__[Attorney name]__
__[Address]__
__[Telephone number]__

Attorney for __[e.g., Defendant]__, __[name]__


            _ _ _ _ _ _ Court, County of _ _ _ _ _ _
                   __[_ _ _ _ _ _ District]__

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _  )   No. _ _ _ _ _ _
                               Plaintiff(s))
vs.                                                        )ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
                                                                          )SUMMARY JUDGMENT
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _  )
                               Defendant(s))Hearing: __[date; time]__
_________________________  )   Department: _ _ _ _ _ _
                                                                                                         Trial Date: __[if set]__

     The motion of __[e.g., defendant]__, __[name]__, for summary
judgment was regularly heard at the above date and time.
Appearing as attorneys were: __[List names of attorneys and
parties represented by each]__.
     After considering (1) the papers filed in support of and in
opposition to the motion and (2) the oral argument of counsel,
the Court denies __[e.g., defendant's]__ motion.
     In accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(g),
the Court finds that a triable controversy exists as to the
following material facts: __[List]__.
     The evidence indicating that a triable issue exists follows:
__[Describe evidence]__.

Date: _ _ _ _ _ _                        ___________________________
                                                                                                                                                                                    Judge
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Legal Forms : Set Two