STATE OF ALABAMA

                               v.

                      WILLIAM MICHAEL KEMP


                     IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF

                          ETOWAH COUNTY

                             ALABAMA

                     CASE NO. CC-95-1083-DWS


                        MOTION TO RECUSE


     Comes now  the presumed  defendant, William Michael Kemp, in
my proper  person by  special visitation,  in  the  above  styled
cause, and  moves the  Court for  the recusal  of Judge Donald W.
Stewart and Judge William Cardwell for cause, said causes for the
recusals being  stated in  affidavit form  [see Exhibit 1, a true
copy of the affidavit in question, included for reference] on the
tenth day  of the  tenth month  of this  year  of  our  Lord  one
thousand nine  hundred and  ninety six,  and  served  upon  these
judges and other officers of the court on the eleventh day of the
tenth month  of this  year of  our Lord one thousand nine hundred
and ninety six.

     Certain facts in contradiction of the affidavit of the tenth
day of the tenth month of this year of our Lord one thousand nine
hundred and  ninety six,  which came  to light  in open court are
addressed in  the affidavit  included in  support of this motion,
and these contradictory facts do not abate the cause for removal,
as the  bulk of  the affidavit  [ Exhibit  1 ]  is unaffected and
unrebutted.


Attorney:  NONE


                 Motion to Recuse:  Page 1 of 15


                        Table of Contents


Page one                      Title Page, statement of MOTION

Page two                      Table of Contents

Page three through five       Affidavit in support of MOTION

Page six through seventeen    Exhibit 1, Affidavit of October 10,
                              1996

Page eighteen                 Exhibit 2,   Affidavit  in  support
                              of search warrant

Page nineteen                 Verification

Page twenty                   Statement itemizing persons served,
                              method


                 Motion to Recuse:  Page 2 of 15


                       AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS

     I, a  man given  the name William Michael by my family Kemp,
being competent  in mind  and in  body and  not under  any  legal
disability now  come to state that I have my own knowledge of the
matters herein  and hereby  declare the  following  to  be  true,
understanding the consequences of making false statements.


                               One

     In section Six of my affidavit of the tenth day of the tenth
month of  this year  of our  Lord one  thousand nine  hundred and
ninety six,  I stated  that the "...warrant is completely without
an affidavit of facts sworn to by another human being."

     As was  revealed in open court, there did exist an affidavit
[ Exhibit  2 ],  and said  affidavit was unlawfully withheld from
me. The  net result  of this  is that I was deprived of a copy of
the so called search warrant until actually in the midst of a so-
called trial, in contravention of due process of law.


                               Two

     The facts  of the  affidavit accompanying the alleged search
warrant [  Exhibit 2]  issued for  my  home  after  the  fact  of
multiple searches do little to show the total circumstances which
led to  the warrantless  assault on  my home,  and in fact show a
pattern of  concealment and  deceit, impeaching  the  warrant  as
badly as not having an affidavit at all would impeach it.

     To wit:  the affidavit [ Exhibit 2 ] states that the affiant
officer, Todd  Entrekin, did  not meet  face to  face with the so
called "informant."  Nothing was  stated in  the affidavit nor in
testimony how  the identity  of  this  "reliable"  informant  was
confirmed, and  though he  testified that  the "informant" stated
that he  had been  in my  back yard  within the twenty four hours
preceding the  assault, the  officer did  not  ascertain  if  the
"informant" had  my permission to be in my back yard. In point of
fact, the  "informant" was  trespassing, a  point often  made and
never rebutted.

     If the  officer was  familiar enough  with this  "informant"
that he  could positively  identify him  by telephone, then it is
obvious that this "informant" is acting as agent for the officer.
This circumstance  would require  that the "informant" be invited
or have  a warrant,  and neither  has been  demonstrated or  even
alleged.

                              Three

     The affidavit  fails to  inform the reader that the physical
location of  my back  porch is  completely secluded from any off-
site observation, and that in fact the officers in the helicopter
helicopter performed  an unauthorized  search, for  which purpose
the helicopter was specifically summoned.

     The  affidavit   states  that   the  officer   received  the
information from  the "informant"  at "0900  hours." The  officer
stated in  sworn testimony  that he  "had probable cause" at that
point, and  he sent for a helicopter. Five hours elapsed while he
waited for  the helicopter,  while he  considered himself to have
probable cause, and he sought no warrant.


                 Motion to Recuse:  Page 3 of 15


                              Four

     The warrantless  assault on my home was carried out for what
is a  misdemeanor violation,  though I do not acknowledge that my
behavior constituted  any crime. However, the alleged "trial" and
the affidavit for the search warrant, finally produced, show that
this entire  effort was  aimed at  a man  with no convictions and
with no  evidence of felonious behavior. No evidence pre-existing
the actual  assault on  my home  was offered on the affidavit for
warrant, and  no testimony  was offered  subsequently to indicate
any felonious behavior. Yet, multiple searches were performed and
an arrest  made on the basis of questionable information obtained
by unlawful means.

                              Five

     Officer Entrekin  testified in  open court  that he  had not
informed the  judge signatory  to the warrant that a search of my
home had  already been  performed, yet in the affidavit he states
that "Jay  Howell saw weapons in the house." This statement is an
outright falsehood, or the testimony offered in court was false.


                               Six

     The affidavit  supporting the warrant states "While clearing
the house for safety..." in describing the search of the interior
my home.  This patently  unlawful act was made "necessary" by the
unconstitutional nature  of the statute, and the unlawful methods
necessary to enforce these statutes inimical to the Constitution.


                              Seven

     In my  affidavit [  Exhibit 1  ], sections  Six and Seven, I
point out  cause for recusal of Judge William Cardwell. This call
was on  the basis  of a  warrant issued after search and seizure,
for the  entrance of  a plea  in  this  alleged  matter  over  my
repeated objection,  and for the issuance of a warrant without an
affidavit of facts.

     An affidavit,  previously concealed from me, was produced at
the  alleged   "trial,"  and  as  previously  discussed  in  this
affidavit is  perhaps more  damning of the alleged "warrant" than
if it  lacked an  affidavit. Regardless,  the  other  causes  for
recusal remain  unrebutted and  demand recusal  of Judge Cardwell
from this matter.


                 Motion to Recuse:  Page 4 of 15


                              Eight

     In my  affidavit [  Exhibit 1  ], section Seven, I point out
cause for  recusal of  Judge Donald Stewart. The reasons for this
call remain  unanswered and  unrebutted, and  are  clear  in  the
affidavit [ Exhibit 1 ].

                              Nine

     I am not trained in the convolutions of statute law- however
I do  know right from wrong through my conscience and the word of
God. If  anyone can prove error herein, I will retract or correct
any  erroneous   statement.  Unless   it  can   be  proven   with
particularity by  stating in written affidavit form within thirty
days of  receipt hereof,  all requisite  actual evidentiary facts
and all  requisite actual  law, and not merely the ultimate facts
and  conclusions   of  law,  that  this  affidavit  statement  is
substantially  and  materially  false,  my  factual  declarations
presented herein will prevail, uncontested.


                           Conclusions

     Recusal  of   Judges  Cardwell   and  Stewart   from   these
proceedings is  required for cause stated and for the impropriety
of ignoring my lawful challenges.


                 Motion to Recuse:  Page 5 of 15


                       AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS

     I,  a  man  given  the  name  William  Michael  Kemp,  being
competent in   mind  and in  body and not under legal disability,
now come  to state  that I  have my  own knowledge of the matters
stated herein,  and hereby  declare the  following  to  be  true,
understanding the consequences of making false statements.


                               One

     The  Constitution  for the United States of America  clearly
states the  source of  sovereignty in  our nation  with the first
words of  the Preamble:  "we, the people of the United States..."
As the  Constitution begins  with the declaration of sovereignty,
the  body   closes  (immediately   prior  to   the   clause   for
ratification) in  Article VI  with the  words: "all executive and
judicial officers,  both of  the United States and of the several
States, shall  be bound  by oath  or affirmation, to support this
constitution; but  no religious  test shall ever be required as a
qualification to  any office  or public  trust under  the  United
States."

     The first  ten Articles  in Amendment  and addition  to  the
Constitution recognize and guarantee and protect my rights and my
sovereign status.  Failure by  any sworn public servant to uphold
the letter  of the entire Constitution is prima facie evidence of
violation of  oath  of  office,  cause  for  criminal  and  civil
actions, and grounds for immediate removal from office.


                               Two

     I, given  the name  William Michael  by my  family, Kemp, am
entitled to  be called by that name, and to answer lawfully to no
other. Specifically,  I do  not   answer to  the fabricated  name
KEMP, WILLIAM MICHAEL; further, I believe that referring to me by
this false  name is  an attempt  to create  a colorable person so
that colorable "law" may be applied.

     I deny  the name  KEMP, WILLIAM  MICHAEL and will henceforth
return unopened  and without  prejudice communications  from  the
court which  are addressed  in this  fashion, or  in any  fashion
other than  herein described.  My proper  name is William Michael
Kemp, and   my  mail-to location  is in  care of two thousand one
hundred eight Lookout Street in Gadsden Alabama.


                              Three

     I have  the right, should I be properly accused in my proper
person of  a proper  crime, to answer proper charges in my proper
person. I need no representation, and certainly do not ascribe to
the legal  fiction that  I am  a "pro  se attorney"  representing
myself. I  stand before  the court  in my  proper  person,  under
duress and by special visitation, demanding to be informed of the
nature and  cause of  accusations against  me. I  have  not  been
properly informed of the nature and cause of the accusations made
against me.


                 Motion to Recuse:  Page 6 of 15


                              Four

     I have  the right  to assistance by my choice of counsel for
my defense.  This is  not the right to be "represented," it is my
right to choose those who, in my opinion,  would provide the best
assistance in  my defense. This counsel may speak to the court in
my stead,  or I  may speak myself, or both. The concept that only
members of  the bar  or "pro  se," "honorary  attorneys"   may be
heard by  the court  is legal  fiction, unlawfully perpetrated by
the bar  associations whose  members practice  under  an  assumed
title of  nobility, contrary  to the  Constitution for the united
States of America.

     I therefore reject the court-imposed label of "pro se," said
label applied  by the  court over  my repeated  statements to the
contrary, and  reject attempts by so called judges who would have
me give  up  my  rights  to  an  officer  of  the  court,  a  bar
association member, who would "represent" me.


                              Five

     I have  the right  of due process of law, which includes but
is not  limited to   proper,  timely notification  in  my  proper
person when  my presence is required by the court. This provision
of due  process, as  well as  most  other  provisions  have  been
totally absent throughout the attempted prosecution of me.

     I have  the right  to be secure in my person, house, papers,
and effects.  The  Fourth Amendment to  the Constitution requires
that warrants  pre-exist searches  and seizures, and rest upon an
affidavit of  facts, determined  by a  judge to  contain probable
cause for  search. Searches and seizures carried out in any other
fashion are  unlawful on  their face,  and are  in fact  criminal
acts.

                               Six

     I have  the right  to an  unbiased judge, who is sworn to be
bound by  and to  uphold the  Constitution, to  preside over  any
legal proceedings  and insure  that  due  process  and  my  other
rights, all of which I demand, are observed.

     So called  judge Cardwell  of Etowah  County, Alabama state,
signed a  so called  warrant on  my place  of housekeeping on the
eighth day  of the  ninth month  of the  year  of  our  Lord  one
thousand nine  hundred ninety  five. This  so called  warrant was
signed despite the fact that the search and seizure for which the
so called  warrant was  issued had  already taken place. Further,
the so called warrant is completely without an affidavit of facts
sworn to by another human being.


                 Motion to Recuse:  Page 7 of 15


                              Seven

     On the  thirtieth day of the ninth month of this year of our
Lord one  thousand nine  hundred  ninety  six,  so  called  judge
Stewart of  Etowah County,  Alabama state read a so called record
from the  so called  court of so called judge Cardwell which bore
little or  no resemblance to the actual events of that day in the
first month  of this  year of  our Lord one thousand nine hundred
ninety  six,   which  I  tape  recorded,  fearing  just  such  an
alteration of  the record  by the  already discredited  so called
court.

     Also on  that thirtieth  day of the ninth month of this year
of our Lord one thousand nine hundred ninety six, so called judge
Stewart set  a date for a so called trial despite the fact that I
had entered  no plea,  and that  no proper  notification  of  the
nature and  cause of  the accusations  had been made, and despite
the fact that he had been so notified.

     Discussions with  the  so  called  judge  continued,  and  I
indicated to  the so  called judge  that I saw no valid crime for
which I  should enter a plea, and also indicated to the so called
judge that  the so  called warrants  used to  excuse the unlawful
actions against my person and property were fraudulent.

     The so  called judge  agreed that a challenge to the law and
the warrant would be entertained. However, immediately following,
the so  called judge  reiterated that  the so  called trial would
take place  on the  date which the so called judge had previously
set, indicating  that any  arguments to the contrary were already
discounted, without  a hearing.  This is  clear demonstration  of
prejudice.

                              Eight

     On the eighth day of the ninth month of the year of our Lord
one thousand  nine hundred  and ninety  six, officers  under  the
command  of   Sheriff  James  Hayes  of  Etowah  County,  Alabama
assaulted my home without warrant. In the course of this assault,
firearms (as  well as  other items) were removed from my home and
are now held in the custody of Sheriff Hayes.

     Neglecting for  the moment the many unlawful aspects of this
action, and  pursuant to the conversation which took place on the
thirtieth day  of the  ninth month  of this  year of our Lord one
thousand nine hundred and ninety six among  judge Donald Stewart,
District Attorney James Hedgspeth, and me concerning the District
Attorney's lack  of interest  in my  firearms, I informed Sheriff
Hayes by  registered certified  mail of my intent to repossess my
firearms from  his custody  on the seventh day of the tenth month
of this  year of  our Lord  one thousand  nine hundred and ninety
six.


                 Motion to Recuse:  Page 8 of 15


                              Nine

     Sheriff  Hayes   refuses  to   surrender  custody  of  these
firearms, citing  the federal  Bureau of  Alcohol,  Tobacco,  and
Firearms and  a section  of the US Code which applies to licensed
firearms  dealers.   He  states   that  he  is  awaiting  further
instruction from  "the court."  He has done this despite the fact
that even after an alleged warrant was obtained after the fact to
give the  color of  law to his actions, the alleged warrant makes
absolutely no  mention of  firearms to be seized. He is therefore
totally without  legal foundation  for  his  actions,  which  are
criminal in nature.

                               Ten

     I have  the right  to be  secure in my person, house, papers
and effects.  The taking  of my  possessions without  warrant  is
theft, and  if accomplished by force, is robbery. I have personal
knowledge that  at least  one  officer  did  enter  my  place  of
housekeeping and  take at  least one  firearm without any warrant
extant which  would have  given the  officer permission to do so,
while another officer held me at gun point on my back porch.


                             Eleven

     If this  court is  unwilling  to  instruct  its  agent,  the
sheriff, to  return  my  firearms,  my  only  alternative  is  to
vigorously prosecute  all persons involved in this armed robbery,
the subsequent receipt and retention of this property stolen from
me, the conspiracy surrounding the crime, and other criminal acts
committed by  members of  law enforcement  and the  court.  If  I
receive no  notification by the eighteenth day of the tenth month
of this  year of  our Lord  one thousand nine hundred ninety six,
that my  firearms are  ordered and  immediately available  to  be
returned, prosecution  shall proceed.  Further, regardless of the
court's action  or lack  thereof, I  retain my right to prosecute
all officials  involved in  these matters  for all their criminal
actions toward me, as well as all my other rights.

     This demand  conveys no  jurisdiction over me to this court,
but is rather to point out criminal activities by officers of the
court.

                             Twelve

     I have  the God-given  right to use my land to feed, clothe,
house, and  provision myself,  unimpeded. I  have  the  God-given
right to  cultivate the  land with  the plants which the Lord has
placed here.  I have the God-given right to retain the product of
my lawful  labor. In fact, I have the God-given duty to labor and
produce so that I might obtain the products to sustain myself.

     I have the God-given right and duty to sustain myself in the
manner which most seems, through His guidance, appropriate to me,
so long  as I  do not  interfere with the rights of another human
being. In  the absence of my interference with another, the state
has no say over my  labor, its products, and my private behavior.
The state has no financial claim over products which I produce on
my own  land with my own labor which have no effect which reaches
beyond the bounds of my property.


                 Motion to Recuse:  Page 9 of 15


                            Thirteen

     My body  and my  life are  given to me by God me for my use,
and are  not the  property of the state. God placed the earth and
all its  contents here  for our  sustenance. The  earth  and  its
contents are  not within  the ownership nor purview of the state,
but are rather placed here for the use of human beings.

     I  suffered   a  closed   head  wound  at  birth,  partially
paralyzing me  and eventually  resulting in gran mal, psychomotor
epileptic seizures.  I have  been an  insulin dependent  diabetic
since  childhood.   I  am   severely  arthritic.  None  of  these
conditions are the fault nor the responsibility of the state, nor
of any  other human  being. While they are not my fault, they are
exclusively my responsibility, from God.

     God  having   vested  in  me  the  responsibility,  and  the
intelligence,  and   the  natural   resources  to  deal  with  my
afflictions, it is within my authority- not that of the state- to
decide how to best use the products of God's Creation in my life.

     Should the state wish to advise me, they may feel free to do
so, but  in no  way am  I obliged  to accept  the opinion  of the
state, nor  to ask  permission for  my use  of natural  products,
including hemp.

                            Fourteen

     I have  the God-given  and Constitutionally guaranteed right
to worship  God and follow his Word as so suits my conscience. My
family Bible,  on the  first page  of the  first book, in Genesis
1:26 and  following: And  God said, Let us make man in our image,
after our  likeness: and  let them have dominion over the fish of
the sea,  and over  the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and
over all  the earth,  and over every creeping thing that creepeth
upon the earth.

     So God  created man  in his  own image,  in the image of God
created he him; male and female created he them.

     And God  blessed them,  and God said unto them, Be fruitful,
and multiply,  and replenish  all the  earth, and  subdue it: and
have dominion  over the fish of the sea, and the fowl of the air,
and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

     And God  said, Behold,  I have  given you every herb bearing
seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in
the which  is the  fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall
be for meat.

     And to  every beast  of the  earth, and to every fowl of the
air, and  to every  thing that  creepeth upon  the earth, wherein
there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was
so.

     And God saw every thing that he had made, and behold, it was
very good.


                Motion to Recuse:  Page 10 of 15


                             Fifteen

     I have the God-given and Constitutionally protected right to
pursue, obtain,   and  propagate knowledge  of the natural world,
whether it  be through  literary investigation  or production, or
through  scientific   investigation  or   publication.  This   is
typically referred to as academic freedom.


                             Sixteen

     I have  the God  given right to defend the body He has given
me, and  the property  with which He has blessed me. Thus springs
the Constitutional  guarantee of  my right to keep and bear arms.
Thus the  state has  no right  to my  firearms in  the absence of
their offensive use.

                            Seventeen

     I have the Constitutionally guaranteed right to be secure in
my person,  house,  papers,  and  effects  against  searches  and
seizures which  are carried out without an affidavit of complaint
against me  from another  human, which therefrom issues a warrant
for search  for search  and seizure. Specifically, a warrant must
be obtained  prior to  search. This is recognition that lives and
property are  products  and  gifts  of  God,  and  that  rightful
ownership is not to be interfered with.


                            Eighteen

     Due to  my sovereign  status in  America and this due to the
direct gift  of life  from God,  I am Constitutionally guaranteed
the right  of due process of law, affording me the opportunity to
know how  I might have damaged or endangered another human being,
to  confront  this  allegedly  damaged  individual  in  order  to
determine whether  rights have been violated, and to have my case
examined by a jury under no duress or undue influence from either
side of the quarrel.

     I have  the right  for this jury to be fully informed of its
lawful duty  and authority to examine all aspects of the case and
to decide  guilty or  not guilty strictly and solely on the basis
of their consciences, if necessary in contravention of "the law."

     I have  the Constitutionally  guaranteed right  to be  heard
before a competent and impartial, Constitutionally loyal judge to
insure that  due process  and all  my rights are observed. I have
the Constitutionally  guaranteed right  to my  choice of counsel,
not subject  to the whims of the court due to an allegiance sworn
to other than the Constitution.


                Motion to Recuse:  Page 11 of 15


                            Nineteen

     The  Ninth Amendment to the Constitution clearly states that
the lack  of enumeration  in the Constitution of a right does not
in any  way deny  or disparage that right. This affidavit clearly
states rights  which  are  clearly  being  denied  by  government
action.

                             Twenty

     Alcohol is  the natural  product of  yeast feeding on sugar,
with alcohol  as the  product. The  Eighteenth Amendment  to  the
Constitution for  the united States of America  was  passed in an
attempt to  stop the  manufacture of  and commercial transactions
involving alcohol,  yet even  with this Constitutional Amendment,
the private possession of alcohol was not addressed.

     This clearly  demonstrates the  unconstitutionality  of  the
government's  interference   with   Constitutionally   guaranteed
commerce  in  the  natural  products  of  the  earth,  without  a
Constitutional Amendment to that effect.

     Further, it  demonstrates that absent the repeal of the Bill
of Rights,  the private  possession of  any natural  substance is
outside governmental purview.


                           Twenty-one

     As hemp  and its  derivatives and  extracts are available by
prescription, this  is in  effect  a  license.  As  licenses  are
nothing more  than a  titles of  nobility, entitling one class to
behavior which would be illegal for others, this alone causes the
criminal  statutes   prohibiting  possession   of  hemp   to   be
unconstitutional.

                           Twenty-two

     As tobacco  is a  plant, and  not a  drug unless  the active
chemicals are  extracted and  otherwise used,  hemp is  a  plant.
Indeed it  contains a substance which has a drug-like effect, but
in its  natural state  it is  nothing more than a plant, an herb,
and therefore not subject to the restrictions placed upon drugs.


                          Twenty-three

     The  Constitution,  to  which  all  executive  and  judicial
officers are  sworn, clearly states that the rights of government
are nonexistent, that all authority is delegated. This delegation
is from  the empowered sovereigns, the people, to their servants,
government. Thus is the requirement that government only stand in
the stead  of a  sovereign human  being, having  no authority  to
exist independent  of the people. In the circumstances which give
rise to this affidavit, there exists no human being for the state
to stand in place of. There is no complaint, no injured party..


                Motion to Recuse:  Page 12 of 15


                           Twenty-four

     I am not trained in the convolutions of statute law- however
I do  know right from wrong through my conscience and the word of
God. If  anyone can prove error herein, I will retract or correct
any  erroneous   statement.  Unless   it  can   be  proven   with
particularity by  stating in written affidavit form within thirty
days of  receipt hereof,  all requisite  actual evidentiary facts
and all  requisite actual  law, and not merely the ultimate facts
and  conclusions   of  law,  that  this  affidavit  statement  is
substantially  and  materially  false,  my  factual  declarations
presented herein will prevail, uncontested.


                             Remedy

     I hereby require, on the basis of facts presented herein and
to  avoid  even  the  appearance  of  impropriety,  that  William
Cardwell  and  Donald  Stewart  join  William  Rhea  in  recusing
themselves from  this attempted  prosecution  of  me,  or  be  so
ordered.

     I hereby  require, on  the basis  of facts presented herein,
that Sheriff  James Hayes  immediately return my firearms and all
other property seized from me.

     I hereby  require, on  the basis  of facts presented herein,
that the alleged, so called search warrant used in this attempted
prosecution of me be declared void.

     I hereby require, on the basis of facts presented herein and
following, that the statutes which attempt a prohibition of hemp,
and   used to  attempt this  prosecution of  me, be overturned as
blatantly contrary to the Bill of Rights, overly broad, maximally
intrusive in  attempting to  control human  behavior in  a manner
outside the  purview of  government, interfering  with  religious
liberty,  perpetuating   a  "class   of   nobility"   in   direct
contradiction of  the Constitutional  edict  against  such,,  and
unequally treating  similar items-  i.e., tobacco,  alcohol,  and
hemp.

     It is  obvious that  the attempt  to prohibit  alcohol  from
commerce even  with a  Constitutional Amendment  authorizing such
was a  dismal failure,  never attempted  private  possession  and
consumption,  greatly  contributed  to  official  corruption  (as
evidenced in  this instance  and in  countless other  instances),
criminalized behavior  which was  not  criminal  in  nature,  and
greatly stressed  the fabric  of a  free society.  The  attempted
prohibition of  hemp without  any Constitutional authorization is
at least  as dismal  a failure,  and is unlawful in addition. The
statutes against  possession of hemp must be immediately declared
void.

     I hereby  require, on  the basis  of facts presented herein,
that the  attempted prosecution  of me  cease, or  be ordered  to
cease, in its entirety..


                Motion to Recuse:  Page 13 of 15


                          Verification

     I hereby  present this  Affidavit of  Facts,  declaring  the
truth of  my statements, knowing the consequences of making false
statements, as per Page One of this Affidavit.

     I decline  to use  a state  licensed  witness  (notary)  and
instead follow the Biblical example of two witnesses.


/s/ Mike Kemp
___________________________
William Michael, Kemp, sui juris
by special visitation
mail-to location:
c/o two one zero eight Lookout Street
Gadsden, Alabama
[35904]

Signed and  verified on this, the tenth day of the tenth month of
this year  of our  Lord One  Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety Six
before these witnesses at Alabama state, Etowah County.



One:_____________________________ Two:___________________________


Statement itemizing persons served; method of service.

I hereby  state that I have placed true and correct copies of the
foregoing in  the hands  of the  persons listed  below, or  their
representative on  this, the  eleventh day  of the tenth month of
this year  of our  Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety Six,
except as noted:

James Hedgspeth,  District Attorney  of  Etowah  County,  Alabama
state

judge Donald Stewart of Etowah County, Alabama state

judge William Cardwell of Etowah County, Alabama state

Sheriff James Hayes of Etowah County, Alabama state

notified via first class mail, postage affixed:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions
State House
11 South Union Street
Montgomery, AL 36130


/s/ Mike Kemp
____________________________
William Michael, Kemp, sui juris
by Special Visitation


                Motion to Recuse:  Page 14 of 15


                          Verification

     I hereby  present this  Affidavit of  Facts,  declaring  the
truth of  my statements, knowing the consequences of making false
statements, as previously stated in this Affidavit.

     I decline  to use  a state  licensed  witness  (notary)  and
instead follow the Biblical example of two witnesses.


/s/ Mike Kemp
___________________________
William Michael, Kemp, sui juris
by special visitation

mail-to location:

c/o two one zero eight Lookout Street
Gadsden, Alabama
[35904]

Signed and  verified on this, the seventeenth day of the eleventh
month of  this year  of our  Lord One  Thousand Nine  Hundred and
Ninety Six  before  these  witnesses  at  Alabama  state,  Etowah
County.


One:_____________________________ Two:___________________________

Statement itemizing persons served; method of service.

I hereby  state that I have placed true and correct copies of the
foregoing in  the hands  of the  persons listed  below, or  their
representative on  this, the eighteenth day of the eleventh month
of this  year of  our Lord  One Thousand  Nine Hundred and Ninety
Six.

James Hedgspeth,  District Attorney  of  Etowah  County,  Alabama
state

Judge Donald  W. Stewart  Circuit Judge of Etowah County, Alabama
state

Judge William  Cardwell Circuit  Judge of  Etowah County, Alabama
state

Circuit Clerk of Etowah County, Alabama state


/s/ Mike Kemp
____________________________
William Michael, Kemp, sui juris
by Special Visitation


                Motion to Recuse:  Page 15 of 15


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Alabama v. Kemp