"Proof the American Republic Is Failing"

 

by

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.,

Private Attorney General (18 U.S.C. 1964)

 

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)

 

 

Republic  n  2.  a government in which the supreme power

is held by the citizens entitled to vote and is exercised

by elected officers and representatives governing

according to law. -- The Merriam-Webster Dictionary

(paperback edition)

 

 

We begin this short essay with the definition above,

taken from a common dictionary of the English language,

and written in words which do not require any attorneys

or any legal dictionaries to understand, explain or interpret.

 

Now, I want to stress one of the key points discussed further below,

with an example which I hope all readers will regard as ridiculous:

 

Let's just say that the City Council in Anchorage, Alaska,

has decided to levy an extra tax against all fines for expired parking meters

imposed by laws in all 50 States of the Union.  Yes, if your parking meter

expires in Miami, Florida, or Boston, Massachusetts, the Anchorage

tax collectors are quite convinced they have the "authority" to collect

an additional amount from you, as stated in that "ordinance" recently

enacted by the Anchorage City Council.

 

"Objection!" you scream.  "The Anchorage City Council

does NOT have jurisdiction in Massachusetts, or Florida."

 

And, by objecting in that manner, you would be entirely correct.

 

Nevertheless, your correct understanding of jurisdiction

is still not good enough to stop Anchorage tax collectors from

garnishing your paychecks and your bank accounts

in order to satisfy their limitless greed for revenues.

 

"Golly gee, I didn't know the long arm of the law

was THAT long," observed the church mouse.

 

"It's actually an octopus with thousands of

very long tentacles, and millions of suction cups,"

explained the Choir Master.

 

Now, switch back to the well documented reality

now facing America:

 

Congress enacts tax collection schemes that apply

ONLY inside the District of Columbia, but in their

infinite and limitless wisdom they chose language

to enforce that same scheme inside all 50 States

of the Union.

 

(HINT:  this scheme is implemented with what

Congress has admitted to be a "special definition of 'State' "

but you are probably hearing about that "special definition"

for the first time today.)

 

"Objection!" you repeat.  "The District of Columbia

is an entirely different and foreign jurisdiction, and

it is outside ('without') the geographic jurisdictions

of all 50 States of the Union."

 

Yes, you are correct again.

 

So, how does the Federal government circumvent

your objections when those objections are

totally and legally correct?

 

Answer:  federal citizenship, THAT'S HOW!

 

You see, even many American judges have

failed to understand the correct legal meaning

of the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof".

 

By a definition (that was never lawfully ratified),

federal citizens are SUBJECT TO all Federal

municipal laws, EVEN IF federal citizens

live and work inside the 50 States.

 

This scam is bad enough, but it gets worse.

 

It is now very well established that federal citizens

are a second, inferior class of Americans

that was first created in the year 1866 A.D.

 

The primary class of State Citizens was initially

recognized in the organic ("original") U.S. Constitution

first ratified on June 21, 1788 A.D.

 

That primary class of State Citizens was

recognized in three Qualifications Clauses for

U.S. Senator, U.S. Representative and President.

 

That primary class of State Citizens was

also recognized in the Diversity Clause,

in the Privileges and Immunities Clause, and

in the Eleventh Amendment to that Constitution.

 

Six different Clauses in the U.S. Constitution.

 

None of those 6 Clauses has ever been amended!

 

However, those State Citizens are now prohibited ("barred")

from voting and from serving on juries of any kind.

 

Go back to the definition of "Republic" quoted

at the beginning of this essay:

 

"supreme power is held by citizens entitled to vote"

 

This one finding proves that America is no longer

a Republic, by law.  It can't be a Republic as long as

State Citizens are not entitled to vote!

 

Americans who are qualified by Law to serve in the

U.S. Senate, House of Representatives and White House

are presently NOT eligible to vote or serve on juries

of any kind.

 

Americans who are eligible to vote and serve on juries

of any kind, are presently NOT qualified to serve in the

U.S. Senate, House of Representatives or White House.

 

This "class discrimination" has worked its way

into "amendments" that were added to many of the 50

State Constitutions, but without review by Congress

and in blatant violation of the Guarantee Clause

in the U.S. Constitution.

 

That Guarantee Clause has also never been amended!

 

This "class discrimination" has already been struck

down by standing decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court,

particularly whenever it occurs during jury selection.

 

We attempted sincerely, and formally, to raise this

class discrimination in the following OPENING BRIEF

presented to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals:

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm#topic-a

 

But, we have very good reasons to suspect that the

resulting "decision" was written by Federal court "clerks"

who tried to say that the Internal Revenue Code

is "not vague".  Even President Ronald Reagan

admitted that the IRC is obviously vague.

 

 

Conclusion:  the population of federal citizens

who inhabit the 50 States are now an

absolute legislative democracy that is

SUBJECT TO all Federal MUNICIPAL laws,

even though those MUNICIPAL laws do not

reach beyond D.C., Guam, Virgin Islands,

American Samoa and Puerto Rico.

 

Democracy in action!

 

Now you know what politicians, lawyers and

judges mean whenever they utter the phrase

"our democracy."

 


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.


http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)