TO:       C I Host

          1851 Central Drive, #110

          Bedford 76021

          TEXAS, USA


FROM:     Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff/Appellant and

          Private Attorney General (18 U.S.C. 1964(a))

          Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.


DATE:     August 1, 2003 A.D.


SUBJECT:  Damages plus Maximum Pre-Judgment Interest

          Allowable under California State Laws


This is our SECOND ADJUSTED INVOICE for partial damages sustained in connection with all COUNTS and the SUMMARY OF DAMAGES described in the Initial COMPLAINT in the above entitled matter, plus the maximum amount of pre-judgment interest allowable under California State usury laws (i.e. seven percent (7%) per annum simple interest).


The authority for this INVOICE is the holding in the case of Hajek v. Burlington Northern R.R. Co., 186 F.3d 1105, hn. 9 (9th Cir. 1999) (local district court rules, under which a failure to object to a magistrate’s jurisdiction was deemed to be a waiver of the right to an Article III judge, were invalid and thus not effective to confer authority upon the magistrate in the absence of express consent by all parties, since the local rules were inconsistent with the statute).


Accordingly, we now hold you liable, both jointly and severally, for all Initial Damages plus twenty-four (24) months of simple interest, beginning Aug. 1, 2001 A.D. thru and including July 31, 2003 A.D.:


Amount   Description                                  Total Amount

------   ----------------------------------------   -----------------

   1     TOTAL DAMAGES in Initial COMPLAINT supra   $2,620,800,000.00

  24     months of simple interest computed using

7% per annum, @ $15,288,000.00 per month      366,912,000.00


         TOTAL AMOUNT DUE NOW:                      $2,987,712,000.00



Our terms are TOTAL AMOUNT DUE NOW upon receipt of this INVOICE.


Sincerely yours,


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell


Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General and Plaintiff/Appellant

Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al.

DCUS Sacramento docket #CIV. S-01-1480 WBS DAD PS

Ninth Circuit docket #02-15269 and 372(c) #02-89005 (U.S. Supreme Court)