FINAL BONA FIDE
OFFER IN COMPROMISE
AND BONA FIDE OFFER
TO HOLD HARMLESS
October 21, 2000 A.D.
Recorder’s Office
County Government Center
East Wing
70 West Hedding Street
San Jose 95110
CALIFORNIA, USA
Subject: Wishart v. United States et al.,
DCUS San Jose, Docket #CR-00-20227-JF:
amended complaint forthcoming
Dear County Recorder:
This is to inform you that I fully intend to name the County of Santa Clara Recorder’s Office, and the County of Santa Clara Supervisors, as additional Cross-Defendants in My forthcoming amended civil complaint.
To date, My VERIFIED CROSS-COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND MONETARY DAMAGES, and My FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD SUPPLEMENT’s TO CROSS-COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES, have been filed and served in the case described above.
Your office has conspired with a known extortion racket and money laundry, apparently domiciled in Puerto Rico under color of the Federal Alcohol Administration, to record demonstrably fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien [sic] against My good name and reputation, causing extensive financial loss to My Personal and professional estates.
Said Notices were recorded without lawful authority(s). Further, said Notices were then miraculously mutated into “Liens” in a criminal conspiracy with IRS agents, who then used them to lien, levy, and seize my property, and also libel my good name, in violation of State and federal laws.
Accordingly, this is My final bona fide offer to hold the Recorder’s Office of the County of Santa Clara, and the Supervisors of the County of Santa Clara, harmless, provided that the County of Santa Clara agrees, within 6 calendar days, to pay Me the certain sum of twenty-five million U.S. dollars ($25,000,000.00).
In the alternative, I will also accept $10,000,000.00 now, and $1,000,000.00 per year for 15 years, payable to Me, My heirs, or My assigns.
This bona fide offer will expire at midnight on the night of Friday, October 27, 2000 A.D., at which time I reserve My Right to proceed on the basis of the presumption that you do not wish to negotiate a settlement in this matter.
I am taking the liberty of forwarding this bona fide offer to your Risk Management offices, because I do not believe that the County of Santa Clara’s insurance policy(s) indemnify criminal conduct. See 18 U.S.C. 242, 241, 1031 and 1962, in chief. If I am in error in this regard, please show me the policy provisions which specifically indemnify criminal conduct by officers and/or employees of the County of Santa Clara.
Please refer to California Penal Code, Sections 560.4 and 580 (copies attached to previous Bona Fide Offer).
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Donald E. Wishart
Donald E. Wishart, DMD
c/o 5150 Graves Avenue, Suite 12-C
San Jose 95129
CALIFORNIA, USA
attachments:
copies of previous Bona Fide Offers (2),
dated October 1 and October 7, 2000 A.D.
cc: County Counsel
Risk Management