Appendix S
Affidavit of Foreign Status
Reader's Notes:
Certified Mail Number:
__________________________________________
Date: __________________________________________
John Q. Doe
c/o general delivery
Marin county
San Rafael [ZIP code exempt]
CALIFORNIA, USA
FOREIGN STATUS AFFIDAVIT
CALIFORNIA STATE/REPUBLIC )
) Subscribed, Sworn and Sealed
MARIN COUNTY )
PREAMBLE
The following
Affidavit of Foreign Status is a public notice to all interested parties
concerning the Affiant's "birthrights" and his "status" as
an "AMERICAN INHABITANT", as that status would apply with respect to the American States (the
50 independent States of the Union) and also with respect to the "United States", as follows:
1. The Affiant, John Q. Doe, was natural born a free Sovereign in Massachusetts,
which is one of the sovereign States of the Union of several States joined
together to comprise the confederation known as the United States of
America. He is, therefore, a
"nonresident alien" individual with
respect to the "United States", which entity obtains its
exclusive legislative authority and jurisdiction from Article 1, Section 8,
Clause 17 and Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 of the Constitution for the United
States of America. The Affiant's
parents were Sovereigns also, born in sovereign States of the Union. As the progeny of Sovereign people, the
Affiant was born "... one of the sovereign people .... A constituent member of the sovereignty
synonymous with the people." Scott
v. Sanford, 19 How. 404. The
Affiant is alien to so-called 14th Amendment "United States"
citizenship, and also nonresident to so-called 14th Amendment State residency,
and therefore he is a "nonresident alien" with respect to both. As a Sovereign whose Citizenship originated
in Massachusetts by birth, and who has remained intact in California since the
year 1952, the Affiant is also a foreigner (alien) with respect to the other 49 States of the Union and with respect to the "United
States". As a consequence of his
birth, the Affiant is an "American Inhabitant". And further,
2. The Affiant, to the best of his informed
knowledge, has not entered into any valid agreements of "voluntary servitude". And further,
3. The Affiant
is a "NONRESIDENT ALIEN" with
respect to the "United States", as that term is defined and used
within the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26, United State Code) and/or Title 27
and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder as follows:
The Internal
Revenue Code (Title 26, United State Code) and associated federal regulations,
clearly and thoroughly make provision for Americans born and living within one
of the 50 Sovereign States of America, to wit:
Section 1.871-4 Proof of residence of aliens.
(a) Rules
of evidence. The following rules of
evidence shall govern in determining whether or not an alien within the United
States has acquired residence therein for purposes of the income tax.
(b) Nonresidence
presumed. An alien by reason of his
alienage, is presumed to be a nonresident alien.
[26 CFR 1.871-4]
And further,
4. The Affiant was not born or naturalized in
the "United States", consequently he is not a "citizen of the
"United States" nor a "United States citizen", as those
terms are defined and used within the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or
Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; and, therefore, he is not subject to the
limited, exclusive territorial or political jurisdiction and authority of the
"United States" as defined.
The
"United States" is definitive and specific when it defines one of its
citizens, as follows:
Section 1.1-1
(c) Who is a
citizen.
Every person born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its
jurisdiction is a citizen.
[26 CFR 1.1-1(c)]
And further,
5. The Affiant is not a "citizen of the
United States" nor a "United States citizen living abroad", as those
phrases are defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or
Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. And further,
6. The Affiant is not a "resident alien
residing within the geographical boundaries of the United States", as that
phrase is defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or
Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. And further,
7. The Affiant is not a "United States
person", a "domestic corporation", "estate",
"trust", "fiduciary" or "partnership" as those
terms are defined and used within the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or
Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. And further,
8. The Affiant
is not an "officer", "employee" or "elected
official" of the "United States", of a "State" or of
any political subdivision thereof, nor of the District of Columbia, nor of any
agency or instrumentality of one or more of the foregoing, nor an
"officer" of a "United States corporation", as those terms
are defined and used within the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title
27 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. And further,
9. The Affiant receives no "income"
or "wages with respect to employment" from any sources within the
territorial jurisdiction of the "United States" and does not have an
"office or other fixed place of business" within the "United
States" from which the Affiant derives any "income" or
"wages" as such, as those terms and phrases are used and defined within
the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder. And
further,
10. The Affiant has never engaged in the conduct
of a "trade or business" within the "United States", nor
does the Affiant receive any income or other remuneration effectively connected
with the conduct of a "trade or business" within the "United
States", as those terms are defined and used within the Internal Revenue
Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder. And further,
11. The Affiant receives no "income",
"wages", "self-employment income" or "other
remuneration" from sources within the "United States", as those
terms are defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or
Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. All remuneration paid to the Affiant is for
services rendered outside (without)
the exclusive territorial, political and legislative jurisdiction and authority
of the "United States". And
further,
12. The Affiant has never had an
"office" or "place of business" within the "United
States", as those terms are defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code
(26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. And further,
13. The Affiant has never been a "United
States employer", nor "employer", nor "employee" which
also includes but is not limited to an "employee" and/or
"employer" for a "United States" "household",
and/or "agricultural" activity, as those terms are defined and used
in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder. And
further,
14. The Affiant has never been involved in any
"commerce" within the territorial jurisdiction of the "United
States" which also includes but is not limited to "alcohol",
"tobacco" and "firearms" and Title 26, Subtitle D and E
excises and privileged occupations, as those terms are defined and used in the
Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. And further,
15. The Affiant has never been a "United
States" "withholding agent" as those terms are defined and used
in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. And further,
16. The Affiant
had no liability for any type, kind or class of Federal Income Tax in past
years, and was and is entitled to a full and complete refund of any amounts
withheld, because any liability asserted and amounts withheld were premised
upon a mutual mistake of fact regarding the Affiant's status. The Affiant has never knowingly,
intentionally, and voluntarily changed his Citizenship status nor has he ever
knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily elected to be treated as a
"resident" of the "United States". And further,
17. The Affiant, to the best of his current
knowledge, owes no "tax" of any type, class or kind to the
"United States" as those terms are defined and used in the Internal
Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. And further,
18. The Affiant anticipates no liability for any
type, class or kind of federal income tax in the current year, because the
Affiant does not intend to reside in the "United States", he does not
intend to be treated as either a "resident" or a "citizen"
of the "United States", he is not and does not intend to be involved
in the conduct of any "trade or business" within the "United
States" or receive any "income" or "wages" from
sources within the "United States", as those terms are defined and
used in the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and/or Title 27 and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder. And
further,
19. The
Affiant, by means of knowingly intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness
of the relevant circumstances and consequences (Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S.
742, 748 (1970)) never agreed or consented to be given a federal Social
Security Number (SSN), same said as to a federal Employee Identification Number
(EIN) and, therefore, waives and releases from liability the "United
States" and any State of the Union of 50 States, for any present or future
benefits that the Affiant may be entitled to claim under the Old-Age Survivors
and the Disability Insurance Act, and/or the Federal Unemployment Tax Act. Additionally, your Affiant makes no claim to
any present or future benefits under any of the foregoing; and
20. Therefore, I, John Q. Doe, am a natural born free inhabitant and, as such, a Sovereign
Citizen/Principal inhabiting the California Republic. Therefore, I am not "within
the United States" but lawfully I am "without the United States" (per Title 28, U.S.C., Section 1746,
Subsection 1), and therefore I have no standing capacity to sign any tax
form which displays the perjury clause pursuant to Title 28, Section 1746, Subsection 2. And further,
PLEASE NOTE WELL: At no time will the Affiant construe any of the
foregoing terms defined within the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26, United State
Code, or within any of the other United State Code, in a metaphorical
sense. When terms are not words of art
and are explicitly defined within the Code and/or within a Statute, the Affiant
relies at all times upon the clear language of the terms as they are defined
therein, NO MORE and NO LESS:
... When aid to construction of the meaning of words, as
used in the statute, is available, there certainly can be no "rule of
law" which forbids its use, however clear the words may appear on
"superficial examination" ....
[United States v. American Trucking Association]
[310 U.S. 534, 543,544 (1939)]
This unsworn
certification is being executed WITHOUT
the "United States", pursuant to Section 1746(1) of Title 28, United State
Code, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:
I affirm
under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, that
I executed the foregoing for the purposes and considerations herein expressed,
in the capacity stated, and that the statements contained herein are true and
correct, to the best of my knowledge.
Executed Anno
Domini, on this the ___________ day in the month of
___________________________, 199___.
Subscribed, sealed and affirmed to this ________________
day of
___________________________, 199___.
_________________________________________________________________
John Q. Doe, Citizen/Principal, by special Appearance, in Propria Persona, proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special,
with explicit reservation of all of my unalienable rights and without prejudice
to any of my unalienable rights.
John Q. Doe
c/o general delivery
San Rafael [ZIP code exempt]
CALIFORNIA, USA
CALIFORNIA
STATE/REPUBLIC )
)
COUNTY OF
MARIN )
On the ______
day of ____________, 199___ Anno Domini,
before me personally appeared John Q.
Doe, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence) to be the Person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in His authorized capacity,
and that by His signature on this instrument the Person, or the entity upon
behalf of which the Person acted, executed the instrument. Purpose of Notary Public is for
identification only, and not for entrance into any foreign jurisdiction.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
_____________________________________
Notary Public
#
# #
Reader’s Notes: