MEMO
TO: Russell Dean., Landers
Wake County Jail, Cell #CA-02-05
c/o P.O. Box 2419
Raleigh, North Carolina state
FROM: Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law
DATE: November 10, 1996
SUBJECT: Removal to DCUS
See if you can follow the sequence of events in these pleadings.
The action begins with FOIA requests, followed by FOIA appeals,
then a Final Notice and Demand for Proof of Power, Standing, and
Jurisdiction in the Particulars (i.e. Demand for Bill of
Particulars).
Once they default for failing to answer this Final Notice and
Demand, you Remove the action into the DCUS, because you have
them in equitable estoppel (silence is consent; silence is
fraud, per U.S. v. Tweel quoting U.S. v. Prudden).
If you want me to implement these pleadings for you, you will
need to make arrangements for all, or part, of my invoice to be
paid. The Freedom Center has fallen totally silent after receipt
of three (3) copies of the invoice.
I repeat, for the last time, I cannot work for you pro bono, or
on contingency. I did what I could to make this amply clear to
Mr. Keven Entzel. Now they have stiffed me big time, and I am
forced to consider a criminal complaint for labor fraud and grand
theft (of my labor).
I now have reason to believe that my invoices to various clients
are not being paid, in order to scuttle the legal research and
strategies which I have developed. Please be your own judge of
the quality and procedural correctness of the enclosed pleadings.
I cannot accept your long-distance calls, until I receive a
retainer to cover the expenses, in addition to the payment of my
overdue invoice.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
Postal Zone 85719/tdc
email: supremelawfirm@altavista.net
website: http://supremelaw.com
# # #
Return to Table of Contents for
U.S.A. v. Landers