Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state, USA
zip code exempt (formerly DMM 122.32)

Under Protest and by Special Visitation
with explicit reservation of all rights







                  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                  JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ARIZONA


IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA      ) Case No. GJ-95-1-6 (JMR)
SERVED ON                      )
NEW LIFE HEALTH CENTER COMPANY ) NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND
                               ) FORMAL OBJECTION TO
                               ) COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE,
                               ) DATED JUNE 10, 1996, FOR
                               ) EXHIBITING A FALSE PRESUMPTION
                               ) THAT COMPANY IS A CORPORATION,
                               ) WITHOUT JUDICIAL DETERMINATION:
                               ) 28 U.S.C. 372(c), 454
_______________________________)


COMES NOW  Paul Andrew,  Mitchell, Sui  Juris, Sovereign  Arizona

Citizen (hereinafter  "Counsel") and  Vice  President  for  Legal

Affairs of  New Life  Health Center  Company,  an  Unincorporated

Business Trust domiciled in the Arizona Republic (hereinafter the

"Company"), formally  to object  to this  Court's Order  to  Show

Cause, dated June 10, 1996, which exhibited the false presumption

that the  Company is  a corporation  when said  Order stated that

"Paul Andrew  Mitchell addresses  the Court  as an officer of the

corporation of  New Life  Health Center."   [emphasis  added]  To

repeat, once  again, Counsel  of record  Paul  Andrew,  Mitchell,

B.A., M.S.,  is not  an officer  of the "corporation" because the

Company is not a corporation.  See above.


  Objection to False Presumption without Judicial Determination:
                           Page 1 of 4


     Counsel strenuously  objects because this Court has not been

moved to  make any  such judicial determination, and because this

false  presumption   flies  directly  in  the  face  of  verified

affidavits which  remain unrebutted right up to the present time;

because it flies in the face of open testimony before this Court;

and because  it flies  in the  face of  the opening paragraphs of

almost every pleading which has already been filed in the instant

case and  served on  all interested  parties, including  also the

presiding Judge,  via first class United States Mail.  See Proofs

of Service filed separately.

     The presiding  Judge of  this Court  is hereby reminded that

the practice of law by justices and judges is a high misdemeanor,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 454, to wit:

     454.  Practice of law by justices and judges

          Any justice  or judge  appointed under the authority of
     the United  States who  engages in  the practice  of law  is
     guilty of a high misdemeanor.

                                                  [28 U.S.C. 454]


     Counsel hereby  reserves the  Company's fundamental Right to

file a  formal judicial  complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 372(c),

and  to  invoke  said  complaint  as  grounds  for  recusing  the

presiding judge  for criminal conduct which is prejudicial to all

parties in the instant action.

     Specifically,  this   Court  was   not  formally  moved  nor

otherwise  requested   to  make   any   judicial   determinations

concerning the  proper legal  status of  the Company.   The Order

dated June  10, 1996,  is controverted  by written  evidence  and

spoken testimony  which have  been before  this Court  since  the

start of the instant action.


  Objection to False Presumption without Judicial Determination:
                           Page 2 of 4


     It is barratry to revisit this issue over and over, when the

United States  has failed  to submit  any competent  evidence  to

controvert the evidence already in the record.  Cf. "barratry" in

Black's Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition.  Furthermore, it is fraud

upon the  Company for  this  Court  to  infer  a  "corporate"  or

fictitious status  merely because  the Company  is spelled in ALL

CAPS in the case caption originally chosen by the United States.


                          VERIFICATION

     I, Paul  Andrew, Mitchell,  B.A., M.S.,  Citizen of  Arizona

state and  Counsel of  record for  the Company,  hereby  certify,

under penalty  of perjury, under the laws of the United States of

America, without  the "United  States", that the above statements

of fact  and  true  and  correct,  to  the  best  of  my  current

information, knowledge,  and belief,  so help Me God, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. 1746(1).


                          RELIEF SOUGHT

     On behalf  of the  Company, Counsel  requests this honorable

Court to  amend the  record, nunc pro tunc, clerically to correct

the false  presumption which  is evident in the first sentence of

its Order  dated June 10, 1996, and to reflect the correct status

of the  Company as  an Unincorporated Business Trust domiciled in

the Arizona Republic, as evident from the record to date.


Executed on June 15, 1996


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
_____________________________________________
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness,
Counsel of Record, and Vice President for
Legal Affairs, New Life Health Center Company,
an Unincorporated Business Trust domiciled
in the Arizona Republic (a Union state)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


  Objection to False Presumption without Judicial Determination:
                           Page 3 of 4


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul  Andrew, Mitchell,  B.A.,  M.S.,  hereby  certify,  under

penalty of  perjury, under  the laws  of  the  United  States  of

America, without the "United States", that I am at least 18 years

of age  and a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and

that I personally served the following document(s):

            NOTICE OF OBJECTION AND FORMAL OBJECTION
      TO COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, DATED JUNE 10, 1996,
    FOR EXHIBITING A FALSE PRESUMPTION THAT THE COMPANY IS A
          CORPORATION, WITHOUT JUDICIAL DETERMINATION:
                      28 U.S.C. 372(c), 454

by placing  said document(s)  with exhibits in first class United

States Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to:


ROBERT L. MISKELL                  John M. Roll
Acapulco Building, Suite 8310      U.S. District Court
110 South Church Avenue            55 E. Broadway
Tucson, Arizona                    Tucson, Arizona

JANET NAPOLITANO                   Clerk
Acapulco Building, Suite 8310      U.S. District Court
110 South Church Avenue            55 E. Broadway
Tucson, Arizona                    Tucson, Arizona

Grand Jury Foreperson              Postmaster
In re: New Life Health Center Co.  U.S. Post Office
55 E. Broadway                     Downtown Station
Tucson, Arizona                    Tucson, Arizona

Judge Alex Kozinski                Evangelina Cardenas
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals     "Internal Revenue Service"
125 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 200     300 West Congress
Pasadena, California               Tucson, Arizona

Attorney General                   Solicitor General
Department of Justice              Department of Justice
10th and Constitution, N.W. !      10th and Constitution, N.W. !
Washington, D.C.                   Washington, D.C.


Dated:  June 15, 1996


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
________________________________________
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


  Objection to False Presumption without Judicial Determination:
                           Page 4 of 4


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena