) Turner, Mr. Warren Buffet, Ms. Oprah Winfrey, Mr. George
Soros, Mr. William Gates Jr., and other Defendants met in New York for the
purpose of planning mass reduction of the World’s population, as evidenced in
part by the presence of Dr. Fauci, the only
non-billionaire believed there present.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-WHB-1322
;
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/billionaire-club-in-bid-to-curb-overpopulation-d2fl22qhl02
;
10. On or about 17 February 2017, Defendant Gates
predicted a world-wide pandemic at the 53 Munich Security Conference stating,
“Bioterrorism has become feasible enough that a genetic engineer
could use computers to create a synthetic airborne pathogen capable of wiping
out a fraction of the world’s population quickly. The next epidemic could
originate on the computer screen of a terrorist intent on using genetic
engineering to create a synthetic version of the smallpox virus, or a super
contagious and deadly strain of the flu.”
[emphasis added]
11. On or about 9 November 2015 Defendant Baric published A SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronaviruses Shows Potential for Human Emergence,
which was the result of his research to create such a virulent disease with
manufactured “gain-of-function” in order to increase transmissibility. Said
report was directed and sent to Defendant Fauci,
stating in part: “Having
established that the SHC014 spike has the ability to mediate infection of human
cells and cause disease in mice, we next synthesized a full-length SHC014-CoV
infectious clone based on the approach used for SARS-CoV.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/
12. On or about 9 November 2015, in the same scientific paper
titled A SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronaviruses Shows Potential
for Human Emergence, Defendant Baric states: “to examine the emergence
potential (that is, the potential to infect humans) of circulating bat CoVs, we built a
chimeric virus encoding a novel, zoonotic CoV
spike protein . . . Using this approach,
we characterized CoV infection mediated by the SHC014
spike protein in primary human airway cells and in vivo and conclude these results confirm that the DIV
vaccine would not be protective against
infection with SHC014 and could
possibly augment disease in the aged‐vaccinated group.” [emphasis added]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/
13. Between January 2014 and December 2020, Defendant Fauci, along with other named and unnamed Defendants
through their instrumentalities, including but not limited to the National
Institutes of Health, EcoHealth Alliance and the
Department of Health and Human Services, provided samples of bio warfare agents
and funding to the Wuhan level 4 biolab for the purpose of continuing
“gain-of-function” research. Though Fauci told
Congress under oath that the purpose was not gain-of-function, evidence would
later prove he lied.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15069561/fauci-admits-us-sent-600k-wuhan-labcovid/
;
14. In 2014 Dr. Anthony Fauci
sent a letter to UNC acknowledging that its research was “gain-of-function”,
again a point about which he would later lie in Congressional testimony. DOD documents discovered in a “Top Secret
Shared Drive” likewise prove Fauci’s knowledge of and
support for gain-of-function research.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IWWRK0fYk5SU/
;
15. In 2015, Defendant Gates stated, “that an infectious
disease pandemic posed a greater threat to the world than nuclear war;” and that “If anything kills over 10 million
people over the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious
virus rather than a war — not missiles, but microbes.”
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-7776521-B1#section=Inventor
16.
In
2015 Dr. Peter Daszak, then CEO of EcoHealth Alliance, in an address to the National Academy
of Science, spoke on the need to promote a major pandemic, saying that “until an infectious disease crisis is very
real, present, and at an emergency threshold it is often ignored. To sustain
the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public
understanding of the need for MCM’s such as a pan‐influenza or pan‐coronavirus
vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follows the hype. We need
to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will
respond if they see profit at the end of the process”.
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-pandemic-was-planned-in-2015-by-gang-of-rico-conspirators/
17. In 2016 UNC announced that the SARS Coronavirus was
poised for human immersion, referencing the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IWWRK0fYk5SU/
18. On or about 17 January 2017, Defendant Fauci met with and warned the newly elected President
Trump, “There is no question that there will be a challenge
to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases,” further
stating, “The thing we’re extraordinarily confident about is that we are
going to see this in the next few years.”
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fauci-warned-of-trump-pandemic2017_n_5e8a0548c5b6e7d76c65c8a4
19. In February 2017, just two to three weeks after his
inauguration, Dr. Fauci foretold of President Trump
having to deal with a major, global pandemic during his first term in office.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puqaaeLnEww
20. On or about 23 March 2019, Defendant WHO declared and
published its first “Situation Report” thereby triggering the claim against a
$500,000,000 Pandemic Insurance Financing Bond issued by Defendant World Bank
for the purpose of ratifying the pandemic declaration and payment of funds to
other named and unnamed Defendants, including payments made or recovered
pursuant to COVID-19 PCR test kits patented and previously sold or financed in
2015 and 2018 respectively, one to five years prior
to the renaming of SARS-CoV-2’s official designation as COVID-19.
https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/donate
21. On or about 18 October 2019, associates of the named
and unnamed Defendants caused the release of the manufactured SARS-CoV-2
Coronavirus in Wuhan, China at the 7th
CISM Military World Games, intentionally or with such wanton disregard for
human life that homicidal intent is inferred through the knowledge and malice
aforethought of the implications and ramifications on global health and world
populations by means of the enhanced transmissibility and virulent, harmful,
deadly and contagious features of the bioweapon, later named officially by
Defendants as the “COVID-19 Virus”.
22. In or about January 2020, named and unnamed Defendants
together with their conspirators and collaborators caused the COVID-19 Virus to
be transmitted into the United States with knowledge and malice aforethought
for the purpose of creating and declaring a Global Pandemic as defined by the
World Health Organization pursuant to the International Health Regulations 2005
as amended, and pursuant to the provisions of Global Preparedness Report of
2019.
https://www.who.int/ihr/9789241596664/en/
;
https://www.foxnews.com/media/chinese-virologist-government-intentionally-coronavirus
23. On or about 11 March 2020, Defendants Dr. Fauci and NIH were made aware of the fabricated nature of
the COVID-19 Virus when Virologist Adam Gaertner sent an email containing the
exact manufacturing process by which the COVID-19 was created, including
components designed to impair or obstruct normal immunological response. The
mechanism by which the Virus was created (“cookbook”) was available to
Defendants Fauci and NIH for investigation and analysis
at the very beginning of the intentional outbreak in the United States; yet
Defendants along with their coconspirators maintained the narrative that the
Virus was naturally occurring until June of 2021. It was Defendants Fauci, NIH, Baric, Collins, Daszak
and others that funded, collaborated and disguised the Virus in an effort to
ensure their stated goals and warning to President Trump: “The thing we’re extraordinarily confident about is that we are
going to see this in the next few years”.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/
;
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fauci-warned-of-trump-pandemic-
2017_n_5e8a0548c5b6e7d76c65c8a4
24. Newly released emails show that Drs. Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins pressured a group of scientists
to abandon their intention to publish a report refuting the premise of a naturally
occurring virus, raising instead the possibility that it was “genetically
manipulated” and likely leaked from the Wuhan laboratory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD0i_YxPATc
25. Other evidence of attempted cover-up include testimony
by former Chinese Scientist Dr. Li-Meg Yan, emails released through FOIA
efforts exposing government efforts to hide conversations between scientists,
and the disclosure of emails that show Fauci and
other health officials sought to promote the natural origin theory despite having evidence and internal
expert opinions that pointed to the possibility of a leak from the Wuhan lab.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/chinese-virologist-coronavirus-cover-up-flee-hong-kong-whistleblower
26. In or about
December 2021, referencing books by Drs. Pam Popper and Peter Breggin, Dr. Peter McCullough, in an interview with Joe
Rogan, claimed the existence of proof that the entire pandemic was planned,
coordinated and perpetrated on the people to induce the people to accept the
experimental vaccines.
27. On or about 24 October 2021, Bayer Pharmaceuticals CEO
Stefan Oelrich, in a presentation at the World Health
Summit in Berlin, Germany, shared with international “experts” from academia,
politics and the private sector that the novel mRNA COVID vaccines are actually
“cell and gene therapy” that would have otherwise been rejected by the public
if not for a “pandemic” and favorable marketing.
28. On or about 18 September 2019, the WHO published a
“Worldwide Exercise in the Release of Respiratory Pathogens”, to facilitate a
worldwide acceptance of a vaccine.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IWWRK0fYk5SU/
29. On or about 19 September 2019, then President Donald
Trump signed an Executive Order laying out a pathway for the “Warp Speed”
development of a vaccine. Dr. Fauci would later tell
Congress on or about 4 December 2019, that the President’s E.O. gave him
authorization to make the mRNA vaccine.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IWWRK0fYk5SU/
;
30. In or about October 2019, Defendants Gates, Fauci, Brix, the NIH, CDC and WHO, together with associated
conspirators planned, orchestrated and conducted Event 201 whereby they
practiced their global and industry-wide response to their criminal enterprise.
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about
31. In or about September 2015, Defendants Richard A.
Rothschild & the Pirbright Institute developed and patented the “COVID-19”
Polymerase Chain Reaction (“PCR”) test kit, four and a half years before the
discovery of the Novel Corona Virus SARS 2, later renamed “COVID-19” in March
of 2020.
http://stateofthenation.co/?p=7130
;
32. In or about January 2018, the World Bank, together
with its affiliated financing subsidiaries and associated entities, including
the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”), financed the purchase of COVID-19
Polymerase Chain Reaction (“PCR”) Test kits for more than 50 countries
world-wide. Said kits were specifically for the purpose of diagnosing COVID-19,
which was a disease that did not exist in 2018 and the Novel Corona Virus SARS
2 was not named as “COVID-19” until March 2020;
yet the World Bank not only financed the acquisitions of the tests but
referenced them as being used to detect “COVID-19”, a heretofore undefined disease.
33. On or about 24 December 2020, Defendants WHO, CDC,
NIH, among others, fraudulently and intentionally caused governments,
ministries, hospitals and global health services to mandate the use of
ineffective face masks and to utilize and incorporate the use of knowingly
ineffective PCR tests among the global population for the purpose of inciting
fear, terror and coercion among the Complainants. In fact, the inventor of the
PCR test stated, “Anyone can test positive for practically anything with a PCR
test, if you run it long enough”.
https://stephenlendman.org/2021/04/28/pcr-tests-dont-work-and-risk-harm/
;
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/s1224-CDC-to-require-negative-test.html
34.
In
or about October 2020, three of the world’s top-tiered epidemiologists: Drs.
Martin Kulldorff, Professor of Medicine Harvard
University and a biostatistician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Sunetra Gupta, Professor of
Theoretical Epidemiology, Oxford University;
and Jay Bhattacharya, Professor of Medicine, Stanford University, along
with forty-three initial co-signers (and as of this compliant now just under
one million) implored establishment officials to focus their approach on those
at greatest risk, exposing in the process the societal consequences of a mass
approach. Emails since released in a Congressional House staff report show that
both Dr. Anthony Fauci and former NIH Director,
Francis Collins, conspired to discredit the Barrington Declaration and to
disparage its authors by pushing for a fresh round of lockdowns.
35.
In
or about September 2021, an international group of about 3,000 physicians and
scientists signed
a declaration accusing COVID-19 policy makers of
“crimes against humanity” for preventing the use of life saving treatments on
their patients.
36. A ‘Frontline Physician’
explains that between the financial inducements of the “CARES Act” and Patient
Rights waivers granted by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(“CMS”).
37. In or about December 2021, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, New York Physician who treated President Donald
Trump, Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro and Israel’s Benjamin
Netanyahu, explained how early COVID treatments were sabotaged in 2020 by
former BARDA Director Dr. Rick Bright, collaborating with Dr. Janet Woodcock,
current Director of the FDA, in contravention to the Executive Order issued in
2020 by then President Donald Trump to make Hydroxychloroquine universally
available.
38. In or about June 2020 the Association of American
Physicians and Surgeons (“AAPS”) sued the FDA to end its arbitrary restrictions
on Hydroxychloroquine.
https://aapsonline.org/hcqsuit/
39. In or about March 2021 Dr. Peter McCullough, in testimony
before the Texas Senate, explained how the denial of therapeutic drug
treatments resulted in the hospitalizations and subsequent deaths of thousands
of people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM
40. In or about July 2020 a group of American physicians
on the steps of the U.S. Capitol held a press conference to address the
censorship of therapeutic drugs for the treatment of the COVID virus.
41. In and around the dates of September 2020 to May 2021,
named and unnamed Defendants, including but not limited to the CDC, WHO, NIH, fraudulently
coerced, mandated, tricked and conducted a criminal scheme to increase the fear
and terror among the global population by economically rewarding hospitals,
physicians, governments, ministries and health service providers with pecuniary
rewards up to US $400,000 per case for diagnosing substantially all sickness,
morbidity and fatalities as being caused by COVID-19.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/travelers/testing-international-air-travelers.html
;
42. On or about 22 August 2005, Defendant Fauci and Defendant NIH declared Hydroxychloroquine (“HCQ”)
a ‘wonder drug’ for the treatment of SARS-CoV-1 and MERS, stating in The
Virology Journal (Defendant NIH’s publication) that “Chloroquine
is a potent inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus spread.” Yet, on or about 30 July 2020, Defendant Fauci testified to Congress that Hydroxychloroquine has “no therapeutic effect” on COVID-19.
https://news.yahoo.com/fauci-shoots-down-flawed-hydroxychloroquine-183931215.html
43. On or about 20 January 2021, Defendants Fauci and NIH publicly dismissed and subverted the use of
Ivermectin, a known and generic antiviral medication that clinically
demonstrated a significant reduction in COVID-19 viruses within a 48-hour
period. Congressional testimony by Dr. Pierre Kory in December 2020 reported a
substantial success rate using Ivermectin as both a prophylactic and cure after
conducting a review of dozens of peer reviewed trials, studies and
publications.
www.bitchute.com/video/YnSppbsgDBYS/
44. On or about 31 January 2020, Defendants Fauci, Collins, Farrar and Daszak
conspired to and did conduct a fraudulent clinical trial, in response to
positive reports about the benefits of HCQ, wherein they overdosed patients
with Hydroxychloroquine for the purpose of creating a published report
discounting the drug’s efficacy and labeling it dangerous and deadly; said conspiratorial conduct, including the
publishing of fraudulent results in several peer-reviewed scientific journals,
including The Lancet and Nature, is now revealed in their own
notes, emails and documents pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request by
and published by Buzzfeed. See also
disclosure of same by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko.
45. In or about March 2020, Dr. Rick Bright, former
Director of the Biomedical Advance Research and Development Authority
(“BARDA”), in a conspiracy with Dr. Janet Woodcock, current Director of the
FDA, sought to thwart an Executive Order issued by then President Donald Trump
to make HCQ universally available by designating it as an “Emergency Use
Authorization” (“EUA”) treatment available only to hospitalized patients.
46. On 19 November 2020, testifying before the Senate Homeland Security Committee
Hearing on COVID‐19 Outpatient Treatment, Dr. Peter McCullough (Epidemiologist,
Cardiologist and Professor of Medicine at Texas A&M University, who opines
frequently as an expert on the use of antiviral medications for the treatment
of COVID-19 infections and prevention) described in detail the success of the
antiviral medications, clinical studies and treatment protocols that were
saving lives at the time. Dr. McCullough also provided statistical data in his
testimony to the U.S. Senate that 50% of the American lives lost could have
been saved with early treatment (4-6 drugs in combination). On 10 March 2021,
Dr. McCullough testified in the Texas Senate that 85% of the lives lost could
have been saved since “we had evolved better treatment programs.” The current
estimate is 85% of lives lost could have been saved, according to Dr.
McCullough.
47. The aforementioned testimony patently contradicted the
subversive messaging and publications Defendants Fauci,
Daszak, Collins and Farrar orchestrated with their
co-conspirators. Effectively, no policy change resulted even after a
redaction by said publications as it relates to the conduct of the
Defendants aforementioned;
and, the FDA persisted in its banning of the emergency use of HCQ
as a treatment alternative.
https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/DrMcCulloughC19OutpatientTreatmnt.html
;
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2012410
48.
In
or about September 2021, an international group of about 3,000 physicians and
scientists signed a declaration accusing COVID-19 policy-makers of “crimes
against humanity” for preventing the use of life saving treatments on their
patients.
49. On or about 28 September 2021, Ontario Physician Dr. Patrick
Phillips, spoke out about authorities shutting down his practice for violating
COVID protocol.
https://brightlightnews.com/full-interview-dr-patrick-phillips-the-war-against-medical-tyranny/
50. In or about December 2021, Dr. Peter McCullough
questioned why governments
and public health officials around the world have put little to no emphasis on
outpatient treatments in their efforts to fight the COVID-19 virus, instead
promoting a massive effort on vaccines.
51. As of 28 May 2021, the Vaccine Adverse Reaction
Reporting System details in excess of 5,100 fatalities and more than 294,000
Serious Adverse Events (“SAE”) and serious injuries resulting from all four
mRNA vaccines produced by the Defendant Manufacturers. It is worth noting that
the VAERS system collects only a fraction of the actual injuries or fatalities,
in this instance by an estimated 4 to 5 times according to Dr. Peter
McCullough.
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
;
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-data-deaths-reported-following-covid-vaccines/
52. In or about June 2021, CDC VAERS data reports a spike
>5,000 mRNA vaccine deaths; the Swine Flu Vaccine was pulled at a
reported 26 deaths.
53. In or about February 2021, CDC data revealed that the
COVID Vaccines are about 18K% more deadly than Flu Vaccines.
54. On or about 25 August 2021, it was reported that the
CDC counts people who died within 14 days of an injection as “Unvaccinated”.
55. The CDC quietly updated its 2019 COVID death numbers, admitting that only 6% of all the 153,504
deaths recorded were actually a result of the COVID Virus.
56. In or about October 2021, U.S. Senator Ron Johnson
revealed that about 63% of U.K. deaths from the Delta Variant were fully
vaccinated.
57. In or about September 2021, a group of
German pathologists and scientists presented findings from a first-ever comprehensive, independent set of autopsies of
people who had died unexpectedly within 2 weeks of the COVID vaccine
injections. One pathologist calculated that, for a certain broad age group,
takers of the injections were 15 times more likely to die from the injections
than from COVID.
https://pathologie-konferenz.de/en/
58. According to Osteopathic Physician, Dr. Joseph
Mercola, the risks of serious reactions and death are far greater in children
than the COVID Virus, itself.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/more-children-die-from-the-covid-shot-than-fromcovid_4215381.html
59. By about July 2021, the CDC’s Vaccine
Adverse Effects Reporting System (“VAERS”) showed that reported injuries had
already surpassed 400K.
60. As of 2 January 2022, the VAERS weekly “Red Box”
Report VAERS reached the unprecedented milestone of 1,000,227 injuries following
coronavirus vaccines. In the 31-year history of VAERS, there are 9,248 reports
of fatalities following all other vaccines. Since the start of the coronavirus
vaccine campaign there have been 21,002 reports of death following coronavirus
vaccines. It is noted, too, that after approximately 26 reported deaths the
Swine Flu Vaccine was stopped.
61. In or about December 2021, Dr. Peter McCullough shared
that VAERS under-reports for COVID Vaccines by a factor of 4 to 5 times, even
though a former Harvard study showed an accuracy rate as low as 1%.
62. In or about September 2021, an HHS ER
physician disclosed in an undercover video that the government does not want to
disclose either the content or the side effects of the vaccines.
63. In or about August 2021, COVID vaccine
maker Moderna received 300,000 reports of side
effects over a three-month period following the launch of its vaccine,
according to an internal report from a company that helps Moderna
manage the reports. That figure is far higher than the number of side effect
reports about Moderna’s vaccine publicly available in
the Federal system that tracks such adverse events.
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/some-actual-news
64. As of January 2022, VAERS Injury and death reports
eclipsed one million.
65. In or about Spring 2021, doctors testified before a
Texas Senate Committee that Phase II Trials were abandoned once it was
determined that most, if not all, test animals were dying after receiving the
vaccine and later being exposed to the natural virus.
https://authentictexan.com/doctor-covid-vaccine-dangers-texas/
66. In or about November 2021, a federal district judge
rejects DOD claim that the Pfizer EUA and Comirnaty
Vaccines are the same.
67. In or about August 2021, Dr. Robert Malone explained
precisely how the Pfizer EUA and BioNTech Comirnaty Vaccines are NOT the same, contrary to efforts of
HHS to claim “FDA Approval” essentially applicable to the EUA.
68. Multiple
reports show that Pfizer has taken a number of liberties with its trials in
violation of the rigid guidelines each trial is required to follow:
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
https://t.me/angiefarellamd/152
69. Dr. Byrum Bridle, Immunologist at Quelph
University, discovered that Pfizer had withheld disclosure of its
Biodistribution Study until forced to share it with Japanese officials who
insisted on seeing it.
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6266459580001#sp=show-clips
70.
On
or about October 2016, Defendant National Institutes of Health, together with
other interested parties, filed for U.S. Patent WO/2018/081318 to create an injectable
compound to cause the recipient to produce a profusion of coronavirus Spike
proteins. This injectable is known as the “Moderna
COVID-19 Vaccine”. A recently disclosed 2015, heretofore ‘Confidential’
Agreement between the NIAID and Moderna shows that
the two jointly owned the vaccine when at the same time sharing the data set
with UNC’s Dr. Ralph Baric.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fauci-warned-of-trump-pandemic-
2017_n_5e8a0548c5b6e7d76c65c8a4
71. Said Moderna COVID-19
Vaccine contains SM-102 (also Luciferase), which is a known poison fatal to
humans and animals as disclosed in Moderna’s Food
and Drug Administration’s published ingredients list. See list of ingredients
and toxicity report for SM-102:
https://www.fda.gov/media/144638/download
72. In 2015 appeared a heretofore confidential agreement
between the NIAID and Moderna proving joint ownership
of the Coronavirus mRNA vaccine, the same vaccine that the NIAID, its parent
HHS, and its co-affiliates the CDC and FDA have been aggressively promoting to
the public.
73. In or about January 2022, it was discovered by
physician and Senator Roger Marshall, R-KY, that Dr. Anthony Fauci had been deceitful in his public financial
disclosures.
74. Moderna and Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines are designed to
cause the human recipients to mass produce Corona Virus Spike Proteins through
messenger RNA stimulus;
such Spike Proteins are known to cause acute cardiovascular
disease, inflammation and/or blood clotting.
75. Animal testing conducted with the Moderna
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine was undertaken in 2012, which included a “Challenge”
study whereby inoculated animals were exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus (later
called “COVID-19”); and, in each and
every instance, the test animals developed Pulmonary Immunopathology causing a
100% fatality rate. The conclusions of various scientific journals opine that
the deaths of the test animals were not caused directly by the vaccine; rather they
were caused by the test subject’s immune response of Spike Protein creation
from the changes made to the animals’ immune system by virtue of the messenger
RNA in the Vaccine. See:
http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep/COVID/mRNA%20vaccine%20review%20final.pdf ;
76. Thirteen (13) people died in the Moderna
human clinical trials as a result of the said enhanced autoimmune response,
which is beyond the industry standard threshold of continued development for
marketable use. See:
https://principia-scientific.com/13-people-died-during-modernas-covid-vaccine-trial/
77. All of the Vaccines produced by the Defendant
manufacturers (Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, Pfizer
and Astra Zeneca) caused the same immunopathological response in their animal
challenge tests conducted years in advance of the Emergency Use Authorization,
and all experienced up to a 100% fatality rate in their challenge studies.
Furthermore, the science was so dispositive that on or about 25 January 2021,
Pfizer’s former Chief Science Officer (Dr. Michael Yeadon) warned “Governments
are lying because they are going to kill you and your family.” See:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/pfizer/reactogenicity.html
78. All of the Defendant manufacturers knew, or should
have known, that their Vaccines caused this immunopathological response and
were warned by the FDA against conducting human trials. See:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7162764/
79. On or about 20 April 2012, the Federation of
Registration Agencies (DOI) published a report that analyzed all of the mRNA
vaccines at the time and arrived at the conclusion that each such injection
presents a near certainty that all SARS
Coronavirus vaccinations lead to Pulmonary Immunopathology upon challenge of
the user; meaning that the inoculated
person or animal will die when exposed to the virus or (relative thereto) being
vaccinated against. This peer-reviewed, common conclusion of scientists
responsible for registration of vaccines arrived at this conclusion more than 8
years in advance of the release, distribution and sale of the COVID Vaccines.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421
80. At all material times Defendants Fauci,
Birx, Gates, Tedros, Baric,
Daszak and others were acting in their official
capacities and had the authority to represent the interest of, and
contractually bind, the institutions or entities by whom they were employed or
compensated.
81. At all material times, Defendants Fauci,
Rothschild, Gates, Baric, Daszak, NIH, CDC, WHO and
other named and unnamed Defendants had economic interests in the intellectual
property rights of the COVID-19 Virus or the various COVID-19 Vaccines, or
both, and conspired to economically benefit from the exploitation of these
bioweapons.
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/anthony-s-fauci-md
;
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866602/ ;
82. Medical Doctors and scientists in
the biological health and treatment of human beings attest to:
a) the fatality rate of the SARS-CoV-2, also known as
COVID-19, virus (hereinafter “Virus”) is .0046% across combined age groups
under age 70 in the United States:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html
b) the case fatality rate was purposefully inflated by
Defendants World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, The National Institutes of Health, or any other governmental or
non-governmental agency or entity acting with authority to make such a
declaration:
c) there are widely available and extremely effective therapeutic
medicines, inclusive of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, that both prevent
and treat said Virus:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32283237/
d) Defendants named herein caused people, entities,
organizations and health care services to avoid the use, prescription and
delivery of said therapeutic medicines to patients and the public at large, and
caused the therapeutic medicines to be unavailable to infected individuals and
the public, resulting in large numbers of unnecessary injuries and deaths in
those that were infected with the Virus:
e) credible evidence exists to support a conclusion that
interested parties and stakeholders disregarded scientific data and
alternative, efficient therapies to coerce people and entities to require
COVID-19 injectables as a condition of employment, entry to properties,
purchase of goods and services and admission to gatherings:
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=64361
f) the Defendant manufactures of the four “COVID-19
Vaccines” identified herein, have attempted and failed to create a messenger
RNA styled vaccine that is suitable for sale or distribution due to safety
concerns, fatalities and morbidities experienced during both animal and human
trials despite more than 10 years of testing:
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/01/health/eua-coronavirus-vaccine-history/index.html
g) the Defendants, manufacturers and other participants,
were warned in multiple scientific and media papers that mRNA designed to
increase spike protein production is, and was, hazardous to the users’
autoimmune systems:
https://principia-scientific.com/the-u-n-and-its-staggering-rise-in-dishonesty/h/
h) the mRNA and adenoviral injections all code for the
original spike protein that was the product of Gain of Function (hereinafter
“GOF”) research in Wuhan, China:
i) this laboratory-engineered spike protein component
created in Wuhan, China is intentionally caused to be
produced in humans via the subject COVID-19 injections. Furthermore, said spike
protein was intentionally modified at the furin
cleavage site of the protein, making the spike protein elicited to be produced
in the body by the COVID-19 injections far more dangerous and infectious to the
human body than the original spike protein created in Wuhan, China:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859469/
j) the spike protein elicited to be produced by injection
of the purported COVID-19 “vaccines” has intentionally placed sequences of RNA
that code for known epitopes of the HIV virus:
k) once administered to humans, all COVID-19 injections
cause the human body to produce the modified Wuhan spike protein product of
Gain of Function (“GOF”) research in an uncontrolled fashion for as long as two
weeks, with no regulation mechanism for 1) the concentration of spike protein,
2) the tissues or locations in the body where it is created, 3) its
distribution in the body, and 4) the duration of its ability to be produced in
the body:
https://www.pnas.org/content/117/41/25254
l) this Wuhan spike protein product of GOF research
directly causes damage to blood vessels and major organs, including the lungs,
heart, brain, kidneys and liver, and directly promotes the development of blood
clots in critical organs, resulting in permanent disability and death in some
cases:
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2021/06/03/covid19-the-spike-protein-and-blood-clotting/
m) the United States mass vaccination program is
investigational. Defendants, either knowingly or with a duty to know and with a
reckless disregard for human life, committed egregious malfeasance that has
resulted in harm to at least hundreds of thousands and death to at least many
thousands of people, in failing to establish an external, unbiased clinical
event adjudication committee, data safety monitoring committee, or human ethics
committee. As a result, there is no mechanism for risk mitigation in the
investigational program (critical event committee, data safety monitoring
board, human ethics committee) and this has contributed to causing the
aforementioned injuries and deaths. Remarkably, 46% of the deaths that have
occurred following the injections have taken place on days 1, 2 or 3 post
injection:
n) furthermore, in an act of egregious malfeasance,
Defendants recommended administration of the experimental injections in large
patient groups that were excluded from the registrational trials on the basis
of either anticipated lack of benefit or excessive harm, resulting in severe
harm and/or death to at least many thousands of people in these groups that
were administered the injections. These groups include: COVID-recovered, suspected COVID-recovered,
those with positive serologies, pregnant women, and childbearing women who
could not assure contraception. In fact, Defendants knowingly administered the
COVID-19 injections to individuals with durable natural immunity due to prior
infection with COVID-19, despite many known studies spanning decades and
demonstrating that these individuals were more susceptible to serious injury
from the injections:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(21)00008-X/fulltext
o) intentional disregard of the results of the animal
challenge studies which resulted in up to 100% fatality rates, was egregious
conduct under the norms of the medical communities’ policies, procedures,
ethical, licensing and other mandates which govern such conduct:
p) Defendant Manufacturers knew or should have known
their Emergency Use Authorization would result in mass fatalities of the Users:
q) Defendants threatened medical doctors who prescribed
widely available, safe and effective therapeutic medicines in furtherance of
coercing the public to take the COVID-19 injections:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-hydroxychloroqidUSKBN23B340
r) Defendants defrauded and coerced the public by
knowingly failing to disclose scientific study results and facts, as well as
knowingly disseminating fraudulent information to the public:
https://amsterdamnews.com/news/2020/12/24/why-black-people-cannot-trust-pfizer-vaccine/
s) Defendants failed to provide notice of risks and the
right of informed consent to the public (per Nuremberg Code):
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
t) sufficient evidence exists to support a determination
that: 1) a bioweapon in the form of a spike protein created in Wuhan, China through
GOF research was released into the civilian population; 2) for the purpose of, or intent to cause, a
demand for COVID-19 injections; 3)
irrespective of or with intent to diminish, disregard or subvert known and
efficient, existing therapies; 4) with
the intent to cause harm or without regard to the consequences of harm that
were known or foreseeable to the users;
5) for purposes of injuring, harming, controlling or killing the users; 6) while Defendant stakeholders enjoy and/or
enjoyed monetary or other economic, academic or political rewards.
https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/stop-damage-mrna-vaccines/
The
overwhelming sum of information presented herein, much of it incontrovertible,
offers more than sufficient probable cause to believe that one or more of the
named Defendants has committed the offenses alleged in this Criminal Complaint,
specifically mass murder through the commission of crimes against humanity.
This complaint alleges that some or all of the Defendants did knowingly,
intentionally, with malice aforethought and/or with reckless disregard for
human life, some also in criminal conspiracy and others of willful ignorance,
engaged in acts that:
A) planned, coordinated, colluded and collaborated among
two or more named and unnamed Defendants to design a criminal enterprise,
taking steps in furtherance thereof for the purpose of:
1) creating the COVID-19 Virus as a Bio warfare weapon;
2) enhancing the efficacy of the virus to further infect,
contaminate and transmit among the global population for the purpose of killing
human beings;
B) orchestrated and implemented fraudulent acts,
statements, public service announcements (“PSA”), publications, mandates and
lockdowns in order to:
1) induce fear in and amongst an unsuspecting public,
thus compelling compliance therewith, including the public’s unwitting
willingness to accept an injectable bioweapon / gene-therapy veiled as a
vaccine;
2) diminish the knowledge, use and efficacy of existing
therapeutic medicines for the purpose of limiting perceived treatments to the
“vaccines” and/or the high-risk drug, Remdesivir;
3) coerce, intimidate or force medical providers into
compliance with non-legislated regulations, thus limiting their treatment
options for infected patients, the consequences of which would often lead to
hospitalization and often death;
C) pre-planned the use and distribution of fraudulent,
non-efficacious PCR tests for the purpose of creating false positive results,
false narratives, false pretenses and false conditions about infection in order
to terrorize, and incite fear, intimidation and coercion in the general
population in support of their sales, marketing and distribution of deadly
COVID-19 Vaccines;
D) conceived, created, manufactured, sold and distributed
deadly COVID-19 Vaccines for the purpose of stimulating a well-known and
established hyper or enhanced immune response in the victims and users of the
experimental gene therapy injectables;
E) falsified data and reports in scientific and news
media publications regarding the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 Vaccines
for the purpose of hiding the deadly effects of the injectables;
F) conspired with and among the many named and unnamed
Defendants to use the aforestated manipulation,
tactics and coercion in furtherance of their economic benefit and genocidal pursuits; and,
G) engaged in, conspired, coordinated and executed on
this criminal homicidal enterprise for their pecuniary, economic, academic
and/or political benefit as a plan to infect, inoculate and kill not less than
70% of the global population.
In particular,
the evidenced elements of the crimes alleged herein are as follows:
A.
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY (18 U.S.C. § 2441(d)(1)(c)):
i) The act of a
person who subjects, or conspires or attempts to subject, one or more persons
within his custody or physical control to biological experiments without a
legitimate medical or dental purpose and in so doing endangers the body or
health of such person or persons.
B. PROHIBITIONS WITH RESPECT TO BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS (18 U.S.C. § 175(a))
ii) Whoever knowingly develops, produces,
stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin,
or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization
to do so, or attempts, threatens, or conspires to do the same, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is
extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section
committed by or against a national
of the United States.
iii) Whoever knowingly possesses any biological agent, toxin,
or delivery system of a type
or in a quantity that, under the circumstances, is not reasonably justified by
a prophylactic, protective, bona fide research, or other peaceful purpose,
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both. In
this subsection, the terms “biological
agent” and “toxin” do not
encompass any biological
agent or toxin that is in
its naturally occurring environment, if the biological agent or toxin has not been cultivated, collected, or otherwise extracted from its
natural source.
iv) Whoever,
whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to
destroy, in whole or in substantial
part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such —
(1)
kills members of that group;
(2)
causes serious
bodily injury to members of that group;
(3)
causes the
permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the
group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;
(4)
subjects the
group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction
of the group in whole or in part;
(5)
imposes measures
intended to prevent births within the group; or (6) transfers by force children of the group to another
group; (7) shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
v) Whoever
knowingly —
(1)
recruits,
enlists, or conscripts a person to serve while such person is under 15 years of
age in an armed force or group; or
(2)
uses a person
under 15 years of age to participate actively in hostilities.
E.
MURDER (18
U.S.C. § 1111(a))
vi) Murder is the unlawful killing of
a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison,
lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and
premeditated killing; or committed in
the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder,
kidnapping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual
abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery; or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or
torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from
a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any
human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree.
F.
ATTEMPTED MURDER (18 U.S.C. § 1113)
vii) Except as provided in section 113 of this title, whoever, within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of
the United States, attempts to commit murder or manslaughter, shall, for an
attempt to commit murder be imprisoned not more than twenty years or fined
under this title, or both, and for an attempt to commit manslaughter be
imprisoned not more than seven years or fined under this title, or both.
viii) CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (18
U.S.C. § 1117)
ix) If two or more persons conspire to violate section 1111,
1114, 1116, or 1119
of this title, and one or more of such
persons do any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy,
each shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
H. ASSAULT WITHIN MARITIME AND TERRITORIAL
JURISDICTION (18 U.S.C. § 113)
x) Whoever, within the special maritime and territorial
jurisdiction of the United States, is guilty of an assault shall be punished as
follows:
(1)
Assault
with intent to commit murder or a violation of section 2241 or 2242, by a fine
under this title, imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both.
(2)
Assault
with intent to commit any felony, except murder or a violation of section 2241
or 2242, by a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than ten
years, or both.
(3)
Assault
with a dangerous weapon, with intent to do bodily harm, by a fine under this
title or imprisonment for not more than ten years, or both.
(4)
Assault
by striking, beating, or wounding, by a fine under this title or imprisonment
for not more than 1 year, or both.
(5)
Simple
assault, by a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than six
months, or both, or if the victim of the assault is an individual who has not
attained the age of 16 years, by fine under this title or imprisonment for not
more than 1 year, or both.
(6)
Assault
resulting in serious bodily injury, by a fine under this title or imprisonment
for not more than ten years, or both.
(7)
Assault
resulting in substantial bodily injury to a spouse or intimate partner, a dating
partner, or an individual who has not attained the age of 16 years, by a fine
under this title or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both.
(8)
Assault
of a spouse, intimate partner, or dating partner by strangling, suffocating, or
attempting to strangle or suffocate, by a fine under this title, imprisonment
for not more than 10 years, or both.
xi) Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection
(b) of this section, knowingly —
(1)
falsifies,
conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device any material fact; or makes any
materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, or
(2)
makes or uses any
false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, in any matter involving
any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred,
disbursed, or paid in connection with a major disaster declaration under section
401 of the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42
U.S.C. 5170) or an emergency declaration
under section 501 of the Robert
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42
U.S.C. 5191), or in connection with any
procurement of property or services related to any emergency or major disaster
declaration as a prime contractor with the United States or as a subcontractor
or supplier on a contract in which there is a prime contract with the United
States, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 30 years, or
both.
I
declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
________________________ (signature)
Jack E. Boteler, Complainant, citizen and resident of
Harris County in the State of Texas
Subscribed and sworn to before me at_______ _________(place),
on this _________________________________ day of ______________________________________ , 2022
_______________________________________________________ _
(Notary Public)
Signed:
___________________________________________________
Sealed: _____________________________________________________