Time:owner-libertylaw@blake.sharpcomm.com  Wed Oct  2 18:14:37 1996
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 1996 18:58:47 -1000
To: libertylaw@www.ultimate.org
From: liberty@mcn.net (Paul Andrew Mitchell)
Subject: LLAW: Response to taxpayer rights
=======================================================================
LIBERTY LAW - CROSS THE BAR & MAKE YOUR PLEA - FIRST VIRTUAL COURT, USA
Presiding JOP: Tom Clark, Constable: Robert Happy, Clerk: Kerry Rushing
=======================================================================
>>     Congress says: "taxpayers do in fact have certain basic due process
>>rights, and the IRS is going to honor those rights."1  The Secretary of the
>>Treasury and the IRS Commissioner certified to Congress that they are
>>committed to protecting taxpayer rights and that they fully recognize the
>>need to respect taxpayer rights.2  IRS Publication 1 is called "Your Rights
>>as a Taxpayer," and it sets forth the rights of a taxpayer and the
>>administrative process due a taxpayer.3  But if you think you have any rights
>>as a taxpayer, think again.  The IRS Commissioner is now arguing before the
>>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - that you have no rights as a
>>taxpayer,4  and that the IRS is authorized to send a notice of deficiency
>>even when the IRS doesn't audit you and doesn't know how much income you have
>>received.5  In fact, the IRS Commissioner says that you have no right to an
>>audit or any examination, and the only process due a taxpayer is a Tax Court
>>trial.6
>
>Sounds to me like it would be a good idea to know
>if one is a 'Taxpayer' or not.  The definition of
>'Taxpayer', AT LAW, does NOT mean simply someone
>who pays a tax.  It means one who is 'made liable'
>for or 'subject to' any internal revenu law.  What
>this means is that there MUST be a LIABILITY STATUTE...
>
>something like:
>
>'The withholding agent is hereby
>MADE LIABLE FOR the tax identified at section XXX', or
>
>'The manufacturer of tobacco products (as defined at
>section XXX) is nereby MADE LIABLE FOR THE TAX imposed
>at section XXX'.
>
>Unless there is a liability statute similar to one of
>th above, CLEARLY making your business or activity 
>liable, YOU ARE NOT LIABLE, and are therefoe NOT SUBJECT
>to any revenu law, and are therefore NOT A 'Taxpayer' as
>that term is defined at law.
>
>In Liberty,
>
>Charles
Tell it like it is, Charles.
This truth shall, and does,
make us free, yes indeed.
Congress can say what it wants,
because taxpayers have no rights
left to protect.  We are fighting
a new, statutory slavery which
was predicted by the infamous 
Hazard Circular soon after the
Civil War began.
These statutory slaves are now
burdened with a bogus federal debt
which is spiraling out of control.
The White House budget office
recently invented a new kind of
"generational" accounting, so as
to project a tax load of 71%
on future generations of these
citizens of the United States.
The final version of that OMB
report upped the projected tax
load to 82%.  
These rates were calculated
on the basis of presumptions
which require these new slaves
to buy all of life's necessities
out of what remains -- 18%.
Do you want to pass this atrocity
along to your children, or theirs?
They will not be very happy with 
you, if you do.  Would you be happy
with your parents if they did that
to you?
/s/ Paul Mitchell
      

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail