"Proof the American Republic Is
Failing"
by
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.,
Private Attorney General (18 U.S.C.
1964)
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)
Republic
n 2. a government in which the supreme power
is held by the citizens
entitled to vote and is exercised
by elected officers and
representatives governing
according to law. -- The Merriam-Webster Dictionary
(paperback edition)
We begin this short essay with the
definition above,
taken from a common dictionary of the
English language,
and written in words which do not
require any attorneys
or any legal dictionaries to
understand, explain or interpret.
Now, I want to stress one of the key
points discussed further below,
with an example which I hope all
readers will regard as ridiculous:
Let's just say that the City Council
in Anchorage, Alaska,
has decided to levy an extra tax
against all fines for expired parking meters
imposed by laws in all 50 States of
the Union. Yes, if your parking meter
expires in Miami, Florida, or
Boston, Massachusetts, the Anchorage
tax collectors are quite convinced
they have the "authority" to collect
an additional amount from you, as
stated in that "ordinance" recently
enacted by the Anchorage City
Council.
"Objection!" you scream. "The Anchorage
City Council
does NOT have jurisdiction
in Massachusetts, or Florida."
And, by objecting in that manner,
you would be entirely correct.
Nevertheless, your correct
understanding of jurisdiction
is still not good enough to stop Anchorage
tax collectors from
garnishing your paychecks and your
bank accounts
in order to satisfy their limitless
greed for revenues.
"Golly gee, I didn't know the
long arm of the law
was THAT long," observed the church mouse.
"It's actually an octopus with
thousands of
very long tentacles, and millions of
suction cups,"
explained the Choir Master.
Now, switch back to the well
documented reality
now facing America:
Congress enacts tax collection
schemes that apply
ONLY inside the District of
Columbia, but in their
infinite and limitless wisdom they
chose language
to enforce that same scheme inside
all 50 States
of the Union.
(HINT: this scheme is implemented with what
Congress has admitted to be a
"special definition of 'State' "
but you are probably hearing about
that "special definition"
for the first time today.)
"Objection!" you repeat.
"The District of Columbia
is an entirely different and foreign
jurisdiction, and
it is outside ('without') the
geographic jurisdictions
of all 50 States of the Union."
Yes, you are correct again.
So, how does the Federal government
circumvent
your objections when those
objections are
totally and legally correct?
Answer: federal
citizenship, THAT'S HOW!
You see, even many American judges
have
failed to understand the correct legal
meaning
of the phrase "subject to
the jurisdiction thereof".
By a definition (that was never
lawfully ratified),
federal citizens are SUBJECT TO all
Federal
municipal laws, EVEN IF federal
citizens
live and work inside the 50 States.
This scam is bad enough, but it gets
worse.
It is now very well established that
federal citizens
are a second, inferior class of
Americans
that was first created in the year 1866 A.D.
The primary class of State Citizens
was initially
recognized in the organic
("original") U.S. Constitution
first ratified on June 21, 1788 A.D.
That primary class of State Citizens
was
recognized in three Qualifications Clauses for
U.S. Senator, U.S. Representative
and President.
That primary class of State Citizens
was
also recognized in the Diversity Clause,
in the Privileges and
Immunities Clause, and
in the Eleventh
Amendment to that Constitution.
Six different Clauses in the U.S.
Constitution.
None of those 6 Clauses has ever
been amended!
However, those State Citizens are
now prohibited ("barred")
from voting and from
serving on juries of any kind.
Go back to the definition of
"Republic" quoted
at the beginning of this essay:
"supreme power is
held by citizens entitled to vote"
This one finding proves that America
is no longer
a Republic, by law. It can't be a Republic as long as
State Citizens are not entitled to
vote!
Americans who are qualified by Law
to serve in the
U.S. Senate, House of
Representatives and White House
are presently NOT eligible to vote
or serve on juries
of any kind.
Americans who are eligible to vote
and serve on juries
of any kind, are presently NOT
qualified to serve in the
U.S. Senate, House of
Representatives or White House.
This "class discrimination"
has worked its way
into "amendments"
that were added to many of the 50
State Constitutions, but without
review by Congress
and in blatant violation of the Guarantee Clause
in the U.S. Constitution.
That Guarantee Clause has also never
been amended!
This "class
discrimination" has already been struck
down by standing decisions of the
U.S. Supreme Court,
particularly whenever it occurs
during jury selection.
We attempted sincerely, and
formally, to raise this
class discrimination in the
following OPENING BRIEF
presented to the Eighth Circuit
Court of Appeals:
http://supremelaw.org/cc/gilberts/opening.htm#topic-a
But, we have very good reasons to
suspect that the
resulting "decision"
was written by Federal court "clerks"
who tried to say that the Internal Revenue Code
is "not vague". Even President Ronald Reagan
admitted that the IRC is obviously
vague.
Conclusion: the population of
federal citizens
who inhabit the 50 States are now an
absolute legislative democracy that is
SUBJECT TO all Federal MUNICIPAL
laws,
even though those MUNICIPAL laws do
not
reach beyond D.C., Guam, Virgin
Islands,
American Samoa and Puerto Rico.
Democracy in action!
Now you know what politicians,
lawyers and
judges mean whenever they utter the
phrase
"our democracy."
Sincerely
yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of
the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal
Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC
1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)