Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
c/o General Delivery at:
2509 North Campbell Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state

In Propria Persona

All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice





             PIMA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED JUSTICE COURT


Paul Andrew Mitchell,           )  Case Number #CV-97-3438
          Plaintiff             )
                                )  NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
     v.                         )  MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE:
                                )  Rule 201(d), Arizona Rules
Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock,      )  of Evidence
          Defendants            )
________________________________)


COMES NOW  Paul Andrew  Mitchell, Sui Juris,  Citizen  of Arizona

state and  Plaintiff in  the above  entitled matter  (hereinafter

"Plaintiff"), to provide formal Notice to all interested parties,

and to  demand mandatory judicial notice by this honorable Court,

pursuant to  Rule 201(d) of the Arizona Rules of Evidence, of the

official court record of representation of the criminal defendant

Charles Levis  Taylor by  the office  of the  Pima County  Public

Defender in the case of State of Arizona v. Charles Levis Taylor,

Superior Court case number #CR-50321.

     Mandatory judicial  notice leaves  no room for discretion on

the part of this honorable Court, since the legislative intent of

the word "shall" in Rule 201(d) has a compulsory meaning.  Confer

at "shall" in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.


     Sixth Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                           Page 1 of 4


     Plaintiff submits the following as proof of the relevance of

said record of representation by the Public Defender's office:

     In a  letter dated  December 10, 1996, Defendant Neil Thomas

Nordbrock made the following libelous statement, to wit:

     "According to  what I  know, of those you have assisted with
     legal problems since coming to Tucson, here are the results:

          "Charles Taylor, convicted." [sic]


Plaintiff submits,  for the  benefit of this honorable Court, and

of all  interested party(s),  the Pima  County  Superior  Court's

MINUTE ENTRY dated March 11, 1996, quoted in part as follows:

     "The defendant moves to dismiss the Public Defender from his
     case and argues to the Court for the dismissal. ...

     "The Court  will not  grant new  counsel.    Mr.  Bowman  is
     directed to  be present  at the  time of sentencing.  If the
     defendant does  not want  him to speak, the defendant can do
     so himself.

     "Mr. Bowman  is directed  to file  a notice  of appeal after
     sentencing for the defendant if the defendant desires one so
     that  this   may  be   done  before   he  is  relieved  from
     representing the defendant."  [emphasis added]

                            [MINUTE ENTRY, Hon. John S. Leonardo]
                            [Arizona Superior Court, Pima County]
                              [Case No. CR-50321, March 11, 1996]


The plain  fact of  the matter is that Mr. Ken Bowman represented

Charles Levis Taylor  throughout  said case;   Mr. Ken Bowman and

Plaintiff  were   both  present  at  the  hearing  scheduled  for

sentencing on  March 28, 1996, which hearing Charles Levis Taylor

did not  attend.   Mr. Nordbrock's  statement  is  libelous,  and

constitutes  defamation  of  Plaintiff's  character,  because  it

insinuates that  Plaintiff's action(s) resulted in the conviction

of Charles  Levis Taylor  for conspiracy  to kidnap in said case.

This is  a lie,  because Plaintiff  did not meet Mr. Taylor until

after Mr. Taylor's conviction in said case.


     Sixth Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                           Page 2 of 4


                          VERIFICATION

I, Paul  Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the  "United States", that the above statement(s) of fact

are true  and correct,  to the  best of  My current  information,

knowledge, and  belief, so  help Me  God, pursuant  to 28  U.S.C.

1746(1).  See Supremacy Clause.


Dated:  March 14, 1997


Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
_____________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


     Sixth Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                           Page 3 of 4


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the  "United States," that I am at least 18 years of age,

a Citizen  of one  of the  United States  of America,  and that I

personally served the following document(s):

                      NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
                   MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE:
             Rule 201(d), Arizona Rules of Evidence

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first

class United  States Mail,  with  postage  prepaid  and  properly

addressed to the following:


Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock
c/o 6642 E. Calle de San Alberto
Tucson, Arizona state

Pima County Public Defender
Attention:  Mr. Ken Bowman           (courtesy copy)
32 North Stone Avenue, 4th Floor
Tucson, Arizona state


Executed on March 14, 1997:

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
_____________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

Attachments follow infra.


     Sixth Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                           Page 4 of 4


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Mitchell v. Nordbrock