CONFIDENTIAL
TO: Arthur Sobey
FROM: Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law
DATE: July 14, 1997
SUBJECT: Project Proposal
The evidence which I faxed to you is only the tip of a very big iceberg, Art. I will try to be brief, but at the risk of leaving out important details. Just ask for clarification, as needed.
Last year, in late Spring, I helped defend an Arizona trust against a federal grand jury subpoena for books and records. I was appointed to the office of Vice President for Legal Affairs of the trust, so I had proper standing to act as Counsel to the trust, in federal court. The IRS was pushing for an indictment of the trust's General Manager.
All my written communications to the grand jury foreperson were obstructed by a conspiracy involving the federal judge, the U.S. Attorneys on the case, and the IRS "Special Agent." These communications included affidavits and other pleadings which were filed with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Tucson. The Clerk later joined the conspiracy.
Altogether, we have nailed the judge and assistant U.S. Attorney on 28 counts of obstructing U.S. Mail, 28 counts of jury tampering, 28 counts of obstruction of justice, and 28 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above. Other crimes have also been documented, such as barratry and perjury.
When the federal judiciary scuttled this case, with the help of the FBI, I chose at that time to file a Complaint of Judicial Misconduct against the federal judge, U.S. District Judge John M. Roll. The authority for such a complaint is found at 28 U.S.C. 372(c). That statute authorizes the United States Courts of Appeal to promulgate their own local rules for implementing this statute. I believe I have already faxed to you the complaint against John M. Roll. Order the 372(c) rules from the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit; one copy is free to each requester.
The Clerk of the Ninth Circuit assigned a docket number, but the Chief Judge, Procter Hug, has done absolutely nothing whatsoever to process this complaint, after it was formally entered in the 9th Circuit docket system, and even after Procter Hug received a demand letter from me to act on it. Procter Hug has chosen instead to sit on his hands. This is criminal obstruction of justice.
The main reasons why the evidence in this case is so powerful are as follows:
1. We traced the genealogy of the IRS to Trust #62, domiciled in Puerto Rico under the Federal Alcohol Administration, which was declared unconstitutional in 1935. "IRS" is not in the U.S. Department of the Treasury; see Title 31, United States Code, for proof.
2. We filed material evidence proving that U.S. Attorneys, judges, and even the President, routinely receive $25,000 to $35,000 for obtaining federal grand jury indictments against "illegal tax protesters" and other political enemies of the President.
3. The alleged authority for these "awards" was the Performance Management and Recognition System ("PMRS"), which Congress repealed in 1993. Use Alta Vista to browse the Internet for "Performance Management and Recognition System".
4. The receipt of illegal kickbacks from government contractors is a felony punishable by 10 years in federal prison. See 41 U.S.C. 51 et seq.
5. I have submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for all financial records of the PMRS. An IRS attorney in Washington, D.C. responded, in writing, on Treasury letterhead, that there are no records for many of the awards, because the payments were made in cash! I then forwarded this letter to Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr.
6. I have filed with two Congressmen formal requests to initiate impeachment proceedings against John M. Roll. Rep. Jim Kolbe from Arizona is now aiding and abetting the criminal conspiracy we found in the U.S. District Court in Tucson. The other Congressman is in Texas, and I am still awaiting an answer from his brother.
I believe it is time to file a criminal complaint against Procter Hug, and everyone he is protecting in this fashion. I have several docket numbers I can use to make the filing official. I volunteer to prepare and sign this criminal complaint, and to serve on all appropriate government offices, particularly the Governor and Attorney General of California, because the Ninth Circuit's headquarters are in San Francisco.
I also believe that Procter Hug is aiding and abetting a much wider property conversion racket which is presently centered in the federal building in downtown Los Angeles. The evidence which I faxed to you primarily concerns this racket.
Here is how it works: DOJ hires front men (and women) to promote the filing and recordation of bogus commercial liens against government employees. The lien by M. Elizabeth Broderick and Richard Broderick is an excellent example of such a bogus lien. With that one lien, they both claimed to have precipitated the largest municipal bankruptcy in the history of this country -- Orange County, California state.
Then, unsuspecting and naive Americans are encouraged to accept documentary drafts (aka "commercial warrants") written against these liens, as a way to "transfer the credit" which they appear to represent. The warrants enter the banking system, and then come in contact with all manner of electronic accounts, records, and what have you.
Now, here's the MO. DOJ first stole the PROMIS software from the Inslaw company many years ago, and then bribed a federal judge to quash the case. Ever since then, DOJ has used its vast financial resources to make improvements to this software, which now has tentacles which reach into most, if not all, of the nation's banking computers. They use sophisticated electronic matching algorithms to build comprehensive electronic dossiers of potential targets; when they isolate the assets they want to hit, in marches the WOD, or IRS, or anybody they want, to sting the owners and force forfeiture of the assets in question.
As history would have it, the Arizona trust I was defending was working closely with two DOJ front women in Los Angeles -- head U.S. Attorney Nora Manella, who is now prosecuting Arizona Governor Fife Symington for bank fraud, and Elizabeth Broderick, who was convicted last year of 26 counts of bank fraud and mail fraud, for trafficking in these bogus commercial warrants.
When I discovered that Broderick's Orange County lien was bogus, her associates loaned me a car with tampered front brakes. Also, another front man in Tucson worked his way into my living room, because he convinced me he was desperate for housing, and later threatened my life 12 times when I confronted him about Broderick's bogus Orange County lien. I told him I had decided to testify against Broderick, and this guy, Herbert Crawford, just hit the roof.
When DOJ in Washington, D.C., admitted on their stationery that Nora Manella had no credentials, Elizabeth Broderick got wind of this and sent an uncertified copy of those credentials to me. Now, isn't it odd that Broderick would come to the immediate defense of her own criminal prosecutor? Not really, if my theory is correct, and I have much more to prove that it is correct.
I would like to coordinate a press conference with your candidate, and give you guys the exclusive announcement of the criminal complaint against Procter Hug. I know one TV anchor in Los Angeles who will probably give you guys a fair shake. He had been battling internally with his colleagues, who thought he was all wet for suggesting that Broderick was a fraud. When I sent him the proof, many months later, it saved his reputation among his closest colleagues at the TV station (Channel 9, downtown L.A.).
I know that this story jumps around a lot, and that is only due to the limited amount of copy I have provided to you here. Please trust me when I say that there is quite a mountain of evidence against the judge in Tucson, and it is quite clear now that Procter Hug is aiding and abetting this conspiracy. It's time for him to resign.
If you absolutely need the contact, I can put you in touch with the former Chief Judge of the Ninth Circuit, but I would prefer to play that card only if it is absolutely necessary, and only if we have no other alternative.
Also, please be extremely discrete with this memo. For now, let's just keep is among you, me, the candidate, and anybody the candidate wants to have it also.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Counselor at Law and federal witness
c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
Postal Zone 85719/tdc
email: pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro 3.0:
preferred, to conserve all resources)
phone: (520) 320-1514 (private line:
please get permission to disclose)
fax machine: (520) 320-1256 (dedicated hard copy:
available 24-hours per day or night)
fax modem: (520) 320-1513 (dedicated email line:
please call phone to switch software)