Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

c/o Lake Union Mail

117 East Louisa Street

Seattle 98102-3203

WASHINGTON STATE, USA

 

In Propria Persona

 

All Rights Reserved

Without Prejudice

 

 

 

 

United States District Court

Western District of Washington

At Seattle

 

INTERVAL LICENSING LLC,            )  Case No. 2:11-cv-00711 MJP

                                   )

          Plaintiff,               )

     v.                            )

                                   )

GOOGLE, INC.,                      )

                                   )

          Defendant.               )

-----------------------------------)

United States                      )  NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND

ex relatione                       )  NOTICE OF INTENT,

Paul Andrew Mitchell,              )  BY AFFIDAVIT:

                                   )

          Interpleader.            )  18 U.S.C. 4, 1962;

___________________________________)  28 U.S.C. 1746(1).

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

The United States hereby notoriously appears specially, not generally, and ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General, for the limited purposes of: (1) providing formal Notice to all Proper Parties, and also to all other recipients of the instant NOTICEs, (2) satisfying the legal requirements imposed by the Federal criminal statute at 18 U.S.C. 4 (misprision of felony), and (3) establishing probable cause calling for the conclusion that the suspects named infra are engaged in a pattern of racketeering activities, in violation of the Federal criminal statute at 18 U.S.C. 1962(d).

INCORPORATION OF EVIDENTIARY DOCUMENTS

Relator hereby incorporates true and correct copies of all attached documents by reference, as if all were set forth fully here.

 

NOTICE OF DEFAULT

Relator hereby provides formal Notice to all interested Parties, and to all other recipients of the instant NOTICEs, that each and every NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE, as duly incorporated above, has not been answered and is now IN DEFAULT, as a matter of established fact.

 

NOTICE OF INTENT

Insofar as the facts, as established above, call for the conclusion that the suspects named infra have been racketeering across State lines, specifically by transmitting documents and PROOFS OF SERVICE from offices in California to the Office of the Clerk of this honorable Court, Relator is consequently obligated to lodge a proper and timely VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION, formally charging same with multiple RICO “predicate acts,” including but not limited to mail fraud and wire fraud.  See 18 U.S.C. 1341, 1343, 1961.

 

NOTICE OF RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT

Relator has been investigating Google, Inc. and its officers, after filing an administrative complaint with the Consumer Protection Division in the Washington State Attorney General’s Office.

The latter office has assigned case number #359316 to said complaint.

On February 11, 2010 A.D., Relator’s explanation of his complaint was briefly summarized to the latter office as follows:

Explanation of complaint:

On or about September 25, 2008, Google, Inc. published on the Internet an evidently bona fide offer of $10 Million, which "will be distributed evenly among the winners" of the best ideas submitted to Google's Project 10^100:

 

http://www.project10tothe100.com/index.html

From Spokane I submitted this idea: "worldwide adoption of the goal and committing all resources necessary to realize 1 Gigabit Internet access everywhere on planet Earth."  In answer to the question: "What initial steps are required to get this idea off the ground?" I replied: "A Policy Proposal circulated widely to IT and government sectors, with a strong PR budget to commence aggressive advocacy of this idea."  Yesterday, Google announced plans that implement this idea almost to the letter:

 

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/think-big-with-gig-our-experimental.html

However, Google staff are now saying that "winners" will not receive ANY money, only "good karma", and that the funds offered will be distributed ONLY to organizations, NOT to individuals who submitted winning ideas.  This change strongly suggests false advertising, bad faith and also fraud by Google's management, for having widely distributed this exact language in their original Offer:  "... [T]he $10 million will be distributed evenly among the winners."

 

Subsequently, Relator supplemented the case file in the matter of complaint #359316 supra with much additional documentation, including but not limited to media reports of privacy complaints lodged against Google, Inc. in connection with its “Street View” data acquisition practices;  reports that Google, Inc. have been secretly collaborating with the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”), and possibly also the National Security Agency (“NSA”), for purposes of implementing sophisticated electronic surveillance of the American People;  and, related reports that an Italian court convicted three (3) current and former Google executives of privacy violations, and that a French court has convicted Mr. Eric Schmidt of defamation.

On information and belief, Relator regards these news reports to be factual and accurate.

NOTICE OF VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION

FORMALLY CHARGING ALL PAST AND PRESENT MEMBERS

OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA

More to the merits of Relator’s administrative complaint number #359316 to the Consumer Protection Division of the Washington State Attorney General’s Office, the absence of valid licenses to practice law in the State of California implicates the suspects named infra in all of the criminal violations which Relator previously charged in his VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION (“VCC”), as duly filed and served in California Superior Court case number #GIC807057.

A copy of the latter VCC is also attached hereto and likewise incorporated by reference, as if set forth fully here.

 

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

All premises having been duly considered, Relator hereby recommends the following conclusions of law to the United States (Federal Government) for deliberation by a lawful Federal Grand Jury:

(1)     None of the suspects named infra has a valid license to practice law in the State of California;

(2)     None of the suspects named infra has lawful power of attorney to appear legally on behalf of named Defendant GOOGLE, INC.;

(3)     None of the suspects named infra has any authority to practice law in the State of California, nor in this honorable Court;  and,

(4)     One or more of the suspects named infra, and all of their as yet unnamed accomplices, committed multiple acts of wire fraud by writing, approving, aiding and/or causing misleading and ever changing “Contest Rules” to be published on the Internet and distributed widely via the Internet, all in bad faith.

VERIFICATION

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Relator in the above entitled action, hereby verify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1) (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are supreme Law of the Land, notwithstanding anything in the Constitution or Laws of Washington State to the contrary.  See Supremacy Clause.)

 

 

Dated:   July 28, 2012 A.D.

 

 

Signed:  /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

         ____________________________________________________________

Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Relator In Propria Persona

         Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)


PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that I am at least 18 years of age, a Citizen of ONE OF the United States of America, and that I personally served the following document(s):

NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND

NOTICE OF INTENT:

18 U.S.C. 4, 1962;  28 U.S.C. 1746(1)

 

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first class United States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to the following:

Clerk of Court  (3x)

United States District Court

700 Stewart Street, Suite 2310

Seattle 98101

WASHINGTON STATE, USA

 

Susman Godfrey, LLP

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800

Seattle 98102

WASHINGTON STATE, USA

 

Google, Inc.

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View 94043

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

 

Courtesy Copies:

 

Consumer Protection Division

Washington State Attorney General

800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000

Seattle 98104-3188

WASHINGTON STATE, USA

 

 

I also hereby certify that I electronically served the foregoing by transmitting an electronic copy of same to all electronic mail (“email”) addresses listed or otherwise showing in the attached STIPULATED MOTION TO SERVE AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS, as filed and served by attorneys for the Plaintiff on May 26, 2011.


[Please see USPS Publication #221 for “addressing” instructions.]

 

 

Dated:   July 28, 2012 A.D.

 

 

Signed:  /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

         ____________________________________________________________

Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Relator In Propria Persona

         Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)


Via Email and First Class U.S. Mail

June 21, 2011 A.D.

 

 

NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR

EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE

 

David Carl Drummond, SBN 142642

Google, Inc.

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View 94043

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Subject:  Sections 6002, 6067-6068, 6126-6128

          California Business and Professions Code

 

 

Greetings David Carl Drummond:

 

We specifically deny that you were ever a member, in good standing, of The State Bar of California.  See Section 6002 supra.

 

 

NOTICE

 

Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code reads as follows:

 

Every person on his admission shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and faithfully to discharge the duties of any attorney at law to the best of his knowledge and ability.  A certificate of the oath shall be indorsed upon his license.

[bold emphasis added]

 

DEMAND

Formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a true and correct copy of said certificate of oath to the mailing location as shown below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, July 1, 2011 A.D. (approximately ten (10) days hence).

 

Failure to perform will give us probable cause to charge you with violating Sections 6126 and 6128 of the California Business and Professions Code (both misdemeanors).  See also 4 U.S.C. 101 (“judicial officer of a State”) in pari materia with the Article VI, Clause 3 and the Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are all supreme Law of the Land).


Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and

Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice  (cf. UCC 1-308)

 

U.S. Mail:

 

       Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

       Private Attorney General

   c/o Lake Union Mail

       117 East Louisa Street

       Seattle 98102-3203

       WASHINGTON STATE, USA

 

 

List of pertinent authorities now follows:

 

Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (“attorneys are officers of the court”);  Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1546 (11th Cir 1993) (“All attorneys, as officers of the court ....”);  Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 1995) (see section “II.”);  “Let Us Be Officers of the Court,” by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, 83 ABA Journal 94 (1997);  and FRCP Rule 1, Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments (“as officers of the court, attorneys share ....”)  [bold emphasis added]


Via Email and First Class U.S. Mail

June 21, 2011 A.D.

 

 

NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR

EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE

 

Oleg Elkhunovich, SBN 269238

Susman Godfrey, LLP

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950

Los Angeles 90067

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Subject:  Sections 6002, 6067-6068, 6126-6128

          California Business and Professions Code

 

 

Greetings Oleg Elkhunovich:

 

We specifically deny that you were ever a member, in good standing, of The State Bar of California.  See Section 6002 supra.

 

 

NOTICE

 

Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code reads as follows:

 

Every person on his admission shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and faithfully to discharge the duties of any attorney at law to the best of his knowledge and ability.  A certificate of the oath shall be indorsed upon his license.

[bold emphasis added]

 

DEMAND

Formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a true and correct copy of said certificate of oath to the mailing location as shown below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, July 1, 2011 A.D. (approximately ten (10) days hence).

 

Failure to perform will give us probable cause to charge you with violating Sections 6126 and 6128 of the California Business and Professions Code (both misdemeanors).  See also 4 U.S.C. 101 (“judicial officer of a State”) in pari materia with the Article VI, Clause 3 and the Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are all supreme Law of the Land).


Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and

Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice  (cf. UCC 1-308)

 

U.S. Mail:

 

       Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

       Private Attorney General

   c/o Lake Union Mail

       117 East Louisa Street

       Seattle 98102-3203

       WASHINGTON STATE, USA

 

 

List of pertinent authorities now follows:

 

Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (“attorneys are officers of the court”);  Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1546 (11th Cir 1993) (“All attorneys, as officers of the court ....”);  Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 1995) (see section “II.”);  “Let Us Be Officers of the Court,” by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, 83 ABA Journal 94 (1997);  and FRCP Rule 1, Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments (“as officers of the court, attorneys share ....”)  [bold emphasis added]


Via Email and First Class U.S. Mail

June 21, 2011 A.D.

 

 

NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR

EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE

 

Warren Stuart Heit, SBN 164658

White & Case, LLP

5 Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor

3000 El Camino Real

Palo Alto 94306

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Subject:  Sections 6002, 6067-6068, 6126-6128

          California Business and Professions Code

 

 

Greetings Warren Stuart Heit:

 

We specifically deny that you were ever a member, in good standing, of The State Bar of California.  See Section 6002 supra.

 

 

NOTICE

 

Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code reads as follows:

 

Every person on his admission shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and faithfully to discharge the duties of any attorney at law to the best of his knowledge and ability.  A certificate of the oath shall be indorsed upon his license.

[bold emphasis added]

DEMAND

Formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a true and correct copy of said certificate of oath to the mailing location as shown below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, July 1, 2011 A.D. (approximately ten (10) days hence).

 

Failure to perform will give us probable cause to charge you with violating Sections 6126 and 6128 of the California Business and Professions Code (both misdemeanors).  See also 4 U.S.C. 101 (“judicial officer of a State”) in pari materia with the Article VI, Clause 3 and the Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are all supreme Law of the Land).


Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and

Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice  (cf. UCC 1-308)

 

U.S. Mail:

 

       Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

       Private Attorney General

   c/o Lake Union Mail

       117 East Louisa Street

       Seattle 98102-3203

       WASHINGTON STATE, USA

 

 

List of pertinent authorities now follows:

 

Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (“attorneys are officers of the court”);  Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1546 (11th Cir 1993) (“All attorneys, as officers of the court ....”);  Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 1995) (see section “II.”);  “Let Us Be Officers of the Court,” by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, 83 ABA Journal 94 (1997);  and FRCP Rule 1, Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments (“as officers of the court, attorneys share ....”)  [bold emphasis added]


Via Email and First Class U.S. Mail

June 21, 2011 A.D.

 

 

NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR

EXHIBITION OF CERTIFICATE

 

Wendi Renee Schepler, SBN 197474

White & Case, LLP

5 Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor

3000 El Camino Real

Palo Alto 94306

CALIFORNIA, USA

 

Subject:  Sections 6002, 6067-6068, 6126-6128

          California Business and Professions Code

 

 

Greetings Wendi Renee Schepler:

 

We specifically deny that you were ever a member, in good standing, of The State Bar of California.  See Section 6002 supra.

 

 

NOTICE

 

Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code reads as follows:

 

Every person on his admission shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and faithfully to discharge the duties of any attorney at law to the best of his knowledge and ability.  A certificate of the oath shall be indorsed upon his license.

[bold emphasis added]

DEMAND

Formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a true and correct copy of said certificate of oath to the mailing location as shown below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, July 1, 2011 A.D. (approximately ten (10) days hence).

 

Failure to perform will give us probable cause to charge you with violating Sections 6126 and 6128 of the California Business and Professions Code (both misdemeanors).  See also 4 U.S.C. 101 (“judicial officer of a State”) in pari materia with the Article VI, Clause 3 and the Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are all supreme Law of the Land).


Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and

Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice  (cf. UCC 1-308)

 

U.S. Mail:

 

       Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

       Private Attorney General

   c/o Lake Union Mail

       117 East Louisa Street

       Seattle 98102-3203

       WASHINGTON STATE, USA

 

 

List of pertinent authorities now follows:

 

Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (“attorneys are officers of the court”);  Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1546 (11th Cir 1993) (“All attorneys, as officers of the court ....”);  Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 1995) (see section “II.”);  “Let Us Be Officers of the Court,” by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, 83 ABA Journal 94 (1997);  and FRCP Rule 1, Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments (“as officers of the court, attorneys share ....”)  [bold emphasis added]