TRANSMITTAL OF MAIL FRAUD REPORT

TRANSMITTAL OF MAIL FRAUD REPORT

TO: Postmaster/Supervisor

Attention: [REDACTED], Retail Counter

University Post Office

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964,

and now Damaged Party

DATE: July 15, 2013 A.D.

SUBJECT: Another Report Alleging a Pattern of Mail Fraud Felonies

Committed by William M. McCool et al., USDC/WDWA

Greetings [REDACTED], Postmaster and USPS Associates:

Enclosed please find a second Mail Fraud Report alleging more felony mail fraud by Mr. William M. McCool et al., as presently employed at the U.S. District Court in downtown Seattle.

I have now been materially damaged by Mr. McCool and his accomplices, chiefly because of the raid on my apartment on June 11, 2013. That raid was instigated by means of a fraudulent “search warrant” which displayed Mr. McCool’s rubber stamp, but no authorized signature(s) by any “clerk” or “deputy clerk of court”.

You should know that the Federal statute at 28 U.S.C. 1691 requires that all Federal Court “process” must exhibit a Clerk’s authorized signature and the Court’s official seal: failure to satisfy these simple requirements deprives a Federal Court of jurisdiction in personam (i.e. jurisdiction over Persons).

On the sidewalk directly in front of Lake Union Mail, that fraudulent “search warrant” was presented to me by two (2) IRS agents -- one from Colorado and one from Wyoming -- and a man claiming to be a U.S. Marshal but who did not produce any business card or badge, and who said his first name was “Ray”, but “Ray” did not disclose his full name. I now have good reason to believe his full name is Ray Fleck.

When I informed them that the “search warrant” was fraudulent, “Ray” said that he was going to “break in” to my apartment. At that point, I emphasized that it was a felony to break and enter into a private dwelling unit without a valid search warrant.

I then informed these 3 men that I was walking straightaway to the Clerk of the U.S. District Court, to inspect the credentials required of Mr. McCool, and James P. Donohue whose name also appeared on that fraudulent “search warrant” as “U.S. Magistrate Judge”.

I was met at the Federal Courthouse by a Deputy U.S. Marshal who is assigned to me in my capacity as a qualified Federal Witness. That Deputy U.S. Marshal consented to escort me to the public counter of the Clerk’s Office. There the two of us were rendered eyewitnesses to more fraud when that Court’s employee at the public counter refused to produce any Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS for any of the employees in question. I believe that employee was Lori Landis, or someone who works under Lori Landis.

After being told quite bluntly that these personnel in the Clerk’s Office refused to cooperate with me, I started walking back to my apartment; and, along the way I encountered a parking control officer. I summarized the day’s events for him and he politely phoned in a request to the Seattle Police Department for a civil standby.

Two SPD officers promptly responded and drove me back to my apartment. They kept me in the back seat of their patrol car, while the lead SPD officer spoke with the Federal “agents” who were in the process of stealing my private client files, computers and numerous other private properties. The items they stole were never adequately itemized.

I watched the lead SPD officer shake hands with these “Feds”. Then, he returned to the patrol car and tried to tell me that the “search warrant” was valid over my objections and flatly contrary to the eyewitness experience which I had just had -- not one hour earlier -- with the Deputy U.S. Marshal at the Clerk’s Office.

I maintain to this day that this was an act of gross negligence by these 2 SPD officers, because they did NOT deal with the FACTs of the missing credentials for personnel in the Clerk’s Office, or express any desire or intention to do any further investigation of those FACTs. They drove me to a local convenience market, and ordered me to stay away from my apartment until the “Feds” had finished for the day.

For your information, please note in particular that my office has been investigating William M. McCool et al. at least since 1996, when I had volunteered to search for 2,500 missing children who had reportedly disappeared into Arizona’s Child Protective Services.

After leaving his position with the Office of Clerk at the U.S. District Court in Tucson, Arizona, McCool took a similar position with the USDC in Pensacola, Florida. By chance, I filed a routine NOTICE in a Federal Court case that had commenced in that Court, and thereby learned that McCool was then working in that Clerk’s Office.

As a result of more fraudulent “process” which I received from that Clerk’s Office, I did lodge a proper Mail Fraud Report alleging felony mail fraud by Messrs. William M. McCool and Federal Judge Clyde Roger Vinson, in connection with their habitual violations of the Federal statute at 28 U.S.C. 1691 (see attached).

You should also know that my office has continued to investigate extensive infiltration of Federal Courts throughout the entire USA; and numerous personnel of the U.S. District Courts and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts in Washington State have failed and/or refused to produce all credentials that are required of them by applicable Federal laws.

I have good reasons to suspect that the fraudulent raid and fraudulent “search warrant” on June 11, 2013, were actually motivated by criminal intent to retaliate against me for that ongoing investigation, which has been actively assisted -- at least since 2001 -- by the Office of Information Policy in the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. See 18 U.S.C. 241, 1512, 1513 and 1962 (for starters).

Also, on July 12, 2013, two different men confronted me in the private parking lot of the apartment building where I live, and one of them refused to produce any business card or badge, and also refused to disclose his name to me. I believe I can prove that they were motivated solely by a desire to intimidate me for the ongoing investigation described above. For example, they did NOT leave when I told them they needed an appointment and had no appointment with me.

I have documented that trespass incident for the attention of three Federal Judges who have produced all 4 credentials required of them, and for my contacts in the King County Prosecutor’s Office, King County Sheriffs, and West Precinct of the Seattle Police Department.

In conclusion, I believe that there is more than sufficient probable cause in the enclosed documents to justify a thorough criminal investigation by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.

When all the facts and laws are placed squarely on the table, it is now my studied professional opinion that all Federal Courts are effectively rendered TOTALLY IMPOTENT insofar as there are no duly credentialed “Clerks” or “Deputy Clerks of Court” who can satisfy the clear requirements for a Clerk’s authorized signature and the Court’s official seal on all “process” that issues from any Federal Court.

The U.S. Postal Inspection Service has primary jurisdiction to investigate the myriad acts of FELONY mail fraud that necessarily result when all such “sewer service” is transmitted via U.S. Mail by personnel employed by the Clerks’ Offices at all such Federal Courts.

Thank you, [REDACTED] and all of your authorized USPS associates, for your continuing professional assistance and conscientious consideration in this matter.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13