Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
c/o General Delivery at:
2509 North Campbell Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state

In Propria Persona

All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice





             PIMA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED JUSTICE COURT


Paul Andrew Mitchell,           )  Case Number #CV-97-3438
          Plaintiff             )
                                )  NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
     v.                         )  MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE:
                                )  Rule 201(d), Arizona Rules
Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock,      )  of Evidence
          Defendants            )
________________________________)


COMES NOW  Paul Andrew  Mitchell, Sui Juris,  Citizen  of Arizona

state, expressly  not a  citizen of  the United  States ("federal

citizen") and Plaintiff in the above entitled matter (hereinafter

"Plaintiff"), to provide formal Notice to all interested parties,

and to  demand mandatory judicial notice by this honorable Court,

pursuant to  Rule 201(d) of the Arizona Rules of Evidence, of the

several attached  documents and  related cases which are itemized

infra.

     Mandatory judicial  notice leaves  no room for discretion on

the part of this honorable Court, since the legislative intent of

the word "shall" in Rule 201(d) has a compulsory meaning.  Confer

at "shall" in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.

     The attached  documents include  the following,  arranged in

the order listed, to wit:


   Fifteenth Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 1 of 6


     (1)  MEMO to  Rich Scully, dated March 17, 1997, detailing a
          total of  $13,350.25  in  damages,  including  but  not
          limited  to   at  least   100  hours   of   Plaintiff's
          professional time to prepare and file all the pleadings
          submitted by  Plaintiff in  the instant case, up to and
          including March 17, 1997;

     (2)  MEMO to  Mr. and  Mrs. Neil T. Nordbrock, dated January
          21, 1997,  claiming an  asset value  of $350,000.00  in
          Plaintiff's one  gigabyte  (1GB)  JAZ  disk  cartridge,
          which Defendants  converted unlawfully  into their  own
          possession and  control, in  violation  of  Plaintiff's
          Common-Law Copyright  to same.   Confer  at "Common-law
          copyright" in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.


     The following  related cases  also have  a direct bearing on

the instant case, to wit:

     (1)  Metro Collections  v. Meggers,  180 Ariz. 570, 886 P.2d
          649 (App. Div.1 1994).  The following abstracts of this
          case are  found in  subject heading  11  --  Attorney's
          fees, amount  involved --  in the  Notes  of  Decisions
          following ARS 22-201, to wit:

               Attorney  fees   claimed  pursuant   to   contract
               provisions specifically  providing for  such award
               do not  have to be excluded in determining whether
               amount  involved   exceeds  $5,000,   pursuant  to
               statute providing  that justices of the peace have
               exclusive  original   jurisdiciton   when   amount
               involved, exclusive  of interest,  costs and award
               of attorney fees when authorized by law, is $5,000
               or less.  [citing Metro supra]

                                                 [emphasis added]


               Amount  involved   exceeded  $5,000,   and,  thus,
               justices of  the  peace  did  not  have  exclusive
               original jurisdiction  and action could be brought
               in superior  court, where  debt collector's action
               against  debtor  sought  credit  card  balance  of
               $4,980.21  plus  $1,659  in  contractual  attorney
               fees.  [citing Metro supra]

                                                 [emphasis added]


     (2)  Sua Sponte  ORDER of  U.S.  Bankruptcy  Judge  Lawrence
          Ollason In  Re Eugene  A. & Linda H. Burns, case number
          #96-01624-TUC-LO, U.S.  Bankruptcy Court,  District  of
          Arizona, Tucson,  filed on  June 24,  1997,  quoted  in
          pertinent part as follows:

               On June  5, 1997  the Application of James Everett
               for payment  of administrative expense came on for
               hearing.   At that  hearing  this  court  informed
               counsel it  had consulted  with Mr. Everett in the
               past  and   therefore  believed   case  should  be
               referred to  another judge.   There  is a  related
               case  number   93-06051-PHX-GBN  NEW  LIFE  HEALTH
               CENTER   CO.    pending   in   Phoenix,   Arizona.
               Therefore, purusant  [sic] to the Judicial Code of
               Conduct,  the  Court sua sponte makes  this motion
               for disqualification and recusal from this case as
               soon as  possible  and  practicable.    The  Court
               HEREBY ORDERS:


   Fifteenth Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 2 of 6


                    1.   That  the  Court's sua sponte motion for
                         disqualification   and    recusal   from
                         presiding over  further proceedings  and
                         further contact  with this  case  hereby
                         declared.

                    2.   That case  be transferred to Phoenix, Az
                         and assigned to a new judge.

                    3.   That  the   Clerk  of  the  Court  shall
                         provide a  copy of  this  order  to  all
                         parties on the master mailing list.

                    4.   That the Clerk of the Court shall notify
                         all parties  on the  master mailing list
                         of the  new judge when the new judge has
                         been assigned to this case.

                         /s/ LAWRENCE OLLASON
                         UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

                                                 [emphasis added]


     (3)  OPENING BRIEF in U.S.A. v. Gilbertson and Gilbertson v.
          U.S. et  al., filed  on June  18, 1997,  United  States
          Court of  Appeals for  the Eighth  Circuit, case number
          #97-2099-MNST, containing  a formal  challenge  to  the
          federal Jury  Selection and Service Act, 28 U.S.C. 1861
          et  seq.,   for  exhibiting  prohibited  discrimination
          against the  class of  People known  as Citizens of the
          United States of America, also known as state Citizens,
          who are  not also  citizens of  the United States, also
          known  as  federal  citizens,  by  Right  of  Election.
          Confer at "Federal citizenship" in Black's supra.


     (4)  MOTION  TO   STAY  MANDATE   AND  PROCEEDINGS,  PENDING
          DISCOVERY OF  DOCUMENTS REQUESTED  UNDER THE  FOIA, AND
          FINAL RESOLUTION  OF CHALLENGE  TO CONSTITUTIONALITY OF
          THE JURY SELECTION AND SERVICE ACT in U.S.A. v. Pixley,
          filed on  June 25, 1997, United States Court of Appeals
          for  the   Second  Circuit,   case   number   #96-1476,
          containing a  formal  challenge  to  the  federal  Jury
          Selection and  Service Act, 28 U.S.C. 1861 et seq., for
          exhibiting prohibited  discrimination against the class
          of People  known as  Citizens of  the United  States of
          America, also known as state Citizens, who are not also
          citizens of  the United  States, also  known as federal
          citizens, by Right of Election.


   Fifteenth Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 3 of 6


                          VERIFICATION

I, Paul  Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the  "United States" (federal government), that the above

statements of  fact  are  true  and  correct,  and  the  attached

documents are  true and correct copies of the originals, with the

sole  exception   of  any  original  blue-ink  signatures,  which

signatures I hereby apply to said documents by proxy, to the best

of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).  See Supremacy Clause.


Dated:  July 8, 1997


Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
_____________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


   Fifteenth Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 4 of 6


                        PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty

of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,

without the  "United States," that I am at least 18 years of age,

a Citizen  of one  of the  United States  of America,  and that I

personally served the following document(s):

                      NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
                   MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE:
             Rule 201(d), Arizona Rules of Evidence

by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first

class U.S. Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to:


Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock               VIA FAX TRANSMISSION
c/o 6642 E. Calle de San Alberto        to: (520) 296-6544
Tucson, Arizona state

Lawrence E. Condit                      VIA FAX TRANSMISSION
c/o 376 South Stone Avenue              to: (520) 624-8414
Tucson, Arizona state

Dr. and Mrs. Eugene A. Burns            VIA FAX TRANSMISSION
c/o 4500 E. Speedway, #27               to: (520) 323-3922
Tucson, Arizona state

Mr. Richard Rineer                      VIA FAX TRANSMISSION
c/o 4841 E. Speedway Boulevard          to: (520) 323-3922
Tucson, Arizona state

Mr. Tim Hay                             VIA FAX TRANSMISSION
c/o 4500 E. Speedway Boulevard, #27     to: (520) 323-3922
Tucson, Arizona state

Mrs. Susan Shew                         VIA FAX TRANSMISSION
c/o 4500 E. Speedway Boulevard, #27     to: (520) 323-3922
Tucson, Arizona state

Mr. and Mrs. Patrick Shew               VIA FAX TRANSMISSION
c/o 2624 W. Flamebrook                  to: (520) 323-3922
Tucson, Arizona state

Todd V. Jones                           VIA FAX TRANSMISSION
c/o 1500 Northwest Tower                to: (520) 884-1294
One South Church Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state

Mr. and Mrs. Herbert Crawford
c/o 4741 W. Camino Tierra
Tucson, Arizona state


   Fifteenth Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 5 of 6


Mr. David Wallen
c/o 2536 Vereda de la Manana
Tucson, Arizona state

Ms. Sheila T. Wallen
c/o 2536 Vereda de la Manana
Tucson, Arizona state

Mr. W. U. Weber
c/o 115 N. Church Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state

Chief of Police
Tucson Police Department
270 S. Stone Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state

Pima County Attorney
c/o 32 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state


Executed on July 8, 1997:

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
_____________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice


   Fifteenth Notice and Demand for Mandatory Judicial Notice:
                          Page 6 of 6


                             #  #  #
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Mitchell v. Nordbrock