Dr. John C. Alden, Sui Juris

c/o 350 – 30th Street, Ste. 444

Oakland 94609-3426

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

tel: (510) 452-2020

fax: (510) 832-8507

 

In Propria Persona

 

All Rights Reserved

without Prejudice

 

 

 

United States District Court

 

Northern District of California

 

 

Amy Alden et al.,                 )  Case No. C-88-4306-SBA

                                  )

          Plaintiffs,             )  NOTICE OF MOTION AND VERIFIED

                                  )  MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER:

     v.                           )

                                  )  FRCP Rules 60(b)(4), 60(b)(6);

United States of America [sic],   )  Arising Under Clause;

                                  )  28 U.S.C. §§ 530B, 1331;

          Defendants.             )  and FREv Rule 201(d).

----------------------------------)

                                  )  Date: ___________________________

and Cross-Action.                 )

__________________________________)  Time: ___________________________

 

COMES NOW Dr. John C. Alden, Sui Juris, Citizen of California State, expressly not a citizen of the United States, and Cross-Defendant in the above entitled matter (“Cross-Defendant John C. Alden”), to move this Court for immediate relief from its ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES’ [sic] SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION dated September 13, 1994 A.D., and the corresponding JUDGMENT filed on September 14, 1994 A.D., for actual and constructive fraud upon this Court and for all of the following meritorious reasons, and to provide formal NOTICE of same to all Proper Parties and their authorized agents:


1.               said ORDER and JUDGMENT were both demonstrably void under FRCP Rule 60(b)(4);

2.               the controlling legal terms of art ‑‑ “United States” and “United States of America” ‑‑ are decidedly not one and the same, pursuant to the holding of the U.S. Supreme Court in Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920) (Congress cannot by legislation alter the U.S. Constitution, from which alone it derives its power to legislate, and within whose limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised);

3.               the named Defendants supra have never been granted any legal standing to sue, or to be sued, by any Act(s) of Congress, denying this Court original jurisdiction in the first instance;  jurisdiction can be raised at any time;

4.               prior to its intervention dated April 22, 2003 A.D., the United States, as such, was not a proper party to the instant action and, prior to April 22, 2003 A.D., the United States had not moved this honorable Court for any relief whatsoever by means of any agent(s) who were duly authorized to appear on its behalf;

5.               neither the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) nor the Office of the United States Attorney (“OUSA”) had any valid power(s) of attorney to represent any of the named Defendants supra before this Court, in the first instance;  see Tenth Amendment in the U.S. Constitution;

6.               neither DOJ nor OUSA had any limited power(s) of attorney to represent any of the named Defendants supra before this Court, in the first instance;  see Tenth Amendment;

7.               Messrs. Michael J. Yamaguchi, Jay R. Weill and David L. Denier did not enjoy any lawful powers of attorney to represent the named Defendants supra;

8.               all pleadings allegedly filed and served by Messrs. Yamaguchi, Weill and Denier supra failed to state any claim(s) upon which relief could be granted by this Court;

9.               Mr. Jay R. Weill is presently in violation of the McDade Act at 28 U.S.C. 530B, and of §§ 6126 and 6127 of the California Business and Professions Code (“CBPC”) ‑‑ misdemeanor and contempt of court, respectively ‑‑ for having failed to certify an oath of office upon any license to practice law in the State of California, as required by CBPC § 6067;

10.          lacking the requisite license to practice law, Mr. Jay R. Weill was never lawfully admitted to practice before this United States District Court for the Northern District of California, or any other federal court, for that matter;

11.          in the absence of any statutes creating a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), Cross-Defendant John C. Alden presently does not have, and never did have, any liability to the United States, nor to the United States of America, for federal income taxes imposed by IRC subtitle A;  and,

12.          for all of the verifiable reasons stated above, a demonstrable fraud was committed upon this honorable Court, nullifying all subsequent decisions made by this Court under false and rebuttable premises in the instant case.


INCORPORATION OF EXHIBIT

Cross-Defendant John C. Alden hereby attaches Exhibit “A”, incorporates same by reference, as if set forth fully here, and also demands mandatory judicial Notice of same, pursuant to Rule 201(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence.  The term “shall” in said Rule has a mandatory, imperative meaning, leaving no room for discretion here.

 

REMEDY REQUESTED

     All premises having been duly considered, Cross-Defendant John C. Alden respectfully moves this honorable Court for an ORDER:

(1)          vacating this Court’s ORDER dated September 13, 1994 A.D.;

(2)          vacating the corresponding JUDGMENT entered in the Clerk’s official docket on September 15, 1994 A.D.;

(3)          dismissing the instant case without prejudice as to Cross‑Defendant John C. Alden, and without prejudice as to all named Co‑Plaintiffs;  and,

(4)          dismissing the instant case with prejudice as to additional Cross‑Defendants the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, the County of Alameda, and the State of California Franchise Tax Board.


VERIFICATION

 

I, John C. Alden, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).  See Supremacy Clause in pari materia with all provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are the supreme Law of the Land, like 28 U.S.C. 1746).

 

 

Dated:   _____________________________________________________________

 

 

Signed: 

         _____________________________________________________________

Printed: John C. Alden, Sui Juris, Cross-Defendant In Propria Persona,

Citizen of California State and Federal Witness (18 U.S.C. 1512, 1513)

(expressly not a “citizen of the United States” [sic])

 

See Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914;  4 USCS 1983;

    and Wadleigh v. Newhall, 136 F. 941 (CC Cal, 1905).

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice nunc pro tunc Jan. 1, 1988 A.D.


PROOF OF SERVICE

 

I, John C. Alden, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that I am at least 18 years of age, a Citizen of ONE OF the United States of America, and that I personally served the following document(s):

VERIFIED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER:

FRCP Rules 60(b)(4), 60(b)(6);

Arising Under Clause;  28 U.S.C. §§ 530B, 1331;

and FREv Rule 201(d)

 

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first class United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to the following:

 

Amy Alden

c/o 350 – 30th Street, Suite 444

Oakland 94609-3426

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Mary Alden

c/o 350 – 30th Street, Suite 444

Oakland 94609-3426

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Laurie Alden

c/o 350 – 30th Street, Suite 444

Oakland 94609-3426

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

John Alden, Jr.

c/o 350 – 30th Street, Suite 444

Oakland 94609-3426

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Residential Mortgage Division

720 East Wisconsin Avenue

Milwaukee 53202-4797

WISCONSIN, USA

 

 

 

 

[Please continue next page.]


Donald R. White

Assessor/Tax Collector

Alameda County

1221 Oak Street, Room 131

Oakland 94612

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Office of the U.S. Attorney

Financial Litigation Unit

P.O. Box 36055

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco 94102

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

United States Marshals Service

Attention:  Cheryl A. Koel,

Supervising Deputy U.S. Marshal

Civil/NASAF Section

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco 94102

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Jack Newman (or successor)

Deputy Attorney General

Department of Justice

State of California

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento 94244-2550

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Courtesy copies:

 

Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong        Glen L. Moss

United States District Judge        Moss & Murphy

c/o Clerk of Court                  1297 “B” Street

United States District Court        Hayward 94541

450 Golden Gate Avenue              CALIFORNIA, USA

San Francisco 94102

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

 

[See USPS Publication #221 for addressing instructions.]

 

 

Dated:   _____________________________________________________________

 

 

Signed: 

         _____________________________________________________________

Printed: John C. Alden, Sui Juris, Cross-Defendant In Propria Persona,

Citizen of California State and Federal Witness (18 U.S.C. 1512, 1513)

(expressly not a “citizen of the United States” [sic])

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice nunc pro tunc Jan. 1, 1988 A.D.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit “A”:

 

“31 Questions and Answers about

the Internal Revenue Service”

 

Revision 3.2

 

Written and Certified

under Penalty of Perjury

 

by

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General,

Qualified Federal Witness and

Webmaster, Supreme Law Library:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm