NOTICE OF REFUSAL
FOR CAUSES
AND DEMAND FOR
IMMEDIATE RESIGNATION
August 19, 2016 A.D.
Mark S. Kaizen
IRS Office of Chief Counsel
1111 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington 20224-0002
District of Columbia, USA
Subject: Tort Claim No. 16-021; GLS-10123516
Mr. Kaizen:
Your ridiculous letter dated August 11, 2016, is hereby refused for causes including but not limited to each of the following:
(1) the facts of my case do establish multiple causes of action for false arrest and false imprisonment as defined by Washington and Wyoming State laws; the 55 moves I endured resulting in violating laws of every other State whose boundary I was forced to cross;
(2) I was not required to cite such State laws in my original Standard Form 95, and in good faith I have supplemented my SF-95 with correct citations to Washington and Wyoming State laws;
(3) the Federal statutes previously cited in extensive documentation already submitted as supplements to my original Standard Form 95 are also supreme Law of the Land throughout Washington State and Wyoming State; see Supremacy Clause for Fundamental authority;
(4) you have now failed timely to produce a true and correct copy of valid APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS properly requested by my Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request dated July 19, 2016 A.D.;
(5) absent proof of the latter mandatory credential, you totally lack any and all authority to make any determinations whatsoever concerning the validity or sufficiency of my original SF-95;
(6) as such, you have transmitted written correspondence via U.S. Mail at least twice now, under false and fraudulent pretenses in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341 (mail fraud) i.e. falsely claiming that you lawfully occupy the office of “Associate Chief Counsel” with the Office of Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service; and,
(7) only two (2) acts of mail fraud are defined at 18 U.S.C. 1961(5) as a pattern of racketeering activities.
NOTICE OF INTENT TO LODGE MAIL FRAUD REPORT
Accordingly, this is my formal Notice of Intent to lodge a formal Mail Fraud Report against you for the acts of mail fraud summarized above, and to do so in timely compliance with all legal obligations imposed by the Federal criminal statute at 18 U.S.C. 4 (misprision of felony).
DEMAND FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE RESIGNATION
Impersonating an officer or employee of the United States is a separate felony Federal offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912. Lacking valid APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS, the Federal law at 5 U.S.C. 5507 bars you from being paid any compensation for the office you now claim to occupy.
Therefore, I hereby formally DEMAND that you resign from any and all positions with the Office of Chief Counsel, effective immediately, and cease and desist from having any further or future contact with my pending Federal Tort Claim(s).
SECOND DEMAND TO RETURN TORT CLAIM
TO THE U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Formal DEMAND is again made
of the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to return my original Tort Claim to the
United States Marshals Service within ten (10) calendar days.
Thank you for your timely compliance.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul
Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew
Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Damaged Party;
Private Attorney
General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964(c)
(see Rotella v. Wood,
528 U.S. 549 (2000)); and,
Agent of
the United States as Qui Tam Relator: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et
seq.
(see U.S. ex rel.
Madden v. General Dynamics Corp.)
U.S. Mail:
Supreme
Law Firm
c/o Trustee
1224 N.E. Walnut, #257
Roseburg 97470
Oregon, USA
Copies:
Congressman Peter DeFazio
Gerald M. Auerbach, USMS General Counsel
William J. Wilkins, IRS Chief Counsel
Trustees, Estate of Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/letter.2016-08-11/page01.refused.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/letter.2016-08-11/page01.gif (2 of 2)
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/letter.2016-07-08/page01.gif (1 of 2)
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/auerbach/letter.2016-07-05/page02.refused.gif
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/kaizen/foia.request.kaizen.htm (IN DEFAULT)
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/tort.claim/kaizen/reservation.of.right.to.inspect.htm
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/vcc.matrix.htm