More Vagueness:
Correctly Defining "resident of
the United States"
in the Internal Revenue Code
by
Paul
Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private
Attorney General
September
17, 2017 A.D.
Join with us as we demonstrate more
vagueness whenever
an average American attempts to confirm the correct legal
meaning
of "resident of the United States" in the
Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”)
and its implementing Regulations.
The term "resident" does
not occur anywhere in Section
1
of the Internal Revenue Code.
This is important, because the term
"resident of the United States" does occur
at IRC section 7701(a)(30), in the definition of "United
States person":
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7701 (a)(30)
(a)(30) United States person
The
term “United States person” means —
(A) a citizen or resident of the United States,
So, what is a "resident of
the United States" as that phrase
occurs in the latter definition of "United States
person"?
Does it include anyone who resides
in the United States,
as common English usage would define that phrase?
Or, does it have a special legal
definition which must be
strictly enforced?
For answers, we turn first to the
Regulation implementing IRC Section 1,
at 26 CFR 1.1-1:
http://supremelaw.org/cfr/26/26cfr1.1-1.htm
In subsection (a) of that
implementing Regulation we find:
(a) General rule.
(1) Section 1 of the Code imposes an income tax
on the income
of every individual who is a citizen
or resident of the United States
However, unlike subsection (c) of
that Regulation,
which does define "Who
is a citizen", there is no
parallel subsection which defines "Who is a resident."
This necessarily complicates our
search for a clear definition.
A major clue can be found in
subsection (b) of that Regulation,
where we find:
(b) Citizens or residents
of the United States liable to tax.
In general, all
citizens of the United States, wherever resident, and
all resident alien individuals are liable to the
income taxes
imposed by the Code
whether the income is received from sources
within or without
the United States.
The context here is very helpful: although headings have no legal force,
it is clear from the latter Regulation that "residents of
the United States"
are synonymous with and equivalent to "resident alien
individuals".
Thus, because "individuals" are human beings in
this context,
we are correct to infer that "resident alien
individuals" are
human beings who are "resident aliens".
So, what is a "resident alien"?
Finally, the definition of "resident alien" can be
found at IRC 7701(b):
(A) Resident alien
An
alien individual shall be treated as a resident of
the United States
with respect to any calendar year if (and only if) such
individual
meets the requirements of clause (i),
(ii), or (iii):
(i) Lawfully admitted
for permanent residence
Such
individual is a lawful permanent resident of the
United States
at any time during such calendar year.
(ii) Substantial presence test
Such
individual meets the substantial presence test of paragraph (3).
(iii)
First year election
Such
individual makes the election provided in paragraph (4).
We will not delve any further into the legal meanings
of "substantial presence test" or "first year
election".
For now, remember that an individual may also be a
"resident alien"
by meeting the substantial presence test or
by making the first year election.
It is the correct legal meaning of the term
"lawful permanent resident of the United States"
that concerns us here, chiefly because
such an individual is a "resident of the United
States".
It is very instructive here to compare the legal definition
of "individual" that is found in the Federal Privacy
Act:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/552a (a)(2)
(2) the term “individual” means a citizen of the United
States or
an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;
All the above are consistent with the conclusions
documented 25 years ago in the book "The Federal Zone",
particularly Chapter 3: "The Matrix":
http://supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chapter3.htm
The following excerpt from that Chapter 3 succinctly
summarizes
the key points discussed above:
Being lawfully admitted for permanent residence
is also called
"the green card test".
IRS
Publication 519 explains the green card test as follows:
You are a
resident for tax purposes if you are
a lawful permanent resident of the United States**
at any time during the
calendar year. ...
This is
known as the "green card" test.
And, "green cards" are issued to RESIDENT ALIENS!
Find yourself such a "green card" to confirm this
yourself.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the path to this conclusion
is not as straightforward as it could have been
if the Internal Revenue Code were not deliberately vague,
the above points succinctly prove that the term
"resident of
the United States" is legally equivalent to and
synonymous with "alien lawfully
admitted for permanent residence"
also known as a RESIDENT ALIEN i.e. green card holder.
And, without holding a green card,
an alien is also a "resident alien"
by satisfying the substantial presence test or
by making the first year election.
In all three instances, a
"resident of the United States"
is legally defined to mean a "resident
alien individual".
Further reading:
The correct legal meaning of "U.S. Individual" is
also
discussed in some detail here:
http://supremelaw.org/cc/hicks/memo04.htm#usindividual
That correct legal meaning is immensely important chiefly
because
“U.S. Individual” occurs in the title of IRS Form 1040!
And, Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, defines
"resident alien" as follows:
One, not yet
a citizen of this country,
who has come
into the country from another with the
intent to abandon
his former citizenship and to reside here.
Sincerely
yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private
Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of
the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal
Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm
(Policy + Guidelines)
All Rights Reserved
(cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)