Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
and Vice President for Legal Affairs
c/o General Delivery at
2509 North Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state

In Propria Persona

All Rights Reserved
without prejudice




                 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

                       DISTRICT OF ARIZONA


In Re:                          )  Case No. #93-06051-PHX-GBN
                                )
New Life Health Center Company  )  APPLICATION FOR
                                )  INTERVENTION OF RIGHT,
                                )  RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY,
                                )  AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS
                                )
________________________________)


COMES NOW  Paul Andrew  Mitchell, Sui Juris, Citizen  of  Arizona

state, expressly  not a  citizen of  the United  States,  federal

witness (hereinafter  "Applicant"), and  Vice President for Legal

Affairs of  New Life  Health Center  Company,  an  unincorporated

business trust  domiciled in  the Arizona  Republic  (hereinafter

"New Life"),  to petition  this honorable Court for the following

specific relief, to wit:

     (1)  intervention of  Right, pursuant  to Rule  24(a) of the
          Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

     (2)  relief from  the automatic  stay now  in force upon all
          creditors in the instant case;


Application to Intervene/Relief from Stay/Declaratory Judgments:
                           Page 1 of 7


     (3)  declaratory judgments in the matters of:

          (a)  Applicant's  claim   to  the   position  of   Vice
               President for Legal Affairs of New Life;  and,

          (b)  Applicant's claim,  and offer  to prove,  that the
               New Life  Trustee, one  "Sheryl Smith" [sic], is a
               fictitious and fraudulent person;  and,

     (4)  all other  relief which this honorable Court deems just

          and proper.


Applicant now addresses each relief in the order mentioned above:


                      INTERVENTION OF RIGHT

     Pursuant to  Rule  24(a)  of  the  Federal  Rules  of  Civil

Procedure, Applicant  hereby  sets  forth  the  causes  for  this

intervention:

     1.   Applicant  is   not  one  of  the  person(s)  currently

identified as  debtor(s), creditor(s),  counsel(s), or trustee(s)

in the instant case.

     2.   Applicant claims  interests relating  to the rights and

properties which are the subject of the instant case.

     3.   Applicant is  so situated  that the  disposition of the

action may,  as a  practical matter, impair or impede Applicant's

ability to protect His own interests.

     4.   The interests  of  the  Applicant  are  not  adequately

represented by the existing party(s) to the instant case.

     Applicant hereby incorporates by reference all statements of

fact expressed  infra, as  if same  were set  forth fully herein.

See Rule  24(a), Intervention  of Right,  in the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure.


Application to Intervene/Relief from Stay/Declaratory Judgments:
                           Page 2 of 7


                   RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY

     Applicant hereby  moves this honorable Court for relief from

the automatic  stay upon  any  lawsuit(s)  brought  by  Applicant

against New Life, for the following reasons:

     1.   The automatic stay is not serving its intended purpose,

which is  to freeze  New Life's  assets and  debts, so  that this

Court can deal with them in an orderly way.

     2.   Applicant hereby  makes an  offer to prove that the New

Life Trustee,  one "Sheryl  Smith" [sic],  is a fictitious person

whose name  has been  used for fraudulent purposes, in this Court

and in numerous other situations.

     3.   After  New  Life's  original  bankruptcy  petition  was

filed, Applicant  was damaged  by current officer(s) of New Life,

and the  damages  incurred  thereby  need  to  be  specified  and

quantified, in  a court  of competent  jurisdiction, in  order to

prioritize New Life's actual debts.

     4.   Freezing New Life's debts at this point in time has the

prejudicial effect  of giving  validity to the false premise that

New Life  owes nothing  to Applicant, when the documentary record

to date proves quite otherwise.

     5.   The activity  stayed will inevitably happen, regardless

of what  the bankruptcy  court  does,  because  the  claim(s)  in

question arose  after New Life's original bankruptcy petition was

first filed.

     6.   Applicant's interest(s)  in the  property(s) owned,  or

possessed, by New Life are currently being harmed by the stay, in

part because  an officer  of  New  Life  refuses  to  acknowledge

Applicant's unpaid  back pay  and other unspecified damages which

Applicant has  suffered at the hands of said officer, and in part

because of  the probable  cause which Applicant now has to charge

said officer  with  fraud,  mail  fraud,  and  other  unspecified

criminal conduct perpetrated against Applicant.


Application to Intervene/Relief from Stay/Declaratory Judgments:
                           Page 3 of 7


     7.   Applicant also  submits a formal, standing objection to

the discharge  of all  New Life  debts  which  have  arisen  from

willful or  malicious acts, debts resulting from fraudulent acts,

such as  perjury and/or  lying on  the  official  record  of  the

instant case, and debts arising from embezzlement or theft.

     8.   Applicant also takes this opportunity to provide formal

Notice to all interested party(s) of Applicant's intent to submit

and serve  a Complaint to Determine Dischargeability of Debt, but

only upon final judgment of the exact extent of the damages which

Applicant has  suffered at  the hands  of New Life and all of its

officers, employees, workers, and contract agents to date.

     9.   In particular,  New Life  cannot discharge fines and/or

penalties that  a federal, state, or local government has imposed

to punish  New  Life,  and/or  its  present  and  past  officers,

employees, workers,  and contract  agents, for  violating a  law.

Specifically, New Life cannot discharge restitution payments that

might be  imposed in criminal cases.  Restitution is specifically

non-dischargeable because it is imposed against the defendant, as

rehabilitation, rather  than to compensate the victim.  See Kelly

v. Robinson, 107 S.Ct. 353 (1986).


                      DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS

     Applicant hereby  moves this honorable Court for declaratory

relief in the following matters:

     (1)  Applicant's claim  to the  office of Vice President for

Legal Affairs  of New  Life, which  appointment  was  made  under

authority of  the New  Life Trustee,  "Sheryl Smith"  [sic],  and

submitted as  a bona  fide document to the United States District

Court for the District of Arizona at Tucson in May of 1996;  and,


Application to Intervene/Relief from Stay/Declaratory Judgments:
                           Page 4 of 7


     (2)  Applicant's claim  and offer to prove that the New Life

Trustee, "Sheryl  Smith" [sic],  is a  fictitious person who name

has been  utilized to  "sign" numerous bank checks and also other

official New Life trust documents.  Said other documents include,

but are not limited to:

     (a)  Applicant's original  appointment to the office of Vice

President for Legal Affairs of New Life;  and,

     (b)  the official  non-disclosure agreement,  also signed by

"Sheryl Smith" [sic], barring the General Manager from disclosing

any  New   Life  documents   to  third   parties  without   prior

authorization of  "Sheryl  Smith"  [sic].    Said  non-disclosure

agreement was  likewise submitted  as a bona fide document to the

United States  District Court  for the  District  of  Arizona  at

Tucson in April of 1996.


                    INCORPORATION OF EXHIBIT

     Pursuant to  Rule 201(d)  of the  Federal Rules of Evidence,

Applicant hereby incorporates by reference the attached AFFIDAVIT

OF DEFAULT  AND OF  PROBABLE CAUSE  IN RE  DR. AND MRS. EUGENE A.

BURNS as  previously filed  in Mitchell v. Nordbrock, Pima County

Consolidated Justice  Court, case  number #CV-97-3438,  as if the

same were set forth fully herein.

     Said AFFIDAVIT addresses Applicant's diligent and good faith

efforts to  determine the  true identity and physical whereabouts

of "Sheryl  Smith" [sic],  and  to  obtain  back  pay  and  other

unspecified compensation from New Life for Applicant's arbitrary,

capricious, and  wrongful termination and other damages inflicted

upon Applicant by Dr. Eugene A. Burns and other named and unnamed

accessories of Dr. Eugene A. Burns.


Application to Intervene/Relief from Stay/Declaratory Judgments:
                           Page 5 of 7


                          VERIFICATION

I, Paul  Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the "United States", that the above statement of facts is

true  and   correct,  according   to  the   best  of  My  current

information, knowledge,  and belief,  so help Me God, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. 1746(1).


Dated:  April 18, 1997


Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
(expressly not a citizen of the United States),
and Vice President for Legal Affairs of
New Life Health Center Company (debtor)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Application to Intervene/Relief from Stay/Declaratory Judgments:
                           Page 6 of 7


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the  "United States," that I am at least 18 years of age,

a Citizen  of one  of the  United States  of America,  and that I

personally served the following document(s):

             APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT,
                   RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY,
                    AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first

class United  States Mail,  with  postage  prepaid  and  properly

addressed to the following:


New Life Health Center Company
c/o 4500 E. Speedway, #27
Tucson, Arizona state


Executed on April 18, 1997:


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
______________________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


Application to Intervene/Relief from Stay/Declaratory Judgments:
                           Page 7 of 7


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

New Life Bankruptcy