[On left margin written vertically:

Please FAX Courtesy Copy to:  (307) 772-2123  Thank you.  PM]

 

Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF   Document 55   Filed 03/20/2014   Page 1 of 4

 

 

Case No. 2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2

 

 

NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY

JUDICIAL NOTICE: FREV Rule 201(c)(2)

 

 

TO:    Hon. Nancy D. Freudenthal, USDC/DWY

 

DATE:  3/14/2014

 

 

Greetings Your Honor:

 

Please accept this pleading for purposes of requiring mandatory judicial notice, pursuant to Rule 201(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, of all the following:

 

(1)     all “Attachments: #1 envelope”, as the latter term occurs at Docket Entry #25, Date Filed: 03/12/2014;

 

(2)     among the latter “Attachments”, the VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION as lodged in the District Court of Wyoming at Cheyenne, formally charging Messrs. James Marcy, Dave guest et al. with multiple Federal felonies;

 

(3)     standing decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court in Johnson v. Zerbst (re: ineffective assistance of counsel ousts the Court of jurisdiction), and Miranda v. Arizona (re: rights secured by the U.S. Constitution:  Art. VI, Sec. 3);

 

(4)     5 CFR 1320.5 (Regulations implementing the Paperwork Reduction Act), and 44 U.S.C. 3512;

 

 

- 1 of 3 –


Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF   Document 55   Filed 03/20/2014   Page 2 of 4

 

 

NAD:  FREV 201(c)(2)

#2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2

 

 

(5)     all requests submitted under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as expressly included among all “Attachments” at (1) above, and related correspondence e.g. from DOJ, whether annotated “REFUSED FOR CAUSE(S)” or not annotated:  5 U.S.C. 552 abbreviated “FOIA”;

 

(6)     the Freedom of Information Act request(s) as the latter occur at Docket Entry #32, and related correspondence e.g. from DOJ, whether annotated as above or not so annotated:  Date Filed:  03/12/2014;

 

(7)     all “Attachments: #1 envelope”, as the latter term occurs at Docket Entry #22, Dated Filed: 02/27/2014;

 

(8)     Relator’s NOTICE OF MISING AND/OR DEFECTIVE CREDENTIALS, as filed and served by the United States ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General, in the case of Hedges et al. v. Obama et al., USDC/SDNY, with 1x written admission by U.S. OPM and 2x written admissions by U.S. OMB (re: Standard Form 61);

 

(9)     all Letters forwarded to Wyoming by USDC-Washington, as the latter occur at Docket Entry #21, Date filed: 02/14/2014;

 

(10)   Docket clerical corrections including, but not limited to, the following:

 

 

- 2 of 3 –


Case 2:14-cr-00027-NDF   Document 55   Filed 03/20/2014   Page 3 of 4

 

 

NAD:  FREV 201(c)(2)

#2:14-CR-00027-NDF-2

 

 

(10a)  at #23 on 03/11/2014,the text “Declaratory Judgments” should be “Declaratory Judgments Act”;

 

(10b)  at #33 on 03/12/2014, the text “Relief for a Enforcement” should be “Relief, FOIA enforcement”:  cf. (5) above;

 

(10c)  at #34 on 03/12/2014, the text “Interlocutary” should be “Interlocutory” as at #23 (see (9a) above);

 

(11)  standing decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland (re: suppression of favorable, exculpatory evidence);  and,

 

(12)  each and every NOTICE AND DEMAND (“NAD”) for disclosure of credentials required by 5 U.S.C. Secs. 2104, 2903, 2906, 3331, 3332, 3333, 5507, and by 28 U.S.C. 453, 544, 951, as expressly included among all “Attachments” at (1) and (7) above, whether annotated “IN DEFAULT” or not so annotated e.g. addressed to Messrs. Harris, McCool, Fisher, and to Ms. Hilliker to date.

 

 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964 (Civil RICO)

(see Rotella v. Wood re: private attorneys general)

 

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)

 

 

- 3 of 3 –