Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@yahoo.com>
Subject: LEGAL NOTICE to Kenneth R. Stone, Hefner Stark & Marois, Sacramento
To: kstone@hsmlaw.com
CC: supremelawfirm@yahoo.com

ELECTRONIC LEGAL NOTICE

 

Re:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/redwood/letter.2005-06-20/

TO:
Kenneth R. Stone
UNlicensed ATTORNey
c/o Hefner Stark & Marois
2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 450
Sacramento 95833-3883
CALIFORNIA, USA
    

Mr. Stone:

 

I regret to inform you that you are now under
formal investigation on suspicion of mail fraud,
defamation per se, witness retaliation, obstruction
of justice, and racketeering, to name a few.
See 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.

 

Your letter to me, dated June 20, 2005, is hereby
refused for fraud and all of the above.

 

No one in your law firm has produced any evidence
of the certificate of oath which each member must
indorse upon his license to practice law, as expressly
required by section 6067 of the State Bar Act:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/cbpc/6067.htm

 

Therefore, all are now in violation of sections 6126,
6127 and 6128:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/cbpc/6126.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/cbpc/6127.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/cbpc/6128.htm

 

You do know how to read, don't you?

 

You compound your crimes, Mr. Stone, by propagating
another vicious lie that feudal personnel in the USDC in
downtown Sacramento had any jurisdiction over the
matter of my Civil RICO case #GIC807057 as filed
in the Superior Court of California.  See:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/index.htm

 

Ms. Gonzalez and Messrs. Drozd, Shubb and England
have all been formally charged with multiple felony
federal offenses, and proper CITIZEN'S ARREST WARRANTs
have also been issued for the apprehension of same,
in addition to Jack L. Wagner.  See 5 U.S.C. 2906,
for example (clerk is legal custodian of all missing
Appointment Affidavits imposed by 5 U.S.C. 3331).

 

State courts have original jurisdiction of Civil RICO
actions.  And, all of the defense counsels who attempted
to appear in that case, also did so withOUT the licenses
to practice law required by section 6067.  Therefore,
none had any powers of attorney to file any answers
or responsive pleadings whatsoever:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/counsels.htm

 

Therefore, any so-called "orders" allegedly issued by those
named Defendants are obviously bogus:  named defendants
have no authority to dismiss the cases filed against them.

Perhaps you might wish to return to Lie School,
to confirm this obvious point (it's called "conflict of interest,"

Mr. Stone, not "due process".  See 28 U.S.C. 455.)

 

A federal SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE is now outstanding for
all licenses of all State Bar members going back ten years;
the State Bar's failure to answer necessarily also implicates you
now for having failed to comply with sections 6067 and 6068
during the period in question:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/statebar/

 

And, as you know or should know, a separate SUBPOENA
was issued and served upon Mr. Giberson in your office
by the Clerk of the Solano County Superior Court.

The record in that case contains extensive evidence
proving that Mr. Giberson prefers lies and fraud
over obedience to California State laws, just like you.

 

The State Bar has not denied our claims:  on the contrary,
they have replied with letters attempting to certify that
one or the other UNlicensed attorney is a Bar "member".

 

However, after we explained the meaning and legislative
intent of controlling terms used in sections 6067 and 6068,
their staff fell silent, as they have also done in the
matter of Mr. Giberson's missing license.  And, their staff
have also refused to produce the Oaths of Office required
by 4 U.S.C. 101.  These acts also implicate the State
Bar as accessories, if not also as principals, in racketeering.

18 U.S.C. 2, 3, 4, 912, 1001, 1341, 1951, 1962.

 

You do need to reply to our Notices, because my office
represents the People of California State in an ongoing
statewide investigation of impersonation and infiltration
of the federal courts, by people like you who snub your
noses at State laws, while hypocritically requiring
your victims strictly to obey all of those laws:

 

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/index.htm

 

Finally, this message will also serve to notify you that
you are now in default, for having failed to obey sections
6067 and 6068 of the State Bar Act, and for violating
sections 6126 (misdemeanor), 6127 (contempt of court)
and 6128 (misdemeanor), in addition to 18 U.S.C. 1962.

 

You didn't obey 6067 when you joined the Bar, and now

you have refused to cure your omission at any time after

that law was placed right before your eyes.

 

You are a vicious liar, Mr. Stone, and I will repeat
this to your face, as soon as I get the chance to do so.

 

Competent law enforcement authorities will receive a
courtesy copy of this message.

 

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness:  18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

hard copy:  via U.S. Mail

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com