“The Case for Sanctions against

L. Robert Murray, Mark C. Hardee et al.”

There are already numerous reasons to impose formal sanctions on Murray, Hardee et al.; in no particular order, there is evidence of:

(1) Gross negligence by failing to enforce proper credentials for Clerk’s Office personnel;

(2) Jury tampering by entering Federal Grand Jury rooms without all proper credentials; see 28 U.S.C. 544 and U.S. v. Pignatiello;

(3) Conspiring to deprive Paul Andrew Mitchell of “meaningful technical assistance” of Counsel; see 28 U.S.C. 1654;

(4) Conspiring, and being accessories after the fact, to violate 7 of the first 10 Amendments, and two (2) Human Rights Treaties; see 18 U.S.C. 241 (felony), 242 (misdemeanor);

(5) Conspiring with U.S. Marshals to defame Paul Andrew Mitchell with false and misleading descriptions e.g. in jail booking records and in his “U.S. Marshal file” e.g. “EXTREMIST” [sic];

(6) Falsely representing fraudulent “grand jury subpoenas” as valid and lawful Federal Grand Jury “process”;

(7) Commencing malicious and selective prosecution, and causing and maintaining false arrest and false imprisonment;

(8) Being principals, and accessories after the fact, to vicious witness retaliation and concealing Court records, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2, 3, 1513, and 1519;

(9) Depriving Paul Andrew Mitchell of required notice and hearing by failing to serve him with the “MOTION” for a “psychological evaluation”, or with NOTICE of any hearing(s) on said “MOTION”;

(10) Depriving Paul Andrew Mitchell of any hearing(s) on said “MOTION” for “psychological evaluation”;

(11) Conspiring, and being accessories after the fact, to violate Article VI, Clause 3, in the U.S. Constitution (Oath of Office Clause) and all implementing laws and administrative guidelines;

(12) Violations of their own Oaths of Office (if any) as required by applicable Federal and Wyoming State laws e.g. McDade Act, and also 4 U.S.C. 101;

(13) Willful misrepresentation of the “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” [sic] as a Proper Plaintiff, when it clearly lacks legal standing; see 28 U.S.C. 1345 (“United States as plaintiff”);

(14) Conspiring to suppress favorable (exculpatory) evidence during Federal Grand Jury hearings; see Brady v. Maryland;

(15) Conspiring to misrepresent the legislative intents of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

(16) Conspiring to defame Paul Andrew Mitchell as being “delusional,” with intent willfully to obstruct a completely lawful credential investigation, and to misrepresent his pro bono assistance to U.S. Coast Guard Investigations and to other Federal Government personnel and agencies e.g. U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”);

(17) Conspiring to inflict cruel and summary punishment upon Paul Andrew Mitchell with three (3) terms of solitary confinement, and “diesel therapy” via 55 DISCRETE MOVES;

(18) Obstructing correspondence, lawfully addressed to a Federal Grand Jury “Foreperson” pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1504 (last paragraph); see also 18 U.S.C. 1702;

(19) Conspiring to perpetrate tortious interference with the lawful livelihood of Paul Andrew Mitchell, and with his ongoing patent research required to support his utility patent pending at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in Washington, D.C.;

(20) Conspiring to cause indefinite delays and further tortious interference with Paul Andrew Mitchell’s access to graduate-level/Ph.D. education in Computer Science and Law;

(21) Causing further indefinite delays and tortious interference with Paul Andrew Mitchell’s claims against the University of Washington at Seattle (“UW”) for defamation, discrimination, witness retaliation, and obstructing his access to UW’s Summer Sessions in 2009 and 2012 A.D.;

(22) Conspiring to perpetrate a state of war and/or “mixed war” against Paul Andrew Mitchell, in connection with the repeated use of a “nom de guerre” (war name) on all Federal Court “process”;

(23) Conspiring to perpetrate tortious interference with the further development and maintenance of Paul Andrew Mitchell’s Internet website (www.supremelaw.org) and Internet discussion list; and,

(24) Conspiring to force total loss of Paul Andrew Mitchell’s Seattle apartment and all of its normal household contents, and personal computer and telecommunications equipment/network.