NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR

EXHIBITION OF WRITTEN OATH

TO: Dwight C. Holton

c/o Office of the U.S. Attorney

1000 S.W. Third Avenue, Suite 600

Portland 97204-2902

OREGON, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

c/o 117 East Louisa Street

Seattle 98102-3203

WASHINGTON STATE, USA

DATE: July 25, 2011 A.D.

SUBJECT: written OATH required by ORS 9.250(2) and 9.460 (duties)

Greetings Dwight C. Holton,

We specifically deny that you were ever a member, in good standing, of the Oregon State Bar. See authorities attached and ORS 9.460(1).

NOTICE

Section 9.250(2) of the Oregon Revised Statutes reads as follows:

The applicant shall execute a written oath that in the practice of law the applicant will support the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this state, and be of faithful and honest demeanor in office. The applicant is entitled to practice as an attorney after the State Court Administrator has received the oath executed under this subsection. [Amended by 1973 c.827 §3; 1981 c.193 §8; 1989 c.1052 §6; 1991 c.726 §4; 1997 c.388 §3]

[bold emphasis added]

A proper Request dated October 8, 2010 A.D. and submitted to the Oregon State Court Administrator supra, under the Oregon Freedom of Information Act, is now PAST DUE for said written OATH.

DEMAND

Formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a true and correct copy of said written OATH to the mailing location shown below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, August 5, 2005 A.D. (approximately ten (10) days hence). Time is of the essence in this matter.

Failure to perform will give us probable cause to charge you with violating 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 912, 1341 and 1962 (for starters). See also 4 U.S.C. 101 (“judicial officer of a State”) in pari materia with Article VI, Clause 3 and the Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are all supreme Law of the Land).

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and

Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

U.S. Mail:

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

c/o Lake Union Mail

117 East Louisa Street

Seattle 98102-3203

WASHINGTON STATE, USA

ORS 9.250 Order for admission;  oath of qualified applicant.

(1) If the Supreme Court finds that an applicant for admission as an attorney is 18 years of age or more, is of good moral character and fit to practice law, and possesses the requisite learning and ability to practice as an attorney in all the courts of this state, the court shall enter an order that the applicant be admitted to practice as an attorney. The order shall specify that admission take effect upon the applicant taking the oath required by subsection (2) of this section.

(2) The applicant shall execute a written oath that in the practice of law the applicant will support the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this state, and be of faithful and honest demeanor in office. The applicant is entitled to practice as an attorney after the State Court Administrator has received the oath executed under this subsection. [Amended by 1973 c.827 §3; 1981 c.193 §8; 1989 c.1052 §6; 1991 c.726 §4; 1997 c.388 §3]

List of pertinent authorities now follows:

Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (“attorneys are officers of the court”); Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1546 (11^th Cir 1993) (“All attorneys, as officers of the court ....”); Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9^th Cir. 1995) (see section “II.”); “Let Us Be Officers of the Court,” by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, 83 ABA Journal 94 (1997); and FRCP Rule 1, Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments (“as officers of the court, attorneys share ....”) [bold emphasis added]