Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
c/o General Delivery at:
2509 North Campbell Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state
 
In Propria Persona
 
Under Protest and Without Prejudice
By Special Visitation Only
 
 
 
 
 
             PIMA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED JUSTICE COURT
 
 
Paul Andrew Mitchell,      )  Case Number #CV-97-3438
          Plaintiff,       )
                           )  PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED
     v.                    )  CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND
                           )  AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE:
                           )
Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock, )  Rule 201(d),
et al.,                    )  Arizona Rules of Evidence;
          Defendants.      )  28 U.S.C. 1746(1);
                           )  Supremacy Clause;
                           )  Universal Declaration of
                           )  Human Rights;  International
                           )  Covenant on Civil and Political
                           )  Rights, enacted with explicit
___________________________)  reservations by the U.S. Congress
 
 
COMES NOW  Paul Andrew  Mitchell, Sui Juris,  Citizen  of Arizona
 
state, expressly  not a  citizen of  the United  States ("federal
 
citizen"), federal  witness, Counselor  at Law,  private attorney
 
general, and  Plaintiff in the above entitled matter (hereinafter
 
"Plaintiff"), to provide formal Notice to all interested parties,
 
and to  demand mandatory judicial notice by this honorable Court,
 
pursuant to  Rule 201(d)  of the  Arizona Rules  of Evidence,  of
 
this, PLAINTIFF'S  VERIFIED CRIMINAL  COMPLAINT AND  AFFIDAVIT OF
 
PROBABLE CAUSE,  charging the following named individual with the
 
corresponding crimes enumerated infra.
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 1 of 23

     Plaintiff hereby formally charges:
 
Mr. Lawrence E. Condit with:
 
     making a  false entry in a book, report, or statement of the
     Bank of  America, Downtown  Branch, Tucson,  Arizona  state,
     with intent  to injure or defraud Plaintiff, in violation of
     18 U.S.C. 1005 and of 18 U.S.C. 1344 (one count each);
 
     placing in  a post  office a  fraudulent bank  check  to  be
     delivered by  the United  States Postal Service to Plaintiff
     for the  sole purpose  of executing  a scheme or artifice to
     defraud Plaintiff,  in violation  of  18  U.S.C.  1341  (one
     count).
 
                   AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE
 
I, Paul  Andrew Mitchell,  Sui Juris,  hereinafter "Plaintiff" in
 
the above entitled matter, hereby testify as follows, to wit:
 
     On November 18, 1997, I received via general delivery at the
 
Post Office  located  at  2509  North  Campbell  Avenue,  Tucson,
 
Arizona state,  a letter  from Sir  Lawrence E.  Condit, Esquire,
 
(hereinafter "Sir  Condit"), dated November 14, 1997, alleging to
 
transmit a  bank check drawn on his trust account in satisfaction
 
of the  final judgment  in the  instant case.  A true and correct
 
copy of  said letter  is  attached  hereto  and  incorporated  by
 
reference as if set forth fully herein.  See Exhibit "A".
 
     On November  18, 1997, in the same envelope from Sir Condit,
 
I also  received bank  check #7013  dated November  14, 1997, and
 
drawn on  the Clients  Trust Account [sic] of LAWRENCE E. CONDIT,
 
ATTORNEY AT LAW P.C. [sic], at the Downtown Office of the Bank of
 
America, Tucson,  Arizona, account  #007013-122101706-012-293269,
 
in the  amount of Three Thousand One Hundred Thirteen Dollars and
 
42/100's ($3,113.42).  A true and correct copy of said bank check
 
is attached  hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth
 
fully herein.  See Exhibit "B".
 
     On November  18, 1997, in the same envelope from Sir Condit,
 
I also received a proposed ORDER purporting as follows:
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 2 of 23

     in satisfaction of judgment: See attached check. [sic].
 
A true and correct copy of said proposed ORDER is attached hereto
 
and incorporated  by reference as if set forth fully herein.  See
 
Exhibit "C".
 
     A true  and correct copy of said envelope is attached hereto
 
and incorporated  by reference as if set forth fully herein.  See
 
Exhibit "D".
 
     Also on  November 18,  1997, immediately after receiving but
 
not accepting  said envelope, I went straightaway to the Downtown
 
Office of  the Bank  of America at 33 North Stone Avenue, Tucson,
 
Arizona state.   There,  I inquired  of the  first available bank
 
teller, whether  or not  there  were  sufficient  funds  in  said
 
Clients Trust Account to cash Sir Condit's check #7013.
 
     Ms.  Linda  Smith  (hereinafter  "Ms.  Smith")  queried  the
 
computer terminal  at her  teller station and reported to Me that
 
there were, in fact, sufficient funds in said account.
 
     After a brief discussion of various negotiable alternatives,
 
I requested Ms. Smith to prepare a standard cashier's check.
 
     At that  moment, Ms. Smith asked Me to disclose the sequence
 
number of  Sir Condit's bank check.  I responded by informing Ms.
 
Smith that  the sequence  number was  #7013 (number  seven, zero,
 
one, three).
 
     Ms. Smith  then informed  Me that  there was  a STOP PAYMENT
 
order on check number #7013.
 
     I then  requested Ms.  Smith to disclose to Me what, if any,
 
reasons were stated for this alleged STOP PAYMENT order.
 
     Ms. Smith  then informed  Me that her computer was reporting
 
"wrong amount" [sic] as the reason for the STOP PAYMENT order.
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 3 of 23

     I then requested Ms. Smith to prepare a written confirmation
 
of this  STOP PAYMENT  order, but she then told Me that she would
 
need to call her supervisor.
 
     Within minutes  after calling  her supervisor,  Ms.  Doriann
 
Foti  ("Ms.  Foti")  came  to  Ms.  Smith's  teller  window,  and
 
confirmed to  Me that  a STOP PAYMENT order was, in fact, showing
 
on check number #7013.
 
     I  then   repeated  to  Ms.  Foti  My  request  for  written
 
confirmation  of   this  alleged  STOP  PAYMENT  order,  and  she
 
explained that she needed to call the staff legal counsel of Bank
 
of America.
 
     Ms. Foti  then called  the staff  legal counsel  of Bank  of
 
America and  explained the  situation,  with  Ms.  Smith  and  Me
 
standing close enough to hear Ms. Foti's half of her conversation
 
with the staff legal counsel of Bank of America.
 
     Upon ending that conversation, Ms. Foti explained to Me that
 
bank policy  prevented Bank  of America from executing and giving
 
Me any written confirmations of the alleged STOP PAYMENT order.
 
     At that  point, I  asked Ms. Foti if she was a bank officer,
 
and she responded by saying that she was not a bank officer.
 
     I then  requested a bank officer, and Ms. Foti picked up the
 
phone again  and summoned  Mr. Ken  Binion, Branch Manager of the
 
Bank of America, Downtown Office, Tucson, Arizona state.
 
     Upon arriving at Ms. Smith's teller station, Mr. Binion also
 
confirmed the  alleged STOP  PAYMENT order  on Sir Condit's check
 
#7013.
 
     Mr. Binion  also confirmed  that bank  policy  did,  indeed,
 
prevent Bank  of America from executing and giving Me any written
 
confirmation(s) of the alleged STOP PAYMENT order by Sir Condit.
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 4 of 23

     At that  point, I  expressed My deep disappointment with the
 
fact that I could not transact check #7013.
 
     I also  informed Ms.  Smith, Ms. Foti, and Mr. Binion that I
 
planned to  subpoena all  three (3) of them as material witnesses
 
to the  fact that  a STOP  PAYMENT order had been placed on check
 
#7013 in Sir Condit's Clients Trust Account.
 
     I also  expressed My  sincere belief  that said STOP PAYMENT
 
order constituted  probable cause  to charge Sir Condit with bank
 
fraud and also with mail fraud, both federal offenses.
 
     I also obtained Ms. Foti's business card.
 
     To commemorate  that encounter with Ms. Smith, Ms. Foti, and
 
Mr. Binion  at the  Bank of  America, I  annotated  Sir  Condit's
 
letter dated  November 14,  1997, with the following statement of
 
fact, to wit:
 
     11/18/97  3 Bank of America employees witnessed STOP PAYMENT
     order on  check #7013,  account #007013-122101706, amount of
     $3,113.42,  reason:   "wrong  amount".    Judgment  was  for
     $3,113.42!
 
 
     A true and correct copy of said annotated letter is attached
 
hereto and  incorporated by  reference  as  if  set  forth  fully
 
herein.  See Exhibit "E".
 
     I then  exited the Bank of America, Downtown Branch, Tucson,
 
Arizona state,  and proceeded  next to  the office of Mr. Charles
 
"Bud" Miltenberger  ("Mr. Miltenberger"),  Program Director,  Bad
 
Check Program,  in the  office of  the Pima County Attorney, 1400
 
Legal Services  Building, 32  North Stone Avenue, Tucson, Arizona
 
state.
 
     I then  met briefly  with Mr.  Miltenberger and proceeded to
 
explain what  had happened,  up to  that point  in time, with Sir
 
Condit's check #7013.
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 5 of 23

     Mr.  Miltenberger   sympathized  with   My  situation,   but
 
explained that  he required  exhibition of  a copy of check #7013
 
which was  annotated by the Bank of America with the nomenclature
 
"STOP PAYMENT ORDERED", or words to that effect.
 
     I obtained Mr. Miltenberger's business card.
 
     True and  correct copies of Ms. Foti's business card, and of
 
Mr.  Miltenberger's   business  card,  are  attached  hereto  and
 
incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.
 
     After receiving  said business  cards, I  mounted same  on a
 
single sheet of paper and annotated said sheet with the following
 
text, to wit:
 
      Witnesses to probable bank fraud and mail fraud [sic]
 
 
See Exhibit "F".
 
     I then  exited Mr.  Miltenberger's office and proceeded next
 
to the  public  counter  of  the  Clerk  of  Court,  Pima  County
 
Consolidated Justice  Court, located  at 115 North Church Avenue,
 
Tucson, Arizona state.
 
     When it  came My  turn to  approach the  Clerk's  window,  I
 
explained what  had transpired  that day  with Sir Condit's check
 
#7013.  At first, the counter clerk appeared to Me to be somewhat
 
dubious about the story I had just told her.
 
     However, said  counter clerk  did agree  to query the docket
 
computer and,  after doing  so, searched  the docket file for the
 
final judgment entry in the instant case.
 
     At that  moment, the  counter clerk verbally confirmed to Me
 
that the  final judgment, as found in the docket computer, showed
 
an amount of $3,113.42.  This was the exact amount, to the penny,
 
showing on Sir Condit's check #7013.
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 6 of 23

     On November 19, 1997, I prepared and executed a CONSTRUCTIVE
 
NOTICE AND  DEMAND and  mailed same  to Sir  Lawrence E.  Condit,
 
Esquire, c/o 376 South Stone Avenue, Tucson, Arizona state.
 
     I also  transmitted said  CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE  AND DEMAND to
 
Sir Condit via facsimile to fax number: (520) 624-8414.
 
     A true  and correct  copy of  said CONSTRUCTIVE  NOTICE  AND
 
DEMAND is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set
 
forth fully herein.  See Exhibit "G".
 
     On November 21, 1997, I received, but did not accept, a two-
 
page  (2-page)  pleading  from  Sir  Condit  entitled  NOTICE  OF
 
WITHDRAWAL OF ORDER INDICATING SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT.
 
     True and  correct copies  of said pleading, and of the first
 
class United  States Mail  envelope in  which it was transmitted,
 
are attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth
 
fully herein.  See Exhibit "H".
 
     After receiving but not accepting said NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL,
 
I prepared and transmitted via facsimile to Sir Condit a one-page
 
(1-page) message with the following text, to wit:
 
                     5:00 p.m. Condit! [sic]
 
 
     A true and correct copy of said one-page message is attached
 
hereto and  incorporated by  reference  as  if  set  forth  fully
 
herein.  See Exhibit "I" ("eye").
 
     After transmitting  said one-page  message to Sir Condit via
 
fax, I  annotated Sir  Condit's letter  dated November  14, 1997,
 
with  the   following  nomenclature:    REFUSED  FOR  FRAUD,  and
 
transmitted same  to Sir Condit via fax.  A true and correct copy
 
of said  annotated letter  is attached hereto and incorporated by
 
reference as if set forth fully herein.  See Exhibit "J".
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 7 of 23

     I also  annotated Sir Condit's alleged ORDER in Satisfaction
 
of judgment  with the following nomenclature:  REFUSED FOR FRAUD,
 
and transmitted  same to  Sir Condit via fax.  A true and correct
 
copy of  said annotated ORDER is attached hereto and incorporated
 
by reference as if set forth fully herein.  See Exhibit "K".
 
     I also annotated the first class U.S. Mail envelope in which
 
Sir Condit  had transmitted  said letter dated November 14, 1997,
 
and  said   proposed  ORDER,  with  the  following  nomenclature:
 
REFUSED FOR FRAUD, and transmitted same to Sir Condit via fax.  A
 
true and  correct copy  of said  annotated envelope  is  attached
 
hereto and  incorporated by  reference  as  if  set  forth  fully
 
herein.  See Exhibit "L".
 
     I also  annotated the pleading entitled NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL
 
OF ORDER  INDICATING SATISFACTION  OF JUDGMENT, and the U.S. Mail
 
envelope in  which it  was delivered  via  U.S.  Mail,  with  the
 
following nomenclature:   REFUSED FOR FRAUD, and transmitted same
 
to Sir Condit via fax.  True and correct copies of said annotated
 
pleading, and  of the  first class U.S. Mail envelope in which it
 
was delivered,  are attached hereto and incorporated by reference
 
as if set forth fully herein.  See Exhibit "M".
 
 
                          VERIFICATION
 
     I, Paul  Andrew Mitchell,  Sui  Juris,  Citizen  of  Arizona
 
state, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of
 
the  United  States  of  America,  without  the  "United  States"
 
(federal government),  that the  above statement of facts is true
 
and correct,  to the  best of  My current information, knowledge,
 
and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 8 of 23

Dated:  November 21, 1997
 
 
Respectfully submitted,
 
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
_____________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)
 
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 9 of 23

                        PROOF OF SERVICE
 
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty
 
of perjury,  under the  laws of  the United  States  of  America,
 
without the  "United States," that I am at least 18 years of age,
 
a Citizen  of one  of the  United States  of America,  and that I
 
personally served the following document(s):
 
             PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
                AND AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE:
             Rule 201(d), Arizona Rules of Evidence;
              28 U.S.C. 1746(1);  Supremacy Clause;
             Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
      International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
               enacted with explicit Reservations
 
by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first
 
class United  States Mail,  with  postage  prepaid  and  properly
 
addressed to the following:
 
 
Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock         (fax line disconnected)
c/o 6642 E. Calle de San Alberto
Tucson, Arizona state
 
Lawrence E. Condit                 VIA FAX TRANSMISSION
c/o 376 South Stone Avenue         to: (520) 624-8414
Tucson, Arizona state
 
Mr. Walter U. Weber                Carl R. Davison III
c/o 115 N. Church Avenue           c/o 270 S. Stone Avenue
Tucson, Arizona state              Tucson, Arizona state
 
James B. Martin                    Timothy J. Cranshaw
c/o 270 S. Stone Avenue            c/o 103 E. Alameda, 1st Floor
Tucson, Arizona state              Tucson, Arizona state
 
Hon. Robert J. Gibson, C.J.        Clerk of Court [sic]
c/o 115 N. Church Avenue           c/o 103 E. Alameda, 1st Floor
Tucson, Arizona state              Tucson, Arizona state
 
 
Executed on November 21, 1997:
 
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
_____________________________________
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)
 
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 10 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "A":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 11 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "B":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 12 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "C":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 13 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "D":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 14 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "E":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 15 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "F":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 16 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "G":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 17 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "H":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 18 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "I":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 19 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "J":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 20 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "K":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 21 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "L":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 22 of 23

 
 
                          Exhibit "M":
 
 
      Plaintiff's Verified Criminal Complaint & Affidavit:
                          Page 23 of 23

 
 
                             #  #  #
 

Return to Table of Contents for

Mitchell v. Nordbrock