REQUEST FOR S.E.C. PROFESSIONAL OPINION

REQUEST FOR S.E.C. PROFESSIONAL OPINION

TO: Amy Edwards, Assistant Director

Office of Markets

Jonathan Sokobin, Acting Director

Division of Risk, Strategy and Financial Innovation

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 “F” Street, N.E.

Washington 20549

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

DATE: June 8, 2011 A.D.

SUBJECT: opportunity/proposal to monetize unpaid INVOICES via

convertible bonds and registered securities

Greetings Ms. Edwards and Mr. Sokobin:

I am writing to your offices with a good faith desire to initiate mutually valuable discussions concerning at least two (2) unpaid INVOICEs payable to me and to the Treasury of the United States, copies of which are enclosed herewith and incorporated by reference.

When the civil case of Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al. reached the U.S. Supreme Court on appeal, 48 unlicensed attorneys for various named Defendants either fell totally silent, or they formally waived their clients’ right to answer. As such, their silence activated legal estoppel against them. Carmine v. Bowen

Moreover, the U.S. Department of Justice did confirm that Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Clarence Thomas and Stephen G. Breyer all lacked the PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSIONS that were required of them by Federal laws. U.S. DOJ is the designated legal custodian of those credentials.

As of September 1, 2010, our FINAL INVOICE AND DEMAND FOR PAYMENT to AOL Time Warner, Inc. (or successor(s) in interest) had increased to a TOTAL AMOUNT DUE of $4,271,904,000.00 with the accrual of 108 months of simple interest at an annual rate of 7% APR (again see attached).

To date, I have received not one penny in payment(s) from this debtor!

Accordingly, I wish hereby to request your professional opinion concerning the following proposal to “monetize” all or part of this outstanding FINAL INVOICE AND DEMAND FOR PAYMENT, as follows:

I would be willing to forgive a significant portion of the above TOTAL AMOUNT DUE NOW, in return for formalizing receipt of a number of convertible bonds equal in value to that same significant portion, at a reasonable par value e.g. $1.00 USD per convertible bond share.

Upon formalizing receipt of that same number of private bond shares, I would then re-issue an amended INVOICE to the debtor that reflects an equivalent reduction in the TOTAL AMOUNT DUE NOW.

To illustrate: taking one year’s accrual of 7% simple interest, shown as being equal to $15,288,000, I would formalize receipt of fifteen million two hundred eighty-eight thousand convertible bond shares @ $1.00 USD par value per share. Then, I would deduct that same amount from an amended INVOICE and serve that amended INVOICE on the debtor, with a written NOTICE explaining how and why this amended INVOICE was authorized and issued.

Upon completion of all necessary documentation, it would be my specific intent to perfect the legal right to convert all such convertible bonds into a single security that is duly registered with the SEC, and then publicly traded on one or more of the world’s several Stock Exchanges, including but not limited to the N.Y.S.E., Hong Kong Stock Exchange, New Zealand Stock Exchange etc.

Because I have had such terribly damaging experiences with attorneys allegedly admitted to The State Bar of California, I sincerely wish to avoid any more bad legal advice from such questionable characters, and to deal directly with your good offices as much as possible.

In particular, the second enclosed INVOICE FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR RESTITUTION directly implicates the Treasury of the United States. Using an approach similar to the one summarized above, it may be possible for your offices formally to authorize a second registered security, which could be used to recover significant portions of the funds missing from United States Treasury in violation of Article I, Sec. 9, Cl. 7. (Specifically, see Items (1), (2) and (3) on that INVOICE FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR RESTITUTION, also now IN DEFAULT.)

And, if the latter is feasible, then a third registered security could also be authorized, permitting me to acknowledge receipt of further convertible bonds in lieu of significant portions of the one percent (1%) management fee payable to Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. (See Item (5) on that INVOICE FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR RESTITUTION).

Again, upon completion of all necessary documentation, it would be my specific intent then to perfect the legal right to convert the latter convertible bonds into a single security that is duly registered with the SEC and then publicly traded on one or more of the world’s several Stock Exchanges, including but not limited to the N.Y.S.E., Hong Kong Stock Exchange, New Zealand Stock Exchange etc.

Thank you very much for your professional consideration. I eagerly look forward to your earnest and timely review of this REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL OPINION.

Enclosures: copies of INVOICES discussed above (2x)

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

Attachment: copy of letter from DOJ dated February 12, 2004