FORMAL REQUEST FOR REFERRAL TO

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

 

TO:       Hon. Jeff Sessions

          Office of the Attorney General

          U.S. Department of Justice

          950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

          Washington 20530-0001

          District of Columbia, USA

 

FROM:     Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Damaged Party;

          Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;  and,

          Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

          Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

 

DATE:     April 14, 2017 A.D.

 

SUBJECT:  Administrative Tort Claim to the Executive Office for

          United States Attorneys (hereinafter “EOUSA Tort Claim”)

 

Greetings Attorney General Sessions:

 

I am writing specifically to request formal referral of my pending EOUSA Tort Claim to the most appropriate alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) option, as fully authorized by Acts of Congress including but not limited to 28 U.S.C. section 2672 (to settle any tort claim against the United States).

 

I also write to make a record of facts which call for the conclusion that my EOUSA Tort Claim has been and continues to be obstructed, resulting in further tortious damages to my good name and estate.

 

Very briefly, after submitting a series of FOIA Requests, beginning October 2012, for the credentials required of certain personnel claiming to be U.S. Attorneys and Assistant U.S. Attorneys, all such personnel turned up with missing and fatally defective credentials.

 

The attached documents constitute material evidence that credentials required by the Oath of Office Clause in the U.S. Constitution and by Acts of Congress which have implemented that Clause, have turned up either missing or fatally defective for Christopher A. Crofts, L. Robert Murray, Sarah Y. Vogel, Lois G. Lerner and Monty Wilkinson.

 

In particular, Monty Wilkinson has either failed or refused to disclose his APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS and APPOINTMENT LETTER appointing him to the Office of Director of the EOUSA.  As such, he lacked any and all authority to make any decisions whatsoever concerning my timely Federal Tort Claim as received by the EOUSA on July 11, 2016.

 

As such, the latter hirelings are now suspected of committing multiple acts of mail fraud, impersonation and racketeering, in violation of the Federal criminal statutes at 18 U.S.C. 1341, 912 and 1962, respectively.  Please know that mail fraud is also defined as a RICO “predicate act” at 18 U.S.C. 1961;  and, any two (2) such predicate acts are defined as a pattern of racketeering activity at 1961(5).

 

In order to minimize unnecessary postage expenses and printing costs, please feel free to access the Internet versions of all relevant documents, which are easily accessible at their corresponding URLs.

 

Executive Recommendation

 

Given the painfully obvious delays and well documented obstructions which have now occurred with all five (5) of my pending Federal Tort Claims (U.S. DOJ Standard Forms 95), I now believe that arbitration, mediation or other alternative dispute resolution technique should be authorized for my EOUSA Tort Claim, in a prompt delegation from the Attorney General to a fair and impartial “neutral” as presently defined by Act of Congress at 5 U.S.C. 573.

 

We also take this opportunity to object to any and all DOJ policy(s) which presently require formal litigation to be commenced BEFORE any ADR options can be invoked.

 

In our professional opinion, such policies appear to defeat the stated intent of Congress to provide damaged parties with practical alternatives to expensive and time-consuming litigation.

 

In this context, please refer in particular to the Congressional Findings as stated in the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996, Public Law 104-320, 110 Stat. 3870, October 19, 1996, to wit:

 

The Congress finds that --

 

(1)     administrative procedure ... is intended to offer a prompt, expert, and inexpensive means of resolving disputes as an alternative to litigation in the Federal courts ....

 

[bold emphasis added]

 

Thank you very much, Attorney General Sessions, for your prompt decision to refer this matter to the most appropriate ADR option, pursuant to the intent of Congress expressed at 28 U.S.C. 2672 and in the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 supra.

 

 

Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Damaged Party;

Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;  and,

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

 

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

 

 

Cc:  Trustee, Estate of Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

 

 


Enclosures:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/three.principals.htm

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/page01.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/page02.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/usps.tracking.9505515456176187003664.htm

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/SF-95.htm

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/crofts/foia.request.1.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/crofts/letter.2013-02-12/page01.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/crofts/letter.2013-02-12/affidavit.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/crofts/letter.2013-02-12/affidavit.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/crofts/letter.2013-02-12/commission.refused.jpg

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/crofts/letter.2013-02-12/commission.gif

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/murray/foia.request.1.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/murray/letter.2013-01-11/page01.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/murray/letter.2013-01-11/page02.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/murray/letter.2013-01-11/affidavit.1.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/murray/letter.2013-01-11/affidavit.2.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/murray/letter.2013-04-30/Notice.of.Errors.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/murray/letter.2013-04-22/page01.refused.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/murray/letter.2013-04-22/page01.gif

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vogel/pleading.07/page01.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vogel/letter.2015-09-30/page01.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vogel/letter.2015-09-30/page02.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vogel/letter.2015-09-30/affidavit.refused.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vogel/letter.2015-09-30/affidavit.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vogel/letter.2015-12-18/page01.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vogel/letter.2015-12-18/page02.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vogel/foia.appeal.htm

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/foia.request.2.lerner.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-02-07/refusal.for.fraud.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-02-07/page01.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2017-02-07/page02.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/foia.request.lerner.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2016-12-08/page01.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2016-11-09/page01.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2016-11-09/affidavit.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/lerner/letter.2016-11-09/appointment.gif

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/wilkinson/foia.request.wilkinson.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/wilkinson/nad.affidavit.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/wilkinson/affidavit.refused.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/wilkinson/affidavit.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/wilkinson/letter.2017-02-22/page01.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/wilkinson/letter.2017-02-22/page02.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/wilkinson/letter.2017-02-07/refusal.for.fraud.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/wilkinson/letter.2017-02-07/page01.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim.eousa/wilkinson/letter.2017-02-07/page02.gif