CONFIDENTIAL MEMO

CONFIDENTIAL

TO: Mr. John N. Vinson, Ph.D.

University of Washington Police

1117 N.E. Boat Street

Seattle 98105

WASHINGTON STATE, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964, Rotella v. Wood

DATE: May 24, 2011 A.D.

SUBJECT: MIRANDA WARNINGs to James A. Landay and Crystal Eney

Greetings Dr. Vinson:

One of several bases for my complaints against Mr. Landay and Ms. Eney are these facts:

(1) I was duly registered, for the UW Summer 2009 Session, fees paid.

(2) I was timely enrolled in CSE 590 and confirmed as such on-line.

(3) I had tried often but in vain to contact Mr. Landay via email.

(4) I was referred to his office hours by the CSE Departmental staff.

(5) Mr. Landay did not show up during his normal office hours.

(6) I was directed to attend the first class by those same staff.

(7) I did attend the first class, as directed by those same staff.

(8) At the first class, I described my work for the U.S. Coast Guard.

(9) Almost immediately, CSE 590 was cancelled.

(10) That cancellation was done without any prior notice(s) to me.

(11) I did receive two (2) written apologies from the UW Registrar.

(12) The UW Registrar did refund my Summer 2009 registration fee.

If you would like to receive a comprehensive set of email messages prior to and during the events above, please advise and I will be happy to locate them and forward hard copies to your good offices.

In the interests of rigorous scientific experimentation, I feel it will be very interesting to see what if any changes do occur in the postures of the suspects in question, now that they have received ACTUAL NOTICE of my status as a qualified Federal Witness.

More to the merits, officials of the University of Washington might be putting the University at risk of wire fraud charges, on the theory of respondeat superior (cf. vicarious liability), insofar as their policies for Summer Sessions -- as stated on their Internet website -- do in fact conflict with certain obviously discriminatory practices by past and present academic and administrative personnel.

Wire fraud and witness retaliation are two of the RICO “predicate acts” itemized by the Congress of the United States at 18 U.S.C. 1961.

Thank you very much, Dr. Vinson, for your continuing professional consideration.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13