MEMO
TO: Donald D. Hoffman
c/o Department of Cognitive Sciences
University of California
Irvine 92697
CALIFORNIA, USA
FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff
U.S. Supreme Court case #03-5070
Superior Court of California case #GIC807057
DATE: January 15, 2005 A.D.
SUBJECT: attached
evidence of fraud by unlicensed attorneys
Greetings Donald D. Hoffman:
I do regret to confirm that none of the four (4) attorneys whom you consented to “represent” you in the latter case has a proper license to practice law in the State of California (see enclosed).
Moreover, after receipt of several requests from me for proof that the attorneys in question have, in fact, been delegated powers of attorney to represent them in this matter, the Regents of the University of California have failed to produce any such proof.
Even if all of the foregoing credentials were all in perfect order, the State of California has not authorized the attorneys in question to represent private parties in their individual capacity, and you were sued in your individual capacity.
Accordingly, we now regard your
attempt to appear and file pleadings by means of unlicensed attorneys as a
fraud on the court and as evidence of default.
See the correct ruling in U.S. v.
High Country Broadcasting Co., 3 F.3d 1244
(9th Cir. 1993) (entry of default judgment was appropriate when
unlicensed corporate president attempted to represent his corporation in
court).
Thank you very much for your timely
and professional consideration.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.,
Plaintiff and
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C.
1964(a)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice (see UCCA
1207)
Notice to principals is notice to agents.
Respondeat superior!
p.s.
For your convenience, a Table of Contents
for each of the two cases in question is here:
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol2/index.htm
copy:
appropriate law enforcement officials