TO:       Mr. Jeffrey T. Miller

      c/o United States District Court

          880 Front Street, Suite 4290

          San Diego 92101-8900



FROM:     Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

          Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and

          Qualified Federal Witness, 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964


DATE:     April 19, 2005 A.D.


SUBJECT:  Councilman Michael Zucchet et al.


Greetings Mr. Miller:


You are not a duly authorized federal judge, if you cannot or will not produce evidence of your Appointment Affidavit as required by the federal statutes at 5 U.S.C. sections 2906 and 3331.


In good faith, the People of the United States of America, and also the “United States” (federal government) ex rel. Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General, have already served upon you actual notice of your unconditional legal obligations in this regard.


You were given a reasonable deadline until 5:00 p.m. on Friday, April 15, 2005 A.D., to produce said Appointment Affidavit, and you have now failed to produce it, or to offer any explanation(s) as to why it is not presently in the legal custody of the Clerk of Court, as required by the federal statute at 5 U.S.C. 2906.


The federal statute at 5 U.S.C. 3331 required you to execute a proper OPM Form 61 Appointment Affidavit, and 5 U.S.C. 2906 required you to convey same to the Clerk of Court, where it should remain, barring any lawful search warrants or other lawful order(s) commanding that it be conveyed elsewhere.


You are also hereby given actual notice that the SUBPOENA served upon the Administrative Office for the U.S. Courts, for your Appointment Affidavit and Oath of Office, is now overdue, and the Director of that office is now in contempt of court for refusing to comply with that SUBPOENA.


And, you are likewise given actual notice that a proper request and appeal under the Freedom of Information Act are now past due for all four (4) of the credentials that are required of all federal judges currently seated on the U.S. District Court in downtown San Diego.


Incorporated herewith is a subset of documents which are now publicly available on the Internet, explaining our nationwide investigation into evidence indicating that the federal judiciary is infiltrated.





Accordingly, in good faith, your so-called “ORDER RETURNING CORRESPONDENCE” [sic] is hereby refused for all of the reasons as stated above and in all documents attached hereto.


It is not generally inappropriate to write letters to any individual who is impersonating an officer of the United States, because such letter writing is expressly protected by the First Amendment in the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended.


You are hereby given formal legal NOTICE that I am not a Proper Party to any cases currently pending before the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, due in part to its lack of original jurisdiction over Superior Court of California docket number #GIC807057.  See Tafflin v. Levitt and Lou v. Belzberg.


The “Local Rule” to which you referred in said “ORDER” [sic] is not binding on me in any way, due in part to the Abrogation Clause in the Rules Enabling Act and its obvious unconstitutionality.  Local Rules may not expand or contract original jurisdiction conferred upon federal district courts by federal statutes enacted by Congress.




YOU ARE IN DEFAULT.  Therefore, formal DEMAND is hereby made of you immediately to cease and desist any further impersonation of a federal judge or any other officer(s) of the United States, in violation of the federal statutes at 18 U.S.C. sections 912, 1341, 1962 and 5 U.S.C. sections 2906 and 3331.





The Undersigned hereby certifies under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America and without the “United States” (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the very best of my current information, knowledge and belief, so help me God, pursuant to the federal statute 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).  See the Supremacy Clause, in chief (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the “United States” (federal government) are the supreme Law of the Land).



Dated:  April 19, 2005 A.D.





/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell


Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and

Qualified Federal Witness, 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964


copies:  Councilman Michael Zucchet, City of San Diego

         U.S. Marshals, duty officer (downtown San Diego)

         Clerk of Court, USDC/SDCA, San Diego, California

         Office of the U.S. Attorney, downtown San Diego

         Foreperson, federal grand jury, downtown San Diego


U.S. Mail:


  c/o Forwarding Agent

      501 West Broadway, #A-332

      San Diego 92101