PUBLIC WARNING OF FELONY RACKETEERING

BY IMPOSTORS IN THE U.S. COURTHOUSE,

Seattle, Washington State, USA

 

July 5, 2013 A.D.

Dear Neighbor,

 

In August of 2006, my office was retained by a physician in Spokane to investigate the existence of proper credentials required of all Federal Judges appointed to the District of Washington State.

 

Most recently, my office has expanded that investigation to include all Federal Magistrates appointed to the District of Washington State.

 

You can access the summary results of that investigation here on the Internet:

 

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm#DWA

 

All Federal Judges must have a valid SENATE CONFIRMATION, PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION, APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS and OATH OF OFFICE.

 

Magistrates are not confirmed by the Senate or commissioned by the President, but they are required to have valid APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS and a separate OATH OF OFFICE.

 

A plain English transcript discussing these requirements is here on the Internet:

 

http://supremelaw.org/authors/stark/transcript.re.credentials.htm

 

The legal and criminal implications of missing and/or defective credentials are very well documented by standing decisions of American courts and U.S. Attorney General, some of which are quoted here:

 

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions.htm

 

You will please note, in particular, that all their acts are void and they cannot even get paid if their required credentials are not in proper order:  these are the serious consequences of ignoring the Laws which make these credentials an absolute necessity.

 

Also, it is painfully true that Americans who have been sentenced to State and Federal prisons by any of these confirmed impostors have been wrongly incarcerated, and justice demands that they be released, and also compensated, for having been deprived of Due Process of Law.

 

There is no fee or other obligation required to access the Internet locations cited above:  the Supreme Law Library is made available as a public service to the American People, without advertising.

 

We ask only that you make the time to become familiar with the documents cited above, and to forward copies of this PUBLIC WARNING to at least ten (10) of your family members, friends, neighbors and other contacts, particularly those who also live and work in Washington State:  http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/public.warning.htm

 

If you feel the need to conduct a more thorough study of this ongoing problem, we do maintain our private SupremeLaw discussion list and message archive which you can join for a nominal fee of $10 per month, prepaid through the end of the current calendar year:

 

http://supremelaw.org/egroups/subscribe.htm

 

 

Thank you very much for your consideration.

 

Thank you also for helping restore justice to a Federal Court “system” which has deteriorated in a carefully concealed manner, and which has only recently been properly documented for the attention of public officials who are responsible for prosecuting white collar crime.

 

 

Sincerely yours,

 

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

 

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

 

Supreme Law Library:  http://www.supremelaw.org

 

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

 

 

Further Reading:

 

Letter to Oregon Department of Justice (January 14, 2005)

http://supremelaw.org/copyrite/uoregon.edu/memo.ag01.htm

 

Required Credentials for United States Judges:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/index.htm

 

Oaths of Office for Federal Judges,

Statutes Defining Legal Custodian:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/federal.judges.htm

 

Letter from Staff of William M. McCool (September 13, 2010),

REFUSED FOR CAUSE: see Rotella v. Wood:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/sebelius/mccool/letter.2010-09-13/page01.JPG

 

The Case Against William M. McCool et al.,

First Subset of Documentary Evidence:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/spd/mccool/Cover.Page.htm

 

PUBLIC NOTICE:  Major Admissions by Office of Management and Budget

and U.S. Office of Personnel Management:

http://supremelaw.org/letters/Public.Notice.htm

 

NOTICE OF MISSING AND/OR DEFECTIVE CREDENTIALS, as filed in

Hedges et al. v. Obama et al. (USDC/SDNY #1:12-CV-00331-KBF):

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/United.States.Notice.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/opm/letter.2012-08-06/

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/omb/letter.2012-08-23/

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/omb/letter.2013-01-25/

 

5 U.S.C. 3331 (Appointment Affidavits):

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/3331.html

 

5 U.S.C. 2906 (Oath; custody):

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2906.html

 

5 U.S.C. 2903 (Oath; authority to administer):

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/5/2903.html

 

28 U.S.C. 453 (Oaths of justices and judges):

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/453.html

 

28 U.S.C. 951 (Oath of office of clerks and deputies):

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/951.html

 

44 U.S.C. 3512 (Public protection):

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/44/3512.html

 

Visual Aides for Jury re: Paperwork Reduction Act:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/vroman/visaides.htm