Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness
c/o General Delivery at
2509 North Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state

In Propria Persona

All Rights Reserved
without prejudice





                 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

                       DISTRICT OF ARIZONA


In Re:                          )  Case No. #96-01624-TUC
                                )
Dr. and Mrs. Eugene A. Burns,   )  APPLICATION FOR
Debtors                         )  INTERVENTION OF RIGHT AND
                                )  RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY
                                )
                                )
________________________________)


COMES NOW  Paul Andrew  Mitchell, Sui Juris, Citizen  of  Arizona

state, expressly  not a citizen of the United States, and federal

witness (hereinafter  "Applicant"), to  petition  this  honorable

Court for  intervention of  Right, for  relief from the automatic

stay now in force upon all creditors in the instant case, and for

all  other  relief  which  this  Court  deems  just  and  proper.

Applicant now addresses each relief in the order mentioned:


                      INTERVENTION OF RIGHT

     Pursuant to  Rule  24(a)  of  the  Federal  Rules  of  Civil

Procedure, Applicant  hereby  sets  forth  the  causes  for  this

intervention:

     1.   Applicant  is   not  one  of  the  person(s)  currently

identified as  debtor(s), creditor(s),  counsel(s), or trustee(s)

in the instant case.


   Application for Intervention of Right and Relief from Stay:
                           Page 1 of 6


     2.   Applicant claims  interests relating  to the rights and

properties which are the subject of the instant case.

     3.   Applicant is  so situated  that the  disposition of the

action may,  as a  practical matter, impair or impede Applicant's

ability to protect His own interests.

     4.   The interests  of  the  Applicant  are  not  adequately

represented by the existing party(s) to the instant case.


     Applicant hereby incorporates by reference all statements of

fact expressed  infra, as  if same  were set  forth fully herein.

See Rule  24(a), Intervention  of Right,  in the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure.


                   RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY

     Applicant hereby  moves this honorable Court for relief from

the automatic  stay upon  any  lawsuit(s)  brought  by  Applicant

against Debtors, for the following reasons:

     1.   The automatic stay is not serving its intended purpose,

which is  to freeze Debtors' assets and debts, so that this Court

can deal with them in an orderly way.

     2.   Applicant hereby  makes an  offer to prove that Debtors

have utilized the alias "Sheryl Smith" for fraudulent purposes in

this Court  and in  numerous other  situations.   This alias  was

utilized instead  of a  real human  being  acting  as  a  proper,

adversarial Trustee  to oversee  the business  of New Life Health

Center Company, an unincorporated business trust domiciled in the

Arizona Republic.

     3.   Applicant  also  offers  to  prove  that  Debtors  have

comingled business  funds of  the New  Life Health Center Company

for their own private use and benefit.


   Application for Intervention of Right and Relief from Stay:
                           Page 2 of 6


     4.   After Debtors'  original bankruptcy petition was filed,

Applicant was  damaged  by  Debtors,  and  the  damages  incurred

thereby need  to be  specified and  quantified,  in  a  court  of

competent jurisdiction,  in order  to prioritize  Debtors' actual

debts.

     5.   Freezing Debtors'  debts at  this point in time has the

prejudicial effect  of giving  validity to the false premise that

Debtors owe  nothing to Applicant, when the documentary record to

date proves quite otherwise.

     6.   The activity  stayed will inevitably happen, regardless

of what  this bankruptcy  Court does,  because  the  claim(s)  in

question arose  after Debtors'  original bankruptcy  petition was

first filed.

     7.   Applicant's interest(s)  in the  property(s) owned,  or

possessed, by  Debtors are currently being harmed by the stay, in

part because  Debtors refuse  to acknowledge  Applicant's  unpaid

back pay  and  other  unspecified  damages  which  Applicant  has

suffered at  the hands  of Debtors,  and in  part because  of the

probable cause  which Applicant  now has  to charge  Debtors with

fraud,  mail   fraud,  and  other  unspecified  criminal  conduct

perpetrated against Applicant.

     8.   Applicant also  submits a formal, standing objection to

the discharge  of all  Debtors'  debts  which  have  arisen  from

willful or  malicious acts, debts resulting from fraudulent acts,

such as  mail fraud,  perjury and/or lying on the official record

of the  instant case,  and  debts  arising  from  deprivation  of

Applicant's fundamental Rights and/or other criminal acts.


   Application for Intervention of Right and Relief from Stay:
                           Page 3 of 6


     9.   Applicant also takes this opportunity to provide formal

Notice to all interested party(s) of Applicant's intent to submit

and serve  a Complaint to Determine Dischargeability of Debt, but

only upon final judgment of the exact extent of the damages which

Applicant has suffered at the hands of Debtors to date.

    10.   In particular,  Debtors cannot  discharge fines  and/or

penalties that  a federal, state, or local government has imposed

to punish  Debtors for  violating a  law.   Specifically, Debtors

cannot discharge  restitution payments  that might  be imposed in

criminal cases.   Restitution  is specifically  non-dischargeable

because it  is imposed  against the defendant, as rehabilitation,

rather than to compensate the victim.  See Kelly v. Robinson, 107

S.Ct. 353 (1986).


                    INCORPORATION OF EXHIBIT

     Pursuant to  Rule 201(d)  of the  Federal Rules of Evidence,

Applicant hereby incorporates by reference the attached AFFIDAVIT

OF DEFAULT  AND OF  PROBABLE CAUSE  IN RE  DR. AND MRS. EUGENE A.

BURNS as  previously filed  in Mitchell v. Nordbrock, Pima County

Consolidated Justice  Court, case  number #CV-97-3438,  as if the

same were set forth fully herein.

     Said AFFIDAVIT addresses Applicant's diligent and good faith

efforts to  determine the  true identity and physical whereabouts

of "Sheryl  Smith" [sic],  and  to  obtain  back  pay  and  other

unspecified compensation  from Debtors for Applicant's arbitrary,

capricious, and  wrongful termination and other damages inflicted

upon Applicant by Debtors and other named and unnamed accessories

of Debtors.


   Application for Intervention of Right and Relief from Stay:
                           Page 4 of 6


                          VERIFICATION

I, Paul  Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the  "United States" (federal government), that the above

statement of  facts is true and correct, according to the best of

My current  information, knowledge,  and belief,  so help Me God,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).


Dated:  May 15, 1997

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


   Application for Intervention of Right and Relief from Stay:
                           Page 5 of 6


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the  "United States," that I am at least 18 years of age,

a Citizen  of one  of the  United States  of America,  and that I

personally served the following document(s):

             APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT,
                 AND RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first

class United  States Mail,  with  postage  prepaid  and  properly

addressed to the following:


Dr. and Mrs. Eugene A. Burns
c/o 4500 E. Speedway, #27
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE

United States Trustee
c/o U.S. Bankruptcy Court
110 South Church Street, Suite 8112
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE

Creditors' Committee
In re: Dr. and Mrs. Eugene A. Burns
c/o United States Trustee
110 South Church Street, Suite 8112
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE


Executed on May 15, 1997:


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
______________________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

[See USPS Publication 221 for addressing instructions.]


   Application for Intervention of Right and Relief from Stay:
                           Page 6 of 6


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

In Re Burns Bankruptcy