TO:       Ms. Irma E. Gonzalez

      c/o Clerk of Court

          880 Front Street, Suite 4290

          San Diego 92101



FROM:     Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

          Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)


DATE:     July 17, 2003 A.D.


SUBJECT:  Fraud for Failure to Disclose Oath of Office

          and Presidential Commission:  Superior Court

          docket #GIC807057;  18 U.S.C. 4, 912, 1341, 1961 et seq.


Greetings Ms. Gonzalez:




This is a formal NOTICE to you that the federal criminal statute at 18 U.S.C. 4 (misprision of felony) creates a serious and formal obligation for me to report felony federal offenses which I witness to a judge or other appropriate officer of the United States (federal government).  Please be advised that I have no intentions of violating this statute.


Impersonating an Article III federal judge is a felony federal offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912.  Mail fraud is a RICO predicate act, as defined at 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.


On May 23, 2003 A.D., I submitted a proper and lawful FOIA request to the legal custodian of record for your Presidential Commission.  On June 7, 2003 A.D., I followed with a FOIA appeal for that Presidential Commission.  To date, as the legal custodian the U.S. Department of Justice has been unable to produce a Presidential Commission for you.


Then, on June 30, 2003 A.D., I executed and mailed to you my FINAL NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR CREDENTIALS REQUIRED BY LAW, which demanded that you produce evidence of your Oath of Office and Presidential Commission, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, July 7, 2003 A.D.


As of that reasonable deadline, neither you nor anyone else nor any thing else, delivered to me any evidence of your requisite credentials (Oath of Office and Presidential Commission).


Accordingly, you are now in default.


Silence is a fraud, where there is a legal or a moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.  U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299 (1977).  Also, silence activates estoppel.  Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906).



The Undersigned hereby verifies under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of my current information, knowledge and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).  See Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are all the supreme Law of this Land).



Sincerely yours,


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell


Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)


U.S. Mail care of:


  Forwarding Agent

  501 W. Broadway, Suite A-332

  San Diego 92101



copy:  U.S. Marshals Service, downtown San Diego

       Hon. Janis Sammartino, Superior Court of California

       forwarding agents for certain parties


All Rights Reserved without Prejudice