Via First Class U.S. Mail

February 10, 2017 A.D.






Michelle Taryn Friedland, SBN #234124

c/o Office of Clerk of Court

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

P.O. Box 193939

San Francisco 94119-3939

California, USA


Subject:  Sections 6002, 6064, 6067-6068, 6126-6128

          California Business and Professions Code



Greetings Michelle Taryn Friedland:


We specifically deny that you were ever a member, in good standing, of The State Bar of California.  See Section 6002 supra.





Section 6067 of the California Business and Professions Code reads as follows:


Every person on his admission shall take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and faithfully to discharge the duties of any attorney at law to the best of his knowledge and ability.  A certificate of the oath shall be indorsed upon his license.


[bold emphasis added]





Formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to deliver a true and correct copy of said certificate of oath and license to the mailing location as shown below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, February 20, 2017 A.D. (approximately ten (10) days hence).


Failure to perform will give us probable cause to charge you with violating Sections 6126 and 6128 of the California Business and Professions Code (both misdemeanors).  See also 4 U.S.C. 101 (“judicial officer of a State”) in pari materia with the Article VI, Clause 3 and the Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are all supreme Law of the Land).

Sincerely yours,


/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell


Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Civil RICO:  18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act:  31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.


All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308)


U.S. Mail:


       Supreme Law Firm

   c/o Trustee

       P.O. Box 3097

       Winston 97496

       Oregon, USA



List of pertinent authorities now follows:


Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45, 73 (1932) (“attorneys are officers of the court”);  Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1546 (11th Cir 1993) (“All attorneys, as officers of the court ....”);  Pumphrey v. K.W. Thompson Tool Co., 62 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir. 1995) (see section “II.”);  “Let Us Be Officers of the Court,” by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen, 83 ABA Journal 94 (1997);  and FRCP Rule 1, Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments (“as officers of the court, attorneys share ....”)  [bold emphasis added]


See also: