Appendix T: Revocation of Birth Certificate


FROM:     John Q. Doe
          Marin County, California
          c/o USPS Post Office Box [##]
          San Rafael, California Republic
          united States of America
          zip code exempt (DMM 122.32)

TO:       Registry of Vital Records
          Commonwealth of Massachusetts
          150 Tremont Street, Room B-3
          Boston, Massachusetts
          Postal Code 02111/TDC

TO:       Social Security Administration
          Office of the Commissioner
          6301 Security Boulevard
          Baltimore, Maryland
          Postal Code 21235/TDC


              NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT
              AND REVOCATION OF POWER ASSEVERATION


California State/Republic   )
                            )        Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
Marin County                )


                            PREAMBLE

     I, John  Q. Doe,  being natural born in Massachusetts a male
human being,  now living in Marin County, California Republic, as
a Citizen in the California Republic, do hereby make this Special
Appearance, by  Affidavit, in  Propria  Persona,  proceeding  Sui
Juris, At  Law, in  Common Law, with Assistance, Special, neither
conferring nor  consenting to any foreign jurisdiction, except to
the judicial  power of  California and/or  America, and as such I
willfully enforce  all Constitutional limitations respectively on
all government  agencies when  dealing with them.  Wherefore, the
undersigned Affiant  named herein  and  above,  upon  affirmation
declares and evidences the following:

     I, the undersigned, a natural born free Sovereign Citizen in
the California  Republic, and  thereby in  the united  States  of
America, hereby affirm, declare and give notice:

     1.   That I  am competent  to testify to the matters herein;
and further

     2.   That I  have personal knowledge of my status and of the
facts and evidence stated herein;  and further

     3.   That all  the facts  stated herein  are not hearsay but
true and  correct, and  admissible as  evidence, if not rebutted;
and further

     4.   That I, John Q. Doe, am of lawful age and competent;  I
am a  natural born  free Sovereign  Citizen  now  living  in  the
California Republic, and thereby in the united States of America,
in  fact,   by  right  of  heritage,  a  Citizen  inhabiting  the
California Republic,  protected by  the  Northwest  Ordinance  of
1787, the  Organic Act  of 1849,  the  original  Constitution  of
California (1849),  the Articles  of  Confederation  (1777),  the
Constitution for  the united  States of  America (1787) including
its Preamble,  and  the  Bill  of  Rights  (1791)  including  its
Preamble;   and as  such I retain all my fundamental, unalienable
rights  granted   by  God   in  positive  law,  embodied  in  the
Declaration of  Independence of  1776  and  binding  rights  upon
myself and my parentage, this day and for all time;  and further

     5.   That this  document has  been prepared,  witnessed  and
filed because  the State of Massachusetts holds the position that
there are no statutory provisions to rescind a Birth Certificate,
nor any  trust or  contractual obligations derived therefrom, and
because there  is no other remedy available to me At Law by which
I can  declare and  enforce  my  right  to  be  free  from  State
enfranchisement and the benefits therefrom;  and further

     6.   That, on  my birthday,  June 21,  1948, I  was born  in
Worcester, Massachusetts  to my parents, James F. Doe and Jane M.
(Smith) Doe, who were both under the misconception that they were
required to  secure a Certificate of Birth on my behalf, and they
did obtain the same;  and further

     7.   That my parents were not aware that, at the Common Law,
births were  to be  recorded in  the family  Bible, and that only
deaths were made a matter of public record;  and further

     8.   That my  parents were  not aware  that any  certificate
required by  statute to  be made  by officers  may, as a rule, be
introduced into evidence (see Marlowe vs School District, 116 Pac
797) and,  therefore, they were acquiescing to State requirements
which  violate  my  rights  to  privacy  and  the  4th  Amendment
protections under  the Constitution  for  the  united  States  of
America, because the Birth Certificate is the record of the State
of Massachusetts,  not of  the individual,  and the  State may be
compelled to  introduce said  record without  my permission;  and
further

     9.   That  such   statutory  practices   by  the   State  of
Massachusetts are  deceitful misrepresentations  by the State and
society, on  the recording of births, and my parents were unaware
that a  Birth Certificate  was not necessary, nor were they aware
that they  were possibly  waiving some of my rights, which rights
are unalienable  rights guaranteed  to me by the Constitution for
the united States of America;  and further

     10.  That the  doctor who  delivered me  acted as a licensed
agent of the State of Massachusetts without the consent of either
my own parents or myself, and offered me into a State trust to be
regulated as  other State and corporate interests and property as
a result  of that offer and acceptance, which comprises a fiction
of  law  under  statutory  law  (called  contracts  of  adhesion,
contracts  implied   by  law,   constructive   contracts,   quasi
contracts, also referred to as implied consent legislation);  and
further

     11.  That, from  my own  spiritual beliefs  and training,  I
have come, and I have determined that the right to be born comes,
from God Almighty (who knew me before I existed) -- not the State
of Massachusetts and not the State of California -- and therefore
original jurisdiction  upon my  behavior requiring  any  specific
performance  comes   from  my   personal  relationship  with  God
Almighty, unless  said performance  causes demonstrable damage or
injury to another natural human being;  and further

     12.  That, after studying the Birth Certificate, I have come
to the  conclusions that  the Birth  Certificate creates  a legal
estate in  myself, and acts as the nexus to bring actions against
this individual  as if he were a corporate entity, that the State
of Massachusetts,  in cooperation with the federal government and
its agents  and assigns,  is maintaining the Birth Certificate so
as to  assume jurisdiction over many aspects of my life in direct
contravention  of  my  unalienable  rights  and  Constitutionally
secured rights  to be  a "Freeman"  and to  operate at the Common
Law;  and further

     13.  That such  statutory provisions  also cause  a loss  or
diminution (depending  upon other statutory provisions) of rights
guaranteed  by  the  1st,  2nd,  4th,  5th,  6th,  7th,  and  9th
amendments in  the Constitution for the united States of America;
and further

     14.  That, as  a result  of my earnest and diligent studies,
my prior  ignorance has  come to  an end,  and I have regained my
capacity to  be an  American  Freeman;    therefore,  it  is  now
necessary that  I declare  any nexus  assumed as  a result of the
Birth Certificate,   by  the State  of Massachusetts or by any of
its agents and assigns, including the federal government, and any
jurisdictional or  other rights that may be waived as a result of
said trust/contract  with all forms of government, to be null and
void from  its inception,  due to  the deceptive  duress,  fraud,
injury, and  incapacity perpetrated upon my parents and myself by
the State of Massachusetts, the third party to the contract;  and
further

     15.  That I  was neither born nor naturalized in the "United
States"  as  defined  in  Title  26,  United  States  Codes  and,
therefore, I  am not subject to its foreign jurisdiction.  See 26
CFR 1.1-1(b)-(c);  and further

     16.  That,  with   this  revocation   of  contract  and  the
revocation of  power, I  do hereby claim all of my rights, all of
my  unalienable   rights  and   all  rights   guaranteed  by  the
Constitution for  the united  States of  America, At  Law, and do
hereby declare,  to one and all, that I am a free and independent
Citizen now  inhabiting the  California Republic,  who is  not  a
creation of,  nor subject  to any State's civil law of admiralty,
maritime, or  equity  jurisdictions  and,  as  such,  I  am  only
attached to  the judicial  Power of  California and/or the united
States of America;  and further

     17.  That I  affirm, under  penalty of  perjury,  under  the
Common Law  of America,  without the  "United States" (see 1:8:17
and 4:3:2  in the  U.S.  Constitution),  that  the  Preamble  and
Sections 1 thru 16 of this Affidavit, are true and correct and so
done in good faith to the best of my knowledge;  and further

     18.  That my use of the phrase "WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF
ALL MY  RIGHTS AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-207 (UCCA 1207)" above
my signature on this document indicates: that I explicitly reject
any and  all benefits  of the  Uniform Commercial  Code, absent a
valid commercial  agreement which is in force and to which I am a
party, and  cite its  provisions herein only to serve notice upon
ALL agencies  of  government,  whether  international,  national,
state, or  local, that they, and not I, are subject to, and bound
by, all  of its provisions, whether cited herein or not;  that my
explicit  reservation  of  rights  has  served  notice  upon  ALL
agencies of  government of  the "Remedy" they must provide for me
under Article  1, Section  207 of  the Uniform  Commercial  Code,
whereby I  have explicitly reserved my Common Law right not to be
compelled to  perform under any contract or commercial agreement,
that  I   have  not  entered  into  knowingly,  voluntarily,  and
intentionally;  that my explicit reservation of rights has served
notice upon  ALL agencies of government that they are ALL limited
to proceeding  against me only in harmony with the Common Law and
that I  do not, and will not accept the liability associated with
the "compelled"  benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreements;
and that  my valid  reservation of  rights has  preserved all  my
rights and  prevented the  loss of any such rights by application
of the concepts of waiver or estoppel.  And


Further This Affiant Saith Not.


Subscribed and  affirmed to,  Nunc Pro  Tunc, on  the date  of my
majority, which date was June 21, 1969.



Subscribed, sealed and affirmed to this __________________ day of

__________________________, 1993 Anno Domini.



     I now  affix my  signature to all of the affirmations herein
WITH EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL MY RIGHTS, AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE
UCC 1-207 (UCCA 1207):






_________________________________________________________________
John Q. Doe, Citizen/Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria
Persona, proceeding  Sui Juris,  with Assistance,  Special,  with
explicit reservation  of all  my unalienable  rights and  without
prejudice to any of my unalienable rights.


                           John Q. Doe
                  c/o USPS Post Office Box [##]
                 San Rafael, California Republic
                  zip code exempt (DMM 122.32)


             California All-Purpose Acknowledgement

CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC       )
                                )
COUNTY OF MARIN                 )

     On the  ________ day  of  ____________,  199_  Anno  Domini,
before me personally appeared John Q. Doe, personally known to me
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the
Person whose  name is  subscribed to  the within  instrument  and
acknowledged to  me that  he executed  the same in His authorized
capacity, and  that by  His  signature  on  this  instrument  the
Person, or  the entity  upon behalf  of which  the Person  acted,
executed the  instrument.    Purpose  of  Notary  Public  is  for
identification only,  and  not  for  entrance  into  any  foreign
jurisdiction.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.



_____________________________________
Notary Public




                                   c/o USPS P.O. Box 6189
                                   San Rafael, California
                                   zip code exempt (DMM 122.32)

                                   April 3, 1992

Registrar
Department of Public Health
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
150 Tremont Street
Boston, Massachusetts


RE:  NUNC PRO TUNC REVOCATION OF CONTRACT AND REVOCATION OF POWER
     ASSEVERATION


Dear Registrar:

     Your letter  to me dated March 23, 1992 acknowledges receipt
of my  signed  and  notarized  revocation  affidavit,  referenced
above.   I am  writing this  letter in  order to  address the two
statements  contained   in  your   letter,  and   to  rebut   any
presumptions which  could or might be conclusively established by
allowing your two statements to remain unchallenged.


Statement #1:  "This letter  is to  inform you  that there  is no
               provision under  Massachusetts law  to  rescind  a
               properly filed birth certificate."

     Although this  statement may,  in fact,  be technically  and
generally true,  it is  irrelevant to the specific issue at hand,
for several  reasons.   First of all, it implies that my original
birth certificate,  on file in your office, was "properly filed".
You have made this statement contrary to numerous facts which are
contained in  my revocation  affidavit.   You have  now had ample
opportunity to rebut any and all of those facts, and you have not
done so.   Accordingly,  your failure to rebut any of those facts
now renders them all conclusive, permanently for the record.  You
are now  forever barred and estopped from challenging those facts
as stated.   Therefore,  my original  birth certificate  was  not
"properly filed" as you incorrectly attempt to imply.

     As a  member of  the  Sovereignty  by  right  of  birth  and
hereditary succession,  I belong to that group of people by whose
authority the  Massachusetts State Constitution was created.  The
Massachusetts State  Legislature was  created, in  turn, by  that
Constitution.   The "Massachusetts law" to which you refer is, in
turn, a  creation of that Legislature.  Regardless of your status
prior to  becoming a  State employee,  your current  status as  a
State employee  necessarily subjects  you to  the letter  of that
"law".  I am not subject either to the letter or to the spirit of
that law, however.

     Even  though  you  are  evidently  restricted  by  law  from
unilaterally rescinding  a birth certificate, I am not subject to
any such  a restriction.   As someone who has explicitly reserved
all  my  unalienable  rights  without  prejudice  to  any  of  my
unalienable  rights,   I  specifically   retain     my  right  to
unilaterally revoke and cancel my original birth certificate, for
the several reasons stated in my affidavit, and to render it null
and void  from its  inception.   The affidavit which I have filed
with your  office is  prima facie  evidence that I have, in fact,
exercised that right, the exercise of which is entirely within my
Sovereign power and authority to do.

     Moreover, you  are evidently  unaware of  my  prior  written
correspondence  with   Governor  William  F.  Weld,  in  which  I
documented the  fraud to  which the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
is an  "accommodation party" as defined in the Uniform Commercial
Code.     If  you   have  any  need  to  obtain  copies  of  this
correspondence between me and Governor Weld, I recommend that you
first   contact    the   Governor's    staff   for    assistance.
Alternatively, Governor  Weld's office has personally informed me
that my  notice to  him, with attachments, has now been forwarded
to the  offices of  Senator  Edward  M.  Kennedy,  United  States
Senate, Washington, District of Columbia.  Governor Weld's office
did not  challenge or rebut any statement of fact contained in my
correspondence to  him, except  to suggest  incorrectly that  the
issues which  I raised were not within his jurisdiction.  Senator
Kennedy's office  has not  responded to  me in any way concerning
the materials which he received from Governor Weld.

          The Commonwealth  of  Massachusetts  is  bound  by  the
provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (see MCLA c 106 Section
1-207).    The  conclusive  facts  as  stated  in  my  revocation
affidavit now  constitute material  proof that  my original birth
certificate was  an unconscionable  contract ab  initio  because,
among other  reasons, it  was lacking  in meaningful choice on my
part.   You have  already been  notified, and I hereby notify you
again, that I have explicitly reserved all my unalienable rights,
without prejudice  to any  of my  unalienable rights.  This means
that I  explicitly reject  any and  all benefits  of the  Uniform
Commercial Code,  absent a valid commercial agreement which is in
force and  to which  I am a party, and cite its provisions herein
only to  serve notice  upon all  agencies of  government, whether
international, national,  state, or  local, that they, and not I,
are subject  to, and  bound by,  all of  its provisions,  whether
cited herein or not.

     Furthermore, my  explicit reservation  of rights  has served
notice upon all agencies of government, including but not limited
to the  Commonwealth of  Massachusetts, of the "Remedy" which you
must provide  for me  under Article 1, Section 207 of the Uniform
Commercial Code, whereby I have explicitly reserved my Common Law
right not  to be  compelled to  perform  under  any  contract  or
commercial agreement,  that I  have not  entered into  knowingly,
voluntarily, and intentionally.

     My explicit reservation of rights has served notice upon all
agencies  of   government,  including  but  not  limited  to  the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and all of its assignees, that they
are all limited to proceeding against me only in harmony with the
Common Law  and that  I do not, and will not accept the liability
associated  with   the  "compelled"  benefit  of  any  unrevealed
commercial agreements  (see UCC  3-305(2)(c)).  You are under the
obligation of good faith imposed at several places in the Uniform
Commercial Code  (see, e.g.,  1-203).   My valid  reservation  of
rights has  preserved all my rights and prevented the loss of any
such rights by application of the concepts of waiver or estoppel.


Statement #2:  "For this  reason, your  birth certificate on file
               in  the   Commonwealth  of  Massachusetts  remains
               valid."

     This statement  is clearly  incorrect because  it is  a  non
sequitor, in  light of  my responses  in this letter to Statement
#1, and  particularly in  light of the conclusive facts as stated
in my  revocation affidavit.   As  an unconscionable contract the
primary purpose  of which  was to offer me into a State trust, to
be regulated  as other  State and  corporate interests without my
full consent of majority, this birth certificate is null and void
from its  inception, as are any rights of interest which may, now
or in  the future,  be claimed  as a  result of any conveyance or
reconveyance thereof to undisclosed third parties.

     Your attempt  to assert its validity in the face of contrary
evidence is noted and can be used as prima facie evidence of your
willingness to  violate and  otherwise contravene  my unalienable
rights and  my Constitutionally  secured rights  as  a  Sovereign
Freeman.   These rights  include, but  are not  limited to, those
which are enumerated in my revocation affidavit.

     You are  hereby  warned  that  you  can  and  will  be  held
personally  liable   for  any  further  attempts  to  violate  my
fundamental, unalienable  rights  by  acts  on  your  part  which
attempt to compel my specific performance to any third-party debt
or obligation created through the unlawful conveyance, conversion
or other  instrumentality of an invalid birth certificate.  As an
employee of  the Commonwealth  of Massachusetts,  you are under a
legal obligation to recognize that "Constructive fraud as well as
actual fraud  may be the basis of cancellation of an instrument,"
El Paso  Natural Gas  Co. vs  Kysar Insurance Co., 605 Pacific 2d
240 (1979).   Your  ignorance of  the law  is no  excuse in  this
matter.  If you are unsure about your own legal situation in this
matter, may  I recommend  that you  contact  the  State  Attorney
General's office for advice and assistance.

     For your  information, I  am  not  subject  to  any  foreign
jurisdiction by  reason of  any contract  or commercial agreement
resulting in adhesion thereto across America, nor are millions of
other Sovereign  Citizens, unless  they have  provided waivers of
rights guaranteed  by the  Constitution  by  means  of  knowingly
intelligent acts, such as contracts or commercial agreements with
such government(s)  "with sufficient  awareness of  the  relevant
circumstances and  likely consequences",  as ruled  by  the  U.S.
Supreme Court in Brady vs U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970).  I have
given no such waivers, nor is it possible that I could have given
such waivers  by reason  of a birth certificate executed by other
parties long  before I  was even able to speak or write, and long
before my  age of  majority.  Therefore, the birth certificate at
issue is  necessarily null  and void,  ab initio, notwithstanding
any and all unsubstantiated statements by you to the contrary.

     If I  do not  hear from you within ten (10) calendar days of
the above  date, I will be entitled to the conclusive presumption
that this  matter is  settled.   Thank you  very  much  for  your
consideration.


Sincerely yours,





John Q. Doe, Sui Juris
with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights
and without prejudice to any of my unalienable rights


copies:   Senator Edward M. Kennedy
          United States Senate

          Social Security Administration
          Baltimore, Maryland
[ Next Appendix | Table of Contents ]