[ D R A F T ]
 
Registered U.S. Mail
Serial Number #R-xxx-xxx-xxx
Return Receipt Requested
Restricted Delivery Requested
 
TO:   Foreperson
      Federal Grand Jury
      c/o [street]
      [city] (zip code exempt)
      [State] STATE
 
DATE: [mm/dd/yy]
 
In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena
       Served on Mr. John Doe
 
 
Dear Foreperson:
 
     At the  verbal request  of My  client, Mr.  John Doe,  I  am
writing this  letter to challenge your alleged authority to issue
a subpoena  upon Him  to testify  before your  body.   We  hereby
document the reasons for Our challenge, as follows:
 
1.   Janet Reno has failed to produce any credentials in response
to a  proper and  timely  Freedom  of  Information  Act  ("FOIA")
request and  appeal submitted  for same.    In  addition  to  the
request and  appeal, a  10-day courtesy notice was also mailed to
Ms. Reno.   Her  deadline for producing credentials was 5:00 p.m.
on Friday,  January  24,  1997.    Her  failure  to  produce  the
requisite  credentials  means  that  she  is  now  estopped  from
claiming any  of the  authorities which  can be  exercised by the
Attorney General,  because her  silence is  a fraud,  pursuant to
U.S. v.  Tweel, and  her silence  activates estoppel, pursuant to
Carmine v.  Bowen.   Thus, the  U.S. Attorney(s)  who signed  the
subpoena to Mr. Doe have no delegation of authority at all.
 
2.   The federal  Jury Selection  and Service Act, 28 U.S.C. 1861
thru 1865,  is unconstitutional  for exhibiting  prohibited class
discrimination against  Citizens of  West Virginia  state who are
not also  federal citizens.   This  is the case, even though each
and every  member of  your "grand  jury" is  otherwise qualified,
according to  the requirements  of this Act.  The problem is that
the Act  itself is  unconstitutional, and its unconstitutionality
dates from the moment of its enactment.  In several federal cases
around the nation, this challenge has been placed properly before
federal courts,  but they  are now obstructing justice by failing
to rule  on it.   Accordingly,  your body  is not  a lawful grand
jury, and  Mr. Doe  cannot be compelled to testify before a group
of people who are not a lawful body.
 
3.   Evidence now  shows that  specific employees  of the federal
government receive  financial kick-backs  upon obtaining  federal
grand jury  indictments against  the "enemies"  of the President.
These  kick-backs   include  $25,000   per  indictment   to  U.S.
Attorneys, and  $35,000 per  indictment to  the President  of the
United States.   These kick-backs are being paid under color of a
defunct federal  program called  the Performance  Management  and
Recognition System  ("PMRS").   A FOIA  request for all financial
records of  the PMRS  system  has  been  submitted  to  the  U.S.
Department of  the Treasury.   A  staff attorney  in the Treasury
Department has  responded by  admitting that there are no records
for many PMRS kick-backs, because they were paid in CASH!  Add to
this the  evidence of  widespread perjury and property conversion
rackets within the Department of Justice, using computer software
which was  stolen by that Department, and you have the makings of
a  massive  criminal  conspiracy  among  employees  of  the  U.S.
Department of  Justice, the "Internal Revenue Service" [sic], and
possibly also the federal judiciary.
 
4.   Recent research  has also  proven that the federal judiciary
has sabotaged  the U.S. Constitution and corrupted laws governing
the conduct of the federal courts.  This has been done in part by
creating the  false impression  that the  United States  District
Court ("USDC")  has territorial  and subject  matter jurisdiction
within  the  several  States  of  the  Union,  particularly  over
criminal prosecutions,  when it  does not.  The truth is that the
USDC is  designed to  adjudicate matters  that arise  within  the
federal zone,  and  the  District  Court  of  the  United  States
("DCUS") is  designed to adjudicate matters that arise within the
state zone.   You will notice on the subpoena which you attempted
to serve  upon Mr.  Doe, that the USDC is named.  This is a fraud
upon you,  upon Me,  upon Mr.  Doe, and upon all American People,
who enjoy  the fundamental  guarantee  of  due  process  of  law.
Sedition by syntax is not due process of law.
 
     For your  edification, We  have attached  to this  letter  a
number of  essays, and  additional  documents,  which  constitute
material evidence to support the challenges which We bring to you
in this  letter.   These documents also constitute probable cause
to charge the U.S. Attorney(s) in Mr. Doe's case with fraud, jury
tampering, and  perjury of  oath, not  to mention a host of other
criminal violations  of pertinent  federal laws.   See  Title 18,
United States Code, Sections 241 and 242, for example.
 
     Please give  all this  evidence your careful and considerate
attention.
 
     The future of this nation is riding on what you do.
 
 
Sincerely yours,
 
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
 
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, federal witness,
Counselor at Law, and Counsel to Mr. John Doe
 
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
 
attachments
 
copies:    Mr. John Doe
           The Internet
 
 
[Please see USPS Pub. 221 for addressing instructions.]
 
 
                             #  #  #
 

Return to Table of Contents for

Grand Jury Subpoena to Butch Paugh