Gmail

Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

NOTICE OF INTENT TO PETITION UN SECURITY COUNCIL FOR REFERRAL TO ICC AND ICJ

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com>

Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 11:06 AM

To:  astrid.sehl@mfa.no, delun@mfa.no, dpa-scsb3@un.org

Cc:  hannahroses111@hotmail.com, education-outreach@un.org, dujarric@un.org, PublicAffairs.Unit@icc-cpi.int, contact@securitycouncilreport.org

Bcc:  [redacted]

 

NOTICE OF INTENT TO PETITION UN SECURITY COUNCIL FOR REFERRAL TO ICC AND ICJ

 

TO:

Norway -- Mission to the United Nations

Attention:  Security Council President (January 2022)

1 Dag Hammarskjöld Plaza #35

New York City 10017

New York State, USA

 

RE:

 

 

Greetings Honorable Security Council President:

 

Please accept this electronic mail correspondence as formal NOTICE

of the specific intents of the People of the USA ex rel. and the United States

(Federal Government) ex rel. to petition the UN Security Council for

a timely formal referral to the International Criminal Court ("ICC") and/or

to the International Court of Justice ("ICJ") of the matter summarized

as follows:

 

 

(1)   as appended to the U.S. Senate’s ratification of the ICCPR

the “not self-executing” Declaration is unconstitutional for violating

the Petition Clause in the First Amendment and

the Bicameralism Clause at Article I, Section 7, Clause 2

 

 

Primary source of the latter challenges was the following proper and timely

MOTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENTS, and Executive Order 13107

as incorporated into the latter MOTION, both of which are archived in the

Supreme Law Library on the Internet here:

 

 

 

 

Please also incorporate herewith the entire database assembled by

The Credential Investigation, as archived here:

 

 

 

We bring the latter to your specific attention now chiefly because

the latter findings of fact continue to justify the conclusion that

all current personnel employed by the U.S. Department of State,

chiefly the United States Ambassador to the United Nations,

do lack authority by having signed COUNTERFEIT credentials

as proven by fair, and just, application of all U.S. laws summarized here:

 

 

 

 

In this context, we wish hereby to stress other consequences

required by the Public Protection Clause in the U.S.

Paperwork Reduction Act at 44 U.S.C. 3512(b), to wit:

 

 

(b)  The protection provided by this section may be raised

in the form of a complete defense, bar, or otherwise

at any time during the agency administrative process

or judicial action applicable thereto.

 

 

We encourage qualified investigators in your good Offices

to exercise the "Right to Inspect" all U.S. Office of Personnel

Management ("OPM") Standard Forms 61, using the following

RESERVATION OF RIGHT TO INSPECT for accurate legal counsel:

 

 

 

Please also incorporate the following documents re: ICC CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

as if all of the same were set forth fully here:

 

http://supremelaw.org/cc/rose.hannah/  (cf. citation to ICCPR Article 7)

 

 

Executive Summary

The United States and the People of the United States of America

now proceed ex rel. on the basis of facts and laws which fully justify the

conclusion that the ICCPR is a duly ratified United States Treaty ab initio

notwithstanding any and all unilateral Declaration(s) by the U.S. Senate

which attempted unlawfully to render Articles 1 thru 27 of the ICCPR

"not self-executing" [sic]:

 

 

 

Thank you for your continuing dedication and professional consideration.

 

 

And, HAPPY NEW YEAR too!

 


--

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (retired)
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

 

All Rights Reserved