|
What
really happened to American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 on Sept 11, 2001.
by
Gerard Holmgren . Copyright. Nov 2003 This
material may be freely reproduced without permission providing that it is not
for commercial purposes. Please include the author's name, the URL where you
found it and the copyright notice. (Author’s
note Jan 9 2005 : This article was originally published here.
Shortly after I published this article the BTS moved it’s database to a new
location—and didn't leave a forwarding address. The new address is
http://www.bts.gov/programs/airline_information/airline_ontime_statistics/ 10 months after I published, they finally got around to doctoring
the database as predicted at the end of this article. Links to back ups of the
original BTS search results done in Nov 2003 are here 1 2 3 4 By
visiting the original article, one can see that in Nov 2003, no-one in the
comments column was disputing that I had accurately represented the contents of
the data base. When I update this article, I will show how the BTS has made a
mess of the cover up. Below is the article as originally
published} On the basis
of photographic and physical evidence, it has now been established for some time
that on Sept 11, 2001 the damage to the Pentagon was caused by something other
than the hijacked Boeing 757, American Airlines Flight 77 claimed by the
Government to have crashed into the building. Physical and
Mathematical analysis of pentagon crash.
Oct 2002 Did
AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts examined. June 2002 More
recently, its become widely accepted on the basis of video evidence that the
object which hit the North Tower of the WTC at 8.46 that morning was not the
hijacked Boeing 767, American Airlines Flight 11, as claimed in the official
story. http://home.earthlink.net/~whatzit http://thewebfairy.com/whatzit/index2.html In response
to these observations, both supporters of the truth and blind deniers of it
agree on one thing. It raises the
question - "If these flights did not hit the buildings as alleged, then where
did they go?' We are now in
a position to answer that question. First, lets
recap the official story of what happened to four planes that
morning. AA 11 left
Boston for LA at about 8 am, was reported as hijacked about 8.25, and hit the
Nth Tower at about 8.46. UA 175 left
Boston for LA at about the same time, was reported hijacked at about 8.55 and
hit the Sth Tower at about 9.03 AA 77 left
Dulles for LA about the same time , was reported hijacked at about 8.55 and hit
the Pentagon at about 9.45 UA 93 left
Newark for SF at about the same time, was reported hijacked about 9.45 and
crashed in PA at about 10.10. The Buruea of
transportation website contains search pages, where one can pull up detailed
statistics about the history of which flights have been scheduled for which
airports on any given day. Go to http://www.bts.gov/ntda/oai/index.shtml and click on
"detailed statistics" where one can search records of scheduled and actual
departure times, arrival times, diversions and cancellations by departure
airport, arrival airport, airline and flight number. Searches for Sept 11 2001
reveal that the flights AA 11 and AA 77 did not exist. They were not scheduled
that day. Here are the search results which I encourage everyone to check for
themselves. A search for
UA flights from Newark on Sept 11, 2001 shows 0093 to SF was scheduled at 8.00
and actually departed at 8.01. It is listed as "diverted" and did not arrive at
its destination. A search for
UA from Boston on that day shows 0175 to LA was scheduled for 8.00 and actually
departed at 7.58. Also listed as "diverted" and did not arrive at its
destination. The term "diverted" is not
clarified as to whether it includes hijacking and/or crashing, so the data gives
no indication one way or the other as to truth of the official story about what
happened to them, but it does confirm that they departed as per the official
story and did not arrive at their destinations. A search for
AA flights from Boston that day does not list 0011. The earliest scheduled AA
flight to LA that day was
0181 at 11.00 A search for
AA flights from Dulles that day does not list 0077. The earliest scheduled AA
flight to LA was 0135 at 11.15. Here's a
different search method. One can find the historical reliability and punctuality
of specific flights over a period of time, by specifying the Airline and flight
number and defining the time period. The search then returns figures on average
delays in departure and arrival times and percentages of cancelled or diverted
flights. If one
searches specifically for UA 175 or UA 93 narrowed down to sept 11 only, the
search returns the result of "diverted" for each flight. A similar search for
either AA 11 or AA 77 returns "no data found". If you search
for AA 11 or AA 77 on different days, you will find that they were regularly
scheduled flights right up to Sept 10. AA 11 was scheduled daily from Logan to
LA at 8.00, and AA 77 from Dulles to LA at 7.45. On Sept 11, they were not
scheduled. Not cancelled. Just not scheduled. On Sept 12,
they re-appear in the schedule (obviously as cancelled for the next few days) up
until Sept 20 when both flights change their numbers. Thus the
official figures from the Bureau of
Transportation statistics indicate that neither AA 11 nor AA 77 flew on Sept, 11
2001. This solves the question of what happened to them. Nothing. Because the
flights did not exist. This is consistent with other evidence which shows that
they were not the objects responsible for the Pentagon and Nth WTC tower
incidents. This still
leaves unanswered the question of what happened to the passengers alleged to be
aboard the non existent flights. In the case of AA 77, while one can always
speculate about the most plausible scenarios, I prefer to wait until some real
evidence emerges. However in the case of AA 11, I think it is worth noting that
UA 175 left from the same airport, at the same time for the same destination as
that normally applicable to AA 11. Therefore, although there is no direct
evidence to support the claim, it would seem reasonable to speculate at this
stage that any passengers who booked for AA 11 that day, and went to the
airport, expecting to get on AA 11, may have been told that there was a last
minute problem with the flight which could not be fixed within a reasonable
period of time, and were offered a flight on UA 175 as compensation.
The data in
this search indicates that we have been systematically lied to about the alleged
flight paths and hijacking sequence of AA 11 and AA 77, as well as the alleged
phone calls made from the planes. It also indicates probable complicity by
American Airlines in the events of Sept 11 , 2001. For the
benefit of any NWO operatives reading this, the search result pages have already
been backed up and widely distributed, so there's no point in trying to pressure
the Bureau into playing hanky panky with the records. Nevertheless, I do
encourage all readers to do the searches themselves and back up the results
pages, just in case this happens. |