--- In
FORUM_FOR_DISCLOSURES@yahoogroups.com, "Alan Dicey" <adicey@...> wrote:
Dear Paul,
This is
incredible!!!
I have
never heard the Social Security Nightmare so clearly explained,
and in
terms anyone can understand!!
Thank you
very much.
I have
learned a lot with your message.
Like I do with many of your emails.
Keep up the
great work, we all appreciate it!!!
With Best
Regards,
Alan Dicey
Miami,
Florida
-----Original
Message-----
From:
FORUM_FOR_DISCLOSURES@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
Tuesday, May 30, 2006 1:59 PM
To: jack topel
Subject:
FORUM FOR DISCLOSURES
Re: Paul, could you clarify this Re: "using illegal aliens
to postpone Social Security's inevitable
failure”?
A Ponzi Scheme is a mathematically
impossible "pyramid",
the base
of which must continue to expand in order to sustain
the
scheme. If the base of this pyramid does
NOT expand,
then the
scheme fails (i.e. participants no
longer receive
benefits,
which flow from bottom up in this pyramid structure).
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/ss/baby.boom.benefits.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/ss/ (Table of Contents for SS)
Our
Parametric Analysis concluded the following JUST FOR BABY BOOMERS:
Summary:
Cumulative
cost of Baby Boom benefits (18 years):
$7.9
trillion (total)
Annual cost
of Baby Boom benefits (2020-2025):
$655
billion (per year)
Now, just
where is Congress going to get that much money,
NOT
COUNTING those who
are already receiving benefits
from the
Social Security scheme? For specific
data,
see The Wall Street Journal article
published in the
Summer of 2000
here:
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/ss/
There is no
"trust fund" because the "surplus" has been
spent and
replaced by government IOUs.
"Surplus" is
the
government's way of describing the difference between
SS taxes
collected and SS benefits paid IN ANY GIVEN YEAR:
it does
NOT describe a positive balance in any "trust fund"
because there
is no trust fund, as such.
As soon as
the difference between tax receipts and benefits paid
goes
negative, you'll know that SS has started to fail.
We predict
that this should occur beginning in 2008 (1946 + 62).
One typical
bureaucrat's solution is to continue expanding
the
pyramid's base, in this instance by inviting aliens to join
the
program. They need SSNs
for driver's licenses and
State-issued
IDs in California, so they effectively join
the
American majority -- by getting SSNs as soon as they
enter
this country.
Given the
current size of the Ponzi Scheme's
"base",
it will require
AT LEAST 5 to 10 TIMES the size of the Baby Boom
in order
to sustain Social Security through all 18 years
(5 to 10 paying in, for every 1 taking money out).
(Actually,
I tend to believe that a 30-to-1 ratio will be
required
to maintain SS solvency, but that ratio frightens
most
people into outright disbelief.)
About 4.2
Million Baby Boomers will retire each year
for each
of those 18 years, so just compute backwards
in order
to arrive at the amount of SS taxes that must
be
collected in order to pay each new Baby Boomer
$1,000 per month (i.e. 4.2
Million x $1,000 per month x 12).
And, just
scale that $1,000 downwards, if Congress is forced
to reduce
SS benefits out of economic necessity.
THIS AMOUNT
IS $50.4 BILLION ADDITIONAL SS TAX REVENUES
REQUIRED TO
BREAK EVEN, EACH YEAR, FOR 18 YEARS
BEGINNING IN 2008. SO, WHAT NUMBER OF
ADDITIONAL
SS TAX
"PAYERS" ARE REQUIRED TO COLLECT THAT
AMOUNT IN
ADDITIONAL SS TAX REVENUES DURING
EACH OF THOSE 18 YEARS?
Are the
numbers starting to sink in yet?
If not,
just compute the number of new SS tax "payers"
that will
be required to generate $50.4 Billion each year,
if each
"payer" contributes $100 per month into this scheme!!!
Answer: $50.4 Billion / $1,200 per year per payer
= 42 million new payers who must be
added to the pyramid
EVERY YEAR FOR 18 YEARS.
That means
that 84 Million must be added by the end of 2 years;
126 Million
must be added by the end of 3 years; and so on,
until the
oldest Baby Boomers are expected to die:
We assumed
that average life expectancy would be 75 years
(about 2 years sooner than the currently published life
expectancy
for Americans, regardless of gender).
I've been
predicting for 15 years that Social Security
will
fail, starting in 2008.
I honestly
don't think that enough aliens can be encouraged
to
migrate into the USA fast enough to save Social Security.
Nevertheless,
the government continues to lie and withhold
these
crucial statistics from the majority who are too naive
to doubt
the pronouncements that issue from D.C.
Meanwhile,
we are bombarded with a debate which does
one
thing: it effectively distracts almost
everyone
from the
inevitable consequences of squandering
all prior
SS tax receipts that SHOULD have been invested,
like any proper
trust fund, rather than being spent
and
replaced with worthless IOUs.
Sincerely
yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private
Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal
Witness: 18 U.S.C.
1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm
All Rights Reserved without
Prejudice
From: Paul
Andrew Mitchell <paulandrewmitchell2004@yahoo.com>
Subject:
using illegal aliens to postpone Social Security's inevitable failure
Date: Tue,
30 May 2006 03:25:57 -0000
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/ss/baby.boom.benefits.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/ss/ (Table of Contents for SS)
They're
doing this to expand the base of the Ponzi Scheme:
the base
of this pyramid scheme must expand for it to
continue working
as it has in the past.
In this
way, the inevitable failure of this scheme
can be
postponed just a few more years.
When we
shared copies of our Parametric Analysis above
with a
few lawmakers, the ongoing debate about SS
came to a
screeching halt.
Sincerely
yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private
Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal
Witness: 18 U.S.C.
1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm
All Rights Reserved without
Prejudice