Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness
c/o General Delivery at
2509 North Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state

In Propria Persona

All Rights Reserved
without prejudice





                 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

                       DISTRICT OF ARIZONA


In Re:                          )  Case No. #96-01624-TUC
                                )
Dr. and Mrs. Eugene A. Burns    )  3rd SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION
                                )  FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT, FOR
                                )  RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY
                                )  AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY
                                )  JUDICIAL NOTICE:
________________________________)
                                )  Rule 201(d), Federal Rules
Paul Andrew Mitchell,           )  of Evidence;  Rule 4001,
                                )  Local Bankruptcy Rules;
          Movant,               )  Full Faith and Credit Clause
                                )
     v.                         )
                                )
Dr. and Mrs. Eugene A. Burns,   )
                                )
                                )
          Respondents.          )
________________________________)


COMES NOW  Paul Andrew  Mitchell, Sui  Juris, Citizen  of Arizona

state, expressly  not a  citizen of  the United  States ("federal

citizen"), and federal witness (hereinafter "Movant"), to provide

formal Notice to all interested party(s), and to demand mandatory

judicial notice  by this honorable Court, pursuant to Rule 201(d)

of the  Federal Rules  of Evidence  and the Full Faith and Credit

Clause, of the following documents, to wit:


       Third Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 1 of 9


     1.   CONFIDENTIAL MEMO  to Neil  Nordbrock from Paul Andrew,
          Mitchell, B.A.,  M.S., Counselor at Law, dated June 22,
          1996, Subject: More Problems (bold emphasis added);

     2.   NOTICE AND DEMAND  to  Dr. Eugene A. Burns, D.C., N.D.,
          New Life Health Center Company, 4500 E. Speedway, Suite
          #27, Tucson  [zip  code  exempt],  ARIZONA STATE,  from
          Paul Andrew,  Mitchell, B.A.,  M.S., Citizen of Arizona
          state, Counselor  at Law,  and federal  witness,  dated
          July 25, 1996.

     The  documents   itemized  above  are  attached  hereto  and

incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.

     Movant wishes  to direct  the attention  of  this  honorable

Court specifically  to the  time proximity  of said  CONFIDENTIAL

MEMO, to  the exact date on which Movant was forced to vacate the

offices of  the New  Life Health  Center  Company  at  4500  East

Speedway, Suite  27,  Tucson,  Arizona  state;    said  date  was

Thursday, July 25, 1996.  See document 2., itemized above.


                          VERIFICATION

I, Paul  Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the  "United States" (federal government), that the above

statements of fact are true and correct, according to the best of

My current  information, knowledge,  and belief,  so help Me God,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).


Dated:  May 27, 1997


Respectfully submitted

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without prejudice


       Third Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 2 of 9


                        CONFIDENTIAL MEMO


TO:       Neil Nordbrock

FROM:     Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
          Counselor at Law

DATE:     June 22, 1996

SUBJECT:  More Problems


     My current  hypothesis is  that there  is, indeed,  a  power
struggle going  on within New Life, and I am thrust into it willy
nilly.   I do  contribute to  that struggle, mostly because of my
aggressive style,  without meaning to.  I have been a warrior for
a long time.  I will work on my style;  I am due for a change.

     Let me  begin by  saying that  I could not run this company,
even if  I tried.  If I had to step in as a temporary manager, it
could only  work if  the whole  staff pitched  in and adjusted in
good faith  and warm  hearts, with  you as the premier example of
both.

     That is  my introduction  to informing  you that  I came  in
today  to   a  40%  pay  cut  ($300/week  now;    was  $500/week;
difference is  200/500 =  0.40).   Either Gene  is doing this sua
sponte, or  he is  consulting with  others in  the company, but I
know you  too well to think that you would punish me in this way,
or even  put the idea on the table, knowing me as you do.  I have
been blamed for the terror which has come down as a result of the
arrest warrant,  and that  blame is undeserved.  I have also been
blamed for  "being out of touch" (at 35,000 feet) when a deal was
being negotiated  with the  help of  the FBI,  and that  blame is
undeserved.   Now I  have seen  a  subsistence  wage  drastically
reduced, without  a hearing or a warning.  Neil, I know you treat
your dogs much better than that;  I can see it in their eyes.

     Second big  item:  before I put this question to Gene, would
you be  willing to  tell me  privately if, and when, Sheryl Smith
authorized Gene  to rubber  stamp checks  and Trust  minutes?  If
Gene has  NOT been  authorized to  do so by Sheryl Smith, I think
you and  I need  to look  at this  delicate situation and fix it,
immediately.   If I  was appointed  an officer of the Trust under
authority of a rubber stamp, and that stamp was not authorized by
the Person  whose name  is on  that stamp,  then we need to clean
this up  absolutely as  soon as possible.  I hope you agree.  The
minutes were  put into the Court record, and the Judge recognized
the appointment;   that  appointment is the ONLY thread we've got
at the  moment to  salvage  my  briefs,  because  the  Court  has
recognized me  as an  officer and allowed me to address the Court
in that  capacity;   that implies  filing briefs on behalf of the
Trust.   If it  doesn't, then  the "law"  is being enforced quite
arbitrarily and capriciously.
                                            [bold emphasis added]


       Third Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 3 of 9


     Third big  item:  if Gene has decided to go his own way with
a  licensed   bar  member,   then  it   raises  questions   about
attorney/client privilege.   Not  that I would ever want to be an
ATTORNey,  but   there   is   the   question   of   privacy   and
confidentiality.   If I  am NOT  his Counsel  of choice any more,
then I  cannot claim the privacy privilege as far as his personal
affairs are  concerned.   This means  that I  can  be  called  to
testify against  him, and  the United  States can  put me in jail
under the  recalcitrant witness  statute, if  I refuse to testify
against him.   I  have seen  it happen  before,  and  Roll  won't
hesitate to do it, just to retaliate against me for all the B-A-D
things I wrote and filed about ATTORNeys, not to mention the mail
fraud sting.   If  the rubber  stamp is not authorized, you and I
need to  solve this problem with the maximum benefit to the Trust
and Gene,  and do  so as soon as possible, for damage control, if
nothing else.

     Fourth item  (also big):   What  are your thoughts about the
timing of  a Trust  action to  restrain the delivery of books and
records to  the grand  jury?   Richard McDonald was as sure as He
has ever  been that  our strong  suit now  is the  non-disclosure
contract.   I would see some form of adversary action, not before
Roll, because I will recommend that we file a Judicial Misconduct
Complaint, under  28 U.S.C.  372(c), automatically  recusing  him
from the  case.   The grounds  for this complaint are 75 felonies
(25 pleadings  each  proving  mail  fraud,  jury  tampering,  and
obstruction of  justice), not  to mention all the other offenses.
To beef  up this  Complaint, we  should  consider  also  a  plain
criminal complaint, filed with the FBI, maybe with Gene's friend.
The Marshals  in L.A.  told us that they no longer have authority
to intake  such complaints  any more  (and they were pissed about
that).   This would  be a  good test  for this  FBI Agent's  true
loyalties;    that  may open  Gene's eyes  a little more.  We can
turn this  crank against every new judge who comes along, perhaps
forcing a Circuit Judge onto the case, or a dismissal.

     Anyway, these  are some  very heavy  issues, which  you will
need time to consider.  Get back to me when you have had a chance
to review  and think  about these  issues.   Thanks for coming by
yesterday evening;  your support means a lot to me.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law

email:    supremelawfirm@altavista.net

website:  http://supremelaw.com


       Third Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 4 of 9


Certified U.S. Mail                   c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Serial Number P-475-744-607           Tucson [zip code exempt]
Return Receipt Requested              ARIZONA STATE
Restricted Delivery Requested
                                      July 25, 1996

Dr. Eugene A. Burns, D.C., N.D.
New Life Health Center Company
4500 E. Speedway, Suite #27
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE

Subject:  Wrongful Discharge


                        NOTICE AND DEMAND

Dear Gene:

     This is  a formal  notice to  You that  I have  vacated  the
business office  which the Trust was providing to Me at the above
location.  I have left the two office keys on the shelves mounted
on  the  wall  adjacent  to  the  office  hallway,  next  to  the
refrigerator.   I have  given Susan Shew Your copy of Black's Law
Dictionary and  the  three  volumes  on  banking  law  which  You
purchased (one 3-ring binder was never shipped by the publisher).
If You  are missing  anything else, please let Me know in writing
at once,  and I  will return it immediately if I agree that it is
Yours and  if I took it by mistake when I had to move out on such
short notice.

     This  is  also  My  formal  demand  that  You  perform  Your
obligations to  Me in  My capacity  as Vice  President for  Legal
Affairs of  New  Life  Health  Center  Company.    The  following
compensation is due to Me:

     last pay check, dated 6/30/96, was $300.00,
     which is $200.00 short of My last full paycheck   $200.00

     pay due for period 7-1-96 to  7-8-96              $500.00

     pay due for period 7-8-96 to  7-15-96             $500.00

     pay due for period 7-15-96 to 7-22-96             $500.00

     pay due for period 7-22-96 to 7-25-96
     (pro rated 4/5 x $500.00)                         $400.00
                                                       -------

     Subtotal:                                       $2,100.00


     I also  demand that  You compensate  Me  for  the  following
unspecified damages:

     1.   You violated the non-disclosure agreement which You had
          with the Trust, and were fully aware when You signed it
          that criminal  liability attached to violations of said


       Third Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 5 of 9


          agreement.   You filed this non-disclosure agreement in
          federal  district   court  in  Tucson,  Arizona,  under
          penalty of  perjury, and  utilized it  as  an  argument
          justifying  Your  refusal  to  disclose  records  to  a
          federal grand jury.

     2.   My fundamental  Right to privacy was also violated when
          You violated the Trust's non-disclosure agreement.

     3.   You were  negligent for  failing to provide Me with the
          option to  disclose My  cancelled pay checks, or not to
          disclose them,  to outside persons.  In Tim's presence,
          I witnessed You culling cancelled checks which You felt
          would incriminate  You before  a  federal  grand  jury,
          because of  trust funds  which You co-mingled with Your
          personal account(s) for Your own personal benefit.

     4.   My discharge  was arbitrary, capricious, and just plain
          wrong, because  You and others around You blamed Me for
          the consequences  that resulted  from Your  failure  to
          appear in  court, and Your decision to surrender to the
          FBI with  a bar member over My objections and/or when I
          was in-flight on Your behalf to the Ninth Circuit Court
          of Appeals.   You  complained that I was "out of touch"
          when I was at 35,000 feet en route to San Francisco, to
          file pleadings for Your Emergency Motion.

     5.   As a  consequence of  the painful  and unnecessary  ill
          will which  resulted from  Your actions described in 4.
          above, My  professional  reputation  has  been  damaged
          because of  the requirement  that I  now explain why My
          tenure  at   the  Trust  was  terminated  so  abruptly,
          arbitrarily, capriciously, and wrongfully.

     6.   In front  of three  witnesses, You openly admitted that
          You were considering a guilty plea in anticipation of a
          federal grand  jury indictment.   In  light of  all the
          conclusive evidence  which I  presented to You to prove
          that there  are  no  federal  income  tax  statutes  to
          violate (e.g.  IRC 7851(a)(6)(A)),  You must  have  had
          some other  criminal statute(s)  in mind.  I reserve My
          Right to  hold You  personally liable to Me for all the
          unnecessary pain and suffering which Your admission has
          caused to Me.

     7.   You agreed  to pursue  the Petition  for a Rehearing En
          Banc and,  upon that  agreement, I proceeded to prepare
          the necessary  Petition to the Ninth Circuit, which You
          then decided  not to file.  This had the consequence of
          destroying most,  if not  all, of  the legal foundation
          which I  had prepared  on behalf of the Trust and other
          American People  similarly situated,  preventing  other
          Trust officers,  all other co-workers, and the American
          People in  general from  ever enjoying  the benefits of
          that foundation, which was prepared as much for Them as
          it was for You.


       Third Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 6 of 9


     8.   You aided  and abetted in an act of wire fraud upon Me,
          when You allowed Susan Shew to use My name, without any
          signature, on  a work  order which  She faxed  from her
          home to  E-Z  Messenger  Service,  and  then  You  made
          excuses for her failure to get prior permission from Me
          to use  My name  in that  fashion.  When I attempted to
          investigate this  wire fraud  by  presenting  You  with
          written evidence of it, You fell silent.

     9.   You discharged  Me without the benefit of a termination
          notice from  the Trustee  of  New  Life  Health  Center
          Company, making it necessary for Me to question whether
          or not  You had any authority to do so.  My appointment
          contract was signed by the Trustee, so I am entitled to
          proceed on  the basis  of  this  proof  that  only  the
          Trustee had  authority to hire and fire officers of the
          Trust.

     10.  I am  currently entitled  to two  percent (2%)  of  the
          gross revenues to be derived from Internet sales of New
          Life Health  Center's products and services, because of
          the agreement  which You  made with Me to that end, and
          because My  computer  expertise  helped  to  open  that
          opportunity for the Trust.  I must proceed on the basis
          of the  presumption that the Trust now has no intention
          of ever  performing under  this agreement, resulting in
          further damages still to Me.

     11.  You violated  My fundamental  Right to personal privacy
          when  you   stated  that  I  had  not  been  using  the
          condominium which  you  helped  Me  to  rent,  and  you
          demanded that  I disclose  my "plans"  to you  and  the
          landlord, Neal  Manning, at  once.  This put Me under a
          cruel and  unusual punishment,  on top  of the wrongful
          discharge and  the demand  that I  vacate  the  Trust's
          business office.  Was it Your intention to throw Me out
          onto the  street and,  if so, for what specific conduct
          by Me?

     12.  I must  now waste the set of business cards which I had
          printed at My own expense, because they exhibit fax and
          telephone numbers which are in Your business office.


     I will  look forward  to knowing that the federal grand jury
in the  matter of  New Life  Health Center  Company  has  decided
against issuing  any indictments  against You  or the  Trust,  in
large part  because of  all the  many overtime hours of difficult
and productive  work which  I performed  on behalf  of You,  Your
Spouse, and the Trust.

     As you  already know,  this work is now a matter of official
record in  the United States District Court, Judicial District of
Arizona, Tucson,  U.S.D.C.  Case  Number  #GJ-95-1-6-JMR,  Appeal
Number #96-16145.


       Third Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 7 of 9


     For the  record, I  hope you  will tell  the truth about the
many times  You complimented Me for all that work, and encouraged
Me to  continue with the chosen strategy, particularly while that
work was  being done  in Your  presence and under Your direct and
immediate supervision.


                       NOTICE OF DEADLINE

     If, within  ten (10)  days, I  do not  receive  from  You  a
written offer  of compensation  and compromise  for  all  of  the
damages to date which are itemized above, I will take appropriate
action to enforce My Rights.


                          VERIFICATION

     I hereby  certify, under  penalty of perjury, that the above
statement of  facts are  true and  correct, to  the  best  of  My
current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God.

     Thank You for Your cooperation and consideration.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state,
Counselor at Law, and federal witness

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

copies:   Neil Nordbrock, witness
          Herb Crawford, witness
          Todd Jones, Snell & Wilmer
          litigation files

email:    supremelawfirm@altavista.net

website:  http://supremelaw.com


       Third Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 8 of 9


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul  Andrew,  Mitchell,  Sui  Juris,  hereby  certify,  under

penalty of  perjury, under  the laws  of  the  United  States  of

America, without the "United States" (federal government), that I

am at  least 18  years of  age, a  Citizen of  one of  the United

States of  America, and  that I  personally served  the following

document(s):

    3rd SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT,
             FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY AND
              DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE:
             Rule 201(d), Federal Rules of Evidence;
                Rule 4001, Local Bankruptcy Rule;
                  Full Faith and Credit Clause

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first

class United  States Mail,  with  postage  prepaid  and  properly

addressed to the following:


Dr. and Mrs. Eugene A. Burns
c/o 4500 E. Speedway, #27
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE

United States Trustee
c/o U.S. Bankruptcy Court
110 South Church Street, Suite 8112
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE

Creditors' Committee
In re: Dr. and Mrs. Eugene A. Burns
c/o United States Trustee
110 South Church Street, Suite 8112
Tucson [zip code exempt]
ARIZONA STATE


[See USPS Publication #221 for addressing instructions.]


Executed on May 27, 1997:


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew, Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


       Third Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
                          Page 9 of 9


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

In Re Burns Bankruptcy