Mr. Chris Case, Sui Juris
Citizen of Florida state
c/o general delivery
Key West [zip code exempt]
FLORIDA STATE

In Propria Persona

All Rights Reserved
without prejudice

In Equity



                 CIRCUIT COURT OF FLORIDA STATE

                          MONROE COUNTY


Chris Case,               ) Case No. 97-441-CA-18
                          )
     Plaintiff,           ) VERIFIED PETITION IN EQUITY FOR
                          ) TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER:
     v.                   )
                          ) Fifth Amendment, due process clause;
Pier House Joint Venture, ) Universal Declaration of Human Rights
                          ) and International Covenant on Civil
     Respondent.          ) and Political Rights, enacted with
                          ) with explicit reservations
__________________________)


COMES NOW  Chris Case,  Sui  Juris,  Citizen  of  Florida  state,

expressly not a citizen of the United States ("federal citizen"),

and  Plaintiff   in  the   above  entitled   matter  (hereinafter

"Plaintiff"), to  petition this  honorable Court  for a Temporary

Restraining  Order   ("TRO"),   temporarily   to   restrain   the

Respondent, all  of its  officers,  employees,  agents,  and  all

interested party(s) who may assert a claim in the instant matter,

from converting  the payment  of funds, now owed to Plaintiff for

His labor  performed under  a lawful contract with Respondent for

same, to any third party, without due process of law, and without

a court-ordered  warrant of distraint having been duly issued and

properly served  upon Plaintiff and Respondent, authorizing same;

and for all other relief which this Court deems just and proper.


  Verified Petition in Equity for Temporary Restraining Order:
                           Page 1 of 5


     Plaintiff respectfully  wishes  to  request  this  honorable

Court to  take formal  judicial notice of the fact that Plaintiff

is proceeding  In Propria  Persona in  the instant  case, and not

"Pro Se".   The  term "Se" is a neuter Latin pronoun which refers

to a fictitious and/or juristic entity, and not to a living human

being who  is competent to handle matters of law and equity which

arise in  His own  life.  See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520

(1972).   Plaintiff is  not "representing" Himself, because to do

so is  to  stand  in  someone  else's  place,  as  that  Person's

substitute.   Plaintiff cannot stand as a substitute for Himself.

Lex non cogit impossibilia.  See also Sixth Amendment.

     Plaintiff now  has probable cause to believe that Respondent

intends  to  breach  the  labor  contract  which  Respondent  has

consummated with  Plaintiff  for  the  provision  of  Plaintiff's

professional services to Respondent and its several customers.

     Plaintiff submits,  for the  careful consideration  of  this

honorable Court,  that a  valid contract  cannot be sustained, if

either party intends to violate the supreme Law of the Land under

color of one or more terms of said contract.  Fraud vitiates even

the most  solemn promise(s).  Confer also at "Anticipatory breach

of contract" in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.

     Waivers of  fundamental Rights  will never  be presumed, and

can only  be  established  by  competent  evidence  of  conscious

choices  which   Plaintiff  has  made  knowingly,  intentionally,

voluntarily,  and   by  means  of  intelligent  acts  done  "with

sufficient awareness of all the relevant circumstances and likely

consequences".   See Brady  v. U.S.,  397 U.S. 742 at 748 (1970).

Plaintiff submits that no such competent waiver by Him exists.


  Verified Petition in Equity for Temporary Restraining Order:
                           Page 2 of 5


     Accordingly, Plaintiff submits that the contract in question

exhibits  absolutely   no  competent   waiver(s)  of  Plaintiff's

fundamental Right  to due  process of  law, nor has Plaintiff had

the  benefit  of  due  process  of  law,  in  the  instant  case.

Specifically,  Plaintiff   alleges,  and  offers  to  prove,  the

following four (4) essential facts:


     (1)  Plaintiff has  not been  served or  otherwise presented
          with  any  verified  complaint  or  summons,  notifying
          Plaintiff  of  another  party's  institution  of  legal
          proceedings to authorize the deprivation of Plaintiff's
          Right to work;

     (2)  Plaintiff has  not previously  had  an  opportunity  to
          appear in  a court of competent jurisdiction to present
          and assert  Plaintiff's position  in  re:  Respondent's
          anticipatory breach of the contract in question;

     (3)  Respondent has  not been  served or otherwise presented
          with  any   court-ordered  Warrant   of  Distraint,  as
          required by the holding in United States v. O'Dell, 160
          F.2d 304 (6th Cir. 1947);  and,

     (4)  Plaintiff has retained the assistance of Counsel, whose
          finished work  perfects a  common law  lien superior to
          that of any other allegedly interested third party.


                        REMEDY REQUESTED

     Wherefore, all  premises having been duly considered by this

Court,  Plaintiff   hereby  respectfully   requests  a  Temporary

Restraining ORDER,  lasting thirty  (30)  calendar  days,  to  be

issued upon  Respondent, temporarily  to restrain Respondent, and

all  of  its  officers,  employees,  agents,  and  all  allegedly

interested party(s) who may assert a claim in the instant matter,

from converting  the payment  of funds, now owed to Plaintiff for

His labor  performed under  a lawful contract with Respondent for

same, to  any third party, without due process of law having run,

and without a court-ordered Warrant of Distraint having been duly

issued and properly served upon Respondent, authorizing same.


  Verified Petition in Equity for Temporary Restraining Order:
                           Page 3 of 5


                          VERIFICATION

     I,  Chris   Case,  Sui  Juris,  Citizen  of  Florida  state,

expressly not  a citizen  of the  United States, and Plaintiff in

the above  entitled  matter,  hereby  verify,  under  penalty  of

perjury, under  the laws of the United States of America, without

the "United  States", that  the above  statement of facts is true

and correct,  to the  best of  My current information, knowledge,

and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).


Executed on:  ______________________________________


Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Chris Case
____________________________________________________
Chris Case, Sui Juris
Citizen of Florida state
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


  Verified Petition in Equity for Temporary Restraining Order:
                           Page 4 of 5


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Chris  Case, Sui  Juris,  hereby  certify,  under  penalty  of

perjury, under  the laws of the United States of America, without

the "United  States," that  I am  at least  18 years  of  age,  a

Citizen of  one of  the United  States of  America,  and  that  I

personally served the following document(s):

                 VERIFIED PETITION IN EQUITY FOR
                  TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER:
              Fifth Amendment, due process clause;
            Universal Declaration of Human Rights and
      International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
               enacted with explicit reservations

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first

class United  States Mail,  with  postage  prepaid  and  properly

addressed to the following:


Ms. Joy Smatt, General Manager
Pier House Joint Venture
c/o 1 Duval Street
Key West [zip code exempt]
FLORIDA STATE


Dated:  _________________________________

/s/ Chris Case
__________________________________________
Chris Case, Sui Juris
Citizen of Florida state
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


[See USPS Publication #221 for addressing instructions.]


  Verified Petition in Equity for Temporary Restraining Order:
                           Page 5 of 5


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Chris Case v. Pier House Joint Venture