MEMO

TO: Mr. Jay Alan Sekulow, J.D., Ph.D.

American Center for Law and Justice

P.O. Box 90555

Washington 20090-0555

District of Columbia, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964; and,

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4 TIMES),

False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

DATE: March 14, 2017 A.D.

SUBJECT: objectives of Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964

Greetings Mr. Sekulow:

In your testimony to the Committee on the Judiciary on July 30, 2014, you made the following pointed statement:

... the only opportunity for justice for those targeted lies with an independent Special Counsel. [emphasis added]

We are writing to invite you to review the intent of Congress when enacting the Civil RICO statute at 18 U.S.C. 1964, as explained by the U.S. Supreme Court (see attached), to wit:

Both statutes [RICO and Clayton Act] bring to bear the pressure of “private attorneys general” on a serious national problem for which public prosecutorial resources are deemed inadequate ....

Because it now appears that public prosecutorial resources were very inadequate during the reign of Loretta Lynch and her accomplices, we encourage you to re-consider your statement to the Judiciary Committee and consider stepping into the role of a Private Attorney General.

I presume you are very aware that individuals were targeted by the IRS Targeting Scandal: I am one of the individuals who was targeted.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved

(cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)