Gmail

Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

ACTUAL NOTICE to Office of Treaty Affairs, U.S. Department of State: NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST LEAVE TO INTERVENE at International Criminal Court, The Netherlands re: ICC reference: OTP-CR-473/21

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:18 AM

To:  hannahroses111@hotmail.com

Cc:  otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int, treatyoffice@state.gov, partnerships@state.gov

Bcc:  [redacted]

Re:

 

 

Greetings Hannah Rose:

 

I am honestly thrilled to read your brief message this morning.

 

Words cannot express the admiration I maintain for your courage

and for the depth of your understanding of this "plandemic".

 

On the merits, there are at least two (2) MAJOR legal issues

that persistently end up being swept under the rug and

disappearing thru cracks in the floor boards:

 

 

(1)  American courts have sustained a "doctrine" which

requires "implementing legislation" before any Treaty

can be enforced in any American courts;  quite painfully,

this "doctrine" defeats the Treaty Clause and the

Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution:

 

if the U.S. Senate ratifies a treaty and

if the U.S. President signs a treaty,

that treaty becomes supreme Law of the Land;

 

 

(2)  the ICCPR in particular was ratified but

the U.S. Senate appended "Reservations, Understandings

and Declarations" ("RUD") which attempted to render that Treaty

"not self-executing" in the USA;  the latter Declaration

is cited by American courts as if it were valid domestic U.S. law,

but the U.S. House of Representatives never voted on it:

 

the other BIG PROBLEM with that "not self-executing" Declaration

is its painfully obvious violation of the Petition Clause in the

First Amendment:  "Congress shall make no law ... abridging

the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances";

it necessarily follows that the U.S. Senate cannot append a

unilateral "not self-executing" Declaration and merely presume

it has the force and effect of Federal law when it also violates that

Petition Clause!

 

 

It's a Treaty, but it's not a Treaty!  Reductio ad absurdum.

 

 

For the record, we attempted to transmit a well researched and

very detailed email message to Judge Thomas Buergenthal

concerning the latter Petition Clause violation.  He has previously

published pointed criticisms of those RUD in a law journal,

and we have archived the relevant pages here:

 

 

"... it is intended to prevent individuals in the United States

from suing in American courts to enforce ... the rights these

treaties proclaim"

 

Our long email message to Judge Buergenthal is here,

but he has never replied, not even once:

 

 

 

It bears repeating, even shouting from the mountain tops,

that ICCPR Article 7 is now ON THE TABLE for all to see.

 

 

And, the People of the United States of America remain

steadfast in our commitment to honor that relevant Article

and to demonstrate to all ICCPR Parties that it was

rendered supreme Law of the Land throughout the USA

on the day it was ratified by the United States

and it has remained so ever since.

 

Furthermore, the People of the United States of America

openly and emphatically OBJECT to our Federal Government's

attempts to obstruct its enforcement by any devious means

including but not limited to "not self-executing" Declarations

and/or "amendments" to valid implementing legislation which

effectively NEUTER the stated intents of Article 7 and of

the Biological Weapons Convention as ratified by the U.S. Senate

and signed by the President of the United States of America:

 

(cf. "eradicate" !! )

 

 

SPECIAL REQUEST:

The People of the United States of America will appreciate very much

if you will kindly remember to transmit email messages that will keep us

up-to-date with the procedural progress of your CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

now lodged with the International Criminal Court.  We have archived

an electronic copy of same for all to see here:

 

 

 

DO KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!

 

 

We are standing by.

 

 

Cc: 

International Criminal Court, The Hague, The Netherlands;  and,

U.S. Department of State, Office of Treaty Affairs

 

Bcc:  interested colleagues

 

--

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.  (retired)
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.


All Rights Reserved

 

 

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 1:44 AM Hannah Rose <hannahroses111@hotmail.com> wrote:

 

Excellent work Paul 

From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2021 1:03:20 AM
To: treatyoffice@state.gov <treatyoffice@state.gov>; partnerships@state.gov <partnerships@state.gov>
Cc: hannahroses111@hotmail.com <hannahroses111@hotmail.com>; otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int <otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int>
Subject: ACTUAL NOTICE to Office of Treaty Affairs, U.S. Department of State: NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST LEAVE TO INTERVENE at International Criminal Court, The Netherlands re: ICC reference: OTP-CR-473/21

 

https://www.state.gov/contact-us-treaty-affairs

Department of State, 2201 C Street, N.W,

L/T Room 5420, Washington, DC 20520

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 4:36 PM
Subject: hyper-linked in the SLL: NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST LEAVE TO INTERVENE at International Criminal Court, The Netherlands re: ICC reference: OTP-CR-473/21
To: <hannahroses111@hotmail.com>
Cc: <otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int>

 

fully hyper-linked here in the Supreme Law Library ("SLL"):

 

 

Please report any broken links here ASAP.

 

Thank you.

 

/s/ Paul

 

 

more here:

 

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:08 AM
Subject: NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST LEAVE TO INTERVENE at International Criminal Court, The Netherlands re: ICC reference: OTP-CR-473/21
To:  International Criminal Court, The Hague, The Netherlands
Cc: UK attorney Hannah Rose

 

NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST LEAVE TO INTERVENE

 

The Office of the Prosecutor
International Criminal Court ("ICC")
Attention:  Mr. Mark P. Dillon
Head of Information & Evidence Unit
The Hague, The Netherlands

ICC reference:  OTP-CR-473/21

Greetings Mr. Dillon et al.:

 

The People of the United States of America ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.,

Private Attorney General (retired) and Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator,

respectfully submit to the ICC our NOTICE OF INTENT to request leave to intervene

in the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT identified above.

 

We wish to take this opportunity to notify the ICC and all affected personnel

of Article 7 in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ("ICCPR"),

to wit:

 

                     Article 7
No one  shall be  subjected to  torture or  to cruel,  inhuman or
degrading treatment  or punishment.   In particular, no one shall
be subjected  without his  free consent  to medical or scientific
experimentation.  [emphasis added]

Although the United States is a signatory to the latter Treaty, ratified by the

U.S. Senate under authority of the Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution,

the U.S. Senate attempted to append a "not self-executing" Declaration

to its formal ratification documents:

 

Declarations:

"(1) That the United States declares that the provisions of

articles 1 through 27 of the Covenant are not self-executing.

 

Our extensive legal research and related formal litigation in the USA

have found that said "not self-executing" Declaration is UNconstitutional

for two (2) important and verifiable reasons, explained formally in the

following MOTION as filed and served in the U.S. District Court

for the Western District of Missouri with attachments:

 

(Federal judge failed to rule, however)

 

Please also give formal NOTICE to the Executive Order which was

incorporated formally into the latter MOTION:

 

 

 

The general rule in American jurisprudence, applicable

in the instant matter, is this:  unconstitutionality dates from the

moment of enactment, not from any decision(s) so branding

the act(s) in question.

 

 

Accordingly, Article 7 in the ICCPR is enforceable supreme Law

in the United States of America that is subject to numerous

applicable provisions of the Federal Criminal Code,

including but not limited to 18 U.S.C. sections 241, 242, 175-178,

1961 and 2332b(g)(5)(B), to wit:

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-10

 

Other relevant provisions of the Constitution, Laws and Treaties

of the United States are omitted from this NOTICE, for purposes

of brevity.

 

 

Thank you for your dedicated and continuing professional consideration

of all serious matters that arise from the above.

 

 

Attachments:  please incorporate the following timely and relevant essay,

and all other documents linked to the latter, as if all were set forth fully here:

 

"U.S. Criminal Code and the Biological Weapons Convention":

 

 

Cc:  Ms. Hannah Rose, UK attorney on behalf of

the peoples of the United Kingdom proprio motu

 

 

Bcc:  other interested colleagues

 

Attachments:

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT;  and,

Receipt by The Hague (6 December 2021)

 

 

--

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.  (retired)
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.


All Rights Reserved



--