|
Dear Friends,
I must be doing something right, finally, because the
above is
the letter which I received today from Mr. Thomas
E. McCarthy,
Foreman of the Grand Jury for the County of
San Diego.
If you have been following the latest news in my Civil
RICO case
now pending before the Superior Court of
California, there was
a recent rash of mail fraud
originating from the Office of the
Presiding Judge. A
Deputy District Attorney recognized fraud
in their
correspondence, and recommended that I bring the
matter to
the attention of the State Attorney General's office.
On the same day that I hand-delivered evidence of mail
fraud
to the State Attorney General's office in downtown
San Diego,
they referred the matter to the State AG's
office in Sacramento.
Also, the Sheriffs in the county courthouse also
recommended
that I consider filing a complaint with the
Grand Jury. I have
now submitted my complaint on
their official Complaint Form here:
And, the Sheriffs also kindly served on the Presiding
Judge's Office
my DEMAND for the identity of the author of
the fraudulent
correspondence which I received from their
office. To date,
personnel in that Office have
refused to reveal the identity(s)
of the author(s) of that
fraudulent letter.
You could all help me a LOT by writing promptly to Mr.
McCarthy --
to explain that it is of utmost importance to
the People of California,
and to the entire nation, that I
be guaranteed an opportunity to
try my Civil RICO case
before a jury of my peers.
A JURY TRIAL IS MY FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT!
The federal government had their chance, and they blew it
-- BADLY!
This is not a lot to ask, because my attempts to try my
case before
a federal trial jury were entirely obstructed
by federal employees,
many of whom turned up withOUT the
requisite credentials;
and those federal employees were
likewise aided and abetted
by numerous attorneys who turned
up withOUT the licenses
that are required by the California
State Bar Act:
Moreover, my federal case was "coercively" referred to
a
man alleging falsely to be a federal Magistrate,
when
25 years of Ninth Circuit cases have held that such
a
referral violates the U.S. Constitution AND the
Federal
Magistrates Act, particularly when the consent of
all
parties was never obtained:
On the legal merits, I do strongly believe that the grand
jury
needs to be informed that Congress intended for
private
attorneys general to step into the role I have now
assumed,
in particular because Congress found that there is
a shortage
of public prosecutors sufficiently qualified to
investigate and
prosecute organized crime syndicates:
In particular, after the RICO laws were amended, criminal
copyright
infringement became a RICO predicate act,
warranting triple damages
on top of the actual damages I
deserve from such infringements.
Since State courts have original jurisdiction of Civil
RICO claims,
it stands to reason that the county grand jury
would also have
the power and authority to pursue such
investigations, if and when
local Districts Attorney either
decline and/or are not qualified
to pursue them
officially.
I don't know if it will ultimately make any difference to
the grand jury,
one way or the other, but I don't think it
could hurt if you explained
to them that the restitution I
deserve is now intended to be used
for charitable purposes,
and to help the People of San Diego
in particular.
My spiritual values prevent me from spending such
sums on
selfish purposes.
Please take the time to write to the Foreman at the
following address
(preferably with AFFIDAVITs attesting to
my qualifications):
Mr. Thomas E. McCarthy, Foreman
San Diego County Grand
Jury
Hall of Justice
330 W. Broadway, Suite 477
San
Diego 92101-3830
CALIFORNIA, USA
Reference: Grand Jury File # 2003/04-070
Thank you all very much for your prompt assistance and
support.
If you do find the time to write to the Foreman
above, please
send me a courtesy copy of your
correspondence. I would
appreciate that very
much.
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
| 
