Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

NOTICE OF INTENT re: Lois Gail Lerner to be formally charged with perjury, impersonation and racketeering

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:04 PM
To: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 7:35 PM
Subject: NOTICE OF INTENT re: Lois Gail Lerner to be formally charged with perjury, impersonation and racketeering
To:
The White House


TO:
President Donald J. Trump
The White House


Greetings Mr. President:

The attached ACTUAL NOTICE OF PROBABLE FRAUD
contains a paragraph which summarizes our specific intent
to lodge a VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION
formally charging Lois Gail Lerner with perjury, impersonating an
officer of the United States, and racketeering.

See 18 U.S.C. 1621, 912 and 1962, respectively.

These charges are based on verifiable factual evidence
which has been provided to my office by the correct document custodians
in the U.S. Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service.

In brief summary, we allege that Lois Gail Lerner committed
felony perjury by signing 2 x IRS Forms 1040 under the penalties of perjury
for calendar years 1979 and 1980, during which time she was employed
by DOJ's Criminal Division, receiving professional compensation
paid to her from the Treasury of the United States.

In this context, see in particular the Acts of Congress at 5 U.S.C. 5507
and section 6065 in the Internal Revenue Code:


Without the required APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS and second OATH OF OFFICE
required by the Constitution and by Acts of Congress which have implemented
the Oath of Office Clause in that Constitution, Lois Gail Lerner impersonated an officer of
the United States until such time as she did execute APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
for the first time on January 29, 1981:


Please note, in particular, the directive found in the last paragraph
of the latter APPOINTMENT LETTER, to wit:

"Please execute the required oath of office at your earliest convenience."

That directive is highly significant, because of the second OATH OF OFFICE
that is required of Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys by the Acts of Congress
at 28 U.S.C. 543 and 544:


In this specific context, please see the correct decision of the U.S. District Court,
District of Colorado, in the case of U.S. v. Pignatiello:


No second OATH OF OFFICE has yet been disclosed by Lois Gail Lerner
nor by the proper document custodians in DOJ or in the IRS.

And, as a principal in what has become known as the "IRS Targeting Scandal"
Lois Gail Lerner did aid, abet, counsel, command, induce and/or procure
acts of witness retaliation, false arrest, unlawful incarceration and obstruction of justice --
as previously documented extensively in my five (5) pending Federal Tort Claims --
all in violation of the Federal criminal statutes at 18 U.S.C. 2 and 1962(d)
i.e. conspiring as a principal to engage in a pattern of racketeering activities.

Accumulated documentary evidence is now archived at the following
Internet locations:






Thank you for your consideration in this matter, President Trump.


p.s.  The United States ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General,
hereby reserves its right to compel discovery of all Federal criminal prosecutions
in which Lois Gail Lerner was involved, in any capacity whatsoever, at any times
during calendar years 1979 and 1980.  Cf. Civil Investigative Demand at 18 U.S.C. 1968:



There is no statute of limitations for fraud.


Attachment (DRAFT #2):  ACTUAL NOTICE OF PROBABLE FRAUD (1/18/2018)


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)


notice.of.fraud.doc
31K