Time: Mon Oct 20 18:00:53 1997
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 17:44:41 -0700
To: snetnews@world.std.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SNET: Eyewitness at Roby Rallies
-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
returned to sender
At 04:49 PM 10/20/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List
>
>Why won't supremeloser admit that his petition for a TRO, like every petition
>for intervention he draws up and everything else he does to try to butt his
>way into a case that doesn't involve him, was denied?
>It's because then he couldn't get anyone to shell out their hard-earned money
>for his useless papers.
>
>Ask Paul sometime how many of his papers rely on federal statutes that
>Conress based on the Fourteenth Amendment, which he refuses to recognize. Do
>you sense that there's something wrong with this idea? Paul knows that his
>claims about cases and statutes are generally exactly the opposite of what
>they mean - except when he relies on the Dred Scott case, which has been
>thoroughly repudiated but he probably wishes were still the law of the land.
> He is quite simply a swindler, relying on the fact he has college degrees
>and cites to sources that most other people cannot easily find, to convince
>well-meaning pro-freedom people to pay him money to ruin their cases and
>often their lives.
>
>If you want to learn basic principles of law, go to a law school bookstore
>and purchase a hornbook (by West, or Legalines, or Emanuel's, or several
>others) on whatever subject you wish to get some understanding of. These
>will give you the basics on any area of law from criminal procedure to
>contracts. If you need to learn the specific laws applicable in your state,
>go to a regular bookstore and purchase a guide to business law, or wills, or
>divorce, or one of many other subjects.
>
>Here's just one little example of how Paul just won't give people the truth
>(from his TRO post) - he suggests that you could be responsible for
>contributory negligence if you don't file for a TRO to protect Ms. Allen.
> Contributory negligence is a defense raised by a defendant accused of
>negligence who claims that the plaintiff was also at fault in causing an
>accidental injury. An hour reading a book about tort law would convince
>anyone that Paul either has absolutely no idea at all what he is talking
>about or is trying to scare people for his own profit. Either way, following
>his advice will endanger your property, and quite possibly your liberty as
>well.
>
>For freedom,
>
>Nick
>
>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
>-> Posted by: NMMJR@aol.com
>
>
>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com
-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School:
E-mail