NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

TO: Scott W. Skavdahl

c/o United States District Court

11 South Wolcott

Casper 82601-2534

WYOMING, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964, Rotella v. Wood

c/o Lake Union Mail

117 East Louisa Street

Seattle 98102-3203

WASHINGTON STATE, USA

DATE: January 7, 2013 A.D.

SUBJECT: credentials required by 5 U.S.C. §§ 2906, 3331; 28 U.S.C. 453

Greetings Scott W. Skavdahl:

The federal statute at 5 U.S.C. 2906 reads as follows:

The oath of office taken by an individual under section 3331 of this title shall be delivered by him to, and preserved by, the House of Congress, agency, or court to which the office pertains.

[emphasis added]

As of October 1, 2004 A.D., a proper SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE was overdue for your OATH OF OFFICE and APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS.

We now infer that 28 U.S.C. 453 (re: Oath) and § 2906 supra result in rendering you a material witness to either the existence, or absence, of the OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS mandated by the federal statute at 5 U.S.C. 3331 and the OATH OF OFFICE mandated by the federal statute at 28 U.S.C. 453.

DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND DEADLINE

Accordingly, formal DEMAND is hereby made of you to locate, photocopy and deliver a true and correct copy of your APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS and OATH OF OFFICE supra to the mailing location shown above no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, January 14, 2013 A.D. (7 calendar days hence). Beyond that reasonable deadline, your silence will activate estoppel pursuant to Carmine v. Bowen, and it will also constitute fraud pursuant to U.S. v. Tweel. See also 18 U.S.C. 912, 1341, 1961 et seq.

Thank you for your timely professional cooperation.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964, Rotella v. Wood