Certified Mail Number: __________________________________________
                 Date: __________________________________________

John E. Trumane
c/o General Delivery
Marin County
San Rafael, California state
united States of America


                NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND
               PUBLIC NOTICE REVOCATION AFFIDAVIT
                       OF JOHN E. TRUMANE


CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC   )
                            )        Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
MARIN COUNTY                )


                            PREAMBLE

     I, Citizen  John E.  Trumane, being  a Massachusetts native-
born white  adult male  living and  working in  Marin County as a
Citizen of  the Republic of California/State since 1979 and I, as
such status,  hereby make  this Special Appearance, by Affidavit,
in Propria  Persona, proceeding Sui Juris, At Law, in Common Law,
with Assistance,  Special, neither  conferring nor  consenting to
any  foreign  jurisdiction,  except  to  the  judicial  power  of
California and/or  America, and  as such  I willfully enforce all
Constitutional  limitations   respectively  on   all   government
agencies  when  dealing  with  them,  wherefore  the  undersigned
Affiant, named  herein and  above, upon  affirmation declares and
evidences the following:

     I, John  E. Trumane, am of lawful age and competent.  I am a
free white  natural born Citizen in California state, and thereby
in the united States of America, in fact, by right of heritage, a
Citizen inhabiting  California state,  protected  via  hereditary
succession by my predecessors' previous contracts with government
as found  in the  Northwest Ordinance of 1787, the Organic Act of
1849, the  original Constitution  of California,  the Articles of
Confederation of  1777, the Constitution for the united States of
America (1787)  including its  Preamble, and  the Bill  of Rights
(1791) including  its Preamble;   and,  as such,  I retain all my
unalienable rights  granted by  God in  positive law, embodied in
the Declaration  of Independence  (1776) and  binding rights upon
myself and  my parentage,  on this  day and  for all time now and
hereafter;  and further,

     I, John E. Trumane, a natural born free white adult male, in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui  Juris, At Law, with Assistance,
Special,  receiving   mail  c/o  General  Delivery,  San  Rafael,
California state,  being duly  sworn and affixing my signature to
this document, do hereby make the following statement of fact and
affirm:   the so-called  "Social Security"  number xxx-xx-xxxx is
revoked in  application, in  body and  in signature, for I affirm
that this  agreement was  imposed upon  me by  usage  of  threat,
coercion, withholding  of material facts, and uninformed consent,
and that  I  was  not  at  age  of  majority;    therefore,  this
aforementioned government  action constitutes  constructive fraud
and placed  me under  duress of mind and therefore deprived me of
giving any  meaningful consent  to the original "Social Security"
application and agreement.  This agreement is null and void, nunc
pro tunc, due to the aforementioned fraud;  and further,


             Letters Social Security Administration:
                          Page 1 of 153


              AFFIDAVIT AMENDMENT PROTECTION CLAUSE

     I, the  undersigned, in  order  to  protect  my  unalienable
rights to  life, liberty  and property,  inclusive of my right to
the proper  in rem  and in personam Citizenship status, have been
forced to  amend certain  legal documents  and statements, due to
the  continued   revelation  and   increased  discovery   of  the
continuous acts  of fraud  upon me  by the  de facto governments,
both State and Federal, and therefore I declare that I am free to
amend any  and all  such documents and statements, as a matter of
substantive right,  for I  cannot be  held liable  for either the
acts or the omissions by governments which are out of my control,
which acts and omissions constitute fraud in one form or another.
Therefore, I  proceed at  all times "WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF
ALL MY  RIGHTS AND  WITHOUT PREJUDICE"  to any  of my unalienable
rights,  inclusive  of  my  personal  right  to  substantive  and
procedural due  process proceedings  under the  Judicial Power of
both my State and my Nation.  And further,


     I, John E. Trumane, state and affirm the following:

     1.   That material  facts were  withheld, such  as Title 28,
Section 1746,  Subsections 1  & 2  (being within  or without  the
"United States"), which caused me to be unaware that a completed,
signed, and  submitted "Form  1040" or  "income tax  return"  and
other IRS  and California  Revenue Department forms and documents
are voluntarily executed instruments which could be used as prima
facie  evidence   against  me   in  criminal   trials  and  civil
proceedings  to   show  that   I  had   voluntarily   waived   my
Constitutionally  secured  rights  and  that  I  had  voluntarily
subjected  myself  to  the  federal  income/excise  tax,  to  the
provisions of  the Internal Revenue Code (hereinafter referred to
as  the   IRC),  to  the  authority  of  the  California  Revenue
Department and  to the  authority of the Internal Revenue Service
(hereinafter referred  to as  the IRS)  by  signing  and  thereby
affirming, under penalty of perjury (within the "United States"),
that I  was, in  effect, a "person" subject to the tax;  that the
above  induced  and/or  forced  action,  via  State  and  Federal
governments, clearly  indicates a  violation of the United States
Constitution, Article  1, Section  9, Clause  3:    "No  Bill  of
Attainder or  ex post  facto Law  shall be passed." and Clause 4:
"No Capitation,  or other  direct, Tax  shall be  laid, unless in
Proportion to  the Census or Enumeration hereinbefore directed to
be taken."   These  above  same  injunctions  are  found  in  the
Northwest Ordinance  and in  the California  Constitution.    And
further,


             Letters Social Security Administration:
                          Page 2 of 153


     2.   That material  facts were  withheld, which caused me to
be unaware  of the legal effects of signing and filing income tax
returns, as  shown by  the decision of the United States Court of
Appeals for  the 9th  Circuit in  the 1974  ruling in the case of
Morse v. U.S., 494 F.2d 876, 880, wherein the Court explained how
a State  Citizen became  a "taxpayer"  by stating:  "Accordingly,
when returns  were filed in Mrs. Morse's name declaring income to
her for  1944 and 1945, making her potentially liable for the tax
due on  that income,  she became a taxpayer within the meaning of
the Internal Revenue Code." [emphasis added]  And further,

     3.   That material  facts were  withheld, which caused me to
be unaware  that the  signing and  filing of an income tax return
and other  IRS forms  are acts of voluntary compliance for a free
Sovereign natural  born Citizen  (see 2:1:5,  U.S.  Constitution)
inhabiting the  united  States  of  America,  when  executed  and
submitted by  said Sovereign living and working within the States
of the  Union;   that I  was unaware that, in a legislative court
such as  a  United  States  District  Court,  the  completed  IRS
documents can  become prima facie evidence, sufficient to sustain
a legal  conclusion by  a judge,  that the signer has voluntarily
changed his  lawful status/state  FROM that  of a  free Sovereign
natural born  Citizen, who  is not  subject to any federal income
tax and  who possesses  all of  his  God-given,  Constitutionally
secured rights  when dealing with government, TO the legal status
of a  "taxpayer" (any  individual,  trust,  estate,  partnership,
association, company  or corporation  subject to  federal  excise
tax), that  is, a  "person" who  is subject to the federal excise
tax and is, therefore, subject to the authority, jurisdiction and
control of  the federal  government under  Title 26 of the United
States Code,  the statutes  governing federal taxation and to the
regulations of  the IRS,  thereby imposing  the tax  on  himself,
waiving his God-given Constitutionally secured rights to property
and labor  in respect  to the  federal income/excise tax statutes
and their  administration by the IRS, and establishing himself as
one who  has privileges only, but no rights, in dealings with the
IRS, the same as a corporation;  that it is my understanding that
the  change   of  status/state  resulting  from  the  signed  IRS
documents is  very similar  to the  change of  status that occurs
when one enlists in the military service and voluntarily takes an
oath that subjects him to the authority, jurisdiction and control
of the  federal government  under Title  10 of  the United States
Code, the statutes governing the armed forces and the regulations
of the  military service,  thereby waiving  his  Constitutionally
guaranteed rights  in relation  to  dealings  with  the  military
services;  and further,


             Letters Social Security Administration:
                          Page 3 of 153


     4.   That I,  as a natural born free Sovereign inhabitant in
the united  States of America, in the Republic of California, and
as  a   freeman,  am   endowed  by   my  Creator   with  numerous
unalienable/inalienable rights  which include but are not limited
to my  rights to  "life, liberty  and the  pursuit  of  happiness
(property)," which  rights are  specifically  identified  in  the
Magna Carta  (1215) and  the Declaration  of Independence (1776),
and protected  and secured  by the  Constitution for  the  united
States of  America (1789)  and the  subsequent  Bill  of  Rights,
Articles in  Amendment 1  thru 10  (1791);  that my birthright to
the "life,  liberty  and  the  pursuit  of  happiness"  has  been
interpreted by  both the  Framers of  the Constitution and by the
U.S. Supreme  Court to  include my unalienable right to contract,
to acquire, to deal in, to sell, rent, and exchange properties of
various  kinds,   real  and   personal,  without   requesting  or
exercising any  privilege or  franchise from  government;  that I
have learned  that these unalienable property rights also include
my right  to contract  for the  exchange of my labor-property for
other properties  and remuneration,  such as wages, salaries, and
other earnings;   that  I have never knowingly, intentionally, or
voluntarily waived  any of  these unalienable  rights, nor can I,
John E.  Trumane, be  forced to waive any of these rights granted
to me  by God the Father, my Creator (see Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S.
742, 748),  because I  am endowed with these rights by my Creator
and by nobody else and nothing else;  and further,

     5.   That I  understand that,  if the  exercise of my rights
were subjected  to taxation, these same rights could be destroyed
by increasing  the tax  rates to unaffordable levels;  therefore,
courts  have  repeatedly  ruled  that  government  has  no  power
whatsoever to tax or otherwise "lien" against the exercise of any
rights, particularly  the rights  of Sovereign Citizens, as shown
by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Murdock v. Pennsylvania,
319 U.S.  105 (1943),  which stated:   "A  state may not impose a
charge for  the enjoyment  of a  right  granted  by  the  Federal
Constitution.";  that unalienable rights are rights against which
no lien  can be established precisely because they are un-a-lien-
able;   that America's  founding documents  enumerate some  of my
unalienable rights,  none of  which rights  I  have  ever  waived
knowingly, voluntarily,  and intentionally;  that I freely choose
to obey  all  American  Law  and  to  pay  all  Lawful  taxes  in
jurisdictions which  are applicable  to me  for the  common good;
that I  stand in  Propria Persona with Assistance, Special;  that
my status  and unalienable  rights, as  stated hereinafter and in
the foregoing, are not negotiable;  and further,

     6.   That, for  years past and at least since the year 1964,
I have  been influenced by numerous cases of people going to jail
and being  punished, and  also by  numerous and  repeated  public
warnings made  by the  California Revenue  Department and  by the
IRS, via  radio, television, the printed press and other forms of
public communication  media, warning of the "deadline" for filing
State and  Federal forms, such as a "Form 1040 Income Tax Return"
and/or other  IRS forms  and documents;  this therefore caused me
to file said forms under duress;  and further,


             Letters Social Security Administration:
                          Page 4 of 153


     7.   That, in  addition to  the aforesaid  warnings, I  have
also been  influenced by  the misleading and deceptive wording of
IRS publications and IRS-generated news articles, by the pressure
of widespread  rumors and  misinformed public opinion, and by the
advice  and  assurances  of  lawyers,  C.P.A.'s  and  income  tax
preparers which  misled me  to believe  incorrectly that the 16th
Amendment to  the Constitution  for the  united States of America
abolished the  Fifth Amendment  of  that  same  Constitution  and
authorized Congress to impose a direct tax on me, my property, my
exchanges of  property and/or  property received  as a  result of
exercising my Constitutionally secured right to contract;  that I
was further  misled into  believing that  I had  a legal duty and
obligation to  file a "Form 1040 Income Tax Return" and other IRS
and State  tax forms,  schedules and  documents, and  that I  was
unaware of  Title 28,  Section 1746 wherein there are two perjury
clauses, one  stating that you are within the "United States" and
one stating  that you  are without  the  "United  States."    The
perjury clauses  on both  State and  Federal tax forms stipulate,
under penalty  of perjury,  that I was stating unknowingly that I
was within  the "United States."  This is an act of fraud by both
State and Federal taxing agencies.  And further,

     8.   That I  have also  been further  influenced, misled and
alarmed by  rumors, by  misinformed public  opinion  and  by  the
advice  and  assurances  of  lawyers,  C.P.A.'s  and  income  tax
preparers to  the effect that "the IRS and the California Revenue
Department will get you," and that it would be a crime punishable
by fine  and/or imprisonment if I did not fill out, sign and file
with the  IRS a  "Form 1040";   that,  in point of fact, the only
person actually  named within  the IRC  as a  person required  to
collect an income tax, to file an income tax return and to pay an
income tax is a "Withholding Agent";  and that, to the best of my
knowledge, I  am not  now, nor  have I  ever been  a "Withholding
Agent";  and further,

     9.   That, in  addition to  all of  the  reasons  stated  in
paragraphs 6,  7 and  8 above, I was influenced by the common and
widespread  practice   of  employers  who,  either  knowingly  or
unknowingly, without  Power of  Attorney,  misled  me  and  their
employees to  believe that they and I must have a Social Security
Number and  that all  are subject  to the  withholding of "income
taxes"  from   their  earnings,  either  with  or  without  their
permission,  based   upon  the   employers'   possible   mistaken
assumption that  they, as  employers,  are  required  by  law  to
withhold "income  taxes" from  the paychecks  of their employees,
which is  contrary to  the Sections 3402(n), 7343 and 7701(a)(16)
of the  IRC, absent  a  voluntary  execution  of  Form  W-4,  the
"Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate";  and further,

     10.  That  I   have  also  been  mistakenly  influenced  and
mistakenly impressed by annual public displays and indiscriminate
public offerings  by the IRS and the State of large quantities of
the Forms  1040 and  540 in  banks, post offices, and through the
U.S. mail,  which public  displays and  offerings  also  had  the
effect of  reminding me of, and inducing me to respond mistakenly
by filling  out, signing  and sending  "Form 1040" to the IRS and
"Form 540" to the State Franchise Tax Board (FTB);  and further,


             Letters Social Security Administration:
                          Page 5 of 153


     11.  That said  "Forms 1040"  contained no  reference to any
law or  laws which  would explain  just exactly who is and who is
not subject  to, or liable for, the income tax, State or Federal,
nor did  it contain  any notice  or warning to anyone that merely
sending said  completed "Form  1040" to  the IRS  would waive  my
right to  privacy, as  secured by  the 4th  Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, and also waive my right to not be a witness against
myself, as secured by the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,
and that  a completed  "Form 1040"  would, in  itself, constitute
legal evidence,  admissible in  a court of law, that the filer is
subject to  and liable for the income/excise tax, even though and
regardless of  the fact  that I, as a free Sovereign natural born
Citizen (see  2:1:5, U.S.  Constitution), am actually and legally
not subject to the statutory jurisdiction of Title 26, nor liable
for any  income/excise tax,  and regardless  of the fact that, to
the best  of my  knowledge, I  have no  legal duty  or obligation
whatsoever to  complete and  file any "Form 1040" or State income
tax forms,  nor did  they evidence  Title 28,  Section 1746;  and
further,

     12.  That at no time was I ever notified or informed, by the
IRS or  by the State of California, nor by any of their agents or
employees, nor  by any  lawyer, C.P.A.,  or tax  preparer, of the
fact that  the  16th  Amendment  to  the  U.S.  Constitution,  as
correctly interpreted  by the U.S. Supreme Court in such cases as
Brushaber v.  Union Pacific  Railroad Co.,  240 U.S. 1 (1916) and
Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916), identified the
income tax  as an  indirect excise tax in accordance with Article
1, Section  8, Clause  1 of  the United States Constitution; that
the  16th  Amendment  to  the  U.S.  Constitution,  as  correctly
interpreted by  the U.S.  Supreme Court, does not authorize a tax
on individuals  but is  applicable to  nonresident  aliens  (e.g.
Frank Brushaber)  who involve themselves in activities, events or
occupations which come under, or are within, the taxing authority
of the  "United States",  as explained in Treasury Decision 2313,
March 21,  1916;   that the  16th Amendment  was  never  actually
ratified nor could it have been enacted into positive law because
the requisite number of States (i.e., 36) did not meet the lawful
requirements for  amending the  Constitution;  and that a mass of
incontrovertible material  evidence available since the year 1985
proves that  the act of "declaring" the 16th Amendment "ratified"
was an  act of  outright fraud by Secretary of State Philander C.
Knox in the year 1913;  and further,

     13.  That at  no time was I ever notified or informed by the
California Department  of Revenue nor by the IRS, their agents or
employees, nor  by any  lawyer, C.P.A.,  or tax  preparer, of the
fact that,  because of  various rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court
in such  cases as  Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107 (1911),
and Pollock  v. Farmer's Loan and Trust Co., 157 U.S. 492 (1895),
the indirect  excise tax  on incomes  identified by the so-called
16th Amendment is also a tax upon corporate privileges granted by
government, which  tax is  measured by  the amount  of  corporate
income (see  Corporations Tax  Act, Statutes at Large, 1909, vol.
XXXVI, section  38, page  112);  that this indirect excise tax is
also imposed  on the  taxable income of foreign corporations, and
on the  taxable income  of nonresident  aliens to the extent this
(latter) income  is either effectively connected with the conduct
of a  trade or  business within the corporate jurisdiction of the
"United States",  or derived  from sources  within the  corporate
jurisdiction of  the "United  States"  although  not  effectively
connected with  the conduct  of  trade  or  business  within  the
corporate jurisdiction  of  the  "United  States",  according  to
Sections 871 and 872 of the IRC;  and further,


             Letters Social Security Administration:
                          Page 6 of 153


     14.  That my attention has been called to Report No. 80-19A,
entitled "Some  Constitutional Questions  Regarding  the  Federal
Income Tax  Laws" published  by the  American Law Division of the
Congressional  Research  Service  of  the  Library  of  Congress,
updated January  17, 1980;   that  this publication describes the
tax on "income" identified in the so-called 16th Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution  as an  indirect excise  tax;  that this report
stated:   "The Supreme  Court, in  a decision  written  by  Chief
Justice White,  first noted  that  the  16th  Amendment  did  not
authorize any  new type  of tax,  nor did it repeal or revoke the
tax clauses  of Article  I of  the  United  States  Constitution,
quoted above.",  and further  stated:  "Therefore, it can clearly
be determined  from the  decisions of  the United  States Supreme
Court that  the income  tax is  an indirect tax, generally in the
nature of  an excise  tax ....", thus proving in my mind that the
"income tax"  is not a tax on me as a free Sovereign natural born
Citizen (see  2:1:5,  U.S.  Constitution),  but  is,  rather,  an
indirect excise  tax as  described by  the U.S.  Supreme Court in
Flint v.  Stone Tracy  Co., 220 U.S. 107 (1911), wherein the high
Court  defined   excise  taxes   as  "...  taxes  laid  upon  the
manufacture, sale,  or  consumption  of  commodities  within  the
country, upon  licenses to  pursue certain  occupations, and upon
corporate   privileges    ....",   none    of   which   aforesaid
classifications apply to me;  and further,

     15.  That  I   was  unaware  of  the  truth  of  the  rarely
publicized statement  by the  IRS that the "income" tax system is
based upon "voluntary compliance with the law and self-assessment
of tax";   that  I was  unaware before  June of  1990 of a posted
notice  in  the  main  lobby  of  the  Federal  Building  in  San
Francisco, California, outside the  offices  of  the  IRS,  which
reads, in  pertinent part,  "The purpose  of the Internal Revenue
Service is  to ...  encourage and  achieve the  highest degree of
voluntary  compliance   in  accordance  with  the  tax  laws  and
regulations.";   that I  was unaware before June of 1990 that Mr.
Roger  M.   Olsen,  Assistant  Attorney  General,  Tax  Division,
Department of  Justice,  Washington,  D.C.,  made  the  following
statement to  an assemblage  of tax  lawyers on May 9, 1987:  "We
encourage voluntary  compliance by scaring the heck out of you.";
that it  has never  been either  my intention  nor my  desire  to
voluntarily self-assess an excise tax upon myself, nor to give up
my right  to property,  nor to voluntarily subject myself to such
an excise  tax;   that I  had always  thought that compliance was
required by law;  and further,

     16.  That I have examined Sections 871 thru 878, 1441, 1442,
1443, 3401(c),  6001, 6011, 6012(a), 6331(a), 7203, 7205 and 7343
of the  IRC (Title  26 U.S.C.),  and I  am entirely convinced and
completely satisfied  that I am not now, nor was I ever, any such
"person" or  individual referred  to  by  these  sections;    and
further,

     17.  That,  after  careful  study  of  the  IRC,  and  after
consultations on  the  provisions  of  that  Code  with  informed
lawyers,  tax   accountants  and  tax  preparers  concerning  the
provisions of  the IRC,  I have  never found  or been  shown  any
sections of  the IRC that imposed any requirement on me as a free
Sovereign  natural  born  Citizen  and  unprivileged  inhabitant,
living and  working within  a County within a State of the Union,
to file a "Form 1040 Income Tax Return" or any other State income
tax form,  or that  imposed a requirement upon me to pay a tax on
"income", or  that would  classify me  as a "person liable", as a
"person made  liable", or  as a "taxpayer" as the term "taxpayer"
is defined  in 26 U.S.C. Section 7701(a)(14), which states:  "The
term 'taxpayer'  means any person subject to any internal revenue
tax.";  and further,


             Letters Social Security Administration:
                          Page 7 of 153


     18.  That, after  the study  and consultations  mentioned in
paragraph 17,  the only  mention of any possible requirement upon
me, as  an individual,  to pay  a tax  on "income",  that I could
find, or  was shown  in 26  U.S.C., was the title of Part I under
Subtitle A,  Chapter 1, Subchapter A (which is deceptively titled
"Tax on  Individuals") and  Section 6012(a),  Subtitle F, Chapter
61-A, Part  II-B, Subpart  B, and  the California  Tax  Statutes;
that a  careful study  and earnest  examination of these parts of
the IRC  revealed that  the "individuals"  to whom these sections
refer are,  in fact, either individuals who work within a foreign
country like  France and  are taxed according to a tax treaty, or
they are  nonresident aliens  who receive  income which is either
effectively connected  with the  conduct of  a trade  or business
within the  corporate jurisdiction  of the  "United  States",  or
derived from  sources within  the corporate  jurisdiction of  the
"United States",  although not  effectively  connected  with  the
conduct of trade or business within the corporate jurisdiction of
the "United  States", according  to Sections  871 and  872 of the
IRC;   and that,  to the  best of  my  knowledge,  I  have  never
conducted any trade or business within the corporate jurisdiction
of the  "United States",  nor have  I ever  derived  income  from
sources within the corporate jurisdiction of the "United States";
and further,

     19.  That, after  the study  and consultations  mentioned in
paragraph 17  above, my  attention was called to the IRC, Chapter
21,  entitled   "Federal  Insurance  Contributions  Act"  (Social
Security), and  my attention  was also  called to Subchapter A of
Chapter 21  entitled "Tax  on Employees",  which includes Section
3101, wherein the (Social Security) tax is identified as a tax on
"income", not  as an  "Insurance Contribution",  not as a "Tax on
Employees", and  not as  a tax  on wages  or earnings;   that  my
attention was  further called  to  these  facts:    there  is  no
provision in  the IRC  that  imposes  the  tax  on  employees  or
requires them to pay the tax;  a voluntarily signed and completed
Form W-4,  "Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate", allows
an employer  to withhold  money from  a worker's  pay for (Social
Security) "income"  tax, even  though the  worker has  claimed on
that form to be "exempt" from the graduated "income" tax;  and an
employer has  no authority  to withhold money from a worker's pay
for  the  (Social  Security)  "income"  tax,  for  the  graduated
"income" tax,  nor for  any IRS-imposed  penalty or assessment if
there is  no voluntarily  signed "W-4"  form in  force and a Form
2678, Granting Power of Attorney;  and further,


             Letters Social Security Administration:
                          Page 8 of 153


     20.  That, after  the study  and consultations  described in
paragraph 17  above, my  attention was called to Section 61(a) of
the IRC,  which lists  items that are sources of "income", and to
the following facts:  that IRS Collections Summons Form 6638 (12-
82) confirms  that these  items are  sources,  not  "income",  by
stating  that   the  following  items  are  "sources":    "wages,
salaries, tips,  fees, commissions,  interest, rents,  royalties,
alimony, state  or local  tax refunds, pensions, business income,
gains from  dealings in property, and any other compensations for
services (including  receipt of  property  other  than  money).";
that sources  are not  "income", but  sources become  "income" if
they are entered as "income" on a signed "Form 1040", because the
signer affirms,  under penalty  of perjury  (within  the  "United
States"), that  the items  entered in the "income" section of the
"Form 1040"  are "income"  to the  signer;   that  Section  61(b)
clearly indicates  which Sections  of the  IRC identify  and list
items that  are included  in "income"  by stating:    "For  items
specifically included  in gross  income, see Part II (sec. 71 and
following)";  and further,

     21.  That my  attention was  then called to the said Part II
entitled: "Items  Specifically Included in Gross Income";  that I
studied sections  71 thru  87 and  noticed that  wages, salaries,
commissions,  tips,   interest,   dividends,   pensions,   rents,
royalties, etc.,  are not listed as being included in "income" in
those Sections  of the  IRC;   and that, in fact, those items are
not mentioned  anywhere in any of these sections of the IRC;  and
further,

     22.  That, after further diligent study, it appears entirely
clear to  me that  the only way that property received by me as a
free  Sovereign   natural   born   Citizen   (see   2:1:5,   U.S.
Constitution), living and working within the States of the Union,
in the  form of  wages, salaries,  commissions,  tips,  interest,
dividends, rents,  royalties and/or  pensions could  be, or could
have been  legally considered to be "income", is if I voluntarily
completed and  signed a  "Form 1040  Income Tax  Return", thereby
affirming, under penalty of perjury (within the "United States"),
that the  information on  such "Form  1040" was true and correct,
and that  any amounts  listed on  the "Form 1040" in the "income"
block were  "income", and  thereby acknowledging  under  oath  or
affirmation, that I am, or was, a taxpayer subject to the tax and
have, or  had, a  duty to  file a  "Form 1040  Income Tax Return"
and/or other  IRS forms,  documents and  schedules, none of which
instruments I  have ever  signed with  the understanding  that  I
signed them  knowingly, voluntarily,  and  intentionally  and  by
means  of   knowingly  intelligent   acts  done  with  sufficient
awareness of all the relevant circumstances and consequences (see
Brady v.  United States,  397 U.S.  742);   and that, when I have
sent in  State and  Federal tax  forms purposely not signed, they
were returned  to me  with a  letter instructing  and stipulating
that I  must sign the forms under the penalty of perjury, thereby
claiming that  I was a "United States citizen" due to the wording
of the perjury clause (Title 28 U.S.C. 1746);  and further,


             Letters Social Security Administration:
                          Page 9 of 153


     23.  That, with good faith, with an honest reliance upon the
aforementioned U.S.  Supreme Court rulings and with reliance upon
my constitutionally  protected Natural Common Law Bill of Rights,
Amendments 1  thru 10  (1791), to  lawfully contract, to lawfully
work and to lawfully acquire and possess property, I am convinced
and satisfied  that I  am not  now, nor  was I  ever subject  to,
liable for,  or required  to pay an income/excise tax;  that I am
not now,  nor have  I ever been a "taxpayer", and there has never
been a Judicial Power proceeding in which it was ruled that I was
a "taxpayer"  as that  term is  defined and used in the IRC;  and
that I  have never had any legal duties or obligations whatsoever
to file any "Form 1040" or to make any "income tax return", or to
sign or  submit any  other IRS "individual" forms or documents or
schedules, to  pay any  "individual"  income  tax,  to  keep  any
personal financial records, or to supply any personal information
to the IRS;  and further,

     24.  That the  U.S.  Congress,  the  International  Monetary
Fund, the Federal Reserve Banks and the Internal Revenue Service,
by means  of vague, deceptive and misleading words and statements
in the IRC, in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), in official
statements by  IRS Commissioners  in the Federal Register, in IRS
publications  and   in  IRS-generated  news  articles,  committed
constructive  fraud   and  misrepresentation  by  misleading  and
deceiving me,  as well as the general public, into believing that
I was  required to  file "Form 1040 Income Tax Returns" and other
IRS forms,  documents and  schedules and that I was also required
to keep  records, to  supply information and to pay income taxes;
and further,

     25.  That, by  reason of  the  aforementioned  facts,  I  do
hereby exercise  my rights  as  a  free  Sovereign  natural  born
Citizen (see  2:1:5, U.S.  Constitution), upheld by various court
decisions, to revoke, to cancel and to render null and void, Nunc
Pro Tunc,  both  currently  and  retroactively  to  the  time  of
signing, based  upon the constructive fraud and misrepresentation
perpetrated upon me by the Federal government, the U.S. Congress,
the IRS,  the "State  of California",  its Revenue Department and
the Franchise Tax Board (FTB), all IRS and FTB forms, statements,
documents, returns, schedules, contracts, licenses, applications,
articles, certificates  and/or commercial  agreements ever signed
and/or submitted  by  me,  or  on  my  behalf  by  third  parties
(including but  not limited to Forms 1040 and attached schedules,
Forms W-2, Forms W-4, and Forms 1099) on the accounts bearing the
account numbers  xxx-xx-xxxx, xx-xxxxxxx, and xx-xxxxxxx, and all
my signatures  on  any  and  all  of  the  aforementioned  items,
including  the  original  "Social  Security"  application,  which
caused the  account bearing  the account number xxx-xx-xxxx to be
established;   that this  notice of  revocation is  based upon my
rights with  respect to  constructive fraud and misrepresentation
as established  in, but  not limited  to, the  cases of  Tyler v.
Secretary of  State, 184 F.2d 101 (1962) and also El Paso Natural
Gas Co.  v. Kysar Insurance Co., 605 Pacific 2d 240 (1979), which
stated:   "Constructive fraud  as well as actual fraud may be the
basis of cancellation of an instrument.";  and further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 10 of 153


     26.  That I  do hereby declare that I am not and never was a
"taxpayer" as  that term is defined in the IRC, a "person liable"
for any  internal revenue  tax, or  a  "person"  subject  to  the
provisions of  the IRC,  and I  do hereby  declare that I am, and
have always  been, a  "nontaxpayer";  that courts have recognized
and acknowledged  that individuals  can be nontaxpayers, "... for
with them  Congress does  not assume to deal and they are neither
the subject  nor the  object of  revenue laws ....", as stated in
the cases  of Long  v. Rasmussen,  281 F.  236 (1922),  Delima v.
Bidwell, 182  U.S. 176,  179, and  Gerth v. United States, 132 F.
Supp. 894 (1955);  and further,

     27.  That evidence  now available  to  me  proves  that  the
Internal Revenue  Service has  to date  failed to comply with the
clear  and   unambiguous  requirements  imposed  on  all  federal
government agencies  by the following Congressional statutes: the
Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.), the Administrative
Procedures  Act  (5  U.S.C.  551  et  seq.),  and  the  Paperwork
Reduction Act  (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);  that the IRS failure to
comply  with  the  requirements  of  these  statutes  constitutes
further constructive  fraud, breach  of fiduciary  trust  between
sovereign Citizens  and public  servants, and  violations of  the
solemn oaths  of office required of federal government officials,
thereby relieving  me of  any and all legal duties which could or
might otherwise  exist for  me to file any returns, schedules, or
other documents  with the IRS;  and that, after having read these
three statutes  and summaries  of related  case  law,  I  thereby
conclude that there is no reason why the IRS would be exempt from
any of  the  clear  and  unambiguous  requirements  imposed  upon
federal   government    agencies   by   these   three   statutes,
notwithstanding any  and all  allegations to  the  contrary  that
heretofore may  have been  published by  the IRS  or the Treasury
Department in the Federal Register without also citing the proper
legal authorities, if any, for such allegations;  and further,

     28.  That recent  diligent studies  have convinced me of the
above, and  that as  such I am not "subject to" the territorially
limited "exclusive  legislation" nor  to the foreign jurisdiction
mandated for  the District of Columbia, federal enclaves, federal
territories, and  federal possessions  by Article  1, Section  8,
Clauses 17  and 18 and Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S.
Constitution, including its "internal" governmental organizations
therein (hereinafter  referred to  as  the  "Federal  Legislative
Democracy" and  elsewhere referred  to in  this Affidavit  as the
"corporate jurisdiction  of the  United States");   that I am not
"subject to"  this foreign  jurisdiction by  reason of  any valid
contract or any  valid commercial agreement resulting in adhesion
thereto across  America,  nor  are  millions  of  other  American
Citizens, unless they have provided "waivers of rights guaranteed
by the  Constitution" by  means of  "knowingly intelligent acts,"
such  as   contracts   or   commercial   agreements   with   such
government(s)  "with   sufficient  awareness   of  the   relevant
circumstances and  likely consequences,"  as ruled  by  the  U.S.
Supreme Court  in Brady  v.  U.S., 397 US 742 at 748 (1970);  and
that I myself have given no such "waivers";  and further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 11 of 153


     29.  That these same diligent studies have also proved to me
that misrepresentation  and a  shrewd and  criminal  constructive
fraud have  been perpetrated upon America Citizens by government,
under  counterfeit   "color  of   law,"  through   the   apparent
entrapments of  "certain ACTIVITIES  (monopoly  occupations)  and
PRIVILEGES  (other   benefits)"  allowed  by  statutory  acts  or
otherwise;   that, by reason of American Law which has never been
repealed, such  sources of  past and  present criminal element in
and  behind   government  should  be  brought  to  justice  in  a
Constitutional  Court   of  Law  for  aiding  and  abetting  this
misrepresentation and  constructive fraud as willing accomplices;
that it  is for  such a Court, with a 12-member jury of peers, to
decide  who   is  and  who  is  not  guilty  among  personnel  of
government, media,  schools,  lawyers,  accountants,  clergy  and
other purveyors  of misinformation and other mind-set propaganda,
in this and related regards;  and further,

     30.  That, due  to such shrewd entrapments over the years, I
have unwittingly  signed many  related documents,  contracts, and
commercial  agreements,  some  even  under  the  "perjury"  jurat
(within the  "United States")  as was  supposedly required;  with
American Law  on my  side, I hereby revoke and cancel any and all
such signatures  and render  them null and void, except for those
which I  may choose  to have  considered  as  being  under  "TDC"
(Threat, Duress and/or Coercion), past and present;  that this is
also my  lawful notice  that all  such signatures  of mine in the
future on  instruments of government or other entities, including
banks, which  might otherwise result in contract adhesion, are to
be considered  as being  under "TDC", whether appearing therewith
or otherwise;  that my Constitutional "Privileges and Immunities"
(per Article  4, Section 2) are apart from those mandated for the
Federal Legislative Democracy by Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 17
and 18  and by  Article 4,  Section 3, Clause 2, and shall not by
Law be  violated ever;   and that my status, in accord, is stated
for all  to see  and know in 2:1:5, 1:2:3, 4:2:1 and 3:2:1 of the
Constitution for the united States of America.  And further,

     31.  That,  with  this  accurate  knowledge  and  with  "the
supreme Law of the Land" (Article 6, Section 2) again on my side,
I do  Lawfully and "squarely challenge" the fraudulent, usurping,
octopus-like authority  and jurisdiction cited above in paragraph
28, which  authority and  jurisdiction do  not apply  to me  (see
Hagans v.   Lavine, 415  US 528  at 533);   it is, therefore, now
mandatory for  any personnel of the Federal Legislative Democracy
or its  agents to FIRST PROVE its "jurisdiction," if any, over me
before any  further procedures  can take  place in my regard, per
Title  5   United  States   Code,  "Government  Organization  and
Employees," Section 556(d), specifically by disclosing in writing
any and  all contracts or other commercial agreements whereby the
Federal Legislative  Democracy  and  its  agents  claim  to  have
obtained  controlling  interest  in  me  such  that  my  specific
performance  to  any  third  party  debt  or  obligation  can  be
compelled;   OR ELSE  any of  its personnel  and accomplices  who
willfully violate  this  statute  can  and  shall  be  personally
charged as  citizens under Title 18 U.S. Criminal Codes 241, 242,
1001 and/or  otherwise;  and, in fairness, it must be added that,
to my knowledge, IRS agents have NO written lawful "Delegation of
Authority" within  the 50  States and their so-called "Form 1040"
appears to  be a  bogus and  bootleg document  on its  face;  and
further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 12 of 153


     32.  That, with  all of  the above  in mind, it appears that
this free  Sovereign natural born American Citizen is, by Law, as
"foreign" and  as much  a "Nonresident Alien" with respect to the
Federal Legislative  Democracy as he is to France, and thus shall
be free to use related Forms of the Federal Legislative Democracy
if and  when they might be needed, required and/or appropriate at
various future  times  and  places  yet  to  be  determined  (see
paragraphs 12,  13 and  18 above),  including but  not limited to
Form W-8 ("Certificate of Foreign Status") for banks and/or other
financial institutions,  Forms 1040X  ("Amended  U.S.  Individual
Income Tax  Return") and  1040NR ("U.S.  Nonresident Alien Income
Tax Return")  for refunds  and for  correcting the administrative
record, and  IRC Section 3402(n) which authorizes certificates of
exemption from withholding.

     33.  That, since  my date  of birth on June 21, 1948, I have
always been  a NONRESIDENT  ALIEN with  respect  to  the  Federal
Legislative  Democracy  of  the  "United  States",  never  having
resided, worked,  nor having  any  income,  to  the  best  of  my
recollection, from  any sources  within the District of Columbia,
Puerto Rico,  Virgin  Islands,  Guam,  American  Samoa,  Northern
Mariana Islands,  the Trust  Territory of  the Pacific Islands or
any other  territory or  possession within  the "United  States",
which entity  obtains its  exclusive  legislative  authority  and
jurisdiction from  Article 1,  Section 8,  Clauses 17  and 18 and
Article 4,  Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution;  that I
have  always   been  a   non-taxpayer  outside   the  venue   and
jurisdiction of  Title 26, United States Code;  that, to the best
of my knowledge, I have never had any "U.S. trade or business" as
defined in  Title 26  and in  26 C.F.R.;  that, to the best of my
knowledge, I  have never  had any  "gross income"  from any  U.S.
sources, as  the term  "gross income"  is defined  in  26  U.S.C.
872(a);  and further,

     34.  That my  use of  IRS Forms  1040X and  1040NR shall  be
presumed to  mean that  they were  filed solely  to  correct  the
administrative record  permanently,  retroactively  to  June  21,
1948, so as to claim any lawful refunds that may be due, to rebut
any  erroneous   presumptions  and/or   terminate  any  erroneous
elections of  U.S. "residence" which may have been established in
error by  the filing  of any prior IRS forms, schedules and other
statements by  mistakes resulting  in part  from the demonstrable
vagueness that is evident in Title 26 and its regulations, and by
mistakes  resulting   also  from   the  constructive   fraud  and
misrepresentation mentioned  throughout this  Affidavit;   that I
was neither  born nor  naturalized in the "United States", I have
never been  subject to  its jurisdiction, and I have never been a
"United States  citizen" as  defined in  26 C.F.R.  1.1-1 and  as
defined in the so-called 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution;
and further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 13 of 153


     35.  That  I   am  not  now,  nor  have  I  ever  knowingly,
intentionally and  voluntarily, with  informed  consent,  entered
into  any   personal,  internal,  public  or  private  agreement,
contract, stipulation,  account or  similar contrivance  with the
"United States",  the "Federal  Government" or  the "District  of
Columbia",  its  territories,  its  agencies  or  other  property
appurtenant thereto,  which would  have altered  or waived  my de
jure, Sui  Juris status,  or  my  natural  unalienable  God-given
natural rights;   that any such agreement, contract, expressed or
implied, such  as a  Social Security  number and  application, or
Driver's License,  or Bank  Signature Card, or the use of Federal
Reserve Notes  (which are  not lawful Specie) etc., have all been
hereby revoked,  due to  the fraudulent  withholding of  material
facts, which  became a  snare and a trap and, as such, are a Bill
of Attainder  on this  free Sovereign  natural born  Citizen  and
inhabitant in the united States of America, for I cannot become a
nexus by  the effect of a fraudulent nexum, because my status and
unalienable  natural   rights  are   not  negotiable,   and   the
government, both State and Federal, has not proved that they ever
had jurisdiction  to change  my status,  as required  by Title  5
U.S.C.  Section   556(d),  or   as  defined  and  set  out  as  a
Constitutional requirement in Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 533
(see also Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 at 748);  that any
change of  status would  lawfully have  to take place in a Common
Law (judicial  power) court  under the  due process clause of the
5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution;  and further,

     36.  That this  is to  certify that I, John E. Trumane, am a
free Sovereign  natural born Citizen and inhabitant in the united
States of  America, living  and breathing  in  California  state,
living and  working in Marin County, living under the Common Law,
having assumed,  among the  powers of the Earth, the Separate and
Equal Station  to which  the Laws  of  Nature  and  Nature's  God
entitles me,  in order  to secure  the Blessings  of  Liberty  to
Myself  and   my  Posterity,  and  in  order  to  re-acquire  the
Birthright that  was taken from me by fraud, do hereby asseverate
and revoke  all feudatory  contracts with  the Federal government
and its  agencies and  with the corporate State of California and
its agencies,  for I,  John E.  Trumane, being  of sound mind and
body, do  not choose,  nor  have  I  ever  chosen,  to  give  up,
relinquish or  otherwise waive  any  of  my  God-given,  natural,
Constitutionally secured rights;  and further,

     37.  That my use of the phrase "WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF
ALL MY  RIGHTS AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-207 (UCCA 1207)" above
my signature on this document indicates: that I explicitly reject
any and  all benefits  of the  Uniform Commercial  Code, absent a
valid commercial  agreement which is in force and to which I am a
party, and  cite its  provisions herein only to serve notice upon
ALL agencies  of  government,  whether  international,  national,
state, or  local, that they, and not I, are subject to, and bound
by, all  of its provisions, whether cited herein or not;  that my
explicit  reservation  of  rights  has  served  notice  upon  ALL
agencies of  government of  the "Remedy" they must provide for me
under Article  1, Section  207 of  the Uniform  Commercial  Code,
whereby I  have explicitly reserved my Common Law right not to be
compelled to  perform under any contract or commercial agreement,
that  I   have  not  entered  into  knowingly,  voluntarily,  and
intentionally;  that my explicit reservation of rights has served
notice upon  ALL agencies of government that they are ALL limited
to proceeding  against me only in harmony with the Common Law and
that I  do not, and will not accept the liability associated with
the "compelled"  benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreements;
and that  my valid  reservation of  rights has  preserved all  my
rights and  prevented the  loss of any such rights by application
of the concepts of waiver or estoppel.  And further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 14 of 153


     38.  That I  reserve my  unalienable  right  to  amend  this
Affidavit at  times and  places of  my own choosing, according as
new facts  and revelations  are made  available to  me at various
future times  and places  as  yet  unknown,  and  as  yet  to  be
determined, given  the massive  fiscal fraud  which has  now been
sufficiently revealed  to me  by  means  of  material  and  other
reliable   evidence    which   constitutes    satisfactory    and
incontrovertible proof  of the  fraud to  which I  refer in  this
paragraph and elsewhere in this Affidavit.

     39.  That I  affirm under  penalty  of  perjury,  under  the
Common Law  of America,  without the  "United States",  that  the
foregoing is true and correct, to the best of my knowledge;  and

Further This Affiant saith not.


Subscribed and  affirmed to  Nunc Pro  Tunc on  the  date  of  my
majority, which day was June 21, 1969.

Subscribed, sealed and affirmed to this  ________________  day of

___________________________, 1982.


I now  affix my  own signature  to all  of the above affirmations
WITH EXPLICIT  RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE
UCC 1-207 (UCCA 1207):

/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.

                         John E. Trumane
                      c/o General Delivery
                  San Rafael, California state


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 15 of 153


Acknowledgement
CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC       )
                                )   Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
MARIN COUNTY                    )


     On this  ______ day of ______________________________, 1982,
John E.  Trumane did personally appear before me, and is known to
be  the  one  described  in,  and  who  executed,  the  foregoing
instrument, and  acknowledged that  he executed  the same  as his
free act and deed as a Citizen/Sovereign in this above named said
State of  the Union.   Purpose  of notary  is for  identification
only, and not for entrance into any foreign jurisdiction.

                            _____________________________________
                            Notary Public


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 16 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                        c/o General Delivery
                                        San Rafael
                                        California state

                                        July 15, 1982

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Subject:  CEASE AND DESIST ORDER
          NOTICE OF PERSONAL LIABILITY

Dear Mr. Blevins:

Please be  advised that  the attached  letter dated July 15, 1982
contains, among  other things,  a CEASE  AND DESIST  ORDER and  a
NOTICE OF  PERSONAL LIABILITY hereby served on your person and on
the other  persons listed  in the attached CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
BY MAIL.

Your receipt  of this  letter and  the attached letter means that
you acknowledge  receipt of  this CEASE AND DESIST ORDER and that
you acknowledge receipt of this NOTICE OF PERSONAL LIABILITY.

Please also  note that  I object  to your  use of a ZIP code when
addressing mail  to me,  if such a ZIP code could be construed to
mean that I am "subject" in any way to the "United States".  I am
consistently informed  by employees of the U.S.P.S. that the only
purpose of  ZIP codes  is  to  expedite  the  delivery  of  mail.
Instead, please  use the above mailing address, exactly as shown,
in any and all future correspondence with me.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and  without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 17 of 153


copies: Commissioner of Social Security
        Social Security Administration
        6401 Security Boulevard
        Baltimore, Maryland

        Delmar D. Dowling, Director
        Office of Public Inquiries
        Social Security Administration
        Baltimore, Maryland

        Kathleen R. Searle
        Department of Health and Human Services
        Social Security Administration
        Baltimore, Maryland


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 18 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested parties  by mailing one copy thereof, on this
fifteenth day  of July,  1982, in  a sealed envelope with postage
prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Kathleen R. Searle
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland


Dated July 15, 1982

/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 19 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                        c/o General Delivery
                                        San Rafael
                                        California state

                                        July 15, 1982

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Dear Mr. Blevins:

Your letter to me, date-stamped July 7, 1982, and postmarked July
9, 1982,  contains erroneous presumptions by you which are hereby
rebutted as follows:


"Wish to Revoke"

Your letter  contains statements  which evidence a presumption on
your part  that I  wish to  revoke my signature on my Application
for a  Social Security  Card (SS-5)  and other  documents.   This
presumption of  yours is  hereby rebutted.   I  do not  "wish" to
"revoke" my  signature on  these documents,  nor have I requested
that you  "honor" any  "request" by  me, because such a "request"
could be construed to mean that my original SS-5 was valid at its
inception and that I now need your approval for such a "request".

On the  contrary, my letter of May 5, 1982 carefully utilized the
phrase "to  unilaterally revoke"  so as  to make  it clear that I
have unilaterally  declared the  contract void from its inception
and I  have put an end to it as though it never were.  This clear
interpretation of  my words, and the clear intent of those words,
are fully  supported by  the following definitions in Black's Law
Dictionary, Sixth Edition, to wit:

     Revoke.   To annul or make void by recalling or taking back.
     To cancel,  rescind, repeal,  or reverse,  as  to  revoke  a
     license or will.

     Rescission of  contract.   To declare a contract void in its
     inception and  to put  an end to it as though it never were.
     A "rescission"  amounts to the unmaking of a contract, or an
     undoing  of   it  from  the  beginning,  and  not  merely  a
     termination, and  it may  be effected  ...  by  one  of  the
     parties declaring  rescission of contract without consent of
     other if  a legally  sufficient ground  therefor exists ....
     It necessarily  involves a repudiation of the contract and a
     refusal of  the moving party to be further bound by it.  ...
     An act  of an  equitable nature in which a party seeks to be
     relieved of  his obligations under a contract on the grounds
     of mutual mistake, fraud, impossibility, etc.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 20 of 153


When I  use the  phrase "to  unilaterally revoke" in this and all
prior documents  served on your Agency, this phrase has a meaning
that is  synonymous with  the phrase  "to rescind  the contract".
That these  meanings are  synonymous is  clearly substantiated by
the above definitions from Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.
This letter  and all  my prior  documents detail  numerous  valid
grounds for  rescinding the  original Social Security contract in
application, in  account, and  in number.  Mutual mistake, fraud,
duress and  coercion are legally sufficient grounds on which I am
entitled to  repudiate, and refuse to be further bound in any way
by, my original Social Security application, account, and number.
The burden  of proving fraud generally falls on the moving party.
I have  already carried  my burden of proving the mutual mistake,
fraud, duress  and coercion  which  together  constitute  legally
sufficient grounds  for unilaterally  repudiating the contract(s)
in question (see my letter of May 5, 1982, page 4).

To the  extent that,  and insofar as my signature dated March 23,
1982 on  Form SSA-521  can or  should be construed to mean that I
have "requested"  consent of  the Social  Security Administration
for withdrawal of my original SS-5 application, I hereby withdraw
any such  "request" because  it was  a mistake;   I  unilaterally
rescind my  signature on  this Form  SSA-521; and  I unilaterally
rescind my  original SS-5 application without the consent of your
Agency, for  the several reasons stated in this letter and in all
other documents  previously served  on your  Agency.   Nothing in
this letter,  or in any previous documents already served on your
Agency, can  or should  be construed  in any  way as  a grant  of
jurisdiction to the "United States", its agencies or its assigns.


General Rebuttal

Your letter  contains statements which have been made contrary to
numerous facts  which are  contained in  my Affidavits  and other
documents previously  served on your Agency.  You and your Agency
have now  had ample  opportunity to  rebut any  and all  of those
facts, and  neither  you  nor  your  Agency  have  now  done  so.
Accordingly, your failure to rebut any of those facts now renders
them all  conclusive, permanently  for the  record.  You and your
Agency are now forever barred and estopped from challenging those
facts as stated.

As a  member of  the Sovereignty by right of birth and hereditary
succession, I  belong to that group by whose authority the United
States Constitution  was created.   The  Congress was created, in
turn, by that Constitution.  The Social Security Act to which you
refer is,  in turn,  a creation  of that Congress.  Regardless of
your  status  prior  to  becoming  an  employee  of  the  federal
government, your current status as a federal employee necessarily
subjects you  to the  letter of  that "law".   I  am not  subject
either to the letter or to the spirit of that "law", however.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 21 of 153


Even though  and regardless  of the  fact that  you are evidently
restricted by  law from  unilaterally rescinding an original SS-5
application, I  am not  subject to  any  such  restriction.    As
someone who  has explicitly  reserved all  my unalienable  rights
without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights, I specifically
retain my right to rescind and cancel my original Social Security
application, for  the several reasons stated in my Affidavits, in
this letter  and in  other documents,  and to  render it null and
void from  its inception.   The  documents which  I have  already
served on  the Social  Security  Administration,  including  this
letter to  you, are  prima facie  evidence that  I  have  already
exercised that right, the exercise of which is entirely within my
Sovereign power and authority to do.

The Social  Security Administration is bound by the provisions of
the Uniform  Commercial Code.   The conclusive facts as stated in
my Affidavits  and other  documents now constitute material proof
that   my   original   Social   Security   application   was   an
unconscionable contract  ab initio  (from its inception) because,
among many  other reasons, it was lacking in meaningful choice on
my part.   You  and your  Agency have  already been  notified via
those documents,  and I  hereby notify you and your Agency again,
that I  have  explicitly  reserved  all  my  unalienable  rights,
without prejudice  to any  of my  unalienable rights.  This means
that I  explicitly reject  any and  all benefits  of the  Uniform
Commercial Code,  absent a valid commercial agreement which is in
force and  to which  I am a party, and cite its provisions herein
only to  serve notice  upon all  agencies of  government, whether
international, national,  state, or  local, that they, and not I,
are subject  to, and  bound by,  all of  its provisions,  whether
cited herein or not.

Furthermore, my  explicit reservation of rights has served notice
upon all agencies of government, including but not limited to the
Social Security  Administration, of  the "Remedy"  which you must
provide for  me under  Article 1,  Section  207  of  the  Uniform
Commercial Code, whereby I have explicitly reserved my Common Law
right not  to be  compelled to  perform  under  any  contract  or
commercial agreement  that I  have not  entered  into  knowingly,
voluntarily, and intentionally.

On the  contrary, my  previous entry  into  the  Social  Security
system was  unknowing, involuntary,  and unintentional;   it  was
based upon  demonstrable  misrepresentation,  fraud,  duress  and
coercion by the federal government because:

1.   it was  imposed upon  me under  duress  and  coercion  by  a
     foreign employer  who  had  been  deceived,  as  indeed  are
     virtually all employers, into believing that Social Security
     was mandatory, and who would not otherwise engage me;

2.   I too  was misled  to believe,  by government-fostered fraud
     and misrepresentation,  that  participation  in  the  Social
     Security system was mandatory for me;

3.   the Social  Security Administration  did not  disclose to me
     that participation was strictly voluntary, or that employers
     are under no requirement to hire only individuals who have a
     Social Security Number;

4.   the Social  Security Administration did not reveal to me the
     implications of thus being connected to the "United States",
     which entity  has its  origin and jurisdiction in 1:8:17 and
     4:3:2 in the U.S. Constitution (aka "The Federal Zone");


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 22 of 153


5.   the Social  Security Administration  did not reveal that the
     monies collected from me were treated like an excise tax and
     were not allocated to a Social Security or other fund;

6.   the Social  Security Administration  did not  disclose to me
     that earnings  from labor,  in and  of themselves, are not a
     revenue-taxable activity that is subject to excise taxes;

7.   the Social  Security Administration  did  not  and  has  not
     informed me  that the Federal Insurance Contributions Act is
     neither a  contribution nor  insurance, but  an excise  tax,
     thus being misleading and misrepresented by title; and

8.   I was  a minor not of lawful, contracting age when I entered
     the Social Security contract.


For  these   reasons,  and   for  the  numerous  reasons  already
documented in  the  Affidavits  and  other  documents  previously
served on  your Agency, I reiterate my prior election to renounce
my Social  Security Number and withdraw from the system entirely.
I have not heretofore received any benefits or payments under the
Social Security Act.

Having  made   this   election   to   discontinue   all   further
participation in  the Social Security system, I hereby demand the
return of  all monies collected from me under the guise of Social
Security and Hospital Insurance.  Out of sheer generosity, I make
this demand  without claim  for any  interest  or  increment  for
inflation.   I further  agree to waive all future Social Security
benefits that  have, or would have, accrued to me by virtue of my
prior uninformed,  fraudulent,  and  coerced  submission  to  the
Social Security contract.

My Social Security application, contract, account and number are,
therefore, null  and  void  from  their  inception,  as  are  any
adhesions which may, now or in the future, be claimed by agencies
of the  federal government,  or by  any undisclosed third-parties
such as  the  Federal  Reserve  banks  and/or  the  International
Monetary Fund,  as a  result of an application, contract, account
and number  that are  all null  and void  ab initio  (from  their
inception).


Notice of Personal Liability

Any further  attempts by  you and/or  others in  your  Agency  to
assert  the  validity  of  that  invalid  application,  contract,
account, and/or  number, in  the face  of clear  and  uncontested
evidence to  the contrary, will be noted and can be used as prima
facie evidence  of your  willingness  to  violate  and  otherwise
contravene my  unalienable rights and my Constitutionally secured
rights as a Sovereign Freeman.  These rights include, but are not
limited to, those which are enumerated in my Affidavits and other
documents, including this letter.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 23 of 153


You are  hereby warned  that you  can and will be held personally
liable  for  any  future  attempts  to  violate  my  fundamental,
unalienable rights  by acts  on your part which attempt to compel
my specific  performance to  any third-party  debt or  obligation
created through  the unlawful  assertion  of  an  invalid  Social
Security application,  contract, account  and/or number.   As  an
employee of  the  federal  government,  you  are  under  a  legal
obligation to  recognize that:   "Constructive  fraud as  well as
actual fraud  may be the basis of cancellation of an instrument,"
El Paso  Natural Gas  Co. v.  Kysar Insurance Co., 605 Pacific 2d
240 (1979).   Your  ignorance of  the law  is no  excuse in  this
matter.


General Assertion of Rights

For  your   information,  I   am  not   subject  to  any  foreign
jurisdiction by  reason  of  any  valid  contract  or  commercial
agreement resulting  in adhesion across America, nor are millions
of other Sovereign Citizens, unless they have provided waivers of
rights, guaranteed  by the  Constitution, by  means of  knowingly
intelligent acts  such as contracts or commercial agreements with
such government(s) "... with sufficient awareness of the relevant
circumstances and  likely consequences ...", as ruled by the U.S.
Supreme Court in Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970).  I have
given no such waivers, nor is it possible that I could have given
such waivers  by reason of a Social Security application executed
long before  my age  of majority.  Therefore, the Social Security
application, contract,  account  and  number  at  issue  are  all
necessarily null and void, ab initio, notwithstanding any and all
unsubstantiated statements by you to the contrary.


Notice of Past Deadline

Please also  take note  that your response to my letter of May 5,
1982 to  Delmar D.  Dowling was not timely.  A timely response to
my letter  of May  5, 1982 would have been addressed on or before
June 5,  1982.   Your letter to me was date-stamped July 7, 1982.
Therefore, I  am entitled  to the  conclusive  presumption  that,
after June 5, 1982, you were barred, by virtue of the doctrine of
estoppel by  acquiescence,  from  any  further  challenge  to  my
statements as  contained  herein  and  as  contained  in  all  my
documents previously served on your Agency.


Cease and Desist Order

Therefore, you  and all  others within  your  Agency  are  hereby
ordered to  cease and  desist any  further attempts to assert the
validity of  an invalid  Social Security  application,  contract,
account, and  number, for  all of  the reasons stated hereinabove
and in  all previous  documents already  served on  your  Agency.
Your failure  to obey this order to cease and desist will make it
necessary for  me to  serve on  your person  the legal  documents
necessary to  substantiate my  claim of one or more violations by
you of  my fundamental,  inherent rights,  which documents  shall
include but  not be  limited to  affidavits  of  probable  cause,
copies of  which will  be  forwarded  to  appropriate  government
officials of California state.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 24 of 153


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and  without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights

copies: Commissioner of Social Security
        Social Security Administration
        6401 Security Boulevard
        Baltimore, Maryland

        Delmar D. Dowling, Director
        Office of Public Inquiries
        Social Security Administration
        Baltimore, Maryland

        Kathleen R. Searle
        Department of Health and Human Services
        Social Security Administration
        Baltimore, Maryland


attachments:  copies of documents relevant to rescissions
              of Social Security and birth certificate,
              in reverse chronological order


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 25 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested parties  by mailing one copy thereof, on this
fifteenth day  of July,  1982, in  a sealed envelope with postage
prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Kathleen R. Searle
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland


Dated July 15, 1982


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 26 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                   c/o General Delivery
                                   San Rafael, California

                                   March 9, 1982

Social Security Administration
Office of the Commissioner
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland
Postal Zone 21235

Dear Commissioner:

Enclosed please find a notarized affidavit which revokes my Birth
Certificate and revokes any Power of Attorney attached thereto.

Please be  so kind  as to  forward the  enclosed affidavit to all
appropriate governmental  office(s), so that proper notice can be
taken of  its contents,  and suitable  action(s) can  be taken to
comply with its mandates.

If I  do not  hear from  you within ninety (90) days of the above
date, I  will presume that my statements are correct and that you
do not have any rebuttal.

Thank you very much for your consideration.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS
AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-207 (UCCA 1207)

enclosure:  NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT
            AND REVOCATION OF POWER ASSEVERATION


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 27 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested

            L E T T E R   O F   T R A N S M I T T A L

                                        c/o General Delivery
                                        San Rafael, California

                                        March 23, 1982

Social Security Administration
Office of the Commissioner
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Dear Commissioner:

Attached please find the following documents:

     REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION, FORM SSA-521

     COVER LETTER PURSUANT TO FORM SSA-521

     NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND
     PUBLIC NOTICE REVOCATION AFFIDAVIT

     FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT


Please be  so kind  as to  forward the  enclosed documents to all
appropriate governmental  office(s), so that proper notice can be
taken of  their contents,  and suitable action(s) can be taken to
comply with their mandates.

If I  do not  hear from  you within ninety (90) days of the above
date, I  will presume that my statements are correct and that you
do not have any rebuttal.

Thank you very much for your consideration.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS
AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OF MY RIGHTS


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 28 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                        c/o General Delivery
                                        San Rafael
                                        California state

                                        May 5, 1982

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Dear Mr. Dowling:

Your letter  to me,  date-stamped April  15, 1982  and postmarked
April 28,  1982, contains  a multitude  of erroneous, irrelevant,
and immaterial presumptions which are rebutted as follows:


"Employee" Presumption

Your letter  contains a  number of  statements which  evidence  a
presumption on  your part that I am an "employee" as that term is
defined in  Title 26 and in Title 42.  I am not an "employee";  I
am not  a "covered  employee";  I am not an "employer";  and I do
not have  an "employer".   The  numerous legal  documents which I
have already served on the Social Security Administration contain
absolutely no statements which even remotely suggest that I am an
"employee", or  that I  have an  "employer", as  those terms  are
defined by  federal statute.   Your willingness to introduce into
the  administrative   record  statements   which  are  erroneous,
irrelevant, and immaterial evidences bad faith on your part.  You
are under  the obligation of good faith imposed at several places
in the Uniform Commercial Code (see e.g. 1-203).


Immigration and Naturalization

Your  letter  recommends  that  I  contact  the  Immigration  and
Naturalization Service  (INS) for  a determination  regarding  my
"citizenship status".   Again, the numerous legal documents which
I have  already served  on  the  Social  Security  Administration
contain absolutely no statements which even remotely suggest that
I immigrated  into this  country, or that I was ever naturalized.
If you  had  read  these  documents  carefully,  you  would  have
discovered that  I was  natural born  on June  21,  1948  in  the
Commonwealth of  Massachusetts and  I have  inhabited  California
state since  1952 (see  2:1:5 in  the Constitution for the united
States of  America).   As such, I am a member of the Sovereignty,
and there  is  no  reason  to  expect  that  INS  will  have  any
information pertinent  to my  status as a Sovereign.  Again, your
evident failure  to read  all  the  statements  contained  in  my
Affidavits and  other documents  constitutes further proof of bad
faith on your part.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 29 of 153


There is  absolutely no  need for  me to  request of  the  INS  a
determination concerning  whether I  am a  "U.S. citizen" as that
term is defined in Titles 26, 42 and their regulations.  My right
to be "present" in these united States of America is a birthright
which is unalienable, fundamental and inherent.  According to the
Declaration of Independence, I am endowed with this birthright by
my Creator,  and not  by any one or any thing else, and certainly
not by  the Immigration and Naturalization Service and not by the
Social Security Administration in any event.

You have  stated that  you cannot honor my request to adjust your
records regarding  my "citizenship" status because, as you state,
the Social Security Administration does not have the authority to
determine whether  my "status should be changed".  Your statement
contains a  non sequitor.   First  of all, I have not requested a
determination whether  my status  should be  changed.  I have not
requested any  change of  status.  My status has not changed, and
there is no need to change my status.

The administrative  record is  another matter,  however.   If  it
contains errors of any kind, you are under the obligation of good
faith to  correct those  errors, if and when they are discovered.
If  that   administrative  record   contains  data  and/or  other
information which suggests that I am a "United States citizen" as
that term  is defined in Title 26 and Title 42, then the contents
of that  record were  premised upon  a  mutual  mistake  of  fact
regarding my  true  status.    Accordingly,  you  are  under  the
obligation of  good faith to correct any and all errors contained
in that  administrative record,  using  the  correct  information
already supplied  to you.   You  are expected  to understand that
correcting errors is entirely different from changing my status.


Constitutionality of Social Security Act

Your letter  contains a statement that the Supreme Court has held
the Social  Security Act  to be constitutional not long after the
law's enactment  in the  1930s.   That may  be so,  but there  is
nothing in  my documents  to suggest  that I  have challenged the
constitutionality of  the Social  Security Act.   I  certainly do
reserve the  right to  so challenge  the Act,  at any time in the
future.   Nothing in  this letter,  nor in  my Affidavits, nor in
other documents  already served  on your Agency, can or should be
construed to  mean that  I have  waived my right to challenge the
constitutionality of any act of Congress, now or in the future.


General Rebuttal

Your letter  contains a  set of  statements which  have been made
contrary to  numerous facts  which are contained in my Affidavits
and other  documents served  on your  Agency.   You have  now had
ample opportunity  to rebut  any and  all of those facts, and you
have not  done so.   Accordingly,  your failure  to rebut  any of
those facts  now renders them all conclusive, permanently for the
record.  You are now forever barred and estopped from challenging
those facts as stated.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 30 of 153


As a  member of  the Sovereignty by right of birth and hereditary
succession, I  belong to that group by whose authority the United
States Constitution  was created.   The  Congress was created, in
turn, by that Constitution.  The Social Security Act to which you
refer is,  in turn,  a creation  of that Congress.  Regardless of
your  status  prior  to  becoming  an  employee  of  the  federal
government, your current status as a federal employee necessarily
subjects you  to the  letter of  that "law".   I  am not  subject
either to the letter or to the spirit of that law, however.

Even though you are evidently restricted by law from unilaterally
revoking an  original SS-5  application, I  am not subject to any
such restriction.   As someone who has explicitly reserved all my
unalienable rights  without prejudice  to any  of my  unalienable
rights, I specifically retain my right to unilaterally revoke and
cancel my  original Social  Security application, for the several
reasons stated in my Affidavits, this letter and other documents,
and to render it null and void from its inception.  The documents
which I  have now  served on  the Social Security Administration,
including this  letter, are  prima facie evidence that I have, in
effect, already  exercised that  right, the  exercise of which is
entirely within my Sovereign power and authority to do.

The Social  Security Administration is bound by the provisions of
the Uniform  Commercial Code.   The conclusive facts as stated in
my Affidavits  and other  documents now constitute material proof
that   my   original   Social   Security   application   was   an
unconscionable contract  ab  initio  because,  among  many  other
reasons, it  was lacking  in meaningful  choice on  my part.  You
have already  been notified  via those  documents, and  I  hereby
notify  you  again,  that  I  have  explicitly  reserved  all  my
unalienable rights,  without prejudice  to any  of my unalienable
rights.  This means that I explicitly reject any and all benefits
of  the  Uniform  Commercial  Code,  absent  a  valid  commercial
agreement which  is in  force and to which I am a party, and cite
its provisions  herein only  to serve notice upon all agencies of
government, whether  international, national,  state,  or  local,
that they,  and not  I, are  subject to, and bound by, all of its
provisions, whether cited herein or not.

Furthermore, my  explicit reservation of rights has served notice
upon all agencies of government, including but not limited to the
Social Security  Administration, of  the "Remedy"  which you must
provide for  me under  Article 1,  Section  207  of  the  Uniform
Commercial Code, whereby I have explicitly reserved my Common Law
right not  to be  compelled to  perform  under  any  contract  or
commercial agreement  that I  have not  entered  into  knowingly,
voluntarily, and intentionally.

On the  contrary, my  previous entry  into  the  Social  Security
system was  unknowing, involuntary,  and unintentional;   it  was
based upon  demonstrable  misrepresentation,  fraud,  duress  and
coercion by the federal government because:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 31 of 153


1.   it was  imposed upon  me under  duress  and  coercion  by  a
     foreign employer  who  had  been  deceived,  as  indeed  are
     virtually all employers, into believing that Social Security
     was mandatory, and who would not otherwise engage me;

2.   I too  was misled  to believe,  by government-fostered fraud
     and misrepresentation,  that  participation  in  the  Social
     Security system was mandatory for me;

3.   the Social  Security Administration  did not  disclose to me
     that participation was strictly voluntary, or that employers
     are under no requirement to hire only individuals who have a
     Social Security Number;

4.   the Social  Security Administration did not reveal to me the
     implications of thus being connected to the "United States",
     which entity  has its  origin and jurisdiction in 1:8:17 and
     4:3:2 in the U.S. Constitution (aka "The Federal Zone");

5.   the Social  Security Administration  did not reveal that the
     monies collected from me were treated like an excise tax and
     were not allocated to a Social Security or other fund;

6.   the Social  Security Administration  did not  disclose to me
     that earnings  from labor,  in and  of themselves, are not a
     revenue-taxable activity that is subject to excise taxes;

7.   the Social  Security Administration  did  not  and  has  not
     informed me  that the Federal Insurance Contributions Act is
     neither a  contribution nor  insurance, but  an excise  tax,
     thus being misleading and misrepresented by title; and

8.   I was  a minor not of lawful, contracting age when I entered
     the Social Security contract.


For  these   reasons,  and   for  the  numerous  reasons  already
documented in  the  Affidavits  and  other  documents  previously
served on  your Agency, I reiterate my prior election to renounce
my Social  Security Number and withdraw from the system entirely.
I have not heretofore received any benefits or payments under the
Social Security  Act.   Neither has anyone else received benefits
by virtue  of my  prior  participation  in  the  Social  Security
system.

Having  made   this   election   to   discontinue   all   further
participation in  the Social Security system, I hereby demand the
return of  all monies collected from me under the guise of Social
Security and Hospital Insurance.  Out of sheer generosity, I make
this demand  without claim  for any  interest  or  increment  for
inflation.   I further  agree to waive all future Social Security
benefits that  have, or would have, accrued to me by virtue of my
prior uninformed,  fraudulent,  and  coerced  submission  to  the
Social Security contract.

My  Social   Security  application,  contract  and  account  are,
therefore, null  and  void  from  their  inception,  as  are  any
adhesions which may, now or in the future, be claimed by agencies
of the  federal government,  or by any undisclosed third-parties,
as a result of an application, contract and account that are null
and void ab initio.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 32 of 153


Notice of Personal Liability

Any further  attempts by  you to  assert  the  validity  of  that
invalid application,  contract and/or  account  in  the  face  of
contrary evidence  will be  noted and  can be used as prima facie
evidence of  your willingness to violate and otherwise contravene
my unalienable rights and my Constitutionally secured rights as a
Sovereign Freeman.  These rights include, but are not limited to,
those which  are enumerated in my Affidavits and other documents,
including this letter.


You are  hereby warned  that you  can and will be held personally
liable  for  any  future  attempts  to  violate  my  fundamental,
unalienable rights  by acts  on your part which attempt to compel
my specific  performance to  any third-party  debt or  obligation
created through  the unlawful  assertion  of  an  invalid  Social
Security application, contract and/or account.  As an employee of
the federal  government, you  are under  a  legal  obligation  to
recognize that:   "Constructive fraud as well as actual fraud may
be the  basis of  cancellation of an instrument," El Paso Natural
Gas Co.  v. Kysar Insurance Co., 605 Pacific 2d 240 (1979).  Your
ignorance of the law is no excuse in this matter.


General Assertion of Rights

For  your   information,  I   am  not   subject  to  any  foreign
jurisdiction by  reason  of  any  valid  contract  or  commercial
agreement resulting  in adhesion across America, nor are millions
of other Sovereign Citizens, unless they have provided waivers of
rights, guaranteed  by the  Constitution, by  means of  knowingly
intelligent acts  such as contracts or commercial agreements with
such government(s) "... with sufficient awareness of the relevant
circumstances and  likely consequences ...", as ruled by the U.S.
Supreme Court in Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970).  I have
given no such waivers, nor is it possible that I could have given
such waivers  by reason of a Social Security application executed
long before  my age  of majority.  Therefore, the Social Security
application, account and number at issue are necessarily null and
void, ab  initio, notwithstanding  any  and  all  unsubstantiated
statements by you to the contrary.


Notice of Deadline

If I do not hear from you within thirty (30) calendar days of the
above date, I will be entitled to the conclusive presumption that
you are  thereby barred, by virtue of the doctrine of estoppel by
acquiescence, from  any further  challenge to  my  statements  as
contained  herein  and  as  contained  in  all  my  documents  as
previously served on your Agency.

Thank you very much for your consideration.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 33 of 153


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 34 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested parties  by mailing one copy thereof, on this
fifth day  of May,  1982,  in  a  sealed  envelope  with  postage
prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland


Dated May 5, 1982

/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 35 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                             c/o General Delivery
                                             San Rafael
                                             California state

                                             October 5, 1982

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Subject:  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT (see attached)
          ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE (see attached)

Dear Ms. King:

     Please  take  notice  that  this  letter  and  all  attached
documents contain,  among other  things, a  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT in
addition to  an ACTUAL  AND CONSTRUCTIVE  NOTICE hereby served on
your person  and on  the other  persons listed  in  the  attached
CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE BY MAIL.

     Please also  take notice  that I formally object to your use
of a ZIP code when addressing mail to me, if such ZIP codes could
be construed  to mean  that I  am "subject"  in any  way  to  the
"United States".   I am consistently informed by employees of the
U.S.P.S. that  the only  purpose of  ZIP codes is to expedite the
delivery of  mail.   Instead, I  hereby repeat my demand that you
utilize the  above mailing  address, exactly as shown, in any and
all future correspondence with me.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and  without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights

attachments:

   [see next page]

copies:

   [see pages 3 and 4, infra]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 36 of 153


     Demand for Payment, Actual and Constructive Notice,
       October 5, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, August 1, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND PUBLIC NOTICE
       REVOCATION AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 199
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, July 15, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, July 15, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, May 5, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, May 5, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23, 1982
     WITHDRAWAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPLICATION, March 23, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to Vital Records, Boston, Mass., April 3, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT AND REVOCATION
       OF POWER ASSEVERATION by John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982

copies:

   [see next page]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 37 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested parties  by mailing one copy thereof, on this
fifth day  of October,  1982, in  a sealed  envelope with postage
prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Kathleen R. Searle
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Speaker of the House
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20515/tdc

Attorney General
State of California
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, California
Postal Zone 94244-2550/tdc

Attorney General
Justice Department
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20530/tdc

Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20201/tdc

Commissioner of IRS
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20224/tdc


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 38 of 153


The Federal Reserve Bank, Inc.
20th and Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20551/tdc

Secretary of the Treasury
State of California
915 Capitol Mall
Sacramento, California
Postal Zone 95814/tdc

Senator Alan Cranston
U.S. Senate
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20510/tdc

Senator John Seymour
U.S. Senate
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20510/tdc

Representative Barbara Boxer
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20515/tdc


Dated October 5, 1982

/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 39 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                             c/o General Delivery
                                             San Rafael
                                             California state

                                             October 5, 1982

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Subject:  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT
          ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE

Dear Ms. King:

     This is  my lawful  and formal  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT of Social
Security taxes  unlawfully withheld  from my  untaxable  personal
compensation that  was exempt  from tax under the fundamental Law
during the  calendar years  1965 to  1986, inclusive.   The total
amount of this demand is itemized as follows:

     Social Security Taxes Unlawfully Withheld by SSA
     from John E. Trumane, itemized as follows:

     Year      Amount and Type of Tax Withheld    Total

     1986     $3,003 social security taxes       $3,003
     1985      2,971   "       "       "          2,971
     1984      1,074   "       "       "          1,074
     1983        503   "       "       "            503
     1982      1,285   "       "       "          1,285
     1981      1,975   "       "       "          1,975
     1980      1,587   "       "       "          1,587
     1979        992   "       "       "            992
     1978      1,070   "       "       "          1,070
     1977        965   "       "       "            965
     1976        822   "       "       "            822
     1975          0   "       "       "              0
     1974        672   "       "       "            672
     1973        418   "       "       "            418
     1972          0   "       "       "              0
     1971         75   "       "       "             75
     1970         55   "       "       "             55
     1969         29   "       "       "             29
     1968         96   "       "       "             96
     1967         47   "       "       "             47
     1966         36   "       "       "             36
     1965         13   "       "       "             13
                                                 ------
               TOTAL AMOUNT DUE:                $17,688
                                                =======


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 40 of 153


     The above  yearly amounts  were  taken  from  the  statement
entitled "Personal Earnings and Benefit Estimate Statement", form
number SSA-7005  (06-88), dated  November 29,  1988 and signed by
Dorcas R. Hardy, Commissioner of Social Security (copy attached).

     Please take  note of  my prior  communications to the Social
Security Administration,  in which  I have reiterated this demand
without claim for any interest or increment for inflation.


ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE

     This is  my formal  reply to your letter date-stamped August
13, 1982.   Please  take notice  of the  fact that I am a de jure
California State  Citizen, not  a de  facto federal citizen under
the so-called  14th Amendment, nor a ward of the Congress who has
a taxable  citizenship  through  Social  Security  or  any  other
governmental privilege  or franchise.  No governmental agency has
power of attorney over me or my property.

     This letter and all attachments are based upon the principle
that a contract is "Null and Void Ab Initio" in the case of fraud
at its  inception, and  it need  not be  formally rescinded  as a
prerequisite to a right of avoidance.  See court authority in the
case of  Bonacci v.  Massachusetts Bonding  and Insurance Co., 58
Cal 2d 657, 664; 137 P.2d 487 (1943).

     Therefore, I again demand that you remove my name and number
from your  system of  records, and  that you  notify any  and all
affected governmental agencies that I am not subject to, nor am I
required to  have, a  Social Security  number or account.  I also
demand that  your agency  return all property that was taken from
me by your use of various elements of fraud (see TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
as shown in the above DEMAND FOR PAYMENT).

     This letter  and  attachments,  and  all  previous  letters,
affidavits, declarations and affirmations sent to you, the Social
Security Administration and/or the Department of Health and Human
Services,  or   any  other  governmental  agency  (all  of  which
documents are  incorporated by  this reference  as if  set  forth
fully herein),  are conclusive and direct evidence of fraud which
has not  and cannot be refuted by any legal means.  Therefore, as
such, these  documents  now  constitute  conclusive  evidence  of
admissions and  confessions of  fraud and entrapment in any court
of law or in any other proceedings.

     These documents  are hereby  deemed to  be  your  "means  of
knowledge".   The means  of knowledge,  especially when knowledge
consists of  public records, is deemed in law to be "knowledge of
the facts".   If  it appears  on record  that an  individual  had
notice or  information of  circumstances which would cause him to
inquire and which, if followed, would lead to knowledge, or if it
appears that  the facts  were presumptively within his knowledge,
then he  will be deemed to have had actual knowledge of the facts
and may  be subsequently  liable for  any damage or injury.  You,
therefore, Gwendolyn  S. King,  have been given "knowledge of the
facts" as  they pertain  to this  conspiracy to  commit  a  fraud
against me and my property.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 41 of 153


     This is  an actual  and constructive notice under California
Civil Code  (CCC), Sections  18 and  19, that if you fail to obey
the law  and if  you continue  to aid and abet the conspiracy, by
use of  fraud, entrapment and misrepresentation, to deprive me of
my de jure state Citizenship and vested property rights, then you
will thereby  cause me  further damage  and injury.    This  will
require me to take whatever action I deem is necessary and lawful
to effect a remedy.

     You will  take formal  notice of the fact that I am a white,
natural born  state Citizen  who is  executing  this  ACTUAL  AND
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE.  If called upon as a witness, I will testify
to the  following facts,  which I believe to be true and correct,
to the best of my knowledge and understanding:

     There is NO LAW that would or could compel me to participate
in the  perpetration of  a fraud.   There  is no provision in the
Social Security Act that would not allow me, a white natural born
state Citizen,  to refrain and withdraw from participating in the
Social Security System, which is based upon CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD as
evidenced by the facts as stated in all attached documents and by
the additional facts which are stated below.

     My true  status and  intent is  to  be  a  Common-Law  State
Citizen  as   established  by   the  Preamble  and  the  original
Constitution for  the United  States of  America (1787)  and  the
original Constitution  of California state (1849).  Thus, for all
the reasons  stated herein  and elsewhere,  I hereby  reaffirm my
right to  rescind, revoke and render null and void nunc pro tunc,
as previously established, the number xxx-xx-xxxx in application,
in body, and in account.

     I hereby  charge that the Social Security Administration and
the Congress  of the  United States,  with full  knowledge of the
following facts, and with willful and full intent to do so:

1.   Did not  reveal the  truth that the Social Security Act is a
     compulsory excise  tax under  Title II  and VIII  which only
     creates a revocable statutory right.  See "Hearings before a
     Subcommittee of  the Committee  on Ways  and Means, House of
     Representatives, 83rd  Congress, First Session, on the Legal
     Status of  OASI Benefits",  dated November 27, 1953, Part 6,
     pages 906,  932, 963.  This reference incorporates fully and
     makes Part 6 a part of this ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE.

2.   Did not reveal the truth that the Social Security Act IS NOT
     insurance and  does not  go into  a separate trust fund, nor
     does it  create any  vested rights.   (See supra, page 1014;
     see also Fleming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 610 (1960).)

3.   Did deliberately  and  willfully  withhold  the  information
     that, upon obtaining a Social Security Number (SSN), a white
     natural born  state Citizen  would be required, for the rest
     of his  working life,  to pay over 50% of his wages acquired
     in exchange  quid pro  quo, as  an income tax, as instigated
     and established for the profit of the Federal Reserve Banks.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 42 of 153


4.   Did not reveal and disclose the truth that, upon obtaining a
     SSN, a  white natural  born State  Citizen  would  lose  his
     primary  State   Citizenship,   his   Privileges   and   his
     Immunities, and  become  instead  a  business  entity  under
     Social  Security,  and  an  enfranchised  person  under  the
     so-called 14th  Amendment, and  would  lose  access  to  his
     Constitutional Rights  as guaranteed  by the Bill of Rights,
     Amendments 1  through 10;   and  instead he  would become  a
     federal citizen  and receive privileges and immunities which
     are revocable  at the  whim and  pleasure of  the  Congress.
     (See Section 1104 of the Social Security Act, and Article I,
     Section 7  of the  California  Constitution,  and  so-called
     Amendment 14 of the U.S. Constitution.)

5.   Did not  reveal and disclose the truth that the SSN would be
     used for the absolute control of the "citizens of the United
     States" under  the so-called 14th Amendment, as evidenced by
     various orders  instituted by  the Internal  Revenue Service
     (similar to  Nazi  Concentration  Camp  numbers  or  federal
     serial numbers).

6.   Have willfully and deliberately utilized Section 1104 of the
     Social Security  Act to  deprive over  250 million people of
     their statutory  rights and  property, as established by the
     original Social Security Act.

7.   Have, by  utilizing constructive  fraud  by  non-disclosure,
     deceit, coercion,  intimidation, duress  and outright lying,
     defrauded me  of  my  Common-Law  Citizenship  and  also  my
     inalienable/unalienable rights to life, liberty and property
     at the  instigation of  the Federal  Reserve Banks  for  the
     profit of the Class A Stockholders of those banks.

8.   Have willfully and deliberately failed to disclose the above
     information and  do still  continue  to  state  that  Social
     Security is "voluntary" and "insurance" when, in fact, it is
     not and,  in fact  and operation,  it is  administered as  a
     compulsory excise  tax;   and thus to compel me to surrender
     my constitutional  state Citizenship and to deprive me of my
     Privileges and  Immunities as  a sovereign state Citizen, in
     order to  be regulated  and to  pay an  "income tax" for the
     profit of the Federal Reserve Banks, is outright fraud being
     instituted by  the U.S.  Congress, the  Department of Health
     and Human  Services, the  Internal Revenue  Service and  the
     Federal Reserve Banks Inc., with the assistance and approval
     of the  U.S. Attorney  General's Office,  with the intent to
     establish the  ten (10)  planks of  the Communist  Manifesto
     within the  United States  as they are now in operation, and
     to abolish  the intent of the United States Constitution, as
     it was  originally  established  by  our  founding  Fathers,
     namely,  to   ordain  and  establish  a  Republic,    NOT  a
     socialistic Slave  State for  the enrichment  of the Class A
     Stockholders of the Federal Reserve banks.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 43 of 153


9.   Have committed  fraud, duress  and coercion, exercised undue
     influence,  and   evidenced  unlawful   menace  against  the
     American people by representing the so-called 14th Amendment
     as a  lawfully ratified  amendment in the U.S. Constitution,
     when contrary  proof, published  court authorities and other
     competent legal  scholars have  now established  that it was
     NOT lawfully ratified.  (See State v. Phillips, 540 P.2d 936
     (1975);   Dyett v.  Turner, 439  P.2d 266 (1968);  28 Tulane
     Law Review 22;  11 South Carolina Law  Quarterly 484.)


     Neither Congress  nor the Social Security Administration nor
the Federal  Reserve banks  had any lawful authority to compel me
to apply for a Social Security account and number.

     Upon application  for a  Social Security account and number,
there was  a hidden  assumpsit that  I  became  "subject  to  the
jurisdiction of the United States" and thereby became entitled to
the privileges  and immunities  granted  by  the  so-called  14th
Amendment,   whereby    the   Congress,   the   Social   Security
Administration and  the Internal Revenue Service could command my
specific performance  to discharge any of their third-party debts
and obligations.

     The Social  Security contract  (SS-5) is  not  an  insurance
contract.   There  is  no  separate  fund  or  account  for  each
participant.   The contract violates federal statutes (see, e.g.,
Title 18,  RICO statutes).  I have  rescinded  my  original  SS-5
application.   I am  holding it voidable and IT IS VOID as to the
issuing party.   Every  consideration  that  arose  out  of  that
contract must be returned to me, the lawful owner.

     I HEREBY  COMMAND  THE  SOCIAL  SECURITY  ADMINISTRATION  TO
RETURN ALL SUCH CONSIDERATIONS AS ITEMIZED ABOVE.

     This is  also an  ACTUAL  AND  CONSTRUCTIVE  NOTICE  to  all
concerned agencies,  both State  and Federal,  that  I,  John  E.
Trumane, a  white natural  born common-law  state Citizen,  now a
Citizen of California state, having no known legal franchise that
would cloud  my position,  hereby give  notice to  all  concerned
agencies that  their failure  to refute  each and  every point by
substantive proof  will be  considered admissions and confessions
and shall establish estoppel by silence and/or acquiescence.

     The continued  deprivation  of  my  substantive  rights,  my
vested property rights and my property as a Citizen of California
state, will  cause me further injury and damage, and will have to
be remedied by whatever actions deemed necessary and lawful.

     All of  the above  statements are  true and  correct, to the
best of my current knowledge, and are affirmed under penalties of
perjury, without  the "United  States", under  the  laws  of  the
United States of America, per 28 USC 1746(1).

            Notice to principals is notice to agents.

            Notice to agents is notice to principals.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 44 of 153


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and  without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights

attachments:

     Personal Earnings and Benefit Estimate Statement
      for John E. Trumane, November 29, 1988
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, August 1, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND PUBLIC NOTICE
       REVOCATION AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 199
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, July 15, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, July 15, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, May 5, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, May 5, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23, 1982
     WITHDRAWAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPLICATION, March 23, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to Vital Records, Boston, Mass., April 3, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT AND REVOCATION
       OF POWER ASSEVERATION by John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982


Copies:  [see next page]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 45 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified  that service  of  this  DEMAND  FOR
PAYMENT and  ACTUAL AND  CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE  have been  made  on
interested parties by mailing one copy thereof, on this fifth day
of October,  1982, in  a sealed  envelope with  postage  prepaid,
properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Kathleen R. Searle
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Speaker of the House
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20505/tdc

Attorney General
State of California
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, California
Postal Zone 94244-2550/tdc

Attorney General
Justice Department
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20530/tdc

Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20201/tdc

Commissioner of IRS
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20224/tdc


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 46 of 153


The Federal Reserve Bank, Inc.
20th and Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20551/tdc

Secretary of the Treasury
State of California
915 Capitol Mall
Sacramento, California
Postal Zone 95814/tdc

Senator Alan Cranston
U.S. Senate
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20510/tdc

Senator John Seymour
U.S. Senate
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20510/tdc

Representative Barbara Boxer
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20515/tdc


Dated October 5, 1982

/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 47 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                        c/o USPS General Delivery
                                        San Rafael
                                        California state
                                        zip code exempt
                                        (DMM 122.32)

                                        June 5, 1983

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Subject:  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT (see attached)
          ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE (see attached)

Dear Ms. King:

     Please  take  notice  that  this  letter  and  all  attached
documents contain  among other things a second DEMAND FOR PAYMENT
in addition  to a  second ACTUAL  AND CONSTRUCTIVE  NOTICE hereby
served on  your person  and on  the other  persons listed  in the
attached CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE BY MAIL.


                       CONSPICUOUS NOTICE:

     In order  to be  valid, all future written communications to
me must explicitly acknowledge the fact that I inhabit California
state, not the arbitrary federal district known as "CA".  Failure
to recognize  this fact  necessarily must  invalidate any and all
future service  of process  and/or other  written  communications
which fail to exhibit the correct mailing location, to wit:

                         John E. Trumane
                       Sovereign Sui Juris
                      c/o General Delivery
                  San Rafael, California state
                  zip code exempt (DMM 122.32)

     Please take  notice that I formally object to your use of an
unqualified ZIP  code when  addressing mail  to me,  if such  ZIP
codes could  be construed  to mean that I am "subject" in any way
to the  "United States".  I am consistently informed by employees
of the  U.S. Postal Service that the only purpose of ZIP codes is
to expedite  the delivery  of mail.   Instead, I hereby repeat my
demand that  you utilize  the above  mailing location, exactly as
shown, in any and all future correspondence with me.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane
Sovereign Sui Juris
all rights reserved


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 48 of 153


attachments:

   [see next page]

copies:

   [see pages 3 and 4, infra]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 49 of 153


attachments to first NOTICE and DEMAND previously served:

     Demand for Payment, Actual and Constructive Notice,
       October 5, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, August 1, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND PUBLIC NOTICE
       REVOCATION AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 199
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, July 15, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, July 15, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, May 5, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, May 5, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23, 1982
     WITHDRAWAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPLICATION, March 23, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to Vital Records, Boston, Mass., April 3, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT AND REVOCATION
       OF POWER ASSEVERATION by John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982

copies:

   [see next page]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 50 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested party(s) by mailing one copy thereof, on this
seventh day  of June,  1983, in  a sealed  envelope with  postage
prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx to:

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland


Copies under separate cover to:

Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.

Representative Lynn Woolsey
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.


Dated:  June 7, 1983

/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 51 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx                c/o General Delivery
Return Receipt Requested                     San Rafael
                                             California state
                                             zip code exempt
                                             (DMM 122.32)

                                             June 5, 1983

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Subject:  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT
          ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE

Dear Ms. King:

     This is  my second  lawful and  formal DEMAND FOR PAYMENT of
Social Security  taxes  unlawfully  withheld  from  my  untaxable
personal  compensation   that  was  exempt  from  tax  under  the
fundamental  Law   during  the   calendar  years  1965  to  1986,
inclusive.   The total  amount of  this  demand  is  itemized  as
follows:

     Social Security Taxes Unlawfully Withheld by SSA
     from John E. Trumane, itemized as follows:

     Year      Amount and Type of Tax Withheld    Total

     1986     $3,003 social security taxes       $3,003
     1985      2,971   "       "       "          2,971
     1984      1,074   "       "       "          1,074
     1983        503   "       "       "            503
     1982      1,285   "       "       "          1,285
     1981      1,975   "       "       "          1,975
     1980      1,587   "       "       "          1,587
     1979        992   "       "       "            992
     1978      1,070   "       "       "          1,070
     1977        965   "       "       "            965
     1976        822   "       "       "            822
     1975          0   "       "       "              0
     1974        672   "       "       "            672
     1973        418   "       "       "            418
     1972          0   "       "       "              0
     1971         75   "       "       "             75
     1970         55   "       "       "             55
     1969         29   "       "       "             29
     1968         96   "       "       "             96
     1967         47   "       "       "             47
     1966         36   "       "       "             36
     1965         13   "       "       "             13
                                                 ------
               TOTAL AMOUNT DUE:                $17,688
                                                =======


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 52 of 153


     The above  yearly amounts  were  taken  from  the  statement
entitled "Personal Earnings and Benefit Estimate Statement", form
number SSA-7005  (06-88), dated  November 29,  1988 and signed by
Dorcas R. Hardy, Commissioner of Social Security (copy attached).

     Please take  note of  my prior  communications to the Social
Security Administration,  in which  I have reiterated this demand
without claim for any interest or increment for inflation.


ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE

     This is  my formal  reply to your letter date-stamped August
13, 1982.   Please  take notice  of the  fact that I am a de jure
California State  Citizen, not  a de  facto federal citizen under
the so-called  14th Amendment, nor a ward of the Congress who has
a taxable  citizenship  through  Social  Security  or  any  other
governmental privilege  or franchise.  No governmental agency has
power of attorney over me or my property.

     This letter and all attachments are based upon the principle
that a contract is "Null and Void Ab Initio" in the case of fraud
at its  inception, and  it need  not be  formally rescinded  as a
prerequisite to a right of avoidance.  See court authority in the
case of  Bonacci v.  Massachusetts Bonding  and Insurance Co., 58
Cal 2d 657, 664; 137 P.2d 487 (1943).

     Therefore, I again demand that you remove my name and number
from your  system of  records, and  that you  notify any  and all
affected governmental agencies that I am not subject to, nor am I
required to  have, a  Social Security  number or account.  I also
demand that  your agency  return all property that was taken from
me by your use of various elements of fraud (see TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
as shown in the above DEMAND FOR PAYMENT).

     This letter  and  attachments,  and  all  previous  letters,
affidavits, declarations and affirmations sent to you, the Social
Security Administration and/or the Department of Health and Human
Services,  or   any  other  governmental  agency  (all  of  which
documents are  incorporated by  this reference  as if  set  forth
fully herein),  are conclusive and direct evidence of fraud which
has not  and cannot be refuted by any legal means.  Therefore, as
such, these  documents  now  constitute  conclusive  evidence  of
admissions and  confessions of  fraud and entrapment in any court
of law or in any other proceedings.

     These documents  are hereby  deemed to  be  your  "means  of
knowledge".   The means  of knowledge,  especially when knowledge
consists of  public records, is deemed in law to be "knowledge of
the facts".   If  it appears  on record  that an  individual  had
notice or  information of  circumstances which would cause him to
inquire and which, if followed, would lead to knowledge, or if it
appears that  the facts  were presumptively within his knowledge,
then he  will be deemed to have had actual knowledge of the facts
and may  be subsequently  liable for  any damage or injury.  You,
therefore, Gwendolyn  S. King,  have been given "knowledge of the
facts" as  they pertain  to this  conspiracy to  commit  a  fraud
against me and my property.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 53 of 153


     This is  an actual  and constructive notice under California
Civil Code  (CCC), Sections  18 and  19, that if you fail to obey
the law  and if  you continue  to aid and abet the conspiracy, by
use of  fraud, entrapment and misrepresentation, to deprive me of
my de jure state Citizenship and vested property rights, then you
will thereby  cause me  further damage  and injury.    This  will
require me to take whatever action I deem is necessary and lawful
to effect a remedy.

     You will  take formal  notice of the fact that I am a white,
natural born  state Citizen  who is  executing  this  ACTUAL  AND
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE.  If called upon as a witness, I will testify
to the  following facts,  which I believe to be true and correct,
to the best of my knowledge and understanding:

     There is NO LAW that would or could compel me to participate
in the  perpetration of  a fraud.   There  is no provision in the
Social Security Act that would not allow me, a white natural born
state Citizen,  to refrain and withdraw from participating in the
Social Security System, which is based upon CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD as
evidenced by the facts as stated in all attached documents and by
the additional facts which are stated below.

     My true  status and  intent is  to  be  a  Common-Law  State
Citizen  as   established  by   the  Preamble  and  the  original
Constitution for  the United  States of  America (1787)  and  the
original Constitution  of California state (1849).  Thus, for all
the reasons  stated herein  and elsewhere,  I hereby  reaffirm my
right to  rescind, revoke and render null and void nunc pro tunc,
as previously established, the number xxx-xx-xxxx in application,
in body, and in account.

     I hereby  charge that the Social Security Administration and
the Congress  of the  United States,  with full  knowledge of the
following facts, and with willful and full intent to do so:

1.   Did not  reveal the  truth that the Social Security Act is a
     compulsory excise  tax under  Title II  and VIII  which only
     creates a revocable statutory right.  See "Hearings before a
     Subcommittee of  the Committee  on Ways  and Means, House of
     Representatives, 83rd  Congress, First Session, on the Legal
     Status of  OASI Benefits",  dated November 27, 1953, Part 6,
     pages 906,  932, 963.  This reference incorporates fully and
     makes Part 6 a part of this ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE.

2.   Did not reveal the truth that the Social Security Act IS NOT
     insurance and  does not  go into  a separate trust fund, nor
     does it  create any  vested rights.   (See supra, page 1014;
     see also Fleming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 610 (1960).)

3.   Did deliberately  and  willfully  withhold  the  information
     that, upon obtaining a Social Security Number (SSN), a white
     natural born  state Citizen  would be required, for the rest
     of his  working life,  to pay over 50% of his wages acquired
     in exchange  quid pro  quo, as  an income tax, as instigated
     and established for the profit of the Federal Reserve Banks.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 54 of 153


4.   Did not reveal and disclose the truth that, upon obtaining a
     SSN, a  white natural  born State  Citizen  would  lose  his
     primary  State   Citizenship,   his   Privileges   and   his
     Immunities, and  become  instead  a  business  entity  under
     Social  Security,  and  an  enfranchised  person  under  the
     so-called 14th  Amendment, and  would  lose  access  to  his
     Constitutional Rights  as guaranteed  by the Bill of Rights,
     Amendments 1  through 10;   and  instead he  would become  a
     federal citizen  and receive privileges and immunities which
     are revocable  at the  whim and  pleasure of  the  Congress.
     (See Section 1104 of the Social Security Act, and Article I,
     Section 7  of the  California  Constitution,  and  so-called
     Amendment 14 of the U.S. Constitution.)

5.   Did not  reveal and disclose the truth that the SSN would be
     used for the absolute control of the "citizens of the United
     States" under  the so-called 14th Amendment, as evidenced by
     various orders  instituted by  the Internal  Revenue Service
     (similar to  Nazi  Concentration  Camp  numbers  or  federal
     serial numbers).

6.   Have willfully and deliberately utilized Section 1104 of the
     Social Security  Act to  deprive over  250 million people of
     their statutory  rights and  property, as established by the
     original Social Security Act.

7.   Have, by  utilizing constructive  fraud  by  non-disclosure,
     deceit, coercion,  intimidation, duress  and outright lying,
     defrauded me  of  my  Common-Law  Citizenship  and  also  my
     inalienable/unalienable rights to life, liberty and property
     at the  instigation of  the Federal  Reserve Banks  for  the
     profit of the Class A Stockholders of those banks.

8.   Have willfully and deliberately failed to disclose the above
     information and  do still  continue  to  state  that  Social
     Security is "voluntary" and "insurance" when, in fact, it is
     not and,  in fact  and operation,  it is  administered as  a
     compulsory excise  tax;   and thus to compel me to surrender
     my constitutional  state Citizenship and to deprive me of my
     Privileges and  Immunities as  a sovereign state Citizen, in
     order to  be regulated  and to  pay an  "income tax" for the
     profit of the Federal Reserve Banks, is outright fraud being
     instituted by  the U.S.  Congress, the  Department of Health
     and Human  Services, the  Internal Revenue  Service and  the
     Federal Reserve Banks Inc., with the assistance and approval
     of the  U.S. Attorney  General's Office,  with the intent to
     establish the  ten (10)  planks of  the Communist  Manifesto
     within the  United States  as they are now in operation, and
     to abolish  the intent of the United States Constitution, as
     it was  originally  established  by  our  founding  Fathers,
     namely,  to   ordain  and  establish  a  Republic,    NOT  a
     socialistic Slave  State for  the enrichment  of the Class A
     Stockholders of the Federal Reserve banks.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 55 of 153


9.   Have committed  fraud, duress  and coercion, exercised undue
     influence,  and   evidenced  unlawful   menace  against  the
     American people by representing the so-called 14th Amendment
     as a  lawfully ratified  amendment in the U.S. Constitution,
     when contrary  proof, published  court authorities and other
     competent legal  scholars have  now established  that it was
     NOT lawfully ratified.  (See State v. Phillips, 540 P.2d 936
     (1975);   Dyett v.  Turner, 439  P.2d 266 (1968);  28 Tulane
     Law Review 22;  11 South Carolina Law  Quarterly 484.)


     Neither Congress  nor the Social Security Administration nor
the Federal  Reserve banks  had any lawful authority to compel me
to apply for a Social Security account and number.

     Upon application  for a  Social Security account and number,
there was  a hidden  assumpsit that  I  became  "subject  to  the
jurisdiction of the United States" and thereby became entitled to
the privileges  and immunities  granted  by  the  so-called  14th
Amendment,   whereby    the   Congress,   the   Social   Security
Administration and  the Internal Revenue Service could command my
specific performance  to discharge any of their third-party debts
and obligations.

     The Social  Security contract  (SS-5) is  not  an  insurance
contract.   There  is  no  separate  fund  or  account  for  each
participant.   The contract violates federal statutes (see, e.g.,
Title 18,  RICO statutes).  I have  rescinded  my  original  SS-5
application.   I am  holding it voidable and IT IS VOID as to the
issuing party.   Every  consideration  that  arose  out  of  that
contract must be returned to me, the lawful owner.

     I HEREBY  COMMAND  THE  SOCIAL  SECURITY  ADMINISTRATION  TO
RETURN ALL SUCH CONSIDERATIONS AS ITEMIZED ABOVE.

       This  is also  an ACTUAL  AND CONSTRUCTIVE  NOTICE to  all
concerned agencies,  both State  and Federal,  that  I,  John  E.
Trumane, a  white natural  born common-law  state Citizen,  now a
Citizen of California state, having no known legal franchise that
would cloud  my position,  hereby give  notice to  all  concerned
agencies that  their failure  to refute  each and  every point by
substantive proof  will be  considered admissions and confessions
and shall establish estoppel by silence and/or acquiescence.

     The continued  deprivation  of  my  substantive  rights,  my
vested property rights and my property as a Citizen of California
state, will  cause me further injury and damage, and will have to
be remedied by whatever actions deemed necessary and lawful.

     All of  the above  statements are  true and  correct, to the
best of my current knowledge, and are affirmed under penalties of
perjury, without  the "United  States", under  the  laws  of  the
United States of America, per 28 USC 1746(1).

            Notice to principals is notice to agents.

            Notice to agents is notice to principals.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 56 of 153


Sincerely yours,


/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane
Sovereign Sui Juris

all rights reserved

attachments to first NOTICE and DEMAND previously served:

     Personal Earnings and Benefit Estimate Statement
      for John E. Trumane, November 29, 1988
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, August 1, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND PUBLIC NOTICE
       REVOCATION AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 199
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, July 15, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, July 15, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, May 5, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, May 5, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23, 1982
     WITHDRAWAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPLICATION, March 23, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to Vital Records, Boston, Mass., April 3, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT AND REVOCATION
       OF POWER ASSEVERATION by John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982

Copies:

   [see next page]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 57 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified  that service  of this second DEMAND
FOR PAYMENT  and ACTUAL  AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE has been made on
interested party(s)  by mailing one copy thereof, on this seventh
day of  June, 1983,  in a  sealed envelope  with postage prepaid,
properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx to:

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland


Copies under separate cover to:

Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.

Representative Lynn Woolsey
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.


Dated:  June 7, 1983

/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 58 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified  that service  of this AFFIDAVIT has
been made  on interested  parties by mailing one copy thereof, on
this twenty-third  day of  March, 1982, in a sealed envelope with
postage prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Social Security Administration
Office of the Commissioner
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland
Postal Zone 21235


Dated March 23, 1982

/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 59 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested parties  by mailing one copy thereof, on this
twenty-third day  of March,  1982,  in  a  sealed  envelope  with
postage prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Social Security Administration
Office of the Commissioner
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland
Postal Zone 21235


Dated March 23, 1982

/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 60 of 153


Certified Mail Number: __________________________________________
                 Date: __________________________________________


FROM:     John E. Trumane
          c/o General Delivery
          County of Marin
          San Rafael, California state
          united States of America

TO:       Social Security Administration
          OCRO
          6301 Security Boulevard
          Baltimore, Maryland
          Postal Zone 21235

Dear Director:

     I am  writing you  pursuant to  the  enclosed  "Request  for
Withdrawal  of   Application",  Form   SSA-521,  OMB  #0960-0015,
pursuant to 20 CFR 422.1 through 422.527.

     I have  never been  required to  have, hold  and/or obtain a
Social Security  account number.   Yet,  by government's usage of
undue influence  concerning a  birth registration  and employment
applications, I  was misled  to believe mistakenly that a Citizen
in one  of the  several united  States of America was required to
have such  an identification number and/or account.  I have never
been naturalized  by Congress, nor are any of my rights conferred
by Congress,  because I  am a  natural born Citizen (see 2:1:5 in
the U.S.  Constitution) and a white male inhabitant in California
state.

     It is  quite obvious  to me  now that  the U.S. Constitution
does not  grant to  Congress  the  power  to  legislate  for,  or
against, any of the independent sovereign States within the Union
of America.  Congress can legislate by usage, and under the scope
and purview,  of the so-called 14th Amendment, under which courts
have determined  that Congress  was enabled  to govern artificial
persons or  entities, which  I am  not.   Moreover, Congress  has
exclusive  legislative   jurisdiction   over   its   territories,
possessions and  enclaves  only  by  virtue  of  the  authorities
granted to  it by  Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 and Article 4,
Section 3, Clause 2 in the U.S. Constitution.

     I have  recently had  a physical  examination and my learned
doctor has  told me  that I am white, I am an adult, I am a human
being, and  I have  always been  such  ever  since  my  birth  in
Worcester, Massachusetts on June 21, 1948.  At no time in my life
have I  ever consented  with foreknowledge to being an artificial
entity, such  as is  a creation  of Congress  or of  the  "United
States", or  a Federal  citizen, nor  was I  born in  the "United
States", nor have I ever been a resident of the "United States".

     The birth and Social Security registrations that were forced
upon me,  without my  consent of  majority and  without knowingly
intelligent acts  on my  part, are  therefore null  and void,  ab
initio.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 61 of 153


     I refuse to be considered as a stranger in California state,
such as  a "United States citizen" or a "resident alien".  I have
never received,  nor made  application for,  any type  of related
Social Security  benefits.   I do  not vote  and therefore I have
never knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily consented to these
purported Social  Security benefits  given by Congress.  I cannot
and will  not  accept  any  such  quasi  contractual  agreements,
particularly when  all associated  terms and  conditions were not
fully disclosed to me.  My arguments of law are as follows:

                     THE CODE OF LAWS OF THE
                    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                  TITLE 1 -- GENERAL PROVISIONS
               CHAPTER 1 -- RULES OF CONSTRUCTION

     Sec. 1.  Words denoting number, gender, and so forth.

     In determining  the meaning  of any  Act of Congress, unless
     the context  indicates otherwise   --   words  importing the
     singular include  and apply  to several  persons, parties or
     things;  words importing the plural include the singular;


     In reviewing  the definition  of "State"  in Section 1101 of
the Social  Security Act,  we find  that the  Congress, when they
were utilizing  a special  definition of  "State", only wanted to
"include" those  three  specifically  defined  Federal  State(s),
(except when  used in Section 531) and no more!  (You are invited
to read Section 531 for yourself.)

     In this  next review,  we see  that the  definition  of  the
"United States" uses a somewhat different construction:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 62 of 153


                 TITLE XI -- GENERAL PROVISIONS
                           DEFINITIONS

     Section 1101(a)

     (2)  The term  "United States"  when used  in a geographical
     sense means  the state(s),  Alaska, Hawaii, and the District
     of Columbia.


     As you  can see,  for purposes of statutory construction and
for clearer  interpretation, it  is necessary for me to emphasize
the "(s)" in "state(s)" .  The term "United States" still defines
only the  "federal state(s)",  and no  more;  otherwise, Congress
would have  been specific.   The  "Ejusdem Generis  Rule" must be
applied to this construction:

     Ejusdem Generis.    Of the same kind, class, or nature.

     In the  construction of  laws, wills, and other instruments,
     the "ejusdem  generis rule"  is, that  where  general  words
     follow an  enumeration of  persons or  things, by words of a
     particular and  specific meaning, such general words are not
     to be  construed in  their widest extent, but are to be held
     as applying  only to  persons or  things of the same general
     class as those specifically mentioned.

          [Black's Law Dictionary, Third Edition, 1933, page 645]
              [see also Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914, page 979]

and ...

     Noscitur a Sociis.  It is known from its associates.

     The  meaning  of  a  word  is  or  may  be  known  from  the
     accompanying words.   3  Term R. 87;  Brown, Max 588.  Under
     this rule  general and  specific words, capable of analogous
     meaning, when  associated together,  take  color  from  each
     other, so  that general  words are  restricted  to  a  sense
     analogous to less general ....

         [Black's Law Dictionary, Third Edition, 1933, page 1256]


     For further  emphasis on this point, we find that the cross-
reference to  Section 1101(a) of the original Social Security Act
has survived  and was  re-codified into  Title 42,  United States
Code, Chapter  7 and  appears in Sections 1301(a)(1) and (2).  We
shall now review this very important section:

                   TITLE 42 UNITED STATES CODE
                  THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
                  CHAPTER 7 -- SOCIAL SECURITY
               SUBCHAPTER XI -- GENERAL PROVISIONS
                         (1982 edition)

     Section 1301(a)  When used in this chapter --

          (1)  The term "STATE", except where otherwise provided,
     INCLUDES the  District of  Columbia and  the Commonwealth of
     Puerto Rico,  and when  used in  subchapters IV, V, VII, XI,
     and XIX  of this  chapter INCLUDES  the Virgin  Islands  and
     Guam.   Such term  when used in subchapters III, IX, and XII
     of this chapter ALSO INCLUDES the Virgin Islands.  Such term
     when used  in subchapter  V and in Part B of this subchapter
     of this  chapter ALSO  INCLUDES American Samoa, the Northern
     Mariana Islands,  and the  Trust Territory  of  the  Pacific
     Islands.   Such term  when used  in subchapter  XIX of  this
     chapter ALSO  INCLUDES  the  Northern  Mariana  Islands  and
     American Samoa.   In  the case  of Puerto  Rico, the  Virgin
     Islands, and Guam, subchapters I, X, and XIV, and subchapter
     XVI of  this chapter  (as in  effect without  regard to  the
     amendment  made  by  section  301  of  the  Social  Security
     Amendments of  1972) shall  continue to  apply, and the term
     "STATE" when used in such subchapters (but not in subchapter
     XVI of  this chapter as in effect pursuant to such amendment
     after December  31, 1973)  INCLUDES Puerto  Rico, the Virgin
     Islands, and  Guam.  Such term when used in subchapter XX of
     this chapter ALSO INCLUDES the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the
     Northern Mariana Islands.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 63 of 153


          (2)  The  term   "UNITED  STATES"   when  used   in   a
     geographical sense  MEANS, except  when otherwise  provided,
     the STATES.

          (8)(A)    The "Federal percentage" for any State (other
     than Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam) shall be 100
     per centum  less  the  State  percentage;    and  the  State
     Percentage shall  be that  percentage which  bears the  same
     ratio to  50 per  centum as  the square  of the  per  capita
     income of  such State bears to the square of the per capital
     income of  the United  States;    except  that  the  Federal
     percentage shall  in no  case be  less than 50 per centum or
     more than 65 per centum.

          (8)(B)    The Federal  percentage for each State (other
     than Puerto  Rico, the  Virgin Islands,  and Guam)  shall be
     promulgated by  the Secretary between October 1 and November
     30 of  each even-numbered  year, on the basis of the average
     per capital  income for  EACH State AND of the United States
     for  the   three  most   recent  calendar  years  for  which
     satisfactory data  are  available  from  the  Department  of
     Commerce.  Such promulgation shall be conclusive for each of
     the eight  quarters in  the period  beginning October 1 next
     succeeding such  promulgation:  Provided, That the Secretary
     shall promulgate  such percentages as soon as possible after
     August 28,  1958, which promulgation shall be conclusive for
     each of  the eleven quarters in the period beginning October
     1, 1958, and ending with the close of June 30, 1961.

          (8)(C)    The term  "United States" MEANS (but ONLY for
     purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph) THE
     FIFTY STATES and the District of Columbia.  [emphasis added]

               [see also Compilation of the Social Security Laws]
                    [98th Congress, 2nd Session, Committee Print]
                       [through April 1, 1984, pages 397 and 398]


     When the  original Social  Security Act  was written, Alaska
and Hawaii  were Territories (Federal States), but today they are
each one  of the 50 States of the Union.  When Section 1101(a) is
laid  alongside  its  surviving  Title  42,  Chapter  7,  Section
1301(a), we see that its substance survived completely intact ...

     ... except  Section 1301(a)(8)(C).   Here  is a Section that
was not  applicable, therefore,  it was  not used in the original
Act, from which the "48 States" were "excluded".


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 64 of 153


     If you read carefully the portions marked 8(A) and 8(B), you
will clearly  understand why  this specific  definition had to be
"included".   The construction  of the  terms "State" and "United
States" in  subparagraph 8(A)  is more  prima facie evidence that
the Social  Security Act  of the 74th Congress, Session 1, August
14, 1935,  as recorded  in  Chapter  531  of  the  United  States
Statutes At  Large, was  and is  intended to  operate "within the
Federal United States ONLY" (per definition).

     If you have very carefully read the original Social Security
Act, you  will discover  that the  term "United  States" is  used
thirty-four (34)  times  and  never,  ever  gives  the  slightest
suggestion that it embraced the Forty-Eight (48) Sovereign States
of the United States of America which existed in the year 1935.

     Hopefully, you have carefully read all of the preceding, and
have  laid   the  original  Sections  1101(a)(1)  and  1101(a)(2)
alongside 42  U.S.C. 1301(a)(1)  and 1301(a)(2) as they presently
read.   It is obvious that our 50 Sovereign States have derogated
their sovereignty  by voluntarily  requesting admission  into the
"Federal System  of National Socialism".  This system was written
under the  authority of  Article 1,  Section  8,  Clause  17  and
Article 4,  Section 3, Clause 2, of the U.S. Constitution.  These
expressed authorities were given only out of necessity to provide
the general  government with  some sort of ability to protect the
Congress assembled.

     In the  most extreme  contemplation of the Constitution, our
Founding Fathers  never envisioned that these two Clauses (1:8:17
and 4:3:2)  could have  been utilized  to impose  their expressed
Legislative Powers  upon the  second  highest  Sovereignty,  that
being the  States  of  the  Union  (the  highest  being  "We  the
People").   Considering the  proceedings of  the convention,  the
same observation is pertinent which we have previously made as to
the 50  States.   The Continental Congress never considered it to
be possible  for these  two clauses  to  be  utilized  so  as  to
derogate the Supreme Sovereignty of "We the People".

     If the  average man were to read the Revenue Laws and accept
them at  face value,  it would appear that the government has all
the advantages  and that the entire Title 26 could be interpreted
at the  whim and caprice of the Revenue Agents.  But, this is not
the case.   The chains of the Constitution do not allow this, and
Congress could  not and  did not enact most of these Revenue Laws
for the  Sovereigns within the 50 States.  When Congress included
a particular  Revenue  Act  into  Title  26,  U.S.C.,  they  were
specific and definitive in stating upon whom that Revenue Act had
effect, as you will see from the following:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 65 of 153


                       UNITED STATES CODE
                TITLE 26 -- INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
            SUBTITLE D -- MISCELLANEOUS EXCISE TAXES
                CHAPTER 38 -- Environmental Taxes
                Subchapter A -- Tax on Petroleum

     Section 4611.  Imposition of Tax.

     (a)  General Rule.  -- There  is hereby imposed a tax at the
          rate specified in subsection (c) on --

          (1)  crude oil  received at  a United  States Refinery,
               and

          (2)  petroleum products  entered into the United States
               for consumption, use or warehousing.


     Section 4612.  Definitions and Special Rules.

     (a)  Definitions. -- For purposes of this subchapter --

          (4)  United States. --

               (A)  In General. -- The term "United States" means
                    the 50  States, the District of Columbia, the
                    Commonwealth of  Puerto Rico,  any possession
                    of the United States, the Commonwealth of the
                    Northern  Mariana   Islands,  and  the  Trust
                    Territory of the Pacific Islands.


     The preceding  is a  true Import  Tax,  as  allowed  by  the
Constitution.   It contains all the indicia of being uniform, and
therefore it  passes the  Constitutionality test  and can operate
within the 50 Sovereign States (see 1:8:1).  The language of this
Revenue Act  is simple,  specific and definitive, and it would be
impossible to attach the "void for vagueness" doctrine to it.

     When we  consider Section  4612  and  examine  the  evidence
presented in  this Chapter  and Chapter  4,  it  is  clear,  when
writing the  Social Security  Act, Congress intended this Revenue
Act to  operate only  within the  "Federal  United  States"  (per
definition)!   The intent  of Congress  shall not  be added to or
subtracted from.  If a Revenue Act is enacted into Law within the
guidelines of the Constitution, then we must obey the Law.

     The  following   is  another   Revenue  Act   that  contains
definitions that  could be misunderstood if you were not thorough
enough in  your research, especially when we contemplate the term
"United States".  Please study the provisions of this Revenue Act
and you will see that the definitions are in contradistinction to
the definitions generally used within Subtitles "A", "B", and "C"
of the United States Code, Title 26:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 66 of 153


                       UNITED STATES CODE
                TITLE 26 -- INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
            SUBTITLE D -- MISCELLANEOUS EXCISE TAXES
                CHAPTER 38 -- Environmental Taxes

            Subchapter B -- Tax on Certain Chemicals

     Section 4661.  Imposition of Tax.

     (a)  General Rule.  -- There  is hereby imposed a tax on any
          taxable chemical sold by the manufacturer, producer, or
          importer thereof.


     Section 4662.  Definitions and Special Rules.

     (a)  Definitions. -- For purposes of this subchapter --
          
          (2)  United States. -- The term "United States" has the
               meaning given such term by section 4612(a)(4).


     I believe  our Supreme  Court can  close this  portion  more
eloquently then I:

     Keeping in  mind the  well settled  rule that the citizen is
     exempt from taxation unless the same is imposed by clear and
     unequivocal language,  and that  where the construction of a
     tax law is doubtful, the doubt is to be resolved in favor of
     those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid.

      [Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McLain, 192 U.S. 397, 416]
                                                 [emphasis added]


     In the  interpretation of  statutes levying  taxes it is the
     established  rule   not  to   extend  their  provisions,  by
     implication, beyond  the clear  import of the language used,
     or to  enlarge their operations so as to embrace matters not
     specifically pointed  out.    In  case  of  doubt  they  are
     construed most strongly against the Government, and in favor
     of the citizen.
                              [U.S. v. Wigglesworth, 2 Story 369]
                                                 [emphasis added]


See also  Benziger v.  U.S., 192 U.S. 38, 55, and Gould v. Gould,
245 U.S. 151, 153 (1917).


                         SOCIAL SECURITY

     We shall  now address our attention to our indentured fellow
Citizens, known  in the  business world  as entrepreneurs.  These
"rugged individuals"  still have  a flicker  of the  candle  that
burned ever  so  brightly  in  the  early  days  of  our  beloved
Republic.  Today, the country knows these "solid men" as being in
"Free Enterprise".   The Federal Government, the Internal Revenue
Service  and   the  Tax   Code  (Title   26  U.S.C.)  define  the
aforementioned as "self-employed".

     Before we  proceed to  examine this  tax, let  us  lay  some
ground work.   We must hold in our mind that this tax is a Social
Security Tax;   its  foundation is within the Social Security Act
in Pari Materia, as follows:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 67 of 153


     Pari Materia.   Latin.   Of  the same  matter;   on the same
     subject;   as, laws  pari materia  must  be  construed  with
     reference to each other.  Bac. Abr. "Statute," 1, 3.

        [Black's Law Dictionary, Third Edition (1933), page 1324]


     First, I  would like to refresh your memory by recalling the
definition of  "State(s)" and  "United States" as those terms are
used in  the Social  Security Act.    We  shall  use  the  master
definition as  exhibited in  Section 1301  of  Title  42,  United
States Code:

                   TITLE 42 UNITED STATES CODE
                  THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
                  CHAPTER 7 -- SOCIAL SECURITY
               SUBCHAPTER XI -- GENERAL PROVISIONS
                         (1982 edition)

     Section 1301(a)  When used in this chapter --

          (1)  The term "STATE", except where otherwise provided,
     INCLUDES the  District of  Columbia and  the Commonwealth of
     Puerto Rico,  and when  used in  subchapters IV, V, VII, XI,
     and XIX  of this  chapter INCLUDES  the Virgin  Islands  and
     Guam.   Such term  when used in subchapters III, IX, and XII
     of this chapter ALSO INCLUDES the Virgin Islands.  Such term
     when used  in subchapter  V and in Part B of this subchapter
     of this  chapter ALSO  INCLUDES American Samoa, the Northern
     Mariana Islands,  and the  Trust Territory  of  the  Pacific
     Islands.   Such term  when used  in subchapter  XIX of  this
     chapter ALSO  INCLUDES  the  Northern  Mariana  Islands  and
     American Samoa.   In  the case  of Puerto  Rico, the  Virgin
     Islands, and Guam, subchapters I, X, and XIV, and subchapter
     XVI of  this chapter  (as in  effect without  regard to  the
     amendment  made  by  section  301  of  the  Social  Security
     Amendments of  1972) shall  continue to  apply, and the term
     "STATE" when used in such subchapters (but not in subchapter
     XVI of  this chapter as in effect pursuant to such amendment
     after December  31, 1973)  INCLUDES Puerto  Rico, the Virgin
     Islands, and  Guam.  Such term when used in subchapter XX of
     this chapter ALSO INCLUDES the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the
     Northern Mariana Islands.

          (2)  The  term   "UNITED  STATES"   when  used   in   a
     geographical sense  MEANS, except  when otherwise  provided,
     the STATES.

          (8)(A)    The "Federal percentage" for any State (other
     than Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam) shall be 100
     per centum  less  the  State  percentage;    and  the  Stage
     Percentage shall  be that  percentage which  bears the  same
     ratio to  50 per  centum as  the square  of the  per  capita
     income of  such State bears to the square of the per capital
     income of  the United  States;    except  that  the  Federal
     percentage shall  in no  case be  less than 50 per centum or
     more than 65 per centum.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 68 of 153


          (8)(B)    The Federal  percentage for each State (other
     than Puerto  Rico, the  Virgin Islands,  and Guam)  shall be
     promulgated by  the Secretary between October 1 and November
     30 of  each even-numbered  year, on the basis of the average
     per capital  income for  EACH State AND of the United States
     for  the   three  most   recent  calendar  years  for  which
     satisfactory data  are  available  from  the  Department  of
     Commerce.  Such promulgation shall be conclusive for each of
     the eight  quarters in  the period  beginning October 1 next
     succeeding such  promulgation:  Provided, That the Secretary
     shall promulgate  such percentages as soon as possible after
     August 28,  1958, which promulgation shall be conclusive for
     each of  the eleven quarters in the period beginning October
     1, 1958, and ending with the close of June 30, 1961.

          (8)(C)    The term  "United States" MEANS (but ONLY for
     purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph) THE
     FIFTY STATES and the District of Columbia.  [emphasis added]

               [see also Compilation of the Social Security Laws]
                    [98th Congress, 2nd Session, Committee Print]
                       [through April 1, 1984, pages 397 and 398]


     We will  use a  slightly different approach in this Section,
but we will adhere to the same principles used previously.

     The following  is a  Federal  Land  Area  Chart  which  will
clearly identify  what we  are discussing  when we  refer to  the
"Federal United  State(s)".   The following  will be  taken  from
Section 1301 of Title 42.  These land areas will be designated as
"Federal State(s)", or "Federal Possession(s)":

                     FEDERAL LAND AREA CHART

(1) District of Columbia .......................... Federal State
(2) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico ................... Federal State
(3) Virgin Islands ................................ Federal State
(4) Guam .......................................... Federal State
(5) American Samoa ................................ Federal State
(6) Northern Mariana Islands ................. Federal Possession
(7) Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands ... Federal Possession


     Inclusive of the aforementioned Federal State(s) and Federal
Possession(s), the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of Congress
also extends  over all  places purchased  by the  consent of  the
Legislature of  one of  the 50  State(s), in which the same shall
be, for  the erection  of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards,
and other needful buildings (see 1:8:17 in U.S. Constitution).

     There are  many "land  areas" within  the 50 States that are
managed by  the Federal  Government, but  "exclusive" legislative
jurisdiction is  not always  retained in  each  instance  by  the
Federal Government.

     I would  like to  make a few more entries for the Director's
future reference.  The following are located in the United States
Code, Title 26:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 69 of 153


     Section 2014(g)    Possession  of  United  States  Deemed  a
     Foreign Country.  -- For  purposes of the credits authorized
     by this  section, each possession of the United States shall
     be deemed to be a foreign country.

and ...

     Section 638.  Continental Shelf Areas.

     For purposes  of applying  the provisions  of  this  chapter
     (including sections  861(a)(3) and  862(a)(3) in the case of
     the performance of personal services) with respect to mines,
     oil and gas wells, and other natural deposits --

     (1)  the term  "United States"  when used  in a geographical
          sense  includes   the  seabed   and  subsoil  of  those
          submarine areas  which are  adjacent to the territorial
          waters of  the United  States and over which the United
          States  has   exclusive  rights,   in  accordance  with
          international law,  with respect to the exploration and
          exploitation of natural resources;  and

     (2)  the terms  "foreign country"  and  "possession  of  the
          United  States"  when  used  in  a  geographical  sense
          include the seabed and subsoil of those submarine areas
          which are  adjacent to  the territorial  waters of  the
          foreign country  or such  possession and over which the
          foreign country  (or the  United States in case of such
          possession) has  exclusive rights,  in accordance  with
          international law,  with respect to the exploration and
          exploitation of  natural resources,  but this paragraph
          shall apply in the case of a foreign country only if it
          exercises, directly  or indirectly, taxing jurisdiction
          with respect to such exploration or exploitation.

     No foreign  country shall,  by reason  of the application of
     this section,  be treated  as a  country contiguous  to  the
     United States.

and ...

     Section 7871.  Indian Tribal  Governments Treated  As States
                    for Certain Purposes.

     (a)  General Rule.  -- An  Indian tribal government shall be
          treated as a State -- ...

     (d)  Treatment of  Subdivisions of Indian Tribal Governments
          as  Political   Subdivisions.  --   For  the   purposes
          specified in subsection (a), a subdivision of an Indian
          tribal government  shall  be  treated  as  a  political
          subdivision of  a State  if (and only if) the Secretary
          determines (after  consultation with  the Secretary  of
          the Interior)  that such subdivision has been delegated
          the right  to exercise  one or  more of the substantial
          governmental functions of the Indian tribal government.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 70 of 153


     Section 7806.  Construction of Title.

     (a)  Cross References. -- The cross references in this title
          to other  portions of the title, or other provisions of
          law, where  the word  "see" is  used, are made only for
          convenience, and shall be given no legal effect.

     (b)  Arrangement  and   Classification.  --   No  inference,
          implication, or presumption of legislative construction
          shall be  drawn or  made by  reason of  the location or
          grouping of  any particular  section  or  provision  or
          portion of this title, nor shall any table of contents,
          table  of   cross  references,   or  similar   outline,
          analysis,  or   descriptive  matter   relating  to  the
          contents of  this title be given any legal effect.  The
          preceding sentence  also applies  to the  sidenotes and
          ancillary tables  contained in  the various  prints  of
          this Act before its enactment into law.


     Let us  now look  at the Sections of Title 26, United States
Code,  which   impose  these   Social  Security  TAXES  upon  the
entrepreneurs of the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave:

                       UNITED STATES CODE
                TITLE 26 -- INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
                   SUBTITLE A -- INCOME TAXES
           CHAPTER 2 --  TAX ON SELF-EMPLOYMENT INCOME

     Section 1401.  Rate of Tax.

     (a)  Old-Age, Survivors,  and Disability  Insurance.  --  In
          addition to  other taxes,  there shall  be imposed  for
          each taxable  year, on  the self-employment  income  of
          every individual,  a tax equal to the following percent
          of the  amount of  the self-employment  income for such
          taxable year:

          In the case of a taxable year

          Beginning after:         And before:            Percent
          December 31, 1983        January 1, 1988          11.40
          December 31, 1987        January 1, 1990          12.12
          December 31, 1989                                 12.40

     (b)  Hospital Insurance.  -- In  addition to the tax imposed
          by the preceding subsection, there shall be imposed for
          each taxable  year, on  the self-employment  income  of
          every individual,  a tax equal to the following percent
          of the  amount of  the self-employment  income for such
          taxable year:

          In the case of a taxable year

          Beginning after:         And before:            Percent
          December 31, 1983        January 1, 1985           2.60
          December 31, 1984        January 1, 1986           2.70
          December 31, 1985                                  2.90


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 71 of 153


     Please read  closely Section (a) of the preceding, then read
the heading  of this portion of the Code.  It is easy to see that
this is  just another  tax!   Yet, we  were told  we were  buying
"insurance".   This is  not a premium upon some insurance policy;
this is  a tax  on, and  for, my  purported dues  for a Franchise
called National  Socialism.   The "Other  Taxes" imposed  in this
very same  Subtitle are taxes upon any additional profits I might
make because  of the  limited liability  the purported  sovereign
offers me  through this  scheme.   The Inheritance  Taxes are  in
Subtitle B.  I know this purported sovereign will not allow me to
devolve my share to my Posterity before this sovereign receives a
pledge from my posterity.

     The following may appear complicated, but if you will please
bear with  me, we  can successfully  wade through  this  esoteric
mess, and we will reach the obvious conclusion, as follows:

     We shall  begin by  determining  how  the  Congress  defined
self-employment:

     Section 1402.

     (b)  Self-Employment Income.  -- The  term  "self-employment
          income" means  the net  earnings  from  self-employment
          derived by  an individual  (other  than  a  nonresident
          alien individual,  except as  provided by  an agreement
          under section  233 of  the Social  Security Act) during
          any taxable  year ....   An  individual who  is  not  a
          citizen of  the United  States but who is a resident of
          the Commonwealth  of Puerto  Rico, the  Virgin Islands,
          Guam, or American Samoa shall not, for purposes of this
          chapter  be   considered  to  be  a  nonresident  alien
          individual.


See also Title 42, United States Code, Chapter 7, Section 411(b).

     If an  individual is  a "Nonresident Alien", he would not be
subject to  this tax!  The Government has made a big thing out of
the status  of this  individual, someone  who doesn't live in the
"United States"  and who  is a foreigner.  Of course, determining
the status of this "nonresident alien" would be the obvious place
to begin  an investigation,  in order to discover how lawfully to
avoid paying this tax.  Evidently, this "nonresident alien" is an
individual who  doesn't live  "here" and  who is not a "citizen",
but who must have a lot of influence over Congress.

     First, we should see what the dictionaries have to say about
this fellow  who appears to have all these special privileges and
advantages.  In the past, these special privileges and advantages
have been  denied to  the undersigned,  a  free  white  male  now
domiciled, sustaining  his life  by  "Private  Enterprise"  as  a
Sovereign At Law in Marin County, California state.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 72 of 153


                           DEFINITIONS
                        WEBSTER'S SEVENTH
                    NEW COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY
                              1972

     non-res-i-dence \  also non-res-i-den-cy  \ n:  the state or
     fact of not residing in a particular place  --  non-resident

and ...

     1 alien \ n, 1 a: belonging or relating to another person or
     place : STRANGE  b: relating, belonging, or owing allegiance
     to another  country or government : FOREIGN  2: different in
     nature or character.

     2 alien  \ n, 1: a person of another family, race, or nation
     2: a  foreign-born resident who has not been naturalized and
     is  still  a  subject  or  citizen  of  a  foreign  country;
     broadly: a foreign-born citizen.


                     BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY
                          SIXTH EDITION
                              1990

     Non-resident.   One who  does not reside within jurisdiction
     in question;   not  an inhabitant of the state of the forum.
     Special rules  govern service  of process  on non-residents;
     e.g. Fed. R. Civil. P. 4(e).  See Long arm statutes.

     Non-resident alien.   One  who is  neither a  resident nor a
     citizen of  the United  States.   Citizenship is  determined
     under the federal immigration and nationalization laws (U.S.
     Code, Title 8.)


                     BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY
                          THIRD EDITION
                              1933

     Non-resident.   One who is not a dweller within jurisdiction
     in question;  not an inhabitant of the state of the forum.

and ...

     Alien.   n.  A foreigner; one born abroad; a person resident
     in one country, but owing allegiance to another. In England,
     one born  out of  the allegiance of the king.  In the United
     States, one  born out  of the  jurisdiction  of  the  United
     States,  and   who  has   not  been  naturalized  under  the
     constitution and laws.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 73 of 153


                    BOUVIER'S LAW DICTIONARY
                    AND CONCISE ENCYCLOPEDIA
                              1914

     Non-resident.  Not residing in the jurisdiction.  Service of
     process on  non-residents is  void,  excepting  cases  which
     proceed in  rem, such  as proceedings  in  admiralty  or  by
     foreign attachment,  and the  like, or where the property in
     litigation is within the jurisdiction of the court.
     One does not necessarily become a non-resident by absconding
     or absenting  himself from  his place  of abode,  Lindsey v.
     Dixon, 52 Mo. App. 291;  nor does a mere casual or temporary
     absence on  business or  pleasure render one a non-resident,
     even if he may not have a house of usual abode in the state,
     Crawford v.  Wilson, 4  Barb. (N.Y.)  504;   if there  is no
     intent to  change his  residence, Fitzgerald v. McMurran, 57
     Minn. 313,  59 N.W. 199.  But where a man has settled abode,
     for the  time being,  in another  state for  the purposes of
     business or  pleasure,  he  is  a  non-resident,  Hanson  v.
     Graham, 82  Cal. 631,  23 Pac. 56, 7 L.R.A. 127;  and it has
     been held  that one  who departs  from the  state  with  his
     family and  remains absent  for  about  a  year  is  a  non-
     resident, though  he has not acquired a residence elsewhere,
     and though he intended to return in a few months;
     
                                                      [page 2359]

and ...

     Alien.  (Latin alienus, belonging to another; foreign).

     A foreigner;   one  of foreign  birth.  In England, one born
     out of  the allegiance  of the  king.  In the United States,
     one born  out of  the jurisdiction  of the United States and
     who has  not been  naturalized under  their constitution and
     laws.  2 Kent 50.  [page 172]


     Considering the  aforementioned definitions  of "Nonresident
Alien", we  still have an individual who doesn't live here and is
a foreigner.  The terms are not consistent with reason and logic.
Why would so much emphasis be put upon this individual:  "One who
is neither  a resident  nor a  citizen within the jurisdiction in
question"?  You have probably figured out to whom the Congress is
referring, if  you have  carefully  studied  and  understood  the
jurisdictional issues discussed above.

     I do  not live "within" the geographical areas as defined by
Congress and  as previously demonstrated in our Federal Land Area
Chart.   I am a Nonresident Alien Individual (per definition) and
I do not owe this tax.  The exact same principles that applied to
"Within the United States" at 26 U.S.C. 3121(b) also apply to the
Nonresident Alien described at 26 U.S.C. 1402(b).

     It appears that this Nonresident Alien individual, who seems
to have  so much  influence and  awesome authority over Congress,
and who  has been  exempted by Congress from the taxes imposed by
the Internal  Revenue Code,  Title 26, is none other than "We the
People", the  "Body Politic".   Specifically,  in the  case of  a
nonresident  alien   individual,  the   quantity  "gross  income"
includes only  gross income which is effectively connected with a
"United States"  trade or  business, and  gross income  which  is
derived from  sources within  the "United  States" (see 26 U.S.C.
872(a)).

     The "Other  Taxes" imposed  by Section  1401(a) and  1401(b)
have an  emphasis on  the term  "self-employed", the  "person(s)"
upon whom  Congress intended to lay this "Social Security Tax" in
addition to "Other Taxes".


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 74 of 153


     There are  two additional  terms we  must define in order to
wade through  the  Internal  Revenue  Code.    These  definitions
complete  our  search  for  understanding  to  whom  Congress  is
referring when  it imposes  the Income Tax.  Hopefully, our final
definitions are:

                        "SELF EMPLOYMENT"
                               AND
                       "TRADE OR BUSINESS"

     Section 1402.

     (b)  Self-Employment Income.  -- The  term  "self-employment
          income" means  the net  earnings  from  self-employment
          derived by  an individual  (other  than  a  nonresident
          alien individual,  except as  provided by  an agreement
          under section  233 of the Social Security Act) ....  An
          individual who  is not  a citizen  of the United States
          but who  is a  resident of  the Commonwealth  of Puerto
          Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, or American Samoa shall
          not, for purposes of this chapter be considered to be a
          nonresident alien individual.
                                              [26 U.S.C. 1402(b)]


See also 42 U.S.C., Chapter 7, Section 411(b).

     As you  can see, the residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the  Virgin  Islands,  Guam  and  American  Samoa  are  not
considered to  be Nonresident  Alien individuals.   By  now, this
should be self-explanatory.  Throughout our entire decodification
of the  Internal Revenue Code, Title 26, we have established that
the Social  Security Act  was written ONLY for the Federal States
and Possessions.


                       UNITED STATES CODE
                  TITLE 26 -- INTERNAL REVENUE
           SUBTITLE F -- PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
                    CHAPTER 79 -- DEFINITIONS

     Section 7701.  Definitions.

     (a)  When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly
          expressed or  manifestly incompatible  with the  intent
          thereof --

          (26) Trade or Business. -- The term "trade or business"
               includes the  performance of  the functions  of  a
               public office.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 75 of 153


and ...

     Section 217.  Moving Expenses.

     (f)  Rules for Self-Employed Individuals. --

          (1)  Definition. --  For purposes  of this section, the
               term   "self-employed    individual"   means    an
               individual who performs personal services --

               (A)  as the  owner of  the entire  interest in  an
                    unincorporated trade or business, or

               (B)  as a  partner in  a partnership carrying on a
                    trade or business.
                                               [26 U.S.C. 217(f)]

and ...

     Section 864.  Definitions.

     (b)  Trade or  Business within  the United  States.  --  For
          purposes of this part, part II, and chapter 3, the term
          "trade or  business within  the United States" includes
          the performance  of personal services within the United
          States at  any time  within the  taxable year, but does
          not include --

          (1)  Performance  of   Personal  Services  for  Foreign
               Employer. -- The performance of personal services

               (A)  for a  nonresident alien  individual, foreign
                    partnership,  or   foreign  corporation,  not
                    engaged  in  trade  or  business  within  the
                    United States ....
                                               [26 U.S.C. 864(b)]


     So, there  we have it.  We tie the whole thing together, and
we reach  the final  obvious conclusion:   The  "Taxes" that  are
imposed are  imposed upon  "Public Officials"  that work  for the
United States government (per definition).

     If you  have absorbed  anything about  our Constitution, you
know that  by the  use of  Article 1,  Section 8,  Clause 17  and
Article 4,  Section 3,  Clause 2, the Congress has all the Powers
exclusively, and  the Social Security Act was written within, and
for, this jurisdiction.  "We the People" were requested to submit
an application  and to  obtain permission  to join this scheme of
National Socialism.

     The "Corporation" founded by "We the People", commonly known
as the  United States Federal Government, has guaranteed in their
Manifesto, known  as Title  42, United States Code, the statutory
right for subjects to receive according to their needs;  and with
its extension,  known as  Title 26,  United States Code, subjects
are required to pay according to their abilities.

     I  will   again  use  documents  published  by  the  Federal
Government for this demonstration:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 76 of 153


     9.21-1  Meaning of net income

     (a)  The tax  imposed by  Title 1  is upon  income.  Neither
     income exempted  by statute or fundamental law, nor expenses
     incurred in connection therewith, other than interest, enter
     into the computation of net income as defined by section 21.

        [Code of Federal Regulations, Title 26 (1939), page 1623]
                                                 [emphasis added]


     If I  have and use a Social Security Account Number, can the
"Fundamental Law" portion of Section 9.21-1 apply to me?  Answer:
No.  Am I compelled to give up my natural rights?  Answer:  No.

     9.22(b)-1  Exemptions;  exclusions from gross income.

     Certain items  of income  specified  in  section  22(b)  are
     exempt from  tax and  may be  excluded  from  gross  income.
     These items,  however, are  exempt only to the extent and in
     the amount  specified.  No other items are exempt from gross
     income except (1) those items of income which are, under the
     Constitution not taxable by the Federal Government ....

        [Code of Federal Regulations, Title 26 (1939), page 1632]


     By a  voluntary request  for,  and  voluntary  use  of,  the
Federal Franchise  called Social Security, a Sovereign individual
rescinds his  rights under the Constitution and allows himself to
be a "subject" of the Congress.  This I will not do.

     9.54-1  Records and income tax forms.

     (a)  Every person  subject to  the tax, except persons whose
     gross income  (1)  consists  solely  of  salary,  wages,  or
     similar compensation  for personal services rendered, or (2)
     arises solely  from the  business  of  growing  and  selling
     products of the soil, shall ... keep such permanent books of
     account or records ....

        [Code of Federal Regulations, Title 26 (1939), page 1738]


     The Social  Security Franchise  would make  me a "taxpayer";
therefore sections  9.21-1, 9.22(b)-1, and 9.54-1 would not apply
to me.   My  "Wages with  respect to  Employment"  would  be  the
formula by  which the revenue laws measure the taxes.  The "Self-
Employed" compensation for personal services rendered by a person
who receives  it "From  Sources within  the United States" is the
formula by  which the Revenue Laws measure the taxes.  Therefore,
I would  be under  a duty  to keep  such books and records, and I
would  be   required  to  file  a  "Tax  Return"  by  regulations
promulgated by the Secretary.

     The provisions of Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 and Article
1, Section  9, Clause 4 and, for that matter, any of the Articles
of the  Bill of  Rights,  which  specifically  protect  the  same
individual, are  of no  value to  any individual who applies for,
and uses, a number that encompasses the Social Security scheme!

     If I  wish to  conduct "Private Enterprise", I must do it on
my own,  without assistance  from government.  I have never asked
for assistance,  nor will  I.  Henry Campbell Black defines these
rights as natural rights of Common Law Entrepreneurs:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 77 of 153


     Proprietary, n.   A  proprietor or  owner;   one who has the
     exclusive title  to a thing;  one who possesses or holds the
     title to  a thing  in  his  own  right.    The  grantees  of
     Pennsylvania and  Maryland and  their heirs  were called the
     proprietaries of those provinces.  Webster.

     Proprietary rights.  Those rights which an owner of property
     has by virtue of his ownership.  When proprietary rights are
     opposed by  acquired rights,  such as easements, franchises,
     etc., they are more often called "Natural Rights".  Sweet.

        [Black's Law Dictionary, Third Edition (1933), page 1449]


     Therefore, as  you can  plainly see, you had no authority to
compel me  to join Social Security.  You had no authority to tell
Citizens in  the States of the Union that Social Security account
numbers were  mandatory.   The only  issue left to be resolved is
fraud, treason  and sedition.   The  Social Security scheme was a
trap to  create slaves  of the  remaining free  people within the
Sovereign States  of the  Union.  I will not be one of them.  You
see, I took the time to read the "Analysis of the Social Security
System, Hearings  before a  Subcommittee of the Committee on Ways
and Means, House of Representatives, Eighty-Third Congress, First
Session on The Legal Status of OASI Benefits, November 27, 1953."
Do not  tell me  that this  document does not contain irrefutable
proof and evidence of fraud.  For example, see pages 935 and 936.

     Therefore, you will now notify all pertinent and appropriate
Federal and  State entities of this withdrawal, thereby restoring
partially what  has been  taken from me, due to your constructive
fraud.


     Correctly submitted this _________ day of _________________,
1982 Anno Domini.


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.

                         John E. Trumane
                      c/o General Delivery
                  San Rafael, California state


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 78 of 153


Acknowledgement


CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC      )
                               )     Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
MARIN COUNTY                   )


     On this ______ day of _______________________________, 1982,
John E.  Trumane did personally appear before me, and is known to
be  the  one  described  in,  and  who  executed,  the  foregoing
instrument, and  acknowledged that  he executed  the same  as his
free act and deed as a Citizen/Sovereign in this above named said
State of  the Union.   Purpose  of notary  is for  identification
only,  and  not  for  entrance  into  any  foreign  jurisdiction,
executed without prejudice.

                            _____________________________________
                            Notary Public


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 79 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                        c/o General Delivery
                                        San Rafael
                                        California state

                                        July 15, 1982

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Subject:  CEASE AND DESIST ORDER
          NOTICE OF PERSONAL LIABILITY

Dear Mr. Blevins:

Please be  advised that  the attached  letter dated July 15, 1982
contains, among  other things,  a CEASE  AND DESIST  ORDER and  a
NOTICE OF  PERSONAL LIABILITY hereby served on your person and on
the other  persons listed  in the attached CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
BY MAIL.

Your receipt  of this  letter and  the attached letter means that
you acknowledge  receipt of  this CEASE AND DESIST ORDER and that
you acknowledge receipt of this NOTICE OF PERSONAL LIABILITY.

Please also  note that  I object  to your  use of a ZIP code when
addressing mail  to me,  if such a ZIP code could be construed to
mean that I am "subject" in any way to the "United States".  I am
consistently informed  by employees of the U.S.P.S. that the only
purpose of  ZIP codes  is  to  expedite  the  delivery  of  mail.
Instead, please  use the above mailing address, exactly as shown,
in any and all future correspondence with me.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and  without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 80 of 153


copies: Commissioner of Social Security
        Social Security Administration
        6401 Security Boulevard
        Baltimore, Maryland

        Delmar D. Dowling, Director
        Office of Public Inquiries
        Social Security Administration
        Baltimore, Maryland

        Kathleen R. Searle
        Department of Health and Human Services
        Social Security Administration
        Baltimore, Maryland


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 81 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested parties  by mailing one copy thereof, on this
fifteenth day  of July,  1982, in  a sealed envelope with postage
prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Kathleen R. Searle
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland


Dated July 15, 1982


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 82 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                        c/o General Delivery
                                        San Rafael
                                        California state

                                        July 15, 1982

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Dear Mr. Blevins:

Your letter to me, date-stamped July 7, 1982, and postmarked July
9, 1982,  contains erroneous presumptions by you which are hereby
rebutted as follows:


"Wish to Revoke"

Your letter  contains statements  which evidence a presumption on
your part  that I  wish to  revoke my signature on my Application
for a  Social Security  Card (SS-5)  and other  documents.   This
presumption of  yours is  hereby rebutted.   I  do not  "wish" to
"revoke" my  signature on  these documents,  nor have I requested
that you  "honor" any  "request" by  me, because such a "request"
could be construed to mean that my original SS-5 was valid at its
inception and that I now need your approval for such a "request".

On the  contrary, my letter of May 5, 1982 carefully utilized the
phrase "to  unilaterally revoke"  so as  to make  it clear that I
have unilaterally  declared the  contract void from its inception
and I  have put an end to it as though it never were.  This clear
interpretation of  my words, and the clear intent of those words,
are fully  supported by  the following definitions in Black's Law
Dictionary, Sixth Edition, to wit:

     Revoke.   To annul or make void by recalling or taking back.
     To cancel,  rescind, repeal,  or reverse,  as  to  revoke  a
     license or will.

     Rescission of  contract.   To declare a contract void in its
     inception and  to put  an end to it as though it never were.
     A "rescission"  amounts to the unmaking of a contract, or an
     undoing  of   it  from  the  beginning,  and  not  merely  a
     termination, and  it may  be effected  ...  by  one  of  the
     parties declaring  rescission of contract without consent of
     other if  a legally  sufficient ground  therefor exists ....
     It necessarily  involves a repudiation of the contract and a
     refusal of  the moving party to be further bound by it.  ...
     An act  of an  equitable nature in which a party seeks to be
     relieved of  his obligations under a contract on the grounds
     of mutual mistake, fraud, impossibility, etc.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 83 of 153


When I  use the  phrase "to  unilaterally revoke" in this and all
prior documents  served on your Agency, this phrase has a meaning
that is  synonymous with  the phrase  "to rescind  the contract".
That these  meanings are  synonymous is  clearly substantiated by
the above definitions from Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.
This letter  and all  my prior  documents detail  numerous  valid
grounds for  rescinding the  original Social Security contract in
application, in  account, and  in number.  Mutual mistake, fraud,
duress and  coercion are legally sufficient grounds on which I am
entitled to  repudiate, and refuse to be further bound in any way
by, my original Social Security application, account, and number.
The burden  of proving fraud generally falls on the moving party.
I have  already carried  my burden of proving the mutual mistake,
fraud, duress  and coercion  which  together  constitute  legally
sufficient grounds  for unilaterally  repudiating the contract(s)
in question (see my letter of May 5, 1982, page 4).

To the  extent that,  and insofar as my signature dated March 23,
1982 on  Form SSA-521  can or  should be construed to mean that I
have "requested"  consent of  the Social  Security Administration
for withdrawal of my original SS-5 application, I hereby withdraw
any such  "request" because  it was  a mistake;   I  unilaterally
rescind my  signature on  this Form  SSA-521; and  I unilaterally
rescind my  original SS-5 application without the consent of your
Agency, for  the several reasons stated in this letter and in all
other documents  previously served  on your  Agency.   Nothing in
this letter,  or in any previous documents already served on your
Agency, can  or should  be construed  in any  way as  a grant  of
jurisdiction to the "United States", its agencies or its assigns.


General Rebuttal

Your letter  contains statements which have been made contrary to
numerous facts  which are  contained in  my Affidavits  and other
documents previously  served on your Agency.  You and your Agency
have now  had ample  opportunity to  rebut any  and all  of those
facts, and  neither  you  nor  your  Agency  have  now  done  so.
Accordingly, your failure to rebut any of those facts now renders
them all  conclusive, permanently  for the  record.  You and your
Agency are now forever barred and estopped from challenging those
facts as stated.

As a  member of  the Sovereignty by right of birth and hereditary
succession, I  belong to that group by whose authority the United
States Constitution  was created.   The  Congress was created, in
turn, by that Constitution.  The Social Security Act to which you
refer is,  in turn,  a creation  of that Congress.  Regardless of
your  status  prior  to  becoming  an  employee  of  the  federal
government, your current status as a federal employee necessarily
subjects you  to the  letter of  that "law".   I  am not  subject
either to the letter or to the spirit of that "law", however.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 84 of 153


Even though  and regardless  of the  fact that  you are evidently
restricted by  law from  unilaterally rescinding an original SS-5
application, I  am not  subject to  any  such  restriction.    As
someone who  has explicitly  reserved all  my unalienable  rights
without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights, I specifically
retain my right to rescind and cancel my original Social Security
application, for  the several reasons stated in my Affidavits, in
this letter  and in  other documents,  and to  render it null and
void from  its inception.   The  documents which  I have  already
served on  the Social  Security  Administration,  including  this
letter to  you, are  prima facie  evidence that  I  have  already
exercised that right, the exercise of which is entirely within my
Sovereign power and authority to do.

The Social  Security Administration is bound by the provisions of
the Uniform  Commercial Code.   The conclusive facts as stated in
my Affidavits  and other  documents now constitute material proof
that   my   original   Social   Security   application   was   an
unconscionable contract  ab initio  (from its inception) because,
among many  other reasons, it was lacking in meaningful choice on
my part.   You  and your  Agency have  already been  notified via
those documents,  and I  hereby notify you and your Agency again,
that I  have  explicitly  reserved  all  my  unalienable  rights,
without prejudice  to any  of my  unalienable rights.  This means
that I  explicitly reject  any and  all benefits  of the  Uniform
Commercial Code,  absent a valid commercial agreement which is in
force and  to which  I am a party, and cite its provisions herein
only to  serve notice  upon all  agencies of  government, whether
international, national,  state, or  local, that they, and not I,
are subject  to, and  bound by,  all of  its provisions,  whether
cited herein or not.

Furthermore, my  explicit reservation of rights has served notice
upon all agencies of government, including but not limited to the
Social Security  Administration, of  the "Remedy"  which you must
provide for  me under  Article 1,  Section  207  of  the  Uniform
Commercial Code, whereby I have explicitly reserved my Common Law
right not  to be  compelled to  perform  under  any  contract  or
commercial agreement  that I  have not  entered  into  knowingly,
voluntarily, and intentionally.

On the  contrary, my  previous entry  into  the  Social  Security
system was  unknowing, involuntary,  and unintentional;   it  was
based upon  demonstrable  misrepresentation,  fraud,  duress  and
coercion by the federal government because:

1.   it was  imposed upon  me under  duress  and  coercion  by  a
     foreign employer  who  had  been  deceived,  as  indeed  are
     virtually all employers, into believing that Social Security
     was mandatory, and who would not otherwise engage me;

2.   I too  was misled  to believe,  by government-fostered fraud
     and misrepresentation,  that  participation  in  the  Social
     Security system was mandatory for me;

3.   the Social  Security Administration  did not  disclose to me
     that participation was strictly voluntary, or that employers
     are under no requirement to hire only individuals who have a
     Social Security Number;

4.   the Social  Security Administration did not reveal to me the
     implications of thus being connected to the "United States",
     which entity  has its  origin and jurisdiction in 1:8:17 and
     4:3:2 in the U.S. Constitution (aka "The Federal Zone");


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 85 of 153


5.   the Social  Security Administration  did not reveal that the
     monies collected from me were treated like an excise tax and
     were not allocated to a Social Security or other fund;

6.   the Social  Security Administration  did not  disclose to me
     that earnings  from labor,  in and  of themselves, are not a
     revenue-taxable activity that is subject to excise taxes;

7.   the Social  Security Administration  did  not  and  has  not
     informed me  that the Federal Insurance Contributions Act is
     neither a  contribution nor  insurance, but  an excise  tax,
     thus being misleading and misrepresented by title; and

8.   I was  a minor not of lawful, contracting age when I entered
     the Social Security contract.


For  these   reasons,  and   for  the  numerous  reasons  already
documented in  the  Affidavits  and  other  documents  previously
served on  your Agency, I reiterate my prior election to renounce
my Social  Security Number and withdraw from the system entirely.
I have not heretofore received any benefits or payments under the
Social Security Act.

Having  made   this   election   to   discontinue   all   further
participation in  the Social Security system, I hereby demand the
return of  all monies collected from me under the guise of Social
Security and Hospital Insurance.  Out of sheer generosity, I make
this demand  without claim  for any  interest  or  increment  for
inflation.   I further  agree to waive all future Social Security
benefits that  have, or would have, accrued to me by virtue of my
prior uninformed,  fraudulent,  and  coerced  submission  to  the
Social Security contract.

My Social Security application, contract, account and number are,
therefore, null  and  void  from  their  inception,  as  are  any
adhesions which may, now or in the future, be claimed by agencies
of the  federal government,  or by  any undisclosed third-parties
such as  the  Federal  Reserve  banks  and/or  the  International
Monetary Fund,  as a  result of an application, contract, account
and number  that are  all null  and void  ab initio  (from  their
inception).


Notice of Personal Liability

Any further  attempts by  you and/or  others in  your  Agency  to
assert  the  validity  of  that  invalid  application,  contract,
account, and/or  number, in  the face  of clear  and  uncontested
evidence to  the contrary, will be noted and can be used as prima
facie evidence  of your  willingness  to  violate  and  otherwise
contravene my  unalienable rights and my Constitutionally secured
rights as a Sovereign Freeman.  These rights include, but are not
limited to, those which are enumerated in my Affidavits and other
documents, including this letter.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 86 of 153


You are  hereby warned  that you  can and will be held personally
liable  for  any  future  attempts  to  violate  my  fundamental,
unalienable rights  by acts  on your part which attempt to compel
my specific  performance to  any third-party  debt or  obligation
created through  the unlawful  assertion  of  an  invalid  Social
Security application,  contract, account  and/or number.   As  an
employee of  the  federal  government,  you  are  under  a  legal
obligation to  recognize that:   "Constructive  fraud as  well as
actual fraud  may be the basis of cancellation of an instrument,"
El Paso  Natural Gas  Co. v.  Kysar Insurance Co., 605 Pacific 2d
240 (1979).   Your  ignorance of  the law  is no  excuse in  this
matter.


General Assertion of Rights

For  your   information,  I   am  not   subject  to  any  foreign
jurisdiction by  reason  of  any  valid  contract  or  commercial
agreement resulting  in adhesion across America, nor are millions
of other Sovereign Citizens, unless they have provided waivers of
rights, guaranteed  by the  Constitution, by  means of  knowingly
intelligent acts  such as contracts or commercial agreements with
such government(s) "... with sufficient awareness of the relevant
circumstances and  likely consequences ...", as ruled by the U.S.
Supreme Court in Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970).  I have
given no such waivers, nor is it possible that I could have given
such waivers  by reason of a Social Security application executed
long before  my age  of majority.  Therefore, the Social Security
application, contract,  account  and  number  at  issue  are  all
necessarily null and void, ab initio, notwithstanding any and all
unsubstantiated statements by you to the contrary.


Notice of Past Deadline

Please also  take note  that your response to my letter of May 5,
1982 to  Delmar D.  Dowling was not timely.  A timely response to
my letter  of May  5, 1982 would have been addressed on or before
June 5,  1982.   Your letter to me was date-stamped July 7, 1982.
Therefore, I  am entitled  to the  conclusive  presumption  that,
after June 5, 1982, you were barred, by virtue of the doctrine of
estoppel by  acquiescence,  from  any  further  challenge  to  my
statements as  contained  herein  and  as  contained  in  all  my
documents previously served on your Agency.


Cease and Desist Order

Therefore, you  and all  others within  your  Agency  are  hereby
ordered to  cease and  desist any  further attempts to assert the
validity of  an invalid  Social Security  application,  contract,
account, and  number, for  all of  the reasons stated hereinabove
and in  all previous  documents already  served on  your  Agency.
Your failure  to obey this order to cease and desist will make it
necessary for  me to  serve on  your person  the legal  documents
necessary to  substantiate my  claim of one or more violations by
you of  my fundamental,  inherent rights,  which documents  shall
include but  not be  limited to  affidavits  of  probable  cause,
copies of  which will  be  forwarded  to  appropriate  government
officials of California state.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 87 of 153


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and  without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights

copies: Commissioner of Social Security
        Social Security Administration
        6401 Security Boulevard
        Baltimore, Maryland

        Delmar D. Dowling, Director
        Office of Public Inquiries
        Social Security Administration
        Baltimore, Maryland

        Kathleen R. Searle
        Department of Health and Human Services
        Social Security Administration
        Baltimore, Maryland


attachments:  copies of documents relevant to rescissions
              of Social Security and birth certificate,
              in reverse chronological order


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 88 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested parties  by mailing one copy thereof, on this
fifteenth day  of July,  1982, in  a sealed envelope with postage
prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Kathleen R. Searle
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland


Dated July 15, 1982


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 89 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                   c/o General Delivery
                                   San Rafael, California

                                   March 9, 1982

Social Security Administration
Office of the Commissioner
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland
Postal Zone 21235

Dear Commissioner:

Enclosed please find a notarized affidavit which revokes my Birth
Certificate and revokes any Power of Attorney attached thereto.

Please be  so kind  as to  forward the  enclosed affidavit to all
appropriate governmental  office(s), so that proper notice can be
taken of  its contents,  and suitable  action(s) can  be taken to
comply with its mandates.

If I  do not  hear from  you within ninety (90) days of the above
date, I  will presume that my statements are correct and that you
do not have any rebuttal.

Thank you very much for your consideration.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS
AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-207 (UCCA 1207)

enclosure:  NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT
            AND REVOCATION OF POWER ASSEVERATION


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 90 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested

            L E T T E R   O F   T R A N S M I T T A L

                                        c/o General Delivery
                                        San Rafael, California

                                        March 23, 1982

Social Security Administration
Office of the Commissioner
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Dear Commissioner:

Attached please find the following documents:

     REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION, FORM SSA-521

     COVER LETTER PURSUANT TO FORM SSA-521

     NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND
     PUBLIC NOTICE REVOCATION AFFIDAVIT

     FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT

Please be  so kind  as to  forward the  enclosed documents to all
appropriate governmental  office(s), so that proper notice can be
taken of  their contents,  and suitable action(s) can be taken to
comply with their mandates.

If I  do not  hear from  you within ninety (90) days of the above
date, I  will presume that my statements are correct and that you
do not have any rebuttal.

Thank you very much for your consideration.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS
AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OF MY RIGHTS


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 91 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                        c/o General Delivery
                                        San Rafael
                                        California state

                                        May 5, 1982

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Dear Mr. Dowling:

Your letter  to me,  date-stamped April  15, 1982  and postmarked
April 28,  1982, contains  a multitude  of erroneous, irrelevant,
and immaterial presumptions which are rebutted as follows:


"Employee" Presumption

Your letter  contains a  number of  statements which  evidence  a
presumption on  your part that I am an "employee" as that term is
defined in  Title 26 and in Title 42.  I am not an "employee";  I
am not  a "covered  employee";  I am not an "employer";  and I do
not have  an "employer".   The  numerous legal  documents which I
have already served on the Social Security Administration contain
absolutely no statements which even remotely suggest that I am an
"employee", or  that I  have an  "employer", as  those terms  are
defined by  federal statute.   Your willingness to introduce into
the  administrative   record  statements   which  are  erroneous,
irrelevant, and immaterial evidences bad faith on your part.  You
are under  the obligation of good faith imposed at several places
in the Uniform Commercial Code (see e.g. 1-203).


Immigration and Naturalization

Your  letter  recommends  that  I  contact  the  Immigration  and
Naturalization Service  (INS) for  a determination  regarding  my
"citizenship status".   Again, the numerous legal documents which
I have  already served  on  the  Social  Security  Administration
contain absolutely no statements which even remotely suggest that
I immigrated  into this  country, or that I was ever naturalized.
If you  had  read  these  documents  carefully,  you  would  have
discovered that  I was  natural born  on June  21,  1948  in  the
Commonwealth of  Massachusetts and  I have  inhabited  California
state since  1952 (see  2:1:5 in  the Constitution for the united
States of  America).   As such, I am a member of the Sovereignty,
and there  is  no  reason  to  expect  that  INS  will  have  any
information pertinent  to my  status as a Sovereign.  Again, your
evident failure  to read  all  the  statements  contained  in  my
Affidavits and  other documents  constitutes further proof of bad
faith on your part.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 92 of 153


There is  absolutely no  need for  me to  request of  the  INS  a
determination concerning  whether I  am a  "U.S. citizen" as that
term is defined in Titles 26, 42 and their regulations.  My right
to be "present" in these united States of America is a birthright
which is unalienable, fundamental and inherent.  According to the
Declaration of Independence, I am endowed with this birthright by
my Creator,  and not  by any one or any thing else, and certainly
not by  the Immigration and Naturalization Service and not by the
Social Security Administration in any event.

You have  stated that  you cannot honor my request to adjust your
records regarding  my "citizenship" status because, as you state,
the Social Security Administration does not have the authority to
determine whether  my "status should be changed".  Your statement
contains a  non sequitor.   First  of all, I have not requested a
determination whether  my status  should be  changed.  I have not
requested any  change of  status.  My status has not changed, and
there is no need to change my status.

The administrative  record is  another matter,  however.   If  it
contains errors of any kind, you are under the obligation of good
faith to  correct those  errors, if and when they are discovered.
If  that   administrative  record   contains  data  and/or  other
information which suggests that I am a "United States citizen" as
that term  is defined in Title 26 and Title 42, then the contents
of that  record were  premised upon  a  mutual  mistake  of  fact
regarding my  true  status.    Accordingly,  you  are  under  the
obligation of  good faith to correct any and all errors contained
in that  administrative record,  using  the  correct  information
already supplied  to you.   You  are expected  to understand that
correcting errors is entirely different from changing my status.


Constitutionality of Social Security Act

Your letter  contains a statement that the Supreme Court has held
the Social  Security Act  to be constitutional not long after the
law's enactment  in the  1930s.   That may  be so,  but there  is
nothing in  my documents  to suggest  that I  have challenged the
constitutionality of  the Social  Security Act.   I  certainly do
reserve the  right to  so challenge  the Act,  at any time in the
future.   Nothing in  this letter,  nor in  my Affidavits, nor in
other documents  already served  on your Agency, can or should be
construed to  mean that  I have  waived my right to challenge the
constitutionality of any act of Congress, now or in the future.


General Rebuttal

Your letter  contains a  set of  statements which  have been made
contrary to  numerous facts  which are contained in my Affidavits
and other  documents served  on your  Agency.   You have  now had
ample opportunity  to rebut  any and  all of those facts, and you
have not  done so.   Accordingly,  your failure  to rebut  any of
those facts  now renders them all conclusive, permanently for the
record.  You are now forever barred and estopped from challenging
those facts as stated.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 93 of 153


As a  member of  the Sovereignty by right of birth and hereditary
succession, I  belong to that group by whose authority the United
States Constitution  was created.   The  Congress was created, in
turn, by that Constitution.  The Social Security Act to which you
refer is,  in turn,  a creation  of that Congress.  Regardless of
your  status  prior  to  becoming  an  employee  of  the  federal
government, your current status as a federal employee necessarily
subjects you  to the  letter of  that "law".   I  am not  subject
either to the letter or to the spirit of that law, however.

Even though you are evidently restricted by law from unilaterally
revoking an  original SS-5  application, I  am not subject to any
such restriction.   As someone who has explicitly reserved all my
unalienable rights  without prejudice  to any  of my  unalienable
rights, I specifically retain my right to unilaterally revoke and
cancel my  original Social  Security application, for the several
reasons stated in my Affidavits, this letter and other documents,
and to render it null and void from its inception.  The documents
which I  have now  served on  the Social Security Administration,
including this  letter, are  prima facie evidence that I have, in
effect, already  exercised that  right, the  exercise of which is
entirely within my Sovereign power and authority to do.

The Social  Security Administration is bound by the provisions of
the Uniform  Commercial Code.   The conclusive facts as stated in
my Affidavits  and other  documents now constitute material proof
that   my   original   Social   Security   application   was   an
unconscionable contract  ab  initio  because,  among  many  other
reasons, it  was lacking  in meaningful  choice on  my part.  You
have already  been notified  via those  documents, and  I  hereby
notify  you  again,  that  I  have  explicitly  reserved  all  my
unalienable rights,  without prejudice  to any  of my unalienable
rights.  This means that I explicitly reject any and all benefits
of  the  Uniform  Commercial  Code,  absent  a  valid  commercial
agreement which  is in  force and to which I am a party, and cite
its provisions  herein only  to serve notice upon all agencies of
government, whether  international, national,  state,  or  local,
that they,  and not  I, are  subject to, and bound by, all of its
provisions, whether cited herein or not.

Furthermore, my  explicit reservation of rights has served notice
upon all agencies of government, including but not limited to the
Social Security  Administration, of  the "Remedy"  which you must
provide for  me under  Article 1,  Section  207  of  the  Uniform
Commercial Code, whereby I have explicitly reserved my Common Law
right not  to be  compelled to  perform  under  any  contract  or
commercial agreement  that I  have not  entered  into  knowingly,
voluntarily, and intentionally.

On the  contrary, my  previous entry  into  the  Social  Security
system was  unknowing, involuntary,  and unintentional;   it  was
based upon  demonstrable  misrepresentation,  fraud,  duress  and
coercion by the federal government because:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 94 of 153


1.   it was  imposed upon  me under  duress  and  coercion  by  a
     foreign employer  who  had  been  deceived,  as  indeed  are
     virtually all employers, into believing that Social Security
     was mandatory, and who would not otherwise engage me;

2.   I too  was misled  to believe,  by government-fostered fraud
     and misrepresentation,  that  participation  in  the  Social
     Security system was mandatory for me;

3.   the Social  Security Administration  did not  disclose to me
     that participation was strictly voluntary, or that employers
     are under no requirement to hire only individuals who have a
     Social Security Number;

4.   the Social  Security Administration did not reveal to me the
     implications of thus being connected to the "United States",
     which entity  has its  origin and jurisdiction in 1:8:17 and
     4:3:2 in the U.S. Constitution (aka "The Federal Zone");

5.   the Social  Security Administration  did not reveal that the
     monies collected from me were treated like an excise tax and
     were not allocated to a Social Security or other fund;

6.   the Social  Security Administration  did not  disclose to me
     that earnings  from labor,  in and  of themselves, are not a
     revenue-taxable activity that is subject to excise taxes;

7.   the Social  Security Administration  did  not  and  has  not
     informed me  that the Federal Insurance Contributions Act is
     neither a  contribution nor  insurance, but  an excise  tax,
     thus being misleading and misrepresented by title; and

8.   I was  a minor not of lawful, contracting age when I entered
     the Social Security contract.


For  these   reasons,  and   for  the  numerous  reasons  already
documented in  the  Affidavits  and  other  documents  previously
served on  your Agency, I reiterate my prior election to renounce
my Social  Security Number and withdraw from the system entirely.
I have not heretofore received any benefits or payments under the
Social Security  Act.   Neither has anyone else received benefits
by virtue  of my  prior  participation  in  the  Social  Security
system.

Having  made   this   election   to   discontinue   all   further
participation in  the Social Security system, I hereby demand the
return of  all monies collected from me under the guise of Social
Security and Hospital Insurance.  Out of sheer generosity, I make
this demand  without claim  for any  interest  or  increment  for
inflation.   I further  agree to waive all future Social Security
benefits that  have, or would have, accrued to me by virtue of my
prior uninformed,  fraudulent,  and  coerced  submission  to  the
Social Security contract.

My  Social   Security  application,  contract  and  account  are,
therefore, null  and  void  from  their  inception,  as  are  any
adhesions which may, now or in the future, be claimed by agencies
of the  federal government,  or by any undisclosed third-parties,
as a result of an application, contract and account that are null
and void ab initio.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 95 of 153


Notice of Personal Liability

Any further  attempts by  you to  assert  the  validity  of  that
invalid application,  contract and/or  account  in  the  face  of
contrary evidence  will be  noted and  can be used as prima facie
evidence of  your willingness to violate and otherwise contravene
my unalienable rights and my Constitutionally secured rights as a
Sovereign Freeman.  These rights include, but are not limited to,
those which  are enumerated in my Affidavits and other documents,
including this letter.

You are  hereby warned  that you  can and will be held personally
liable  for  any  future  attempts  to  violate  my  fundamental,
unalienable rights  by acts  on your part which attempt to compel
my specific  performance to  any third-party  debt or  obligation
created through  the unlawful  assertion  of  an  invalid  Social
Security application, contract and/or account.  As an employee of
the federal  government, you  are under  a  legal  obligation  to
recognize that:   "Constructive fraud as well as actual fraud may
be the  basis of  cancellation of an instrument," El Paso Natural
Gas Co.  v. Kysar Insurance Co., 605 Pacific 2d 240 (1979).  Your
ignorance of the law is no excuse in this matter.


General Assertion of Rights

For  your   information,  I   am  not   subject  to  any  foreign
jurisdiction by  reason  of  any  valid  contract  or  commercial
agreement resulting  in adhesion across America, nor are millions
of other Sovereign Citizens, unless they have provided waivers of
rights, guaranteed  by the  Constitution, by  means of  knowingly
intelligent acts  such as contracts or commercial agreements with
such government(s) "... with sufficient awareness of the relevant
circumstances and  likely consequences ...", as ruled by the U.S.
Supreme Court in Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970).  I have
given no such waivers, nor is it possible that I could have given
such waivers  by reason of a Social Security application executed
long before  my age  of majority.  Therefore, the Social Security
application, account and number at issue are necessarily null and
void, ab  initio, notwithstanding  any  and  all  unsubstantiated
statements by you to the contrary.


Notice of Deadline

If I do not hear from you within thirty (30) calendar days of the
above date, I will be entitled to the conclusive presumption that
you are  thereby barred, by virtue of the doctrine of estoppel by
acquiescence, from  any further  challenge to  my  statements  as
contained  herein  and  as  contained  in  all  my  documents  as
previously served on your Agency.

Thank you very much for your consideration.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 96 of 153


Sincerely yours,


/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 97 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested parties  by mailing one copy thereof, on this
fifth day  of May,  1982,  in  a  sealed  envelope  with  postage
prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland


Dated May 5, 1982


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 98 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                             c/o General Delivery
                                             San Rafael
                                             California state

                                             October 5, 1982

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Subject:  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT (see attached)
          ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE (see attached)

Dear Ms. King:

     Please  take  notice  that  this  letter  and  all  attached
documents contain,  among other  things, a  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT in
addition to  an ACTUAL  AND CONSTRUCTIVE  NOTICE hereby served on
your person  and on  the other  persons listed  in  the  attached
CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE BY MAIL.

     Please also  take notice  that I formally object to your use
of a ZIP code when addressing mail to me, if such ZIP codes could
be construed  to mean  that I  am "subject"  in any  way  to  the
"United States".   I am consistently informed by employees of the
U.S.P.S. that  the only  purpose of  ZIP codes is to expedite the
delivery of  mail.   Instead, I  hereby repeat my demand that you
utilize the  above mailing  address, exactly as shown, in any and
all future correspondence with me.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and  without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights

attachments:

   [see next page]

copies:

   [see pages 3 and 4, infra]

attachments:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 99 of 153


     Demand for Payment, Actual and Constructive Notice,
      October 5, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, August 1, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND PUBLIC NOTICE
       REVOCATION AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 199
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, July 15, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, July 15, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, May 5, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, May 5, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23, 1982
     WITHDRAWAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPLICATION, March 23, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to Vital Records, Boston, Mass., April 3, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT AND REVOCATION
       OF POWER ASSEVERATION by John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982

copies:

   [see next page]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 100 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested parties  by mailing one copy thereof, on this
fifth day  of October,  1982, in  a sealed  envelope with postage
prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Kathleen R. Searle
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Speaker of the House
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20515/tdc

Attorney General
State of California
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, California
Postal Zone 94244-2550/tdc

Attorney General
Justice Department
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20530/tdc

Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20201/tdc

Commissioner of IRS
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20224/tdc


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 101 of 153


The Federal Reserve Bank, Inc.
20th and Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20551/tdc

Secretary of the Treasury
State of California
915 Capitol Mall
Sacramento, California
Postal Zone 95814/tdc

Senator Alan Cranston
U.S. Senate
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20510/tdc

Senator John Seymour
U.S. Senate
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20510/tdc

Representative Barbara Boxer
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20515/tdc


Dated October 5, 1982


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 102 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                             c/o General Delivery
                                             San Rafael
                                             California state

                                             October 5, 1982

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Subject:  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT
          ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE

Dear Ms. King:

     This is  my lawful  and formal  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT of Social
Security taxes  unlawfully withheld  from my  untaxable  personal
compensation that  was exempt  from tax under the fundamental Law
during the  calendar years  1965 to  1986, inclusive.   The total
amount of this demand is itemized as follows:

     Social Security Taxes Unlawfully Withheld by SSA
     from John E. Trumane, itemized as follows:

     Year      Amount and Type of Tax Withheld    Total

     1986     $3,003 social security taxes       $3,003
     1985      2,971   "       "       "          2,971
     1984      1,074   "       "       "          1,074
     1983        503   "       "       "            503
     1982      1,285   "       "       "          1,285
     1981      1,975   "       "       "          1,975
     1980      1,587   "       "       "          1,587
     1979        992   "       "       "            992
     1978      1,070   "       "       "          1,070
     1977        965   "       "       "            965
     1976        822   "       "       "            822
     1975          0   "       "       "              0
     1974        672   "       "       "            672
     1973        418   "       "       "            418
     1972          0   "       "       "              0
     1971         75   "       "       "             75
     1970         55   "       "       "             55
     1969         29   "       "       "             29
     1968         96   "       "       "             96
     1967         47   "       "       "             47
     1966         36   "       "       "             36
     1965         13   "       "       "             13
                                                 ------
               TOTAL AMOUNT DUE:                $17,688
                                                =======


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 103 of 153


     The above  yearly amounts  were  taken  from  the  statement
entitled "Personal Earnings and Benefit Estimate Statement", form
number SSA-7005  (06-88), dated  November 29,  1988 and signed by
Dorcas R. Hardy, Commissioner of Social Security (copy attached).

     Please take  note of  my prior  communications to the Social
Security Administration,  in which  I have reiterated this demand
without claim for any interest or increment for inflation.


                 ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE

     This is  my formal  reply to your letter date-stamped August
13, 1982.   Please  take notice  of the  fact that I am a de jure
California State  Citizen, not  a de  facto federal citizen under
the so-called  14th Amendment, nor a ward of the Congress who has
a taxable  citizenship  through  Social  Security  or  any  other
governmental privilege  or franchise.  No governmental agency has
power of attorney over me or my property.

     This letter and all attachments are based upon the principle
that a contract is "Null and Void Ab Initio" in the case of fraud
at its  inception, and  it need  not be  formally rescinded  as a
prerequisite to a right of avoidance.  See court authority in the
case of  Bonacci v.  Massachusetts Bonding  and Insurance Co., 58
Cal 2d 657, 664; 137 P.2d 487 (1943).

     Therefore, I again demand that you remove my name and number
from your  system of  records, and  that you  notify any  and all
affected governmental agencies that I am not subject to, nor am I
required to  have, a  Social Security  number or account.  I also
demand that  your agency  return all property that was taken from
me by your use of various elements of fraud (see TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
as shown in the above DEMAND FOR PAYMENT).

     This letter  and  attachments,  and  all  previous  letters,
affidavits, declarations and affirmations sent to you, the Social
Security Administration and/or the Department of Health and Human
Services,  or   any  other  governmental  agency  (all  of  which
documents are  incorporated by  this reference  as if  set  forth
fully herein),  are conclusive and direct evidence of fraud which
has not  and cannot be refuted by any legal means.  Therefore, as
such, these  documents  now  constitute  conclusive  evidence  of
admissions and  confessions of  fraud and entrapment in any court
of law or in any other proceedings.

     These documents  are hereby  deemed to  be  your  "means  of
knowledge".   The means  of knowledge,  especially when knowledge
consists of  public records, is deemed in law to be "knowledge of
the facts".   If  it appears  on record  that an  individual  had
notice or  information of  circumstances which would cause him to
inquire and which, if followed, would lead to knowledge, or if it
appears that  the facts  were presumptively within his knowledge,
then he  will be deemed to have had actual knowledge of the facts
and may  be subsequently  liable for  any damage or injury.  You,
therefore, Gwendolyn  S. King,  have been given "knowledge of the
facts" as  they pertain  to this  conspiracy to  commit  a  fraud
against me and my property.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 104 of 153


     This is  an actual  and constructive notice under California
Civil Code  (CCC), Sections  18 and  19, that if you fail to obey
the law  and if  you continue  to aid and abet the conspiracy, by
use of  fraud, entrapment and misrepresentation, to deprive me of
my de jure state Citizenship and vested property rights, then you
will thereby  cause me  further damage  and injury.    This  will
require me to take whatever action I deem is necessary and lawful
to effect a remedy.

     You will  take formal  notice of the fact that I am a white,
natural born  state Citizen  who is  executing  this  ACTUAL  AND
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE.  If called upon as a witness, I will testify
to the  following facts,  which I believe to be true and correct,
to the best of my knowledge and understanding:

     There is NO LAW that would or could compel me to participate
in the  perpetration of  a fraud.   There  is no provision in the
Social Security Act that would not allow me, a white natural born
state Citizen,  to refrain and withdraw from participating in the
Social Security System, which is based upon CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD as
evidenced by the facts as stated in all attached documents and by
the additional facts which are stated below.

     My true  status and  intent is  to  be  a  Common-Law  State
Citizen  as   established  by   the  Preamble  and  the  original
Constitution for  the United  States of  America (1787)  and  the
original Constitution  of California state (1849).  Thus, for all
the reasons  stated herein  and elsewhere,  I hereby  reaffirm my
right to  rescind, revoke and render null and void nunc pro tunc,
as previously established, the number xxx-xx-xxxx in application,
in body, and in account.

     I hereby  charge that the Social Security Administration and
the Congress  of the  United States,  with full  knowledge of the
following facts, and with willful and full intent to do so:

1.   Did not  reveal the  truth that the Social Security Act is a
     compulsory excise  tax under  Title II  and VIII  which only
     creates a revocable statutory right.  See "Hearings before a
     Subcommittee of  the Committee  on Ways  and Means, House of
     Representatives, 83rd  Congress, First Session, on the Legal
     Status of  OASI Benefits",  dated November 27, 1953, Part 6,
     pages 906,  932, 963.  This reference incorporates fully and
     makes Part 6 a part of this ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE.

2.   Did not reveal the truth that the Social Security Act IS NOT
     insurance and  does not  go into  a separate trust fund, nor
     does it  create any  vested rights.   (See supra, page 1014;
     see also Fleming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 610 (1960).)

3.   Did deliberately  and  willfully  withhold  the  information
     that, upon obtaining a Social Security Number (SSN), a white
     natural born  state Citizen  would be required, for the rest
     of his  working life,  to pay over 50% of his wages acquired
     in exchange  quid pro  quo, as  an income tax, as instigated
     and established for the profit of the Federal Reserve Banks.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 105 of 153


4.   Did not reveal and disclose the truth that, upon obtaining a
     SSN, a  white natural  born State  Citizen  would  lose  his
     primary  State   Citizenship,   his   Privileges   and   his
     Immunities, and  become  instead  a  business  entity  under
     Social  Security,  and  an  enfranchised  person  under  the
     so-called 14th  Amendment, and  would  lose  access  to  his
     Constitutional Rights  as guaranteed  by the Bill of Rights,
     Amendments 1  through 10;   and  instead he  would become  a
     federal citizen  and receive privileges and immunities which
     are revocable  at the  whim and  pleasure of  the  Congress.
     (See Section 1104 of the Social Security Act, and Article I,
     Section 7  of the  California  Constitution,  and  so-called
     Amendment 14 of the U.S. Constitution.)

5.   Did not  reveal and disclose the truth that the SSN would be
     used for the absolute control of the "citizens of the United
     States" under  the so-called 14th Amendment, as evidenced by
     various orders  instituted by  the Internal  Revenue Service
     (similar to  Nazi  Concentration  Camp  numbers  or  federal
     serial numbers).

6.   Have willfully and deliberately utilized Section 1104 of the
     Social Security  Act to  deprive over  250 million people of
     their statutory  rights and  property, as established by the
     original Social Security Act.

7.   Have, by  utilizing constructive  fraud  by  non-disclosure,
     deceit, coercion,  intimidation, duress  and outright lying,
     defrauded me  of  my  Common-Law  Citizenship  and  also  my
     inalienable/unalienable rights to life, liberty and property
     at the  instigation of  the Federal  Reserve Banks  for  the
     profit of the Class A Stockholders of those banks.

8.   Have willfully and deliberately failed to disclose the above
     information and  do still  continue  to  state  that  Social
     Security is "voluntary" and "insurance" when, in fact, it is
     not and,  in fact  and operation,  it is  administered as  a
     compulsory excise  tax;   and thus to compel me to surrender
     my constitutional  state Citizenship and to deprive me of my
     Privileges and  Immunities as  a sovereign state Citizen, in
     order to  be regulated  and to  pay an  "income tax" for the
     profit of the Federal Reserve Banks, is outright fraud being
     instituted by  the U.S.  Congress, the  Department of Health
     and Human  Services, the  Internal Revenue  Service and  the
     Federal Reserve Banks Inc., with the assistance and approval
     of the  U.S. Attorney  General's Office,  with the intent to
     establish the  ten (10)  planks of  the Communist  Manifesto
     within the  United States  as they are now in operation, and
     to abolish  the intent of the United States Constitution, as
     it was  originally  established  by  our  founding  Fathers,
     namely,  to   ordain  and  establish  a  Republic,    NOT  a
     socialistic Slave  State for  the enrichment  of the Class A
     Stockholders of the Federal Reserve banks.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 106 of 153


9.   Have committed  fraud, duress  and coercion, exercised undue
     influence,  and   evidenced  unlawful   menace  against  the
     American people by representing the so-called 14th Amendment
     as a  lawfully ratified  amendment in the U.S. Constitution,
     when contrary  proof, published  court authorities and other
     competent legal  scholars have  now established  that it was
     NOT lawfully ratified.  (See State v. Phillips, 540 P.2d 936
     (1975);   Dyett v.  Turner, 439  P.2d 266 (1968);  28 Tulane
     Law Review 22;  11 South Carolina Law  Quarterly 484.)


     Neither Congress  nor the Social Security Administration nor
the Federal  Reserve banks  had any lawful authority to compel me
to apply for a Social Security account and number.

     Upon application  for a  Social Security account and number,
there was  a hidden  assumpsit that  I  became  "subject  to  the
jurisdiction of the United States" and thereby became entitled to
the privileges  and immunities  granted  by  the  so-called  14th
Amendment,   whereby    the   Congress,   the   Social   Security
Administration and  the Internal Revenue Service could command my
specific performance  to discharge any of their third-party debts
and obligations.

     The Social  Security contract  (SS-5) is  not  an  insurance
contract.   There  is  no  separate  fund  or  account  for  each
participant.   The contract violates federal statutes (see, e.g.,
Title 18,  RICO statutes).  I have  rescinded  my  original  SS-5
application.   I am  holding it voidable and IT IS VOID as to the
issuing party.   Every  consideration  that  arose  out  of  that
contract must be returned to me, the lawful owner.

     I HEREBY  COMMAND  THE  SOCIAL  SECURITY  ADMINISTRATION  TO
RETURN ALL SUCH CONSIDERATIONS AS ITEMIZED ABOVE.

     This is  also an  ACTUAL  AND  CONSTRUCTIVE  NOTICE  to  all
concerned agencies,  both State  and Federal,  that  I,  John  E.
Trumane, a  white natural  born common-law  state Citizen,  now a
Citizen of California state, having no known legal franchise that
would cloud  my position,  hereby give  notice to  all  concerned
agencies that  their failure  to refute  each and  every point by
substantive proof  will be  considered admissions and confessions
and shall establish estoppel by silence and/or acquiescence.

     The continued  deprivation  of  my  substantive  rights,  my
vested property rights and my property as a Citizen of California
state, will  cause me further injury and damage, and will have to
be remedied by whatever actions deemed necessary and lawful.

     All of  the above  statements are  true and  correct, to the
best of my current knowledge, and are affirmed under penalties of
perjury, without  the "United  States", under  the  laws  of  the
United States of America, per 28 USC 1746(1).

            Notice to principals is notice to agents.

            Notice to agents is notice to principals.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 107 of 153


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane


John E. Trumane, Sui Juris
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and  without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights

attachments:

     Personal Earnings and Benefit Estimate Statement
       for John E. Trumane, November 29, 1988
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, August 1, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND PUBLIC NOTICE
       REVOCATION AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 199
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, July 15, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, July 15, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, May 5, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, May 5, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23, 1982
     WITHDRAWAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPLICATION, March 23, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to Vital Records, Boston, Mass., April 3, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT AND REVOCATION
       OF POWER ASSEVERATION by John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982


Copies:

   [see next page]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 108 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified  that service  of  this  DEMAND  FOR
PAYMENT and  ACTUAL AND  CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE  have been  made  on
interested parties by mailing one copy thereof, on this fifth day
of October,  1982, in  a sealed  envelope with  postage  prepaid,
properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Delmar D. Dowling, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Kathleen R. Searle
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Darrell Blevins
SSA Privacy Officer
Department of Health and Human Services
Social Security Administration
Baltimore, Maryland

Speaker of the House
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20505/tdc

Attorney General
State of California
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, California
Postal Zone 94244-2550/tdc

Attorney General
Justice Department
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20530/tdc

Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20201/tdc

Commissioner of IRS
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20224/tdc


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 109 of 153


The Federal Reserve Bank, Inc.
20th and Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20551/tdc

Secretary of the Treasury
State of California
915 Capitol Mall
Sacramento, California
Postal Zone 95814/tdc

Senator Alan Cranston
U.S. Senate
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20510/tdc

Senator John Seymour
U.S. Senate
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20510/tdc

Representative Barbara Boxer
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Postal Zone 20515/tdc


Dated October 5, 1982


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 110 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx
Return Receipt Requested
                                        c/o General Delivery
                                        San Rafael
                                        California state
                                        zip code exempt
                                        (DMM 122.32)

                                        June 5, 1983

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Subject:  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT (see attached)
          ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE (see attached)

Dear Ms. King:

     Please  take  notice  that  this  letter  and  all  attached
documents contain  among other things a second DEMAND FOR PAYMENT
in addition  to a  second ACTUAL  AND CONSTRUCTIVE  NOTICE hereby
served on  your person  and on  the other  persons listed  in the
attached CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE BY MAIL.


                       CONSPICUOUS NOTICE:

     In order  to be  valid, all future written communications to
me must explicitly acknowledge the fact that I inhabit California
state, not the arbitrary federal district known as "CA".  Failure
to recognize  this fact  necessarily must  invalidate any and all
future service  of process  and/or other  written  communications
which fail to exhibit the correct mailing location, to wit:

                         John E. Trumane
                       Sovereign Sui Juris
                      c/o General Delivery
                  San Rafael, California state
                  zip code exempt (DMM 122.32)

     Please take  notice that I formally object to your use of an
unqualified ZIP  code when  addressing mail  to me,  if such  ZIP
codes could  be construed  to mean that I am "subject" in any way
to the  "United States".  I am consistently informed by employees
of the  U.S. Postal Service that the only purpose of ZIP codes is
to expedite  the delivery  of mail.   Instead, I hereby repeat my
demand that  you utilize  the above  mailing location, exactly as
shown, in any and all future correspondence with me.


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane
Sovereign Sui Juris

all rights reserved


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 111 of 153


attachments:

   [see next page]

copies:

   [see pages 3 and 4, infra]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 112 of 153


attachments to first NOTICE and DEMAND previously served:

     Demand for Payment, Actual and Constructive Notice,
      October 5, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, August 1, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND PUBLIC NOTICE
       REVOCATION AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 199
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, July 15, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, July 15, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, May 5, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, May 5, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23, 1982
     WITHDRAWAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPLICATION, March 23, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to Vital Records, Boston, Mass., April 3, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT AND REVOCATION
       OF POWER ASSEVERATION by John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982

copies:

   [see next page]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 113 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested party(s) by mailing one copy thereof, on this
seventh day  of June,  1983, in  a sealed  envelope with  postage
prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx to:

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland


Copies under separate cover to:

Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.

Representative Lynn Woolsey
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.


Dated:  June 7, 1983


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 114 of 153


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx                c/o General Delivery
Return Receipt Requested                     San Rafael
                                             California state
                                             zip code exempt
                                             (DMM 122.32)

                                             June 5, 1983

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland

Subject:  DEMAND FOR PAYMENT
          ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE

Dear Ms. King:

     This is  my second  lawful and  formal DEMAND FOR PAYMENT of
Social Security  taxes  unlawfully  withheld  from  my  untaxable
personal  compensation   that  was  exempt  from  tax  under  the
fundamental  Law   during  the   calendar  years  1965  to  1986,
inclusive.   The total  amount of  this  demand  is  itemized  as
follows:

     Social Security Taxes Unlawfully Withheld by SSA
     from John E. Trumane, itemized as follows:

     Year      Amount and Type of Tax Withheld    Total

     1986     $3,003 social security taxes       $3,003
     1985      2,971   "       "       "          2,971
     1984      1,074   "       "       "          1,074
     1983        503   "       "       "            503
     1982      1,285   "       "       "          1,285
     1981      1,975   "       "       "          1,975
     1980      1,587   "       "       "          1,587
     1979        992   "       "       "            992
     1978      1,070   "       "       "          1,070
     1977        965   "       "       "            965
     1976        822   "       "       "            822
     1975          0   "       "       "              0
     1974        672   "       "       "            672
     1973        418   "       "       "            418
     1972          0   "       "       "              0
     1971         75   "       "       "             75
     1970         55   "       "       "             55
     1969         29   "       "       "             29
     1968         96   "       "       "             96
     1967         47   "       "       "             47
     1966         36   "       "       "             36
     1965         13   "       "       "             13
                                                 ------
               TOTAL AMOUNT DUE:                $17,688
                                                =======


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 115 of 153


     The above  yearly amounts  were  taken  from  the  statement
entitled "Personal Earnings and Benefit Estimate Statement", form
number SSA-7005  (06-88), dated  November 29,  1988 and signed by
Dorcas R. Hardy, Commissioner of Social Security (copy attached).

     Please take  note of  my prior  communications to the Social
Security Administration,  in which  I have reiterated this demand
without claim for any interest or increment for inflation.


                 ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE

     This is  my formal  reply to your letter date-stamped August
13, 1982.   Please  take notice  of the  fact that I am a de jure
California State  Citizen, not  a de  facto federal citizen under
the so-called  14th Amendment, nor a ward of the Congress who has
a taxable  citizenship  through  Social  Security  or  any  other
governmental privilege  or franchise.  No governmental agency has
power of attorney over me or my property.

     This letter and all attachments are based upon the principle
that a contract is "Null and Void Ab Initio" in the case of fraud
at its  inception, and  it need  not be  formally rescinded  as a
prerequisite to a right of avoidance.  See court authority in the
case of  Bonacci v.  Massachusetts Bonding  and Insurance Co., 58
Cal 2d 657, 664; 137 P.2d 487 (1943).

     Therefore, I again demand that you remove my name and number
from your  system of  records, and  that you  notify any  and all
affected governmental agencies that I am not subject to, nor am I
required to  have, a  Social Security  number or account.  I also
demand that  your agency  return all property that was taken from
me by your use of various elements of fraud (see TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
as shown in the above DEMAND FOR PAYMENT).

     This letter  and  attachments,  and  all  previous  letters,
affidavits, declarations and affirmations sent to you, the Social
Security Administration and/or the Department of Health and Human
Services,  or   any  other  governmental  agency  (all  of  which
documents are  incorporated by  this reference  as if  set  forth
fully herein),  are conclusive and direct evidence of fraud which
has not  and cannot be refuted by any legal means.  Therefore, as
such, these  documents  now  constitute  conclusive  evidence  of
admissions and  confessions of  fraud and entrapment in any court
of law or in any other proceedings.

     These documents  are hereby  deemed to  be  your  "means  of
knowledge".   The means  of knowledge,  especially when knowledge
consists of  public records, is deemed in law to be "knowledge of
the facts".   If  it appears  on record  that an  individual  had
notice or  information of  circumstances which would cause him to
inquire and which, if followed, would lead to knowledge, or if it
appears that  the facts  were presumptively within his knowledge,
then he  will be deemed to have had actual knowledge of the facts
and may  be subsequently  liable for  any damage or injury.  You,
therefore, Gwendolyn  S. King,  have been given "knowledge of the
facts" as  they pertain  to this  conspiracy to  commit  a  fraud
against me and my property.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 116 of 153


     This is  an actual  and constructive notice under California
Civil Code  (CCC), Sections  18 and  19, that if you fail to obey
the law  and if  you continue  to aid and abet the conspiracy, by
use of  fraud, entrapment and misrepresentation, to deprive me of
my de jure state Citizenship and vested property rights, then you
will thereby  cause me  further damage  and injury.    This  will
require me to take whatever action I deem is necessary and lawful
to effect a remedy.

     You will  take formal  notice of the fact that I am a white,
natural born  state Citizen  who is  executing  this  ACTUAL  AND
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE.  If called upon as a witness, I will testify
to the  following facts,  which I believe to be true and correct,
to the best of my knowledge and understanding:

     There is NO LAW that would or could compel me to participate
in the  perpetration of  a fraud.   There  is no provision in the
Social Security Act that would not allow me, a white natural born
state Citizen,  to refrain and withdraw from participating in the
Social Security System, which is based upon CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD as
evidenced by the facts as stated in all attached documents and by
the additional facts which are stated below.

     My true  status and  intent is  to  be  a  Common-Law  State
Citizen  as   established  by   the  Preamble  and  the  original
Constitution for  the United  States of  America (1787)  and  the
original Constitution  of California state (1849).  Thus, for all
the reasons  stated herein  and elsewhere,  I hereby  reaffirm my
right to  rescind, revoke and render null and void nunc pro tunc,
as previously established, the number xxx-xx-xxxx in application,
in body, and in account.

     I hereby  charge that the Social Security Administration and
the Congress  of the  United States,  with full  knowledge of the
following facts, and with willful and full intent to do so:

1.   Did not  reveal the  truth that the Social Security Act is a
     compulsory excise  tax under  Title II  and VIII  which only
     creates a revocable statutory right.  See "Hearings before a
     Subcommittee of  the Committee  on Ways  and Means, House of
     Representatives, 83rd  Congress, First Session, on the Legal
     Status of  OASI Benefits",  dated November 27, 1953, Part 6,
     pages 906,  932, 963.  This reference incorporates fully and
     makes Part 6 a part of this ACTUAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE.

2.   Did not reveal the truth that the Social Security Act IS NOT
     insurance and  does not  go into  a separate trust fund, nor
     does it  create any  vested rights.   (See supra, page 1014;
     see also Fleming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 610 (1960).)

3.   Did deliberately  and  willfully  withhold  the  information
     that, upon obtaining a Social Security Number (SSN), a white
     natural born  state Citizen  would be required, for the rest
     of his  working life,  to pay over 50% of his wages acquired
     in exchange  quid pro  quo, as  an income tax, as instigated
     and established for the profit of the Federal Reserve Banks.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 117 of 153


4.   Did not reveal and disclose the truth that, upon obtaining a
     SSN, a  white natural  born State  Citizen  would  lose  his
     primary  State   Citizenship,   his   Privileges   and   his
     Immunities, and  become  instead  a  business  entity  under
     Social  Security,  and  an  enfranchised  person  under  the
     so-called 14th  Amendment, and  would  lose  access  to  his
     Constitutional Rights  as guaranteed  by the Bill of Rights,
     Amendments 1  through 10;   and  instead he  would become  a
     federal citizen  and receive privileges and immunities which
     are revocable  at the  whim and  pleasure of  the  Congress.
     (See Section 1104 of the Social Security Act, and Article I,
     Section 7  of the  California  Constitution,  and  so-called
     Amendment 14 of the U.S. Constitution.)

5.   Did not  reveal and disclose the truth that the SSN would be
     used for the absolute control of the "citizens of the United
     States" under  the so-called 14th Amendment, as evidenced by
     various orders  instituted by  the Internal  Revenue Service
     (similar to  Nazi  Concentration  Camp  numbers  or  federal
     serial numbers).

6.   Have willfully and deliberately utilized Section 1104 of the
     Social Security  Act to  deprive over  250 million people of
     their statutory  rights and  property, as established by the
     original Social Security Act.

7.   Have, by  utilizing constructive  fraud  by  non-disclosure,
     deceit, coercion,  intimidation, duress  and outright lying,
     defrauded me  of  my  Common-Law  Citizenship  and  also  my
     inalienable/unalienable rights to life, liberty and property
     at the  instigation of  the Federal  Reserve Banks  for  the
     profit of the Class A Stockholders of those banks.

8.   Have willfully and deliberately failed to disclose the above
     information and  do still  continue  to  state  that  Social
     Security is "voluntary" and "insurance" when, in fact, it is
     not and,  in fact  and operation,  it is  administered as  a
     compulsory excise  tax;   and thus to compel me to surrender
     my constitutional  state Citizenship and to deprive me of my
     Privileges and  Immunities as  a sovereign state Citizen, in
     order to  be regulated  and to  pay an  "income tax" for the
     profit of the Federal Reserve Banks, is outright fraud being
     instituted by  the U.S.  Congress, the  Department of Health
     and Human  Services, the  Internal Revenue  Service and  the
     Federal Reserve Banks Inc., with the assistance and approval
     of the  U.S. Attorney  General's Office,  with the intent to
     establish the  ten (10)  planks of  the Communist  Manifesto
     within the  United States  as they are now in operation, and
     to abolish  the intent of the United States Constitution, as
     it was  originally  established  by  our  founding  Fathers,
     namely,  to   ordain  and  establish  a  Republic,    NOT  a
     socialistic Slave  State for  the enrichment  of the Class A
     Stockholders of the Federal Reserve banks.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 118 of 153


9.   Have committed  fraud, duress  and coercion, exercised undue
     influence,  and   evidenced  unlawful   menace  against  the
     American people by representing the so-called 14th Amendment
     as a  lawfully ratified  amendment in the U.S. Constitution,
     when contrary  proof, published  court authorities and other
     competent legal  scholars have  now established  that it was
     NOT lawfully ratified.  (See State v. Phillips, 540 P.2d 936
     (1975);   Dyett v.  Turner, 439  P.2d 266 (1968);  28 Tulane
     Law Review 22;  11 South Carolina Law  Quarterly 484.)


     Neither Congress  nor the Social Security Administration nor
the Federal  Reserve banks  had any lawful authority to compel me
to apply for a Social Security account and number.

     Upon application  for a  Social Security account and number,
there was  a hidden  assumpsit that  I  became  "subject  to  the
jurisdiction of the United States" and thereby became entitled to
the privileges  and immunities  granted  by  the  so-called  14th
Amendment,   whereby    the   Congress,   the   Social   Security
Administration and  the Internal Revenue Service could command my
specific performance  to discharge any of their third-party debts
and obligations.

     The Social  Security contract  (SS-5) is  not  an  insurance
contract.   There  is  no  separate  fund  or  account  for  each
participant.   The contract violates federal statutes (see, e.g.,
Title 18,  RICO statutes).  I have  rescinded  my  original  SS-5
application.   I am  holding it voidable and IT IS VOID as to the
issuing party.   Every  consideration  that  arose  out  of  that
contract must be returned to me, the lawful owner.

     I HEREBY  COMMAND  THE  SOCIAL  SECURITY  ADMINISTRATION  TO
RETURN ALL SUCH CONSIDERATIONS AS ITEMIZED ABOVE.

       This  is also  an ACTUAL  AND CONSTRUCTIVE  NOTICE to  all
concerned agencies,  both State  and Federal,  that  I,  John  E.
Trumane, a  white natural  born common-law  state Citizen,  now a
Citizen of California state, having no known legal franchise that
would cloud  my position,  hereby give  notice to  all  concerned
agencies that  their failure  to refute  each and  every point by
substantive proof  will be  considered admissions and confessions
and shall establish estoppel by silence and/or acquiescence.

     The continued  deprivation  of  my  substantive  rights,  my
vested property rights and my property as a Citizen of California
state, will  cause me further injury and damage, and will have to
be remedied by whatever actions deemed necessary and lawful.

     All of  the above  statements are  true and  correct, to the
best of my current knowledge, and are affirmed under penalties of
perjury, without  the "United  States", under  the  laws  of  the
United States of America, per 28 USC 1746(1).

            Notice to principals is notice to agents.

            Notice to agents is notice to principals.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 119 of 153


Sincerely yours,

/s/ John E. Trumane

John E. Trumane
Sovereign Sui Juris

all rights reserved

attachments to first NOTICE and DEMAND previously served:

     Personal Earnings and Benefit Estimate Statement
      for John E. Trumane, November 29, 1988
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, August 1, 1982
     Letter to Treasury Secretary, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC ESTOPPEL AT LAW AND PUBLIC NOTICE
       REVOCATION AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 199
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT of John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, July 15, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, July 15, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, May 5, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, May 5, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23, 1982
     WITHDRAWAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPLICATION, March 23, 1982
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 23, 1982
     Letter to Vital Records, Boston, Mass., April 3, 1982
     Letter to SSA, Baltimore, Maryland, March 9, 1982
     NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT AND REVOCATION
       OF POWER ASSEVERATION by John E. Trumane
     Certificate of Service by Mail, March 9, 1982


Copies:

   [see next page]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 120 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified  that service  of this second DEMAND
FOR PAYMENT  and ACTUAL  AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE has been made on
interested party(s)  by mailing one copy thereof, on this seventh
day of  June, 1983,  in a  sealed envelope  with postage prepaid,
properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx to:

Gwendolyn S. King
Commissioner of Social Security
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland


Copies under separate cover to:

Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.

Representative Lynn Woolsey
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.


Dated:  June 7, 1983


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 121 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified  that service  of this AFFIDAVIT has
been made  on interested  parties by mailing one copy thereof, on
this twenty-third  day of  March, 1982, in a sealed envelope with
postage prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Social Security Administration
Office of the Commissioner
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland
Postal Zone 21235


Dated March 23, 1982

/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 122 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is  hereby certified that service of this LETTER has been
made on  interested parties  by mailing one copy thereof, on this
twenty-third day  of March,  1982,  in  a  sealed  envelope  with
postage prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Certified Mail #P xxx xxx xxx

Social Security Administration
Office of the Commissioner
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland
Postal Zone 21235


Dated March 23, 1982


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 123 of 153


Certified Mail Number: __________________________________________
                 Date: __________________________________________


FROM:     John E. Trumane
          c/o General Delivery
          County of Marin
          San Rafael, California state
          united States of America

TO:       Social Security Administration
          OCRO
          6301 Security Boulevard
          Baltimore, Maryland
          Postal Zone 21235


Dear Director:

     I am  writing you  pursuant to  the  enclosed  "Request  for
Withdrawal  of   Application",  Form   SSA-521,  OMB  #0960-0015,
pursuant to 20 CFR 422.1 through 422.527.

     I have  never been  required to  have, hold  and/or obtain a
Social Security  account number.   Yet,  by government's usage of
undue influence  concerning a  birth registration  and employment
applications, I  was misled  to believe mistakenly that a Citizen
in one  of the  several united  States of America was required to
have such  an identification number and/or account.  I have never
been naturalized  by Congress, nor are any of my rights conferred
by Congress,  because I  am a  natural born Citizen (see 2:1:5 in
the U.S.  Constitution) and a white male inhabitant in California
state.

     It is  quite obvious  to me  now that  the U.S. Constitution
does not  grant to  Congress  the  power  to  legislate  for,  or
against, any of the independent sovereign States within the Union
of America.  Congress can legislate by usage, and under the scope
and purview,  of the so-called 14th Amendment, under which courts
have determined  that Congress  was enabled  to govern artificial
persons or  entities, which  I am  not.   Moreover, Congress  has
exclusive  legislative   jurisdiction   over   its   territories,
possessions and  enclaves  only  by  virtue  of  the  authorities
granted to  it by  Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 and Article 4,
Section 3, Clause 2 in the U.S. Constitution.

     I have  recently had  a physical  examination and my learned
doctor has  told me  that I am white, I am an adult, I am a human
being, and  I have  always been  such  ever  since  my  birth  in
Worcester, Massachusetts on June 21, 1948.  At no time in my life
have I  ever consented  with foreknowledge to being an artificial
entity, such  as is  a creation  of Congress  or of  the  "United
States", or  a Federal  citizen, nor  was I  born in  the "United
States", nor have I ever been a resident of the "United States".

     The birth and Social Security registrations that were forced
upon me,  without my  consent of  majority and  without knowingly
intelligent acts  on my  part, are  therefore null  and void,  ab
initio.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 124 of 153


     I refuse to be considered as a stranger in California state,
such as  a "United States citizen" or a "resident alien".  I have
never received,  nor made  application for,  any type  of related
Social Security  benefits.   I do  not vote  and therefore I have
never knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily consented to these
purported Social  Security benefits  given by Congress.  I cannot
and will  not  accept  any  such  quasi  contractual  agreements,
particularly when  all associated  terms and  conditions were not
fully disclosed to me.  My arguments of law are as follows:

                     THE CODE OF LAWS OF THE
                    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                  TITLE 1 -- GENERAL PROVISIONS
               CHAPTER 1 -- RULES OF CONSTRUCTION

     Sec. 1.  Words denoting number, gender, and so forth.

     In determining  the meaning  of any  Act of Congress, unless
     the context  indicates otherwise   --   words  importing the
     singular include  and apply  to several  persons, parties or
     things;  words importing the plural include the singular;


     In reviewing  the definition  of "State"  in Section 1101 of
the Social  Security Act,  we find  that the  Congress, when they
were utilizing  a special  definition of  "State", only wanted to
"include" those  three  specifically  defined  Federal  State(s),
(except when  used in Section 531) and no more!  (You are invited
to read Section 531 for yourself.)

     In this  next review,  we see  that the  definition  of  the
"United States" uses a somewhat different construction:

                 TITLE XI -- GENERAL PROVISIONS
                           DEFINITIONS

     Section 1101(a)

     (2)  The term  "United States"  when used  in a geographical
     sense means  the state(s),  Alaska, Hawaii, and the District
     of Columbia.


     As you  can see,  for purposes of statutory construction and
for clearer  interpretation, it  is necessary for me to emphasize
the "(s)" in "state(s)" .  The term "United States" still defines
only the  "federal state(s)",  and no  more;  otherwise, Congress
would have  been specific.   The  "Ejusdem Generis  Rule" must be
applied to this construction:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 125 of 153


     Ejusdem Generis.    Of the same kind, class, or nature.

     In the  construction of  laws, wills, and other instruments,
     the "ejusdem  generis rule"  is, that  where  general  words
     follow an  enumeration of  persons or  things, by words of a
     particular and  specific meaning, such general words are not
     to be  construed in  their widest extent, but are to be held
     as applying  only to  persons or  things of the same general
     class as those specifically mentioned.

          [Black's Law Dictionary, Third Edition, 1933, page 645]
              [see also Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914, page 979]

and ...

     Noscitur a Sociis.  It is known from its associates.

     The  meaning  of  a  word  is  or  may  be  known  from  the
     accompanying words.   3  Term R. 87;  Brown, Max 588.  Under
     this rule  general and  specific words, capable of analogous
     meaning, when  associated together,  take  color  from  each
     other, so  that general  words are  restricted  to  a  sense
     analogous to less general ....

         [Black's Law Dictionary, Third Edition, 1933, page 1256]


     For further  emphasis on this point, we find that the cross-
reference to  Section 1101(a) of the original Social Security Act
has survived  and was  re-codified into  Title 42,  United States
Code, Chapter  7 and  appears in Sections 1301(a)(1) and (2).  We
shall now review this very important section:

                   TITLE 42 UNITED STATES CODE
                  THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
                  CHAPTER 7 -- SOCIAL SECURITY
               SUBCHAPTER XI -- GENERAL PROVISIONS
                         (1982 edition)

     Section 1301(a)  When used in this chapter --

          (1)  The term "STATE", except where otherwise provided,
     INCLUDES the  District of  Columbia and  the Commonwealth of
     Puerto Rico,  and when  used in  subchapters IV, V, VII, XI,
     and XIX  of this  chapter INCLUDES  the Virgin  Islands  and
     Guam.   Such term  when used in subchapters III, IX, and XII
     of this chapter ALSO INCLUDES the Virgin Islands.  Such term
     when used  in subchapter  V and in Part B of this subchapter
     of this  chapter ALSO  INCLUDES American Samoa, the Northern
     Mariana Islands,  and the  Trust Territory  of  the  Pacific
     Islands.   Such term  when used  in subchapter  XIX of  this
     chapter ALSO  INCLUDES  the  Northern  Mariana  Islands  and
     American Samoa.   In  the case  of Puerto  Rico, the  Virgin
     Islands, and Guam, subchapters I, X, and XIV, and subchapter
     XVI of  this chapter  (as in  effect without  regard to  the
     amendment  made  by  section  301  of  the  Social  Security
     Amendments of  1972) shall  continue to  apply, and the term
     "STATE" when used in such subchapters (but not in subchapter
     XVI of  this chapter as in effect pursuant to such amendment
     after December  31, 1973)  INCLUDES Puerto  Rico, the Virgin
     Islands, and  Guam.  Such term when used in subchapter XX of
     this chapter ALSO INCLUDES the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the
     Northern Mariana Islands.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 126 of 153


          (2)  The  term   "UNITED  STATES"   when  used   in   a
     geographical sense  MEANS, except  when otherwise  provided,
     the STATES.

          (8)(A)    The "Federal percentage" for any State (other
     than Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam) shall be 100
     per centum  less  the  State  percentage;    and  the  State
     Percentage shall  be that  percentage which  bears the  same
     ratio to  50 per  centum as  the square  of the  per  capita
     income of  such State bears to the square of the per capital
     income of  the United  States;    except  that  the  Federal
     percentage shall  in no  case be  less than 50 per centum or
     more than 65 per centum.

          (8)(B)    The Federal  percentage for each State (other
     than Puerto  Rico, the  Virgin Islands,  and Guam)  shall be
     promulgated by  the Secretary between October 1 and November
     30 of  each even-numbered  year, on the basis of the average
     per capital  income for  EACH State AND of the United States
     for  the   three  most   recent  calendar  years  for  which
     satisfactory data  are  available  from  the  Department  of
     Commerce.  Such promulgation shall be conclusive for each of
     the eight  quarters in  the period  beginning October 1 next
     succeeding such  promulgation:  Provided, That the Secretary
     shall promulgate  such percentages as soon as possible after
     August 28,  1958, which promulgation shall be conclusive for
     each of  the eleven quarters in the period beginning October
     1, 1958, and ending with the close of June 30, 1961.

          (8)(C)    The term  "United States" MEANS (but ONLY for
     purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph) THE
     FIFTY STATES and the District of Columbia.  [emphasis added]

               [see also Compilation of the Social Security Laws]
                    [98th Congress, 2nd Session, Committee Print]
                       [through April 1, 1984, pages 397 and 398]


     When the  original Social  Security Act  was written, Alaska
and Hawaii  were Territories (Federal States), but today they are
each one  of the 50 States of the Union.  When Section 1101(a) is
laid  alongside  its  surviving  Title  42,  Chapter  7,  Section
1301(a), we see that its substance survived completely intact ...

     ... except  Section 1301(a)(8)(C).   Here  is a Section that
was not  applicable, therefore,  it was  not used in the original
Act, from which the "48 States" were "excluded".

     If you read carefully the portions marked 8(A) and 8(B), you
will clearly  understand why  this specific  definition had to be
"included".   The construction  of the  terms "State" and "United
States" in  subparagraph 8(A)  is more  prima facie evidence that
the Social  Security Act  of the 74th Congress, Session 1, August
14, 1935,  as recorded  in  Chapter  531  of  the  United  States
Statutes At  Large, was  and is  intended to  operate "within the
Federal United States ONLY" (per definition).


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 127 of 153


     If you have very carefully read the original Social Security
Act, you  will discover  that the  term "United  States" is  used
thirty-four (34)  times  and  never,  ever  gives  the  slightest
suggestion that it embraced the Forty-Eight (48) Sovereign States
of the United States of America which existed in the year 1935.

     Hopefully, you have carefully read all of the preceding, and
have  laid   the  original  Sections  1101(a)(1)  and  1101(a)(2)
alongside 42  U.S.C. 1301(a)(1)  and 1301(a)(2) as they presently
read.   It is obvious that our 50 Sovereign States have derogated
their sovereignty  by voluntarily  requesting admission  into the
"Federal System  of National Socialism".  This system was written
under the  authority of  Article 1,  Section  8,  Clause  17  and
Article 4,  Section 3, Clause 2, of the U.S. Constitution.  These
expressed authorities were given only out of necessity to provide
the general  government with  some sort of ability to protect the
Congress assembled.

     In the  most extreme  contemplation of the Constitution, our
Founding Fathers  never envisioned that these two Clauses (1:8:17
and 4:3:2)  could have  been utilized  to impose  their expressed
Legislative Powers  upon the  second  highest  Sovereignty,  that
being the  States  of  the  Union  (the  highest  being  "We  the
People").   Considering the  proceedings of  the convention,  the
same observation is pertinent which we have previously made as to
the 50  States.   The Continental Congress never considered it to
be possible  for these  two clauses  to  be  utilized  so  as  to
derogate the Supreme Sovereignty of "We the People".

     If the  average man were to read the Revenue Laws and accept
them at  face value,  it would appear that the government has all
the advantages  and that the entire Title 26 could be interpreted
at the  whim and caprice of the Revenue Agents.  But, this is not
the case.   The chains of the Constitution do not allow this, and
Congress could  not and  did not enact most of these Revenue Laws
for the  Sovereigns within the 50 States.  When Congress included
a particular  Revenue  Act  into  Title  26,  U.S.C.,  they  were
specific and definitive in stating upon whom that Revenue Act had
effect, as you will see from the following:

                       UNITED STATES CODE
                TITLE 26 -- INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
            SUBTITLE D -- MISCELLANEOUS EXCISE TAXES
                CHAPTER 38 -- Environmental Taxes
                Subchapter A -- Tax on Petroleum

     Section 4611.  Imposition of Tax.

     (a)  General Rule.  -- There  is hereby imposed a tax at the
          rate specified in subsection (c) on --

          (1)  crude oil  received at  a United  States Refinery,
               and

          (2)  petroleum products  entered into the United States
               for consumption, use or warehousing.


     Section 4612.  Definitions and Special Rules.

     (a)  Definitions. -- For purposes of this subchapter --

          (4)  United States. --

               (A)  In General. -- The term "United States" means
                    the 50  States, the District of Columbia, the
                    Commonwealth of  Puerto Rico,  any possession
                    of the United States, the Commonwealth of the
                    Northern  Mariana   Islands,  and  the  Trust
                    Territory of the Pacific Islands.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 128 of 153


     The preceding  is a  true Import  Tax,  as  allowed  by  the
Constitution.   It contains all the indicia of being uniform, and
therefore it  passes the  Constitutionality test  and can operate
within the 50 Sovereign States (see 1:8:1).  The language of this
Revenue Act  is simple,  specific and definitive, and it would be
impossible to attach the "void for vagueness" doctrine to it.

     When we  consider Section  4612  and  examine  the  evidence
presented in  this Chapter  and Chapter  4,  it  is  clear,  when
writing the  Social Security  Act, Congress intended this Revenue
Act to  operate only  within the  "Federal  United  States"  (per
definition)!   The intent  of Congress  shall not  be added to or
subtracted from.  If a Revenue Act is enacted into Law within the
guidelines of the Constitution, then we must obey the Law.

     The  following   is  another   Revenue  Act   that  contains
definitions that  could be misunderstood if you were not thorough
enough in  your research, especially when we contemplate the term
"United States".  Please study the provisions of this Revenue Act
and you will see that the definitions are in contradistinction to
the definitions generally used within Subtitles "A", "B", and "C"
of the United States Code, Title 26:

                       UNITED STATES CODE
                TITLE 26 -- INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
            SUBTITLE D -- MISCELLANEOUS EXCISE TAXES
                CHAPTER 38 -- Environmental Taxes
            Subchapter B -- Tax on Certain Chemicals

     Section 4661.  Imposition of Tax.

     (a)  General Rule.  -- There  is hereby imposed a tax on any
          taxable chemical sold by the manufacturer, producer, or
          importer thereof.


     Section 4662.  Definitions and Special Rules.

     (a)  Definitions. -- For purposes of this subchapter --
          
          (2)  United States. -- The term "United States" has the
               meaning given such term by section 4612(a)(4).


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 129 of 153


     I believe  our Supreme  Court can  close this  portion  more
eloquently then I:

     Keeping in  mind the  well settled  rule that the citizen is
     exempt from taxation unless the same is imposed by clear and
     unequivocal language,  and that  where the construction of a
     tax law is doubtful, the doubt is to be resolved in favor of
     those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid.

      [Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McLain, 192 U.S. 397, 416]
                                                 [emphasis added]


     In the  interpretation of  statutes levying  taxes it is the
     established  rule   not  to   extend  their  provisions,  by
     implication, beyond  the clear  import of the language used,
     or to  enlarge their operations so as to embrace matters not
     specifically pointed  out.    In  case  of  doubt  they  are
     construed most strongly against the Government, and in favor
     of the citizen.
                              [U.S. v. Wigglesworth, 2 Story 369]
                                                 [emphasis added]


See also  Benziger v.  U.S., 192 U.S. 38, 55, and Gould v. Gould,
245 U.S. 151, 153 (1917).


                         SOCIAL SECURITY

     We shall  now address our attention to our indentured fellow
Citizens, known  in the  business world  as entrepreneurs.  These
"rugged individuals"  still have  a flicker  of the  candle  that
burned ever  so  brightly  in  the  early  days  of  our  beloved
Republic.  Today, the country knows these "solid men" as being in
"Free Enterprise".   The Federal Government, the Internal Revenue
Service  and   the  Tax   Code  (Title   26  U.S.C.)  define  the
aforementioned as "self-employed".

     Before we  proceed to  examine this  tax, let  us  lay  some
ground work.   We must hold in our mind that this tax is a Social
Security Tax;   its  foundation is within the Social Security Act
in Pari Materia, as follows:

     Pari Materia.   Latin.   Of  the same  matter;   on the same
     subject;   as, laws  pari materia  must  be  construed  with
     reference to each other.  Bac. Abr. "Statute," 1, 3.

        [Black's Law Dictionary, Third Edition (1933), page 1324]


     First, I  would like to refresh your memory by recalling the
definition of  "State(s)" and  "United States" as those terms are
used in  the Social  Security Act.    We  shall  use  the  master
definition as  exhibited in  Section 1301  of  Title  42,  United
States Code:


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 130 of 153


                   TITLE 42 UNITED STATES CODE
                  THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
                  CHAPTER 7 -- SOCIAL SECURITY
               SUBCHAPTER XI -- GENERAL PROVISIONS
                         (1982 edition)

     Section 1301(a)  When used in this chapter --

          (1)  The term "STATE", except where otherwise provided,
     INCLUDES the  District of  Columbia and  the Commonwealth of
     Puerto Rico,  and when  used in  subchapters IV, V, VII, XI,
     and XIX  of this  chapter INCLUDES  the Virgin  Islands  and
     Guam.   Such term  when used in subchapters III, IX, and XII
     of this chapter ALSO INCLUDES the Virgin Islands.  Such term
     when used  in subchapter  V and in Part B of this subchapter
     of this  chapter ALSO  INCLUDES American Samoa, the Northern
     Mariana Islands,  and the  Trust Territory  of  the  Pacific
     Islands.   Such term  when used  in subchapter  XIX of  this
     chapter ALSO  INCLUDES  the  Northern  Mariana  Islands  and
     American Samoa.   In  the case  of Puerto  Rico, the  Virgin
     Islands, and Guam, subchapters I, X, and XIV, and subchapter
     XVI of  this chapter  (as in  effect without  regard to  the
     amendment  made  by  section  301  of  the  Social  Security
     Amendments of  1972) shall  continue to  apply, and the term
     "STATE" when used in such subchapters (but not in subchapter
     XVI of  this chapter as in effect pursuant to such amendment
     after December  31, 1973)  INCLUDES Puerto  Rico, the Virgin
     Islands, and  Guam.  Such term when used in subchapter XX of
     this chapter ALSO INCLUDES the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the
     Northern Mariana Islands.

          (2)  The  term   "UNITED  STATES"   when  used   in   a
     geographical sense  MEANS, except  when otherwise  provided,
     the STATES.

          (8)(A)    The "Federal percentage" for any State (other
     than Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam) shall be 100
     per centum  less  the  State  percentage;    and  the  Stage
     Percentage shall  be that  percentage which  bears the  same
     ratio to  50 per  centum as  the square  of the  per  capita
     income of  such State bears to the square of the per capital
     income of  the United  States;    except  that  the  Federal
     percentage shall  in no  case be  less than 50 per centum or
     more than 65 per centum.

          (8)(B)    The Federal  percentage for each State (other
     than Puerto  Rico, the  Virgin Islands,  and Guam)  shall be
     promulgated by  the Secretary between October 1 and November
     30 of  each even-numbered  year, on the basis of the average
     per capital  income for  EACH State AND of the United States
     for  the   three  most   recent  calendar  years  for  which
     satisfactory data  are  available  from  the  Department  of
     Commerce.  Such promulgation shall be conclusive for each of
     the eight  quarters in  the period  beginning October 1 next
     succeeding such  promulgation:  Provided, That the Secretary
     shall promulgate  such percentages as soon as possible after
     August 28,  1958, which promulgation shall be conclusive for
     each of  the eleven quarters in the period beginning October
     1, 1958, and ending with the close of June 30, 1961.

          (8)(C)    The term  "United States" MEANS (but ONLY for
     purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph) THE
     FIFTY STATES and the District of Columbia.  [emphasis added]

               [see also Compilation of the Social Security Laws]
                    [98th Congress, 2nd Session, Committee Print]
                       [through April 1, 1984, pages 397 and 398]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 131 of 153


     We will  use a  slightly different approach in this Section,
but we will adhere to the same principles used previously.

     The following  is a  Federal  Land  Area  Chart  which  will
clearly identify  what we  are discussing  when we  refer to  the
"Federal United  State(s)".   The following  will be  taken  from
Section 1301 of Title 42.  These land areas will be designated as
"Federal State(s)", or "Federal Possession(s)":

                     FEDERAL LAND AREA CHART

(1) District of Columbia .......................... Federal State
(2) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico ................... Federal State
(3) Virgin Islands ................................ Federal State
(4) Guam .......................................... Federal State
(5) American Samoa ................................ Federal State
(6) Northern Mariana Islands ................. Federal Possession
(7) Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands ... Federal Possession


     Inclusive of the aforementioned Federal State(s) and Federal
Possession(s), the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of Congress
also extends  over all  places purchased  by the  consent of  the
Legislature of  one of  the 50  State(s), in which the same shall
be, for  the erection  of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards,
and other needful buildings (see 1:8:17 in U.S. Constitution).

     There are  many "land  areas" within  the 50 States that are
managed by  the Federal  Government, but  "exclusive" legislative
jurisdiction is  not always  retained in  each  instance  by  the
Federal Government.

     I would  like to  make a few more entries for the Director's
future reference.  The following are located in the United States
Code, Title 26:

     Section 2014(g)    Possession  of  United  States  Deemed  a
     Foreign Country.  -- For  purposes of the credits authorized
     by this  section, each possession of the United States shall
     be deemed to be a foreign country.

and ...

     Section 638.  Continental Shelf Areas.

     For purposes  of applying  the provisions  of  this  chapter
     (including sections  861(a)(3) and  862(a)(3) in the case of
     the performance of personal services) with respect to mines,
     oil and gas wells, and other natural deposits --


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 132 of 153


     (1)  the term  "United States"  when used  in a geographical
          sense  includes   the  seabed   and  subsoil  of  those
          submarine areas  which are  adjacent to the territorial
          waters of  the United  States and over which the United
          States  has   exclusive  rights,   in  accordance  with
          international law,  with respect to the exploration and
          exploitation of natural resources;  and

     (2)  the terms  "foreign country"  and  "possession  of  the
          United  States"  when  used  in  a  geographical  sense
          include the seabed and subsoil of those submarine areas
          which are  adjacent to  the territorial  waters of  the
          foreign country  or such  possession and over which the
          foreign country  (or the  United States in case of such
          possession) has  exclusive rights,  in accordance  with
          international law,  with respect to the exploration and
          exploitation of  natural resources,  but this paragraph
          shall apply in the case of a foreign country only if it
          exercises, directly  or indirectly, taxing jurisdiction
          with respect to such exploration or exploitation.

     No foreign  country shall,  by reason  of the application of
     this section,  be treated  as a  country contiguous  to  the
     United States.

and ...

     Section 7871.  Indian Tribal  Governments Treated  As States
                    for Certain Purposes.

     (a)  General Rule.  -- An  Indian tribal government shall be
          treated as a State -- ...

     (d)  Treatment of  Subdivisions of Indian Tribal Governments
          as  Political   Subdivisions.  --   For  the   purposes
          specified in subsection (a), a subdivision of an Indian
          tribal government  shall  be  treated  as  a  political
          subdivision of  a State  if (and only if) the Secretary
          determines (after  consultation with  the Secretary  of
          the Interior)  that such subdivision has been delegated
          the right  to exercise  one or  more of the substantial
          governmental functions of the Indian tribal government.


     Section 7806.  Construction of Title.

     (a)  Cross References. -- The cross references in this title
          to other  portions of the title, or other provisions of
          law, where  the word  "see" is  used, are made only for
          convenience, and shall be given no legal effect.

     (b)  Arrangement  and   Classification.  --   No  inference,
          implication, or presumption of legislative construction
          shall be  drawn or  made by  reason of  the location or
          grouping of  any particular  section  or  provision  or
          portion of this title, nor shall any table of contents,
          table  of   cross  references,   or  similar   outline,
          analysis,  or   descriptive  matter   relating  to  the
          contents of  this title be given any legal effect.  The
          preceding sentence  also applies  to the  sidenotes and
          ancillary tables  contained in  the various  prints  of
          this Act before its enactment into law.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 133 of 153


     Let us  now look  at the Sections of Title 26, United States
Code,  which   impose  these   Social  Security  TAXES  upon  the
entrepreneurs of the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave:

                       UNITED STATES CODE
                TITLE 26 -- INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
                   SUBTITLE A -- INCOME TAXES
           CHAPTER 2 --  TAX ON SELF-EMPLOYMENT INCOME

     Section 1401.  Rate of Tax.

     (a)  Old-Age, Survivors,  and Disability  Insurance.  --  In
          addition to  other taxes,  there shall  be imposed  for
          each taxable  year, on  the self-employment  income  of
          every individual,  a tax equal to the following percent
          of the  amount of  the self-employment  income for such
          taxable year:

          In the case of a taxable year

          Beginning after:         And before:            Percent
          December 31, 1983        January 1, 1988          11.40
          December 31, 1987        January 1, 1990          12.12
          December 31, 1989                                 12.40

     (b)  Hospital Insurance.  -- In  addition to the tax imposed
          by the preceding subsection, there shall be imposed for
          each taxable  year, on  the self-employment  income  of
          every individual,  a tax equal to the following percent
          of the  amount of  the self-employment  income for such
          taxable year:

          In the case of a taxable year

          Beginning after:         And before:            Percent
          December 31, 1983        January 1, 1985           2.60
          December 31, 1984        January 1, 1986           2.70
          December 31, 1985                                  2.90


     Please read  closely Section (a) of the preceding, then read
the heading  of this portion of the Code.  It is easy to see that
this is  just another  tax!   Yet, we  were told  we were  buying
"insurance".   This is  not a premium upon some insurance policy;
this is  a tax  on, and  for, my  purported dues  for a Franchise
called National  Socialism.   The "Other  Taxes" imposed  in this
very same  Subtitle are taxes upon any additional profits I might
make because  of the  limited liability  the purported  sovereign
offers me  through this  scheme.   The Inheritance  Taxes are  in
Subtitle B.  I know this purported sovereign will not allow me to
devolve my share to my Posterity before this sovereign receives a
pledge from my posterity.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 134 of 153


     The following may appear complicated, but if you will please
bear with  me, we  can successfully  wade through  this  esoteric
mess, and we will reach the obvious conclusion, as follows:

     We shall  begin by  determining  how  the  Congress  defined
self-employment:

     Section 1402.

     (b)  Self-Employment Income.  -- The  term  "self-employment
          income" means  the net  earnings  from  self-employment
          derived by  an individual  (other  than  a  nonresident
          alien individual,  except as  provided by  an agreement
          under section  233 of  the Social  Security Act) during
          any taxable  year ....   An  individual who  is  not  a
          citizen of  the United  States but who is a resident of
          the Commonwealth  of Puerto  Rico, the  Virgin Islands,
          Guam, or American Samoa shall not, for purposes of this
          chapter  be   considered  to  be  a  nonresident  alien
          individual.


See also Title 42, United States Code, Chapter 7, Section 411(b).

     If an  individual is  a "Nonresident Alien", he would not be
subject to  this tax!  The Government has made a big thing out of
the status  of this  individual, someone  who doesn't live in the
"United States"  and who  is a foreigner.  Of course, determining
the status of this "nonresident alien" would be the obvious place
to begin  an investigation,  in order to discover how lawfully to
avoid paying this tax.  Evidently, this "nonresident alien" is an
individual who  doesn't live  "here" and  who is not a "citizen",
but who must have a lot of influence over Congress.

     First, we should see what the dictionaries have to say about
this fellow  who appears to have all these special privileges and
advantages.  In the past, these special privileges and advantages
have been  denied to  the undersigned,  a  free  white  male  now
domiciled, sustaining  his life  by  "Private  Enterprise"  as  a
Sovereign At Law in Marin County, California state.

                           DEFINITIONS
                        WEBSTER'S SEVENTH
                    NEW COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY
                              1972

     non-res-i-dence \  also non-res-i-den-cy  \ n:  the state or
     fact of not residing in a particular place  --  non-resident

and ...

     1 alien \ n, 1 a: belonging or relating to another person or
     place : STRANGE  b: relating, belonging, or owing allegiance
     to another  country or government : FOREIGN  2: different in
     nature or character.

     2 alien  \ n, 1: a person of another family, race, or nation
     2: a  foreign-born resident who has not been naturalized and
     is  still  a  subject  or  citizen  of  a  foreign  country;
     broadly: a foreign-born citizen.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 135 of 153


                     BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY
                          SIXTH EDITION
                              1990

     Non-resident.   One who  does not reside within jurisdiction
     in question;   not  an inhabitant of the state of the forum.
     Special rules  govern service  of process  on non-residents;
     e.g. Fed. R. Civil. P. 4(e).  See Long arm statutes.

     Non-resident alien.   One  who is  neither a  resident nor a
     citizen of  the United  States.   Citizenship is  determined
     under the federal immigration and nationalization laws (U.S.
     Code, Title 8.)


                     BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY
                          THIRD EDITION
                              1933

     Non-resident.   One who is not a dweller within jurisdiction
     in question;  not an inhabitant of the state of the forum.

and ...

     Alien.   n.  A foreigner; one born abroad; a person resident
     in one country, but owing allegiance to another. In England,
     one born  out of  the allegiance of the king.  In the United
     States, one  born out  of the  jurisdiction  of  the  United
     States,  and   who  has   not  been  naturalized  under  the
     constitution and laws.


                    BOUVIER'S LAW DICTIONARY
                    AND CONCISE ENCYCLOPEDIA
                              1914

     Non-resident.  Not residing in the jurisdiction.  Service of
     process on  non-residents is  void,  excepting  cases  which
     proceed in  rem, such  as proceedings  in  admiralty  or  by
     foreign attachment,  and the  like, or where the property in
     litigation is within the jurisdiction of the court.

     One does not necessarily become a non-resident by absconding
     or absenting  himself from  his place  of abode,  Lindsey v.
     Dixon, 52 Mo. App. 291;  nor does a mere casual or temporary
     absence on  business or  pleasure render one a non-resident,
     even if he may not have a house of usual abode in the state,
     Crawford v.  Wilson, 4  Barb. (N.Y.)  504;   if there  is no
     intent to  change his  residence, Fitzgerald v. McMurran, 57
     Minn. 313,  59 N.W. 199.  But where a man has settled abode,
     for the  time being,  in another  state for  the purposes of
     business or  pleasure,  he  is  a  non-resident,  Hanson  v.
     Graham, 82  Cal. 631,  23 Pac. 56, 7 L.R.A. 127;  and it has
     been held  that one  who departs  from the  state  with  his
     family and  remains absent  for  about  a  year  is  a  non-
     resident, though  he has not acquired a residence elsewhere,
     and though he intended to return in a few months;

                                                      [page 2359]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 136 of 153


and ...

     Alien.  (Latin alienus, belonging to another; foreign).

     A foreigner;   one  of foreign  birth.  In England, one born
     out of  the allegiance  of the  king.  In the United States,
     one born  out of  the jurisdiction  of the United States and
     who has  not been  naturalized under  their constitution and
     laws.  2 Kent 50.  [page 172]


     Considering the  aforementioned definitions  of "Nonresident
Alien", we  still have an individual who doesn't live here and is
a foreigner.  The terms are not consistent with reason and logic.
Why would so much emphasis be put upon this individual:  "One who
is neither  a resident  nor a  citizen within the jurisdiction in
question"?  You have probably figured out to whom the Congress is
referring, if  you have  carefully  studied  and  understood  the
jurisdictional issues discussed above.

     I do  not live "within" the geographical areas as defined by
Congress and  as previously demonstrated in our Federal Land Area
Chart.   I am a Nonresident Alien Individual (per definition) and
I do not owe this tax.  The exact same principles that applied to
"Within the United States" at 26 U.S.C. 3121(b) also apply to the
Nonresident Alien described at 26 U.S.C. 1402(b).

     It appears that this Nonresident Alien individual, who seems
to have  so much  influence and  awesome authority over Congress,
and who  has been  exempted by Congress from the taxes imposed by
the Internal  Revenue Code,  Title 26, is none other than "We the
People", the  "Body Politic".   Specifically,  in the  case of  a
nonresident  alien   individual,  the   quantity  "gross  income"
includes only  gross income which is effectively connected with a
"United States"  trade or  business, and  gross income  which  is
derived from  sources within  the "United  States" (see 26 U.S.C.
872(a)).

     The "Other  Taxes" imposed  by Section  1401(a) and  1401(b)
have an  emphasis on  the term  "self-employed", the  "person(s)"
upon whom  Congress intended to lay this "Social Security Tax" in
addition to "Other Taxes".

     There are  two additional  terms we  must define in order to
wade through  the  Internal  Revenue  Code.    These  definitions
complete  our  search  for  understanding  to  whom  Congress  is
referring when  it imposes  the Income Tax.  Hopefully, our final
definitions are:

                        "SELF EMPLOYMENT"
                               AND
                       "TRADE OR BUSINESS"

     Section 1402.

     (b)  Self-Employment Income.  -- The  term  "self-employment
          income" means  the net  earnings  from  self-employment
          derived by  an individual  (other  than  a  nonresident
          alien individual,  except as  provided by  an agreement
          under section  233 of the Social Security Act) ....  An
          individual who  is not  a citizen  of the United States
          but who  is a  resident of  the Commonwealth  of Puerto
          Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, or American Samoa shall
          not, for purposes of this chapter be considered to be a
          nonresident alien individual.
                                              [26 U.S.C. 1402(b)]


See also 42 U.S.C., Chapter 7, Section 411(b).


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 137 of 153


     As you  can see, the residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the  Virgin  Islands,  Guam  and  American  Samoa  are  not
considered to  be Nonresident  Alien individuals.   By  now, this
should be self-explanatory.  Throughout our entire decodification
of the  Internal Revenue Code, Title 26, we have established that
the Social  Security Act  was written ONLY for the Federal States
and Possessions.

                       UNITED STATES CODE
                  TITLE 26 -- INTERNAL REVENUE
           SUBTITLE F -- PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
                    CHAPTER 79 -- DEFINITIONS

     Section 7701.  Definitions.

     (a)  When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly
          expressed or  manifestly incompatible  with the  intent
          thereof --

          (26) Trade or Business. -- The term "trade or business"
               includes the  performance of  the functions  of  a
               public office.

and ...

     Section 217.  Moving Expenses.

     (f)  Rules for Self-Employed Individuals. --

          (1)  Definition. --  For purposes  of this section, the
               term   "self-employed    individual"   means    an
               individual who performs personal services --

               (A)  as the  owner of  the entire  interest in  an
                    unincorporated trade or business, or

               (B)  as a  partner in  a partnership carrying on a
                    trade or business.
                                               [26 U.S.C. 217(f)]

and ...

     Section 864.  Definitions.

     (b)  Trade or  Business within  the United  States.  --  For
          purposes of this part, part II, and chapter 3, the term
          "trade or  business within  the United States" includes
          the performance  of personal services within the United
          States at  any time  within the  taxable year, but does
          not include --

          (1)  Performance  of   Personal  Services  for  Foreign
               Employer. -- The performance of personal services

               (A)  for a  nonresident alien  individual, foreign
                    partnership,  or   foreign  corporation,  not
                    engaged  in  trade  or  business  within  the
                    United States ....
                                               [26 U.S.C. 864(b)]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 138 of 153


     So, there  we have it.  We tie the whole thing together, and
we reach  the final  obvious conclusion:   The  "Taxes" that  are
imposed are  imposed upon  "Public Officials"  that work  for the
United States government (per definition).

     If you  have absorbed  anything about  our Constitution, you
know that  by the  use of  Article 1,  Section 8,  Clause 17  and
Article 4,  Section 3,  Clause 2, the Congress has all the Powers
exclusively, and  the Social Security Act was written within, and
for, this jurisdiction.  "We the People" were requested to submit
an application  and to  obtain permission  to join this scheme of
National Socialism.

     The "Corporation" founded by "We the People", commonly known
as the  United States Federal Government, has guaranteed in their
Manifesto, known  as Title  42, United States Code, the statutory
right for subjects to receive according to their needs;  and with
its extension,  known as  Title 26,  United States Code, subjects
are required to pay according to their abilities.

     I  will   again  use  documents  published  by  the  Federal
Government for this demonstration:

     9.21-1  Meaning of net income

     (a)  The tax  imposed by  Title 1  is upon  income.  Neither
     income exempted  by statute or fundamental law, nor expenses
     incurred in connection therewith, other than interest, enter
     into the computation of net income as defined by section 21.

        [Code of Federal Regulations, Title 26 (1939), page 1623]
                                                 [emphasis added]


     If I  have and use a Social Security Account Number, can the
"Fundamental Law" portion of Section 9.21-1 apply to me?  Answer:
No.  Am I compelled to give up my natural rights?  Answer:  No.

     9.22(b)-1  Exemptions;  exclusions from gross income.

     Certain items  of income  specified  in  section  22(b)  are
     exempt from  tax and  may be  excluded  from  gross  income.
     These items,  however, are  exempt only to the extent and in
     the amount  specified.  No other items are exempt from gross
     income except (1) those items of income which are, under the
     Constitution not taxable by the Federal Government ....

        [Code of Federal Regulations, Title 26 (1939), page 1632]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 139 of 153


     By a  voluntary request  for,  and  voluntary  use  of,  the
Federal Franchise  called Social Security, a Sovereign individual
rescinds his  rights under the Constitution and allows himself to
be a "subject" of the Congress.  This I will not do.

     9.54-1  Records and income tax forms.

     (a)  Every person  subject to  the tax, except persons whose
     gross income  (1)  consists  solely  of  salary,  wages,  or
     similar compensation  for personal services rendered, or (2)
     arises solely  from the  business  of  growing  and  selling
     products of the soil, shall ... keep such permanent books of
     account or records ....

        [Code of Federal Regulations, Title 26 (1939), page 1738]


     The Social  Security Franchise  would make  me a "taxpayer";
therefore sections  9.21-1, 9.22(b)-1, and 9.54-1 would not apply
to me.   My  "Wages with  respect to  Employment"  would  be  the
formula by  which the revenue laws measure the taxes.  The "Self-
Employed" compensation for personal services rendered by a person
who receives  it "From  Sources within  the United States" is the
formula by  which the Revenue Laws measure the taxes.  Therefore,
I would  be under  a duty  to keep  such books and records, and I
would  be   required  to  file  a  "Tax  Return"  by  regulations
promulgated by the Secretary.

     The provisions of Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 and Article
1, Section  9, Clause 4 and, for that matter, any of the Articles
of the  Bill of  Rights,  which  specifically  protect  the  same
individual, are  of no  value to  any individual who applies for,
and uses, a number that encompasses the Social Security scheme!

     If I  wish to  conduct "Private Enterprise", I must do it on
my own,  without assistance  from government.  I have never asked
for assistance,  nor will  I.  Henry Campbell Black defines these
rights as natural rights of Common Law Entrepreneurs:

     Proprietary, n.   A  proprietor or  owner;   one who has the
     exclusive title  to a thing;  one who possesses or holds the
     title to  a thing  in  his  own  right.    The  grantees  of
     Pennsylvania and  Maryland and  their heirs  were called the
     proprietaries of those provinces.  Webster.

     Proprietary rights.  Those rights which an owner of property
     has by virtue of his ownership.  When proprietary rights are
     opposed by  acquired rights,  such as easements, franchises,
     etc., they are more often called "Natural Rights".  Sweet.

        [Black's Law Dictionary, Third Edition (1933), page 1449]


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 140 of 153


     Therefore, as  you can  plainly see, you had no authority to
compel me  to join Social Security.  You had no authority to tell
Citizens in  the States of the Union that Social Security account
numbers were  mandatory.   The only  issue left to be resolved is
fraud, treason  and sedition.   The  Social Security scheme was a
trap to  create slaves  of the  remaining free  people within the
Sovereign States  of the  Union.  I will not be one of them.  You
see, I took the time to read the "Analysis of the Social Security
System, Hearings  before a  Subcommittee of the Committee on Ways
and Means, House of Representatives, Eighty-Third Congress, First
Session on The Legal Status of OASI Benefits, November 27, 1953."
Do not  tell me  that this  document does not contain irrefutable
proof and evidence of fraud.  For example, see pages 935 and 936.

     Therefore, you will now notify all pertinent and appropriate
Federal and  State entities of this withdrawal, thereby restoring
partially what  has been  taken from me, due to your constructive
fraud.


     Correctly submitted this _________ day of _________________,
1982 Anno Domini.


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.

                         John E. Trumane
                      c/o General Delivery
                  San Rafael, California state


Acknowledgement


CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC      )
                               )     Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
MARIN COUNTY                   )


     On this ______ day of _______________________________, 1982,
John E.  Trumane did personally appear before me, and is known to
be  the  one  described  in,  and  who  executed,  the  foregoing
instrument, and  acknowledged that  he executed  the same  as his
free act and deed as a Citizen/Sovereign in this above named said
State of  the Union.   Purpose  of notary  is for  identification
only,  and  not  for  entrance  into  any  foreign  jurisdiction,
executed without prejudice.

                            _____________________________________
                            Notary Public


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 141 of 153


Certified Mail Number: __________________________________________
                 Date: __________________________________________


John E. Trumane
c/o General Delivery
Marin County
San Rafael, California state
united States of America


                    FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT


CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC    )
                             )       Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
MARIN COUNTY                 )


                            PREAMBLE

     The following Affidavit of Foreign Status is a public notice
to all  interested parties concerning the Affiant's "birthrights"
and his  "status" as  an "AMERICAN  INHABITANT", as  that  status
would  apply   with  respect  to  the  American  States  (the  50
independent States  of the  Union) and  also with  respect to the
"United States", as follows:

     1.   The Affiant,  John E.  Trumane, was born a Sovereign in
Massachusetts, which  is one of the sovereign States of the Union
of several  States joined  together to comprise the confederation
known as  the united  States of  America.   He is,  therefore,  a
"nonresident  alien"  individual  with  respect  to  the  "United
States", which entity obtains its exclusive legislative authority
and jurisdiction from Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 and Article
4, Section  3, Clause 2 of the Constitution for the united States
of America.   The Affiant's parents were Sovereigns also, born in
sovereign States  of the  Union.   As the  progeny  of  Sovereign
people, the  Affiant was  born "...  one of  the sovereign people
....  A constituent member of the sovereignty synonymous with the
people.", Scott v. Sanford, 19 How. 404.  The Affiant is alien to
so-called 14th  Amendment "United  States" citizenship,  and also
nonresident to  so-called 14th  Amendment  State  residency,  and
therefore he is a "nonresident alien" with respect to both.  As a
Sovereign whose Citizenship originated in Massachusetts by birth,
and who  has remained  intact in  California since the year 1952,
the Affiant is also a foreigner (alien) with respect to the other
49 States  of the  Union and with respect to the "United States".
As a  consequence of  his birth,  the  Affiant  is  an  "American
Inhabitant";  and further,

     2.   The Affiant, to the best of his informed knowledge, has
not entered  into any  valid agreements of "voluntary servitude";
and further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 142 of 153


     3.   The Affiant  is a  "NONRESIDENT ALIEN"  with respect to
the "United  States", as that term is defined and used within the
Internal Revenue  Code (Title  26, United  States  Code),  and/or
Title 27  U.S.C., and  with respect  to the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder as follows:

     The Internal Revenue Code, Title 26, and/or Title 27, United
States Code,  and associated  federal  regulations,  clearly  and
thoroughly make  provision for  Americans born  and living within
one of the 50 Sovereign States of America, to wit:

     Section 1.871-4  Proof of residence of aliens.

     (a)  Rules of  evidence.   The following  rules of  evidence
          shall govern  in determining  whether or  not an  alien
          within the United States has acquired residence therein
          for purposes of the income tax.

     (b)  Nonresidence presumed.   An  alien  by  reason  of  his
          alienage, is presumed to be a nonresident alien.

                                                 [26 CFR 1.871-4]

and further,

     4.   The Affiant  was not born or naturalized in the "United
States", consequently he is not a "citizen of the "United States"
nor a  "United States  citizen", as  those terms  are defined and
used within  the Internal  Revenue Code  (26  U.S.C.)  and/or  27
U.S.C. and  the rules  and  regulations  promulgated  thereunder;
and, therefore,  he is  not subject  to  the  limited,  exclusive
territorial  or  political  jurisdiction  and  authority  of  the
"United States" as defined.

     The "United  States" is  definitive  and  specific  when  it
defines one of its citizens, as follows:

     Section 1.1-1

     (c)  Who is  a citizen.  Every person born or naturalized in
          the United  States and subject to its jurisdiction is a
          citizen.
                                                [26 CFR 1.1-1(c)]


     5.   The Affiant is not a "citizen of the United States" nor
a "United  States citizen  living abroad",  as those  phrases are
defined and  used in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or
27 U.S.C.  and the  rules and regulations promulgated thereunder;
and further,

     6.   The Affiant  is not  a "resident  alien residing within
the geographical boundaries of the United States", as that phrase
is defined  and used  in the  Internal Revenue  Code (26  U.S.C.)
and/or 27  U.S.C.  and  the  rules  and  regulations  promulgated
thereunder;  and further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 143 of 153


     7.   The  Affiant   is  not  a  "United  States  person",  a
"domestic  corporation",   "estate",  "trust",   "fiduciary"   or
"partnership" as  those terms  are defined  and used  within  the
Internal Revenue  Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or 27 U.S.C. and the rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder;  and further,

     8.   The Affiant is not an "officer", "employee" or "elected
official" of  the  "United  States",  of  a  "State"  or  of  any
political subdivision  thereof, nor  of the District of Columbia,
nor of  any agency  or instrumentality  of one  or  more  of  the
foregoing, nor  an "officer" of a "United States corporation", as
those terms are defined and used within the Internal Revenue Code
(26 U.S.C.)  and/or 27  U.S.C.  and  the  rules  and  regulations
promulgated thereunder;  and further,

     9.   The Affiant receives no "income" or "wages with respect
to  employment"   from  any   sources  within   the   territorial
jurisdiction of  the "United States" and does not have an "office
or other fixed place of business" within the "United States" from
which the  Affiant derives  any "income"  or "wages"  as such, as
those terms  and phrases are used and defined within the Internal
Revenue Code  (26 U.S.C.)  and/or 27  U.S.C. and  the  rules  and
regulations promulgated thereunder;  and further,

     10.  The Affiant  has never  engaged in  the  conduct  of  a
"trade or  business" within  the "United  States", nor  does  the
Affiant receive  any income  or  other  remuneration  effectively
connected with  the conduct  of a  "trade or business" within the
"United States",  as those  terms are defined and used within the
Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and 27 U.S.C. and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder;  and further,

     11.  The  Affiant  receives  no  "income",  "wages",  "self-
employment income"  or "other  remuneration" from  sources within
the "United  States", as  those terms are defined and used in the
Internal Revenue  Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or 27 U.S.C. and the rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder.  All remuneration paid to
the Affiant  is  for  services  rendered  outside  (without)  the
exclusive territorial, political and legislative jurisdiction and
authority of the "United States";  and further,

     12.  The Affiant  has never  had an  "office" or  "place  of
business" within  the "United States", as those terms are defined
and used  in the  Internal Revenue  Code (26  U.S.C.)  and/or  27
U.S.C. and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder;  and
further,

     13.  The Affiant  has never been a "United States employer",
nor "employer",  nor "employee"  which also  includes but  is not
limited to  an "employee" and/or "employer" for a "United States"
"household", and/or  "agricultural" activity,  as those terms are
defined and  used in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or
27 U.S.C.  and the  rules and regulations promulgated thereunder;
and further,

     14.  The Affiant  has never  been involved in any "commerce"
within the  territorial jurisdiction of the "United States" which
also includes  but is  not limited  to "alcohol",  "tobacco"  and
"firearms" and  Title 26, Subtitle D and E excises and privileged
occupations, as  those terms are defined and used in the Internal
Revenue Code  (26 U.S.C.)  and/or 27  U.S.C. and  the  rules  and
regulations promulgated thereunder;  and further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 144 of 153


     15.  The  Affiant   has  never   been  a   "United   States"
"withholding agent"  as those  terms are  defined and used in the
Internal Revenue  Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or 27 U.S.C. and the rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder;  and further,

     16.  The Affiant  had no  liability for  any type,  kind  or
class of  Federal Income  Tax in  past  years,  and  was  and  is
entitled to  a full  and complete refund of any amounts withheld,
because any liability asserted and amounts withheld were premised
upon a  mutual mistake  of fact  regarding the  Affiant's status.
The Affiant  has never  knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily
changed  his  Citizenship  status  nor  has  he  ever  knowingly,
intentionally,  and  voluntarily  elected  to  be  treated  as  a
"resident" of the "United States";  and further,

     17.  The Affiant, to the best of his current knowledge, owes
no "tax"  of any  type, class  or kind  to the "United States" as
those terms are defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code (26
U.S.C.)  and/or   27  U.S.C.   and  the   rules  and  regulations
promulgated thereunder;  and further,

     18.  The Affiant  anticipates no  liability  for  any  type,
class or  kind of federal income tax in the current year, because
the Affiant  does not intend to reside in the "United States", he
does not  intend to  be treated  as  either  a  "resident"  or  a
"citizen" of  the "United  States", he is not and does not intend
to be  involved in  the conduct of any "trade or business" within
the "United  States" or  receive any  "income"  or  "wages"  from
sources within  the "United  States", as  those terms are defined
and used  in the  Internal Revenue  Code (26  U.S.C.)  and/or  27
U.S.C. and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder;  and
further,

     19.  The Affiant,  by means  of knowingly  intelligent  acts
done with  sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and
consequences (Brady  v. U.S.,  397 U.S. 742, 748) never agreed or
consented to  be given  a federal  Social Security  Number (SSN),
same said  as to  a federal  Employee Identification Number (EIN)
and, therefore,  waives and  releases from  liability the "United
States" and  any State of the Union of 50 States, for any present
or future  benefits that  the Affiant  may be  entitled to  claim
under the  Old-Age Survivors  and the  Disability Insurance  Act,
and/or the  Federal Unemployment  Tax Act.    Additionally,  your
Affiant makes  no claim  to any  present or future benefits under
any of the foregoing;  and

     20.  Therefore, I,  John E.  Trumane, am a natural born free
inhabitant and, as such, a Sovereign Citizen/Principal inhabiting
California state.  Therefore, I am not "within the United States"
but lawfully  I am  "without the  United States"  (per Title  28,
U.S.C., Section  1746, Subsection  1), and  therefore I  have  no
standing capacity to sign any tax form which displays the perjury
clause pursuant  to Title  28, Section  1746, Subsection  2;  and
further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 145 of 153


     PLEASE NOTE  WELL:  At no time will the Affiant construe any
of the  foregoing terms defined within the Internal Revenue Code,
Title 26  and/or Title  27, United  States Code, or within any of
the other  United States  Codes, in  a metaphorical  sense.  When
terms are  not words of art and are explicitly defined within the
Code and/or  within a  Statute, the  Affiant relies  at all times
upon the clear language of the terms as they are defined therein,
NO MORE and NO LESS:

     "... When  aid to  construction of  the meaning of words, as
     used in the statute, is available, there certainly can be no
     'rule of law' which forbids its use, however clear the words
     may appear on 'superficial examination' ...."

                 [United States v. American Trucking Association]
                                   [310 U.S. 534, 543,544 (1939)]


     This unsworn  certification is  being executed  WITHOUT  the
"United States",  pursuant to Section 1746(1) of Title 28, United
States Code, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:

     I affirm  under penalty  of perjury  under the  laws of  the
United States  of America  that I  executed the foregoing for the
purposes and  considerations herein  expressed, in  the  capacity
stated, and  that the  statements contained  herein are  true and
correct, to the best of my knowledge.


Executed Anno Domini, on this the ___________ day in the month of

___________________________, 1982.

Subscribed, sealed and affirmed to this  ________________  day of

___________________________, 1982.


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.

                         John E. Trumane
                      c/o General Delivery
                  San Rafael, California state


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 146 of 153


Acknowledgement


CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC       )
                                )   Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
MARIN COUNTY                    )


     On this  ______ day of ______________________________, 1982,
John E.  Trumane did personally appear before me, and is known to
be  the   one  described  in,  and  who  executed  the  foregoing
instrument, and  acknowledged that  he executed  the same  as his
free act and deed as a Citizen/Sovereign in this above named said
State of  the Union.   Purpose  of notary  is for  identification
only, and not for entrance into any foreign jurisdiction.

                            _____________________________________
                            Notary Public


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 147 of 153


John E. Trumane
Marin County, California
c/o General Delivery
San Rafael, California state
united States of America

TO:  Registry of Vital Records
     Commonwealth of Massachusetts
     150 Tremont Street, Room B-3
     Boston, Massachusetts
     Postal Zone 02111

TO:  Social Security Administration
     Office of the Commissioner
     6301 Security Boulevard
     Baltimore, Maryland
     Postal Zone 21235


              NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT
              AND REVOCATION OF POWER ASSEVERATION


California State/Republic   )
                            )        Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
Marin County                )


                            PREAMBLE

     I, John  E. Trumane,  being natural  born in Massachusetts a
white male  human being,  now living  in Marin County, California
state, as  a Citizen  in California  state, do  hereby make  this
Special Appearance,  by Affidavit, in Propria Persona, proceeding
Sui Juris,  At Law,  in Common  Law,  with  Assistance,  Special,
neither conferring  nor consenting  to any  foreign jurisdiction,
except to the judicial power of California and/or America, and as
such  I   willfully  enforce   all   Constitutional   limitations
respectively on  all government  agencies when dealing with them.
Wherefore, the  undersigned Affiant  named herein and above, upon
affirmation declares and evidences the following:

     I, the  undersigned, a free white male Citizen in California
state, and  thereby in  the  united  States  of  America,  hereby
affirm, declare and give notice:

     1.   That I  am competent  to testify to the matters herein;
and further,

     2.   That I  have personal knowledge of my status and of the
facts and evidence stated herein;  and further,

     3.   That all  the facts  stated herein  are not hearsay but
true and  correct, and  admissible as  evidence, if not rebutted;
and further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 148 of 153


     4.   That  I,   John  E.  Trumane,  am  of  lawful  age  and
competent;   I am a natural born free white Citizen now living in
California state, and thereby in the united States of America, in
fact, by  right of  heritage,  a  Citizen  inhabiting  California
state, protected  by the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, the Organic
Act of  1849, the original Constitution of California (1849), the
Articles of Confederation (1777), the Constitution for the united
States of  America (1787) including its Preamble, and the Bill of
Rights (1791)  including its  Preamble;  and as such I retain all
my fundamental,  unalienable rights  granted by  God in  positive
law, embodied  in the  Declaration of  Independence of  1776  and
binding rights upon myself and my parentage, this day and for all
time;  and further,

     5.   That this  document has  been prepared,  witnessed  and
filed because  the State of Massachusetts holds the position that
there are no statutory provisions to rescind a Birth Certificate,
nor any  trust or  contractual obligations derived therefrom, and
because there  is no other remedy available to me at law by which
I can  declare and  enforce  my  right  to  be  free  from  State
enfranchisement and the benefits therefrom;  and further,

     6.   That, on  my birthday,  June 21,  1948, I  was born  in
Worcester, Massachusetts  to my parents, Peter F. Modzelewski and
Ann M. (Young) Modzelewski, who were both under the misconception
that they  were required  to secure  a Certificate of Birth on my
behalf, and they did obtain the same;  and further,

     7.   That my parents were not aware that, at the Common Law,
births were  to be  recorded in  the family  Bible, and that only
deaths were made a matter of public record;  and further,

     8.   That my  parents were  not aware  that any  certificate
required by  statute to  be made  by officers  may, as a rule, be
introduced into evidence (see Marlowe v. School District, 116 Pac
797) and,  therefore, they were acquiescing to State requirements
which  violate  my  rights  to  privacy  and  the  4th  Amendment
protections under  the Constitution  for  the  united  States  of
America, because the Birth Certificate is the record of the State
of Massachusetts,  not of  the individual,  and the  State may be
compelled to  introduce said  record without  my permission;  and
further,

     9.   That  such   statutory  practices   by  the   State  of
Massachusetts are  deceitful misrepresentations  by the State and
society, on  the recording of births, and my parents were unaware
that a  Birth Certificate  was not necessary, nor were they aware
that they  were possibly  waiving some of my rights, which rights
are unalienable  rights guaranteed  to me by the Constitution for
the united States of America;  and further,

     10.  That the  doctor who  delivered me  acted as a licensed
agent of the State of Massachusetts without the consent of either
my own parents or myself, and offered me into a State trust to be
regulated as  other State and corporate interests and property as
a result  of that offer and acceptance, which comprises a fiction
of  law  under  statutory  law  (called  contracts  of  adhesion,
contracts  implied   by  law,   constructive   contracts,   quasi
contracts, also referred to as implied consent legislation);  and
further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 149 of 153


     11.  That, from  my own  spiritual beliefs  and training,  I
have come, and I have determined that the right to be born comes,
from God Almighty (who knew me before I existed) -- not the State
of Massachusetts and not the State of California -- and therefore
original jurisdiction  upon my  behavior requiring  any  specific
performance  comes   from  my   personal  relationship  with  God
Almighty, unless  said performance  causes demonstrable damage or
injury to another natural human being;  and further,

     12.  That, after studying the Birth Certificate, I have come
to the  conclusions that  the Birth  Certificate creates  a legal
estate in  myself, and acts as the nexus to bring actions against
this individual  as if he were a corporate entity, that the State
of Massachusetts,  in cooperation with the federal government and
its agents  and assigns,  is maintaining the Birth Certificate so
as to  assume jurisdiction over many aspects of my life in direct
contravention  of  my  unalienable  rights  and  Constitutionally
secured rights  to be  a "Freeman"  and to  operate at the Common
Law;  and further,

     13.  That such  statutory provisions  also cause  a loss  or
diminution (depending  upon other statutory provisions) of rights
guaranteed  by  the  1st,  2nd,  4th,  5th,  6th,  7th,  and  9th
amendments in  the Constitution for the united States of America;
and further,

     14.  That, as  a result  of my earnest and diligent studies,
my prior  ignorance has  come to  an end,  and I have regained my
capacity to  be an  American  Freeman;    therefore,  it  is  now
necessary that  I declare  any nexus  assumed as  a result of the
Birth Certificate,   by  the State  of Massachusetts or by any of
its agents and assigns, including the federal government, and any
jurisdictional or  other rights that may be waived as a result of
said trust/contract  with all forms of government, to be null and
void from  its inception,  due to  the deceptive  duress,  fraud,
injury, and  incapacity perpetrated upon my parents and myself by
the State of Massachusetts, the third party to the contract;  and
further,

     15.  That I  was neither born nor naturalized in the "United
States"  as  defined  in  Title  26,  United  States  Codes  and,
therefore, I  am not subject to its foreign jurisdiction.  See 26
CFR 1.1-1(b)-(c);  and further,

     16.  That,  with   this  revocation   of  contract  and  the
revocation of  power, I  do hereby claim all of my rights, all of
my  unalienable   rights  and   all  rights   guaranteed  by  the
Constitution for  the united  States of  America, at  law, and do
hereby declare,  to one and all, that I am a free and independent
Citizen now  inhabiting California  state, who  is not a creation
of, nor  subject to any State's civil law of admiralty, maritime,
or equity  jurisdictions and,  as such, I am only attached to the
judicial Power of California and/or the united States of America;
and further,


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 150 of 153


     17.  That I  affirm, under  penalty of  perjury,  under  the
Common Law  of America,  without the  "United States" (see 1:8:17
and 4:3:2  in the  U.S.  Constitution),  that  the  Preamble  and
Sections 1 thru 16 of this Affidavit, are true and correct and so
done in good faith to the best of my knowledge;  and further,

     18.  That my use of the phrase "WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF
ALL MY  RIGHTS AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-207 (UCCA 1207)" above
my signature on this document indicates that I have exercised the
"Remedy" provided for me in the Uniform Commercial Code in Book 1
at Section  207, whereby I have explicitly reserved my Common Law
right not  to be  compelled to  perform  under  any  contract  or
commercial agreement,  that I  have not  entered into  knowingly,
voluntarily, and  intentionally;  that my explicit reservation of
rights has  served notice  upon ALL  administrative  agencies  of
government, whether  international, national,  state,  or  local,
that I  do not, and will not accept the liability associated with
the "compelled"  benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreements;
and that  my valid  reservation of  rights has  preserved all  my
rights and  prevented the  loss of any such rights by application
of the concepts of waiver or estoppel; and


Further This Affiant Saith Not.

Subscribed and  affirmed to,  Nunc Pro  Tunc, on  the date  of my
majority, which date was June 21, 1969.


Subscribed, sealed and affirmed to this __________________ day of

__________________________, 1982 Anno Domini.


     I now  affix my  signature to all of the affirmations herein
WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS, AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE
UCC 1-207 (UCCA 1207):

/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 151 of 153


                         John E. Trumane
                      c/o General Delivery
                  San Rafael, California state


Acknowledgement


CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC      )
                               )     Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
MARIN COUNTY                   )


     On this ______ day of _______________________________, 1982,
John E.  Trumane did personally appear before me, and is known to
be  the  one  described  in,  and  who  executed,  the  foregoing
instrument, and  acknowledged that  he executed  the same  as his


free act and deed as a Citizen/Sovereign in this above named said
State of  the Union.   Purpose  of notary  is for  identification
only,  and  not  for  entrance  into  any  foreign  jurisdiction,
executed without prejudice.

                            _____________________________________
                            Notary Public


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 152 of 153


   C E R T I F I C A T E   O F   S E R V I C E   B Y   M A I L

     It is hereby certified that service of this ASSEVERATION has
been made  on interested  parties by mailing one copy thereof, on
this             , day of            , 1982, in a sealed envelope
with postage prepaid, properly addressed to them as follows:


Registry of Vital Records
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
150 Tremont Street, Room B-3
Boston, Massachusetts
Postal Zone 02111

Social Security Administration
Office of the Commissioner
6301 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland
Postal Zone 21235


Dated           , 1982


/s/ John E. Trumane
_________________________________________________________________
John E.  Trumane, Citizen/Principal,  by Special  Appearance,  in
Propria Persona,  proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
"Without Prejudice" to any of my unalienable rights.


             Letters to Social Security Administration:
                          Page 153 of 153


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

John E. Trumane