Time:owner-libertylaw@blake.sharpcomm.com Wed Oct 2 15:25:56 1996
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 1996 16:22:40 -1000
To: libertylaw@www.ultimate.org
From: liberty@mcn.net (Paul Andrew Mitchell)
Subject: Re: LLAW: Answers to SSN Queries
=======================================================================
LIBERTY LAW - CROSS THE BAR & MAKE YOUR PLEA - FIRST VIRTUAL COURT, USA
Presiding JOP: Tom Clark, Constable: Robert Happy, Clerk: Kerry Rushing
=======================================================================
>>>> The only way out of the SSN trap is to rescind your SSN then stop making
>>>>any record in the anti-christ system. In 7 yesrs you will be listed as civil
>>>>death. in the mean time you must learn how to defend your self should the
>>>>anti-christ system come after you. Robert Wangrud. Behold.
>>>
>>>Any cites to back up this opinion, Robert?
>>>
>>>(That's all it is until and unless you do)
>>>
>>>In Liberty,
>>>
>>>Charles
>
> For starters I am not a subcriber to the Law net,
> so you have not seen all that I have posted on this
> issue. YOU CAN VISIT Behold's home page and get all
> the cites you want. Robert Wangrud. Behold
>>
>>
>>We of the never never ...
>>... never never utilize
>>government numbers.
>>
>>We are the unnumbered People.
>>
>>The truth makes us free ...
>>... ask the One Who Knows.
>>
>>USDC's have no criminal
>>jurisdiction ...
>>... whatsoever.
>
> If the USDC has no criminal jurisdiction how does the USDC
> HEAR CRIMINAL CHARGES?
18 U.S.C. 3231 does not mention
the United States District Court,
only the district courts of the
United States. See 18 U.S.C.
1964(a) and compare with 1964(c);
both refer to the same subject
matter, i.e. 18 U.S.C. 1962
(racketeering).
See also:
"Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius."
Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
I agree the USDC is not exercising
> the Judicial Power of the United States as per Article III
> of the U.S. Const. Article III establishes Constitutional
> Federal Courts and Article One of the U.S. Const.
> establishes what criminal jurisdiction a Constitutional
> Federal Court shall have. The only answer to this problem
> is what other Courts have a criminal jurisdiction other than
> the criminal jurisdiction established by Article One of
> the U.S. Constitution. There are Two Courts that share the
> same criminal jurisdiction outside of Article One of the
> U.S. Constitution. One Court is a Military Tribunal. A
> Military Tribunal exercises a criminal jurisdiction under
> Martial-Law Proper. The second Federal Court that exercises
> a criminal jurisdiction is found under Article Four of the
> U.S. Constitution. These Courts were titled the USDC'S.
> also known as Territoral Courts. Territoral Courts displayed the
> Yellow Fringe National Flag, and used the Military to enforce
> their Orders. There can be no doubt territoral courts exercised
> the criminal jurisdiction of Martial-Law Proper. The gray area
> in all this is we still have USDC'S SETTING IN THE SEVERAL
> STATES? What needs to be proved is did Congress remake the USDC
> into an Article III Court when the Territories became States?
> Also what happend to the Dictrict Court of the United States?
> Military Tribunals have always been titled as Article One Courts
> The problem as I see it is to understand Article ONE, Article
> Four, and Article III Courts and what Criminal Jurisdiction
> each court has? Robert Wangrud. Behold.
>>
>>/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
>>
>>
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail