Teresa Giordano, Sui Juris
Citizen of California
c/o Forwarding Agent at:
40960 California Oaks Road, #281
Murrieta 92526
CALIFORNIA, USA
May 1, 2002 A.D.
Gregory Nicolaysen, Esquire
Federal Criminal Defense Attorney
16000 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 500
Encino 91436
CALIFORNIA, USA
Dear Greg,
Please understand that my time is very valuable, just like yours.
I have investigated the pertinent California State laws and I have now exercised my Petition Clause Right to compel production of your license to practice law in the State of California. See First Amendment.
Separately this morning, I faxed to you a copy
of the SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE that the Clerk of the federal court in downtown
Los Angeles issued to you, for production of your license with a valid
certificate of oath indorsed upon that license. Please see Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions
Code (if you have not already done so).
That SUBPOENA is being served upon you via Certified U.S. Mail with return receipt requested.
I am also informed that Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Coded was held to be constitutional in Cohen v. Wright, 22 C. 293 (1863).
A
California court has also declared that our State Legislature does have a right
to impose on attorneys the oath required by Section 6067. See Ex parte Yale, 24
C. 241 (1864), 85 Am. Dec. 62 (1864).
Also, a
California court has ruled that courts do have the power to inquire into the
existence of an attorney’s license, and to dispose the question summarily,
upon motion of an opposing party to dismiss, founded upon the affidavit of the
person or party concerning whom the motion is made. See Clark v. Willett, 35 Cal. 534, 539.
If you
are presenting yourself as an officer of the court, and if you did make any
attempts to represent me at the two (2) hearings held to date, I now believe
that those facts constitute probable cause to charge you formally with two
counts of violating each of Sections 6126 (a misdemeanor) and 6127
(contempt of court).
Moreover,
because my Right to the assistance of Counsel of my choice is a fundamental
Right guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, your violations above have also
necessarily implicated a separate federal offense in violation of 18
U.S.C. 242 (another misdemeanor).
Also,
if you refuse to obey the proper SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE which has been issued
by the Clerk of the federal district court, you will be in contempt of court
once again (count three).
On
April 22, 2002 A.D., I witnessed my Counsel and Private Attorney General
‑‑ Paul Andrew Mitchell ‑‑ demand your license in the
hallway outside the arraignment courtroom.
I specifically remember that you did not produce any license in
response to his demand. Instead, you
walked away and appeared to flee into that courtroom.
Accordingly, for all of the reasons stated
above, I decline to meet with you until the matter of your license to practice
law is finally resolved to my complete and total satisfaction.
If you should need any information from me,
please put your request(s) in writing and transmit those requests via first
class U.S. Mail to the mailing location shown below.
Please be reminded that I also have a fundamental Right to a Republican Form of Government. See the Guarantee Clause in the U.S. Constitution. This means that I am guaranteed the rule of law and not the rule of arbitrary government bureaucrats posing as officers of some State or federal courts.
Thank you, Greg, for your immediate cooperation. I do hope that this letter helps to persuade you of the seriousness which I attach to this matter.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Teresa Giordano
Teresa Giordano, Sui Juris
Citizen of California
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice (UCCA 1207)
U.S. Mail:
c/o Forwarding Agent
40960 California Oaks Road
Box 281
Murrieta 92526
CALIFORNIA, USA