NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST

 

 

TO:       Clerk of Court et al.

          Superior Court of California

          P.O. Box 120128

          San Diego 92112-0128

          CALIFORNIA, USA

 

FROM:     Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Plaintiff and Relator:

          Superior Court of California #GIC807057

 

DATE:     January 11, 2008 A.D.

 

SUBJECT:  PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT,

          ON INFORMATION (dated January 7, 2008 A.D.)

 

 

Greetings Clerks of Court:

 

I was required to REFUSE another instance of mail fraud by one or more members of your staff today, for the following reasons.  These are all reasons which you and your entire staff either know, or should know, already concerning Civil RICO case number GIC807057:

 

·                     the Superior Court enjoys original jurisdiction (see attached);

 

·                     the case was NOT removed to any federal courts, contrary to false pretenses fabricated and maintained by known impostors;

 

·                     not one defense attorney has a valid license to practice law;

 

·                     the assigned “judge” never had a license to practice law either, creating an obvious and irreparable conflict of interest;

 

·                     federal court personnel also turned up without credentials;

 

·                     those same federal personnel are identified as Named Defendants responsible for one or more of the alleged RICO violations, thus creating still more obvious conflicts of interest;

 

·                     the case was NOT transferred to the U.S. District Court in Sacramento, nor to any other federal court, for that matter;

 

·                     VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS had already been filed against named personnel of the U.S. District Court in Sacramento (see first 3 CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS) as required by 18 U.S.C. 4 (misprision);

 

·                     all CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS are essential parts of the verified body of evidence already filed in Superior Court #GIC807057;  and,

 

·                     Named Defendants have absolutely no right to dismiss any complaints which formally charge them with racketeering.  None!

DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE

 

Accordingly, formal demand is hereby made of you immediately to present copies of this NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST to all current and future members of your clerical staff, with the added directive to cease and desist from any further acts of mail fraud, docket tampering, witness retaliation, obstruction of justice, conspiracy, and/or aiding and abetting any conspiracy(s) to engage in a pattern of racketeering activities, which the INITIAL COMPLAINT and all subsequently court filings have already alleged in proper form and in sufficient detail.

 

Notice to principals is notice to agents.

 

Notice to agents is notice to principals.

 

VERIFICATION

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Plaintiff in the above entitled action, hereby verify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1) (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are supreme Law of the Land, notwithstanding anything in the Constitutions or Laws of California to the contrary.  See Supremacy Clause.)

 

 

Dated:   January 11, 2008 A.D.

 

 

Signed:  /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

         ____________________________________________________________

Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Relator In Propria Persona

         Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)